Might be a few posts early, but whatever, new thread
Latest news from rotoworld:
>NE:James White scores 2 TDs in Patriots' victory
>BUF:LeSean McCoy piles up 123 yds, TD in MNF loss
>NE:Never-ending MNF game ends, Pats move to 10-0
>NE:Danny Amendola leaves in 3Q with knee injury
>NE:Keshawn Martin among Patriots' MNF inactives
>SEA:Seahawks not expecting Lynch to play Week 12
>GB:Packers to stay with '1-2 punch' in backfield
>DEN:Peyton 'incensed' about report on 2016 plans
>NYJ:Revis (concussion) in danger of missing Wk 12
>HOU:O'Brien confirms Hoyer will return vs. Saints
>ATL:Quinn: Freeman off to good start for Week 12
>CAR:Panthers to activate DE Johnson for Week 12
Seriously though, how was Keenum not taken off the field after this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=amcyZiH6Skk
>>63769703
nth for Rawls Royce for OROY
>Rasm
Check 'em.
Just fuck my wildcard up senpai
Cam Newton is a furry and there's nothing you can do about it.
Brock Osweiler is a true superior Germanic man who should be used as a genetic template for humanities future
>>63769733
Or perhaps he enjoys hunting trips and killed that small furry animal, taking the tail as a souvenir, before beating off to its bloody corpse
>>63769735
>Not superior Aryan race
Bruh...
>>63769744
when i first read that i thought you meant he hunted tripfags like they were prey
Is there anything more pathetic than slobbering beta cowardly Patriot fans who declare ahead of time that they expect to lose?
Seriously how fucking pathetic is that? And I've seen it a million fucking times. As a Pats fan, I hang around Pats forums and shit, and I see it there just as much as I see it here. I just don't get it.
Quit being a sniveling little baby. You play the game to win, so go cheer on your fucking team.
>>63769744
That tail was clearly manufactured and bought it for specific public celebration purposes. He is a furry.
>>63769754
Aryan isnt exclusively blond and blue eyed.
in fact the core of the "Aryan" race (Anglo, Germanic, Norman and Nordic) actually only have a small majority or strong minority that display these traits.
>>63769730
>chiefs started 1-5
>4 weeks later are unironically the 6th seed
>>63769735
jesus christ he looks like robert pattinson
brady is making the NFL great again
>>63769783
for all the shit he gets, Andy Reid knows how to win in the regular season
So when do the Pats call Randy Moss?
>>63769783
but can the executive vice president of game management north america finally fix andy reid's playoff clock skills
>>63769795
Hopefully first thing tomorrow morning
>>63769783
Scarletism knows his stuff
God, I'm so sorry, but I must keep posting this, because if I don't, something Scarletism worked really hard on will die
So yeah, just a quick reference thingy since we're at the season halfway point at week 8 now. This is every team's strength of schedule change sorted by rank distance. For example, the Titans had the 25th hardest schedule so far (looking only at the games every team played), and they will have the 6th hardest schedule from here on out (looking only at the games left to play for every team), so the difference is -19. Obviously a negative number means the second half of the season will be harder, and positive numbers mean it will be easier, statistically speaking anyways.
30 Kansas City Chiefs
28 Indianapolis Colts
27 Jacksonville Jaguars
15 Baltimore Ravens
15 New Orleans Saints
15 San Francisco 49ers
14 Washington Redskins
13 Green Bay Packers
11 St. Louis Rams
8 Oakland Raiders
8 Pittsburgh Steelers
6 Seattle Seahawks
5 Carolina Panthers
5 Cleveland Browns
5 Detroit Lions
4 Dallas Cowboys
0 Miami Dolphins
0 New York Jets
0 Philadelphia Eagles
-2 Buffalo Bills
-6 Chicago Bears
-8 Cincinnati Bengals
-8 San Diego Chargers
-11 Tampa Bay Buccaneers
-12 New England Patriots
-17 Houston Texans
-18 Denver Broncos
-19 Tennessee Titans
-27 Atlanta Falcons
-27 New York Giants
-28 Arizona Cardinals
-29 Minnesota Vikings
this post was certified with the Autism Seal of Authenticity®
>>63769785
yes but unlike Pattinson's frail 6'1", 165 lb body, Brock is a behemoth of a man at a rock solid 6'8", 250 lbs.
>>63769819
Big Ben Part 2 Confirmed?
>>63769805
>Hey Randy, we need you
>OK coach, just say when
>When...
