Bad referee decisions thread
>>63933799
>>63933815
what the shit just happened
>>63933815
Ramsay Snow
>>63933815
Correct decision.
>>63933868
What? What decision? Excess celebration? Because the keeper fell down? Did he kick the keeper in the nuts but the video cut that part out? A red card? What the fuck is going on?
>>63933898
How about breaking valuable equipment? At this level the teams are not swimming in money so it's a huge dickmove to break stuff. Yellow card for excess celebration and yellow card for breaking shit. It was a shitty fucking tap-in, fuck off.
>>63933913
Sucks for those poorshit teams
>>63933815
this >>63933913
Even his teammates disapproved
>>63933868
this. players get yellow carded for taking off their shirt, vandalizing the stadium is red.
>>63933926
Sucks for the retard that headbutted the player's bench.
>>63933799
yeah I mean it's a poor decision in that it would normally be given but it fucking shits me that he could easily have kept his feet there but instead went down to try and draw a free - I actually wish soccer was refereed like this more of the time
>>63933950
>I actually wish the rules would be ignored more
>>63933950
go back to your gay orgies pls
>>63933989
change the rules then
rewarding players for going to ground when they could have kept their feet does not create a good spectacle
>>63933995
over the line!
>>63933994
fuck off it was a clear obstruction and foul
>>63933994
was mostly about a red card to the keeper, not just a free kick. also, the stuff that send players tumbling down arent the only things that should be considered fouls.
>thread hasn't been shit up by Patriots fanboys
It's an early Christmas miracle.
>>63933992
>rugby is more gay than soccer
Holy shit lmao
>>63933913
plus slamming your head into equipment is the most retarded thing to do
video related
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xyRy04Hn_-k
>>63934083
you've seen nothing
image search for "les dieux du stade"
>>63934001
mark it zero, dude!
>After Couch spiked the football, McAulay interjected and said they would review Morgan's catch, even though NFL rules stipulate that a replay cannot take place if another play has started.
>Jones called for McAulay to explain himself to the crowd, but he never did. Eventually, McAulay declared that the game was over, with 48 seconds showing on the clock.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YxWuUbmL-8Y
refbalona
ITALY 2002
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMftczhqniU
better version
>>63936136
what did he disallow it for?
>>63936181
this is your brain on racial equality
>>63933913
>breaking valuable equipment
it was just a bit cling film to cover the hole where it was previously damaged
>>63936213
what the fuck the goal stood?
>>63933799
>>63936280
Yep. Schalke vs Basel.
Here you can see the Basel coach's reaction after the goal
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zzArW6b1CMM
>>63936280
Yeah. There's a ten minute video of Yakin's reaction.
https://youtu.be/zzArW6b1CMM
>>63936343
holy kek why isn't that a reaction gif
>>63936343
10 fucking minutes
HEEEY GUYS DID U KNOW
https://youtu.be/zzArW6b1CMM [Embed]
Yakin's reaction.
>>63936343
FUORIGIOCO ARBITROOO
CARABBINIERIII
top lel why is marcozzi there
>>63936428
To be fair it's worthy of being 10 minutes long. It's the embodiment of 'The fuck is this bullshit?'
>>63936318
EXPLAIN
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7MBcIJDa3ts
>>63933799
OLE OLA SOSAT SPARTAK MOSKVA PIDORASI OVTSEEBI OTSOSITE U OSLA
P.S CSKA is a champion
CSKA CHEMPION SOOQA
>>63935437
Daily reminder that the bottlegate was justified
>>63936181
>letting an african referee into the world cup
i genuinely thought he was there as a gimmick
Still laugh my ass off at this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QXvFDg5lQS0
>>63937035
JEWentus
>>63936343
Can we please webm/gif that. One of the funniest reaction faces I've ever seen
>>63933815
an accurate representation of germany in ww2
![QxJvh[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/Niv7yd7.jpg "QxJvh[1].jpg")
didn't matter, but still funny
>>63937119
>didn't matter
u wot
would've changed the entire game
>>63937203
4-1 or 4-2 really makes no difference
>>63937073
Found it a gif by googling a bit
>>63937249
While searching I also found this epic meme
>>63936251
And people still watch barcalona and supporting this, absolute disgrace to everything called mankind along with manhood. Its like he is a prostitue
>>63937249
Ty my man
As a fellow European (was born there, came over here not too long ago) I love seeing European's facial expressions, especially after being here and everyone else being so fucking boring
>>63937226
>what is momentum
>>63937249
it's the second hand gesture that does it
>>63937297
the same thing as
>they wanted it more
>>63933815
Great celebration for that pedestrian goal.
