>>63880957
i prefer the 1.000 club personally.
>>63880957
>Vikings
>elite
I don't care what their record is, no one with a brain thinks they have a legit shot at winning it all.
>>63880957
You got the Panthers at the top.
Nice work anon
>>63881003
Pucker, this is the elite thread, you aren't .700, it's time to leave.
How about this. Go make a, "Lost to both the lions and bears" thread, then you can have your own little fun club with the raiders.
>>63880957
Not expecting the Pats to win tonight, to be honest. They're down to one healthy receiver and Denver's at home with a good defense.
Though, Brock Osweiler IS a rookie, and Belichick does feast on the souls of rookie QBs, so it might be worth watching.
>>63890925
>Packers lost to the Bears and Lions
>but the Vikings lost to the Packers
It's one thing to lose to those teams but what's it like to lose to the team that lost to those teams?
>>63881002
me too family
>>63891910
We beat the lions twice and the bears once. That's the difference.
Vikings choked once. Packers have choked 4 of the last 5 games.
Feels good man
>>63881002
>filled with two teams who have yet to beat a team with a winning record
Pats might prove their worth today though
>>63881003
That's not what this thread is about. It's about being over .700 presently
>>63891970
But you choked when it matters the most chum. Well maybe this will be the year you add another notch on your Super Bowl belt*.
*Super Bowl belt notches for indication of Super Bowls not actually attended.
>>63891997
pats beat the colts and jets senpai
>>63891970
Packers didn't just beat you, they blew you the fuck out, while only losing to the bears and lions by 3 points
>>63891997
Pats beat the Steelers, Jets, and Colts
Panthers beat the Packers
>>63891997
>Packers
>not having a winning record
>>63892016
>>63892036
Says the team that lost to the lions and bears in Wisconsin lel
>Packers in charge of staying 1st this year
>>63892051
The Puckers are a shit team, they don't count.
You now remember this ad
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6aKYZFcmAmU
>>63892053
Says the team that lost to the Packers in Whineisota. Don't forget, your season ends in Green Bay.
this is a .700 club
pucker fans are not allowed sorry.
>>63892166
How would our season end in Green Bay? The bears can't really take first at this point.
The Packers season however, ended with that loss to the Loins. It was all over at that point.
Maybe next year puckers.
Why are there so many puckers fags in here trying to rebut and contest the fact that the Vikes are 8-3 and in 1st place of the NFC North? That's the reality and whether you think they should be there or not is irrelevant
>>63892084
You're an idiot
>>63891055
Osweiler is a fourth year QB, I don't know where the rookie thing comes from.
Otherwise I agree though, New England is in for some trouble against the best defense in the NFL after they have had an entire season of BTFOing the worst defenses in the league in the NFC East and AFC South
>the city of Green Gay
>>63891997
panthers beat packers, colts, seattle in seattle, and the 3-0 tony romo cowboys.
> Patriots and Panthers played in and against shit divisions all season.
> Broncos can't beat colts
> Vikings really really really lost to the packers
The only good teams were the two teams playing last Sunday night and that was the Bengals and the Cardinals.
>>63892264
No, your season literally ends in Green Bay, that's your last game of the season you fucking idiot. Some fan you are you don't even know your own schedule...
The colts as a whole cant post here but HasselGOAT can
>>63893238
just because the pats and the panthers have played shit teams doesnt mean that they themselves are not good. if they werent good, they would have let some of those games slip. but as it stands they won every game placed in front of them. What else do you want them to do?
pats> panthers > cardinals > bengals > ded pats > primetime bengals
0. Healthy Patriots
1. Cardinals
2. Panthers
3. Bengals
4. Patriots (RIP their entire roster)
5. Broncos
6. Vikings
99999999999. Primetime Bengals
>>63893501
i just have a hard time with the cards. they dropped the rams and are currently up 6-3 against the fucking blaine gabbert 49ers. i understand these are division games but they are still red flags you cant ignore.
>>63893414
I would die of laughter if Hasselbeck gets the Clots to the playoffs, then they start Luck and go one and done.
yfw the winner of their next meet up will most likely determine the winner of the division. Does anyone truly believe the Packers won't win again?
>The Packers damage control in this thread.
Eternal Bandwagon faggotry.
>>63894779
If the Seahawks don't finish strong, the Vikings, Packers and Bears can all make the playoffs
>>63894541
Luck hasn't gone one and done since his rookie season, I wouldn't get your hopes up
>>63894948
I would love this haha
even the Lions are looking resurgent
>>63892036
They got that first touchdown served to them on a 3 penalty silver platter, setting their momentum for the next half. Not to mention all of our first half drives got fucked by ticky-tacky penalties. They didn't beat us, the refs did/we beat ourselves.