>(Le epic theme maymay)
>Moss pulls up in his convertible, stretches a bit, and steps out onto the practice field
>A smile spreads across Tom Brady's face, much like a shark catching the scent of blood in the water
>Doesn't even need a playbook, the 07 chemistry is still there
>Tom Nods
>Moss Nods Back
>Belichick's cock is dripping with precum on the sideline
>First route, runs a go in triple coverage, and catches the ball over all of them
>The duo is back, 19-0 inevitable, a revenge tour for the ages
>There are "people" on /sp/ RIGHT NOW who don't think Brady is going to get his points no matter which defense he's up against
There's nobody better in the NFL at limiting Brady than rex ryan and he still scored 20 with a beat up offense.
The question you have to ask yourself is "can my team score on their top-ranked defense enough to get a big lead? Can my defense stop Brady in the last 2 minutes if it's a close game down to the wire?"
Nobody's done it yet this year. Nobody's done it since last year's game at KC without the pats intentionally resting starters.
Your odds aren't good, Denver - especially not with a scrub backup starting at QB.
>>63769863
>who is aaron"whooped the pats ass" rodgers
>>63769722
>rams have such an ungodly hatred for quarterbacks they try to murder their own QB on the field
damn man the rams don't fuck around
>>63769839
>Giants headquarters
>"Mr. Coughlin..."
>"I know it already son, I know it already"
>Coach reaches the phone button in his office
>"get me Michael on the phone"
>Fox headquarters
>A strong wide-grinned man answers
>"Yeth?"
>"He's back Michael. Code 18-1. Can you be here at 8 tomorrow"
>"Doeth the pope poo in loo?"
>a pair of loud laughs fill the no longer calm uneventful night
Sneak's Official Post Week 11 NFL Power Rankings, sponsored by Draft Kings™
1. Patriots
2. Panthers
3. Cardinals (+1)
4. Bengals (-1)
5. Broncos (+2)
6. Steelers (+1)
7. Packers (+20)
8. Seahawks
9. Vikings (-4)
10. Giants (-1)
11. Colts (+2)
12. Chiefs (+2)
13. Falcons (-3)
14. Bills (-3)
15. Texans (+6)
16. Jets (-4)
17. Redskins (-2)
18. Rams (-2)
19. Raiders (-2)
20. Bucs (+4)
21. Dolphins (-3)
22. Jaguars (+3)
23. Eagles (-4)
24. Saints (-2)
25. Lions (+1)
26. Bears (-6)
27. Cowboys (+3)
28. Ravens
29. 49ers (-6)
30. Chargers (-1)
31. Titans
32. Browns
>>63769880
god, was their a better fucking player than Micheal Strahan?
He fucking went up to brady in the prime of his career, when brady had the best team in the world at his disposal, and put his ass on the ground
he single handedly keked brady out of GOAT status
>>63769867
I forgot about that game, but really GB barely won at home. Still, yeah, they won. So one team did it sinc the KC game, but it wasn't with a scrub backup like denver has
>>63769890
Fuck yeah based Tits only ranked 31.
>>63769831
Haven't seen enough of him to really get a sense of what kind of player he is.
defiantly big though
>>63769898
shut your dirty jew mouth before I gag it with my cock fgt
Brock = great QB who will be elite
>>63769890
I unironically feel like the Patriots were exposed tonight. Granted there was some refball involved it looked like the pressure the Bills put on Brady made him unable to make the throws he usually makes. Even the quick ones. They didn't look like the juggernaut that they've been much of the season. How much of that is the fact they're going to have nobody at WR soon who knows. 16-0 not happening. 14-2 losses to Buncos and Jests.
Pic unrelated.
>>63769927
>GG Allin
>ever unrelated
>>63769927
If anything today and the giants game show me the opposite.
1) Pats have a great defense. The D wins them games even when the O struggles. That's a big fuckin deal.
2) The O is clutch. Even when they struggle all game, they still make winning plays when they have to to get it done.
3) Opponents have no room for error. They have to play a nearly perfect game JUST to get a small lead, and if they let up at all, then that lead is GONE
Pats should adjust and only get better moving forward. The rest of the league is on notice.
>>63769927
I don't think they were exposed more that injuries are slowly taking their toll on them.
NFL is very much survival of the fittest, hard to win if you lose 3-4 of your best 8-10 players,
>>63769945
>no room for error
>bills make dumb penalties out the ass, drop passes, and turn the ball over
>>63769961
They lost.