>>63936181
>no. 3 literally in a headlock
top kek
>>63937365
Didn't he went to prison ?
>>63937322
it's the exact same gesture though.
literally means "what the fuck" btw
>>63935437
Is this real life?!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-teMkx2vgA
>>63936318
not even within the same zipcode as the plate
VAI TOMAR NO CU AMARILLA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YXIfAUMRZ7k
>>63933950
That's clear obstruction. It doesn't matter if he went down or not, there was no way he could've gotten to the ball
>>63933815
finland with the lols
>>63933815
What a fucking idiot. Who celebrates like that
>>63939180
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YXIfAUMRZ7k
that video gave me autism.
>>63936619
I guess that's because the ball didn't cross the strike zone, yet the ref considered it a strike anyway.
>>63939180
Tite was so shit at offense back then. Look at the attack. Just crossing the ball inside the area like idiots.
torsten frings
>>63937285
You're REALly MAD huh
>>63937285
We know its you, Martin
>>63939180
this stuff makes me so mad.
>>63935437
That was THE worst thing I'd ever seen
>>63934098
Holy shit why man why'd you do it?
>>63937297
mass times velocity
>>63937375
yup
narcotraffic
Funny to think that it's likely that Barcelona would not have went on to win the CL that year if this didn't happen. But this was during the time of "Uefalona"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQjCCfI9vUQ
>>63945223
same thing in the 2009 semi finals against Chelsea, but the barca bandwagoners actually defend them, its hilarious
>>63945223
>ZERO SHOTS
Like it would have made a difference.
>>63945223
>kicks the ball after the whistle to waste time (a yellow card offense)
>gets a yellow card
>hurr durr uefalona
arsekeks are the worst
>>63945399
>>63945223
that's a standard yellow card situation though
>>63945421
>>63936318
still top keks years later
>>63945403
>kick ball 1 second after the whistle while the entire stadium is flipping the fuck out
>>63939708
On the final out of the game too, giving the pitcher his 300th career save
>>63945439
Rules say nothing about time after the whistle nor do they say anything about the amount of people flipping out for the rule to be unenforceable
>think you can be a clever fuck and waste time without getting a yellow card
>get a yellow card anyway
>muh uefalona conspiracy
>>63933992
>this is what rugby was like before we gave it freedom
>>63936181
BRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
The best and worst of times.
>>63945503
>literally in the process of kicking and being unable to hear a whistle in a stadium of thousands of dirty Catalans
>hurrr yellow card
Filthy snaggle-toothed prick bandwagoner
>>63945673
>American sawker fans of foreign clubs calling anyone else a bandwagoner
back to your containment thread
>>63945421
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=DBv9VMAuVrY
>>63945673
>literally in the process of kicking
objectively not true
>unable to hear a whistle in a stadium of thousands of dirty Catalans
100000 fans heard the whistle, 21 players on the pitch heard the whistle (one Barcelona defender even stops running), poor van Persie is the only person who can not hear the whistle. The whistle is loud as fuck it never happens that someone can't hear it and even if van Persie really is deaf there is nothing in the rules that says it's ok to ignore the whistle if you didn't hear it.
>Filthy snaggle-toothed prick bandwagoner
>saying a yellow card offense should result in a yellow card is now being a bandwagoner
sure thing, besides, if you had actually watched the game you'd remember that even his first yellow was a borderline red card
>>63939736
2013 was a shit team tbf, everyone on the attack didn't want to play.
In 2015 we have Vagner Love and we are destroying because Vagner Love wants to play.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bg3psAYfOv8
I was mad 13 years ago, and I'm still mad now
>>63937365
Why do people even try to argue with the ref. I've never seen them change a decision so why bother?
>>63945223
>I'm just pretending to be retarded
>>63946663
>objectively not true
Except he was
>10000fans heard the whistle, 21 players heard the whistle
Pretty damning proof you have there
>>63945698
Because I clearly stated I followed any foreign team
How do monkeys work computers in favelas anyways?
>>63946829
how could you be that upset when you were only 3
>>63946952
>happens all the time in football
>hurr
>arse
>chelshit
>salty anti barca faggots
kekekek
>>63946829
yet burgers still can't stop themselves from deepthroating german cock,its pathetic
>>63946663
But you have to admit, a yellow resulting in a sending off just becuase of this? Time wasting when he took almost no time to shoot? Seems a little excesive. The FIFA rulebook is rather vague most of the time because a rulebook should not force referees into taking absurd decisions. That's why referees are given a margin to decide and personally, I do not think this was reasonble.
That, and Barcelona has a history of shady decisions that benefit them in the Champions League in the last 10 years. You cannot blame someone for being suspicious considering how controversial this call was and the history of the team involved.
>>63947055
>Barcelona has a history of shady decisions that benefit them in the Champions League in the last 10 years.
This is a one big meme. They have a history of making the losing teams butthurt and yelling refball at the top of their lungs after every loss.
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S7tLmp7kQJA
>everyone remembers a kind of soft but valid by the rules yellow for van Persie
>no one remembers a legit goal disallowed that would've made it 0-2 at the Emirates
>>63947055
people say the same about fergie's united and they said the same about milan in the early 90s its just asspain and very loud salty faggots like >>63947116
has just said
>>63945389
Arsenal were leading at the time. They didnt need to score
>>63947055
Also champions league has multiple balls so no time would have been wasted anyway. It was a scandalous decision. Maximum refball.
>>63947333
That's not the point, you can't do that period. Feels so good it happened too all this crying feeds me
>>63945432
No its not. You only see yellows if its several seconds after the whistle, or if the ball is kicked as an team awarded the freekick tries to get it ball take the freekick. The ref is just being a fuck head here.
>>63947351
>sometimes referees let players break the rules
>think every single referee ever will let you get away with that
>break the rules
>get punished for breaking the rules
>MUH REFBALL
>>63947116
C'mon.
Stamford Bridge?
That game with Inter in 2010? Nobody remembers the disgraceful acting from Busquets because Barca lost that one, but the red card was still given.
There was another episode with a dobious penalty against Milan in 2011 if I recall correctly.
The whole semi final against Real Madrid in 2011 was controversial to say the least, with the Pepe sent off and Higuain's disallowed goal.
Barca is a controversial team when it comes to referee decisions in the Champions League. I cannot say for certain if refball was involved in any of this situations. But I can say without doubt that there are reasons to suspect Barcelona.
>>63946989
>happens all the time
I bet you can't name one
>Barcelona bandwagoners
Ew
>>63947434
You're just proving my point here.
You remember a penalty or two not given at the Stamford Bridge, you forget that Abidal was sent off for nothing and that there should've been a penalty + a sending off for Terry at the Camp Nou (clear goal foul on Henry).
You remember the Busquets play acting red card, you forget that Barcelona had a legit tie winning goal disallowed in the same game, that Inter's 3-1 goal from the 1st leg was offside and that there should've been a penalty after Sneijder cut down Alves.