>>63769971
but if they made mistakes the pats should have won by 30 points according to your logic
>>63769977
They made mistakes and lost, that is the logic he is using. Doesn't matter if you win by 30 or 3, a win is a win.
>>63769977
Not at all, because the pats struggled too. See: strong D, clutch O. Made the plays they needed to win. Bills needed to be perfect, and they want. Add one to the L column
This really isn't hard to understand.
>mfw i found out the patriots have the best scoring defense in the league
>>63769989
>>63769991
BUT YOU just said that there is no room for error
assuming each mistake the bills made was a pats touchdown, the bills would have won by 3 scores so there WAS room for error
not hard to follow
>>63769994
Granted I didn't wake up at 3 for this game, but im still confused by your math since the pats didn't score on all the bills turnovers, and yet they still won
>>63769994
Are you mentally retarded? BILLS LOST. They had no room for error, but committed errors. Therefore, they lost. In fact they never even had a lead despite the struggles of the Patriots offense.
>>63770004
but every mistake the bills made equaled a touchdown because they lost an opportunity to score meaning if the bills made no mistakes, they would have won 40-13
>>63770005
yes, the bills lost, but they have room for error, since if they made 1 mistake they would of still won 33-13
>>63770012
Not making mistakes doesn't mean scoring a touchdown on every drive, retard. The other team has their defense on the field playing the game too.
>>63770023
but how do you know 100% that they aren't going to score if they didn't make the mistake, you have to assume that they will score, otherwise it counts as a mistake and thus increasing the room for error by the winning team
>>63770031
Fuck you're retarded. Look, dude, even if they made no mistakes and New England struggled, they would still have to contend with a great D and a clutch O. THAT is why opponents have no room for error.
I hope Brady is as salty as I am that that TD was taken away. Will get him , and hopefully the Oline too, into focus for Denver.
>>63770042
that makes absolutely no sense
I'm just salty that Gostkowski missed a 50+ yard FG that cost me my fantasy game, lost by 3 points.
Goddamn Phil Dunphy looking motherfucker.
>>63770058
Then you should get yourself examined for mental retardation.
>>63770079
best kicker in the league my ass
>>63770095
>>63770079
>misses one kick
>waaahh he sucks
No. He's still based as fuck.
>>63770100
He is don't get me wrong. I'm happy to have him because he is easily the best. I just wish he could have missed in another week, say last week for instance where my opponent didn't set his lineup and had 3 players on byes.
>>63770100
good kickers don't miss
Since we cant use tbeeh or FAMily anymore how about we just start saying "my nigga" after everything my niggas?
>>63769994
>assuming each mistake the bills made was a pats touchdown
Kek do you think before you type, pal?
The bills made mistakes and lost. Yes it was a close game, but how much better could the bills have played? They were even on turnovers, got a nice phantom play stoppage from the refs, and kept gronkowski to 1/3 of his yards in the first meeting against the bills this year. This was all while the bills were playing a team that is expecting Jamie Collins back and, well, you know about the offense.
The point is that at a time when the patriots are at their weakest, they still gut out the w.
>No raidniggers spamming Carr memes
JUST
>>63770132
>>63770158
whats the story behind this my nigga?
According to Elias the Lions are the first team in NFL history to score exactly 18 points in two straight games.
>>63770175
halftime during Super Bowl I
>>63770111
31 other teams have missed at least one FG this season. This game was the first for the Patriots this season. That's pretty damn good.
>>63770178
>another useless stat brought to you by Elias
>>63770158
>implying we arent resting a bit
>implying we arent going to push your shit in
TYBC
>>63770178
>>63770214
I welcome our new mlb autist tier stats
>2015
>losing football games
>>63770231
I don't
>"It's 3rd and 1. The [team] have been 5 for 7 on third-down conversions today, but have only been 37 for 102 on the year, and 17 for 27 while the QB has had a chinstrap beard for the past 5 games; for the rest he's gone with a mullet."
>>63770224
You won't though
ayy lmao
>>63770426
the writer saw the opportunity and he took it, respect.
As a Packers fan I like the patriots because the amount of butthurt they generate. Delicious tears everytime they win.
That aside, honestly, the patriots going 18-0 is the best for maximum tears this season.
>18-1 repeat
>18-1 repeat with Eli beating patriots(Still not out of the running yet)
>18-1 repeat with the panthers going undefeated
>18-1 panthers losing 1 regular season game but wins it all making the pats go 18-1 while patfans try and spam 18-1 back defensively crying
>18-1 with queens winning(sure my own tears would be in this but still cause a lot of butthurt)
>18-1 with packers winning(less likely than giants winning tbqhf [to be quite honest family])
Or finally
>19-0
Fans of every single franchise on /sp/ except the patriots have tears escaping every one of their orifices for a week, or a month, while Brady now has 5 rings, 2 undefeated regular seasons, and 1 undefeated season.
Oh, and the worst of it all and to top it all of Brady's undefeated season will have zero (0) asterisks next to it.
Soon...
>The shit covered hovel known as Cincinnati
are we going to get BTFO on sunday
>>63770665
yeah honestly 16-0 is the best case, massive butthurt either way
However easily the biggest shitshow is if they go 17-1 and lose to the Bengals in the second round
>>63771094
16-0 is looking less likely every week for the Pats. They seem to be getting weaker every game.
The scary thing is the Panthers actually seem to be getting stronger.
>>63769890
>packers (+20)
Let's take it easy there sneak that's a bit extreme
Post yfw the Panthers go 16-0 and then lose their first playoff game
Jim Bob Cooter is a decent OC
>>63771129
>Failcunts fans
>Aints fans
>Busc fans
>Anally devastated Skins fans
>>63771191
>the only team to have a 16-0 regular season and win a playoff game is the NE patriots
>Every other team that's gone undefeated in the regular season has always lost their first playoff game
>>63771201
>Cam Newton's only playoff win was against a Cardinals team that was plagued with injuries and was using a third string quarterback, and still barely won.
>>63769744
>2015
>not killing an animal to use its fur as a masturbation tool
>>63769703
Should the Bengals be fined for Cadencegate? Seems like a pretty serious rule violation going on there, I didn't know they were a bunch of cheaters.
Are there any good teams in the AFC that are just honest?
>>63771287
Stoolers
Jameis Winston will lead the Bucs to the playoffs.
>>63771058
Patriots will probably win but you won't get BTFO. Patriots are too ded on offense to score in bunches on that defense, as of right now, they're top 3 WRs are literally LaFell, Harper and Slater. I'd say it's going to finish 17-13
>amendola most likely fine just getting an mri just to make sure he is okay
THANK YOU SATAN
Would sp explode if the superb owl is played by two undefeated teams and >18-1 happens again?
>>63771287
Patriots
>>63771412
where are all you bucs fans coming from?
i mean im not complaining but where were you guys 2 years ago?
>>63771480
being seahawks fans
>>63771480
?
I've fucking been here for years m8. Usually before he season I'll say the Bucs will make the playoffs but they always end up being shit so why would I continue to shitpost? Now they have a legitimate shot at making the playoffs.
>>63771510
im just glad to see more of us here
>>63771491
>almost losing to the Bills
There are people that ACTUALLY believe the Pats can beat the Packers.
>>63771538
>actually losing to the Lions
>>63771555
I think one game every 25 years is OK.
MVP power rankings:
1. Tony Romo
2. Cam Newton
3. Tom Brady
>>63771562
You lost to them last year, idiot.
>>63771538
>Implying the statistically best defense in the league couldn't contain Erin Rodgers
These guys are literally better than Seattle
>>63771576
In Detroit when they had the best defense in the league? Doesn't count. Which is why we made it to the NFCCG and they didn't.
>>63770426
It's funny because White is black
>>63771577
>bragging about being better than Seattle
Topkek.
>>63770158
>Smoking during a game that you're playing in
>Deliberately lowering your lung capacity during a time when you need all the air you can get
>Deliberately constricting blood vessels during periods of short, high-intensity exercise
>>63771586
>Claims superiority
>Is given proof of the opposite
>BUT THAT DOESN'T COUNT
Puckers fans, everyone.
>>63771597
Better than last year's Seattle, better than Denver, better than the anemic Puckers D by a longshot.
>>63771616
>the record last year head to head was 1-1
>Packers make it to NFCCG
>Lions don't
>Packers not superior
Ummmmm...
>>63771538
filtered
>>63771622
Nigga, the Packers D would rape Brady. Straight up pull his longjohns down and put it in.
>>63771630
>Pats fans can't handle the bants
>>63771634
Hahaha packers d? Maybe in week two or three. They are banged up and couldn't even slow down the lions.
>>63771538
Do people want to ignore the fact the bills have a very solid defense this season
>>63771634
Dude you're retarded
>>63771647
I wouldn't exactly say the Lions had a strong offense in that game. Plus, we would have won if our kicker hadn't shanked the ball.