>scream about all the events that support your theory
>disregard and forget all the events that disprove your theory
literally every conspiracy every
>>63947497
>a penalty or two
Try three
>you forget that Abidal was sent off for nothing
Should've been sent off earlier for taking down the last man Drogba from behind
>legit tie winning goal
That's incredibly debatable, you also forget Pique had an offside goal that was allowed, you also forget Diego Milito had a 1v1 chance in the first leg called offside when it was onside
>Sneijder cut down Alves
Alves dive
>>63947497
Its brilliant really, conspiracy theorists and their delusions. Oh how I wish they repeat this season, the asspain alone would be glorious
>>63947526
>and their delusions
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/world-cup/10775490/Daughter-of-World-Cup-official-had-2m-put-into-account.html
>>63947523
Four actually
>>63947523
didn't pique also handballed on stafordbridge - that game was a total disgrace and oly true delued brca fan could say otherwise or some asspain ABC.
further proof: Ovrebo, after the game ended, reportedly admitted to UEFA officials he "made several big mistakes."
>>63947535
http://www.caughtoffside.com/2010/04/22/inter-milan-vs-barcelona-referee-states-im-from-milan-olegario-benquerenca-could-be-in-trouble/
All this asspain is great
>>63947587
Wolfgang Stark was also a Qatar oil worker
>>63947523
>That's incredibly debatable
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QrJINGQFw48
>2:45
>ball struck from a short distance
>unclear whether it even hits the hand
>even if it does it has no bearing on the rest of the play
>also a reminder that only intentional handballs are offenses
i-it's debatable
>Alves dive
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7xEuPwZ6FA
>get beat 1 on 1
>lunge with two feet
>make contact with opponents leg
h-he dived
> you also forget Pique had an offside goal that was allowed
No I'm not. I can acknowledge that there were some bad decisions made in those ties (like in most games ever played) but I'm not blinded by my asshurt to only see one side and scream refball and conspiracy after seeing my team lose
>>63947658
>punches the ball downwards
>not debatable
>make contact
About the bare minimum, Alves made a meal of it
>No I'm not
You clearly are
>scream refball and conspiracy
Well it's refball, maybe not intentional, but it's pretty blatant nonetheless
>>63947668
>much conspiracies when its not the result I want
KEK
>>63947700
Spic english
>>63947668
>Alves made a meal of it
So, you know, kind of like Drogba? (literally known as one of the biggest divers and play actors in EPL history)
>>63946829
fuck all the 02 refs
>>63933799
>Bad referee decisions
What is the Football World Championship Tournament of 2002 held in Japan and Korea?
>>63947434
Reminder that the red was pointless because Motta was already on a yellow and he was going to be sent off even with a second yellow.
I strongly dislike Pep's Barça but they blamed/hated for everything, even when nothing wrong happened.
>>63947783
>and he was going to be sent off even with a second yellow
Quite a bold prediction, almost as bold as saying Italy would've beaten Australia in 2006 even if they didn't dive for a penalty
>>63933913
>>63933815
But why is the ref pointing towards the goal? Was it foul play on the goalie? Maybe two yellows (one for stomping on the goalie and the second one for being retarded)?
>>63934098
The way he goes down...
>>63936181
Why would you be mad about this? We still topped that meme group that year. I was more mad in the Ghana game where there were foul galore and those shitty niggers kept stopping the play over stupid shit
>>63947497
This anon is correct.
It's the same way people still bring up that effort from Pedro Mendes at Old Trafford that should have been a goal. People remember he big teams getting decisions but conveniently forget the rest to suit their agenda.
>>63947497
Took some time to review those matches.
>You remember a penalty or two not given at the Stamford Bridge
Try four. Everyone agrees at least on four.
Abidal was sent off because he fouled someone to deny a clear chance on goal, or so the referee thought. I don't know if I agree, but its not a wrong decision, could go either way. It's part of the margin each ref has to make decisions.
Terry wasn't involved in the supoused Henry penalty, it was Bosingwa. There was some contact, but I can't tell if Henry fell because he lost his balance or because of the tug.
>had a legit tie winning goal disallowed in the same game, that Inter's 3-1 goal from the 1st leg was offside and that there should've been a penalty after Sneijder cut down Alves.
There was a hand, that's why the goal was disallowed. He clearly seems to punch the ball down. I understand its debatable, but the Pique goal in that match was clearly offside anyway.
Alves clearly dived.
Regarding the second Milito goal in the first leg, it does seem to be offside, I'll have to agree with you on that one. However, Milito managed to recieve a pass behind the defenders in the first half that would have surely been converted into a goal. That couldn't be because that play was wrongly called offside.