>>63771656
You still were only in that position because prater missed two extra points
>>63771624
Hey shit for brains, lets go back over this.
>I think one game every 25 years is OK.
Except that you lost to them last year.
>BETTER DEFENSE, THAT DOESN'T COUNT
So you somehow concede that they were a better team while simultaneously trying to play the DOESN'T REALLY COUNT card?
>MUH NFCCG
Yes, and you lost that game to the Seakeks. The Cowgirls were the only thing that saved you from Detroit in the playoffs last year.
>Peyton Manning reportedly injure foot trying to lift the "really heavy" epic meats pizza from Papa Johns™.
>>63769744
there's a furry girl in my English class who wears a tail exactly like this sometimes.
>>63769790
Brady for VP
Mods are asleep post undefeated quarterbacks
>>63771656
No, the Packers D is just shit
>friend says he'll by me a thirty rack every other week if the cowboys beat the panthers
>>63771716
>>63771717
To be fair, the lions players had their jobs on the line, so despite being shit, they still played harder. Win was still because of a miracle though
>>63771742
>the other team wanted it more
How triggered will the seakuks be this Sunday sp?
Would a British team be an automatic rival for the Patriots?
>>63771577
I miss Collins :(
>Tfw your team does not have a franchise qb
>>63771819
>tfw your team has a franchise QB who refuses to prioritize his own health
At least we have a kicksss backup
>>63771815
>tfw he'll never stop dying from fucking dysentery
>>63771773
is case keenum going to die
>>63771857
Yes. I don't know where or when, but each of us has to go in our own time.
>>63771841
Fuuuuuuuck, is that what he has?
Post Collins so he may be ready for Buncos
I think the Bills can beat the Patriots if they get into the play offs. This game was very close. Bills kept fucking themselves and then their QB died.
>>63771877
i heard he had the plague
>#15 on nfl.com power rankings
We're going to the playoffs for sure
>>63771957
>12 on ESPN
>>63769895
Amazing player. Even better leader.
>>63771956
would be karma, pat players deserve it
>>63769819
>the season halfway point at week 8
fix that or I will have to withdraw my endorsement on account of autism, the halfway point was after week 9
How likely is it that the pats.sign Moss? He was at that joint pratice between the pats and saints. Also if Welker was still a free agent would they have signed him?
>>63769890
>49ers (-6)
are you implying you had expectations that we'd beat the seahawks in the first place?
is Osweiler elite?
You may only reply if your favorite team hasn't lost in 3 weeks
>>63771840
a backup that's playing better than your starter atm desu
Made a better rating system to describe the results of the season so far based on who has beaten who and no other factors. Scrapped the PAR system, it was too unwieldy. Note that this is supposed to be a descriptive stat, not a predictive one.
The basis for the methodology was derived from these three ideas:
1. Winning should make a team's rating go up and losing should make it go down, never the reverse.
2. Teams with high ratings should fall harder because of a loss compared to what they can gain by winning. The opposite is true for teams with low ratings.
3. The results should be recursive so that all games in the season are held to the current context of results, not the context at the time.
1. (1.000) Carolina Panthers
1. (1.000) New England Patriots
3. (0.827) Denver Broncos
4. (0.824) Cincinnati Bengals
5. (0.800) Green Bay Packers
6. (0.767) Arizona Cardinals
7. (0.716) Minnesota Vikings
8. (0.638) Kansas City Chiefs
9. (0.613) Indianapolis Colts
10. (0.609) Pittsburgh Steelers
11. (0.599) Buffalo Bills
12. (0.587) Seattle Seahawks
13. (0.549) Houston Texans
14. (0.495) Atlanta Falcons
15. (0.461) New York Jets
16. (0.448) New York Giants
17. (0.439) Tampa Bay Buccaneers
18. (0.427) Chicago Bears
19. (0.415) Jacksonville Jaguars
20. (0.410) Washington Redskins
21. (0.392) St. Louis Rams
22. (0.387) New Orleans Saints
23. (0.367) Detroit Lions
24. (0.356) Miami Dolphins
25. (0.342) San Francisco 49ers
26. (0.338) Philadelphia Eagles
27. (0.294) Oakland Raiders
28. (0.257) Dallas Cowboys
29. (0.246) Baltimore Ravens
30. (0.176) Tennessee Titans
31. (0.120) San Diego Chargers
32. (0.102) Cleveland Browns
>>63772054
>this edge
>>63772311
>implying the "Eye test" isn't flawless
>>63772348
I have no issue from a philosophical standpoint with subjective standards, they do serve a purpose. That's what my weekly power rankings polls were, after all. This is just an exercise in objective measurements rather than subjective, and that's fine too.