Overall, the mistakes made by referees that have wronged Barcelona seem to be greatly outnumbered and outweighted by the mistakes that have given Barcelona undue advantages.
>>63946966
kek SQ btfo
>>63947817
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YlHnGAstOqs
>2:27
You're dismissing an obvious mistake by the referee (Anelka literally trips himself, there's 0 contact with Abidal) because the referee THOUGHT there there was foul and that it's part of the margin of error (apparently calling fouls with 0 contact is part of margin of error when it doesn't fit your narrative) and then you cry refball and conspiracy when the referee THOUGHT Abidal didn't foul Drogba.
>>63945223
It looks like Persie had a look at the linesman raising his flag before he took the shot.
>>63947867
Learn to read, faggot.
I didn't say that.
I said that referees had a margin to make decisions, which is different to saying there's a margin of error. The margin is in how referees interpret the rules and apply them. If a referee thinks or not if a fould is denying a certain chance of goal it's the margin. There was no mistake.
Now, I undestand it looks weird because Anelka does trip, however, there's a contact before that. Anelka loses his balance and trips because of the contact. It's a foul.
But, let's assume it was a mistake by the ref. Abidal should have still been sent off half an hour earlier for a foul of similar caracteristics on Drogba. He should be grateful he got that extra half hour as a gift.
>>63947938
>tf
>talking about refball and cheating
literally can't make this shit up lmao
>>63947938
>If a referee thinks or not if a fould is denying a certain chance of goal it's the margin
Cool, and the referee did not think that Abidal denied a certain chance when he brought down Drogba. There was no mistake since the referee has a margin in how to interpret the rules and apply them.
Glad we cleared that up.
>>63947956
But he did think so when he fouled Anelka. Im glad we came to the agreement that there was no mistake in the Abidal red card.
That only leaves as mistakes the at least 4 penalties in favor of Chelsea the referee failed to see. Those were all clear fouls inside the box, so Im afraid there's not much room for interpretation.
>>63936619
It's like a ref calling a shot that the keeper caught 5 feet in front of the line a goal
>>63948025
The ref just interpreted the rules differently for those penalties m8. You know, the margin and stuff
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZdaVL4bcTM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLpptT_nCp0
>>63935437
>McAulay
Should have been straight up fired for pulling that shit.
No card.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Ikb13wvCqs
>>63948145
fuggin pussy refs
>>63947766
Wasn't that actual rigging?
>>63947809
>we
>>63936626
>takes off shirt whilst on pitch having already been booked
>wonders why he gets sent off
I hope the manager fined him
>>63933992
>Hue honestly believes Australia cares about this """sport"""
>>63937449
I know it's just funnier the second time
>>63936626
Referee was absolutely correct on that one.
You don't take of your shirt while on the field, period.
The only stupid guy there was the player, there's no way he doesn't know the rules.
>>63936181
fucking rage
>>63937285
desu he did get spiked in the dick.
>>63945223
vP speaks pretty good English
>>63937541
>dat tommy coughlin
my man
>>63949016
While I'm at it, here's a blown call that ended the Giants season in 2002:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IlUnW7yL8Pc
After the game, the NFL admitted that it should have been pass interference, which would have allowed the Giants to rekick and (presumably) win the game.
Bonus lul: Strahan seemingly getting a beej on the sidelines
>>63947116
Fuck off lying retard
>no henry handball
>>63949699
He's right though.
The tears are still delicious after all these years.
>>63937285
everyone knows it hurts like a motherfucker just to get your balls grazed senpaitachi
ronaldo straight up kicked him in the nuts
>>63946829
02 WC was a riot of refball. Italy vs Worst Korea was the worst.
>>63947414
He neither wasted time nor did he intend to. If refs actually stuck to that rule as youre stating then there would be at least 5 yellows a game for that offense
>>63949851
m8 yellow carding players for shooting to goal after the play was already invalidated is the usual procedure.
>Pac-10 refs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-O1QGjGFYlg