>>63772386
Does it employ "Quality losses"?
>>63772326
sorry if that scares you
I'm an apathetic son of a bitch, i generally don't give a fuck if people die, even ones close to me
most people are idiots, and the less of them polluting the earth the better.
>>63772456
>17 year old filled with angst detected
>>63772468
it's ironic retard
>>63772423
>FTC is Bill Simmons
>>63772456
Showing off your new edge, i see
>>63772423
I hate that term because it often implies you can go up after losing, but something like that. it's more like it punishes you either way for losing, but it's even worse if you lose to shit. I couldn't make it work otherwise, believe me I tried. at first I tried making it so that losing was more of a static hit to your rating, and wins were progressively scaled so that beating a great team counted for more than beating a bad team. unfortunately, when applying the recursive steps the numbers immediately started diverging into random nonsense rather than converge onto one specific number for each team. I realized that I had to either progressively scale the rating boost/drop for BOTH wins and losses, or for neither. with that I tried to see if doing neither would work first, but it ended up converging every team onto exactly .500 instead which is useless. what I posted above is what it looks like when teams get more of a boost beating a good team, less of a boost beating a bad team, more of a drop losing to a bad team, and less of a drop losing to a good team. as a result, undefeated teams automatically converge on perfect because their rating can only go up no matter who they played. if there were any unvictorious teams, they'd be at dead 0 as well.
>>63772456
>>63772527
Can you employ your algorithm into the College top 32 to see who is really the best?
My "meme test" rankings are solid. But it won't tell me the true top 10.
>>63772527
how about just using Elo
>Patriots lose another key player
>Buffalo exploits huge problem in Patriots offense
>Patriots going into Denver to play an even more skilled defensive team
>Osweiler and team defeat the Patriots
Osweiler can ruin both Peyton and Brady in a single game
The Chiefs have been sneaky good. So many people, myself included discounted them because of their record, but have you seen who they've played.
>DEN
>GB
>CIN
>Desperate Chicago
>MIN
It's completely understandable why they went 1-5, they went against 4 of the best teams in the league.
They're definitely not a Top 2 tier team, but they're good enough for to lose in the WC, or beat a downward trending playoff team.
>>63772649
not really (not as-is anyways) because of the inclusiveness of the NFL league structure compared to Div-1A. if they only played each other ever and that was it, then I guess it would work it'd just have over a hundred teams in the pool instead. I'd have to heavily modify it to do what you're asking, either to account for only partial schedules being calculated or for teams outside the relevant set somehow impacting the results.
>>63772653
I don't like its methodology, and it's already been done anyways, so no. if you know someone that already calculated it for the NFL as of right now feel free to post it here, but I personally wouldn't care.
>>63769890
>Packers +20
I hate you so much Sneak.
>Adam Schefter @Adam Schefter 23s
Reports are Danny Amendola has suffered a torn ACL. Aaron Dobson with a broken foot. Both expected to go on IR.
>>63771624
Packers are 2-3 against the Lions the past 3 seasons.
>>63772722
He's such a fucking baby
>>63772653
What would the electric light orchestra help?
>>63772731
>Adam Schefter @Adam Schefter 1m
>Reports are Danny Amendola has suffered a torn ACL. Aaron Dobson with a broken foot. Both expected to go on IR.
FUCK FUCK FUCK
>>63772711
Points per possession differential vs pppd
There you go. That's how you pick games
>>63771538
There are people here who ACTUALLY think the Pack is going to the superbowl.
>>63771912
I think you're retarded
>tfw all players on IR
FEELS bad man
>>63772731
Fake. But with the luck Patriots have had with injuries I checked it with an increased heart rate
>>63769733
Like you've never seen a man with a pocket-squirrel before.
How many times has Rex beaten Trillicheck in the last 9 meetings like once? Rex and Buffalo both stink.
>>63772780
>increased heart rate
>britkek
Fck off bandwagon patriots are CANADAS TEAMS mother fcker
>>63771287
Chiefs
>>63772750
>>63772731
10-6 incoming.
Why the fuck would you support a team owned by a kike?
>>63772791
since Rex became a head coach in the NFL
he's like 4-11 against Bill all time
>>63772763
>There you go. That's how you pick games
>pick games
you are missing the entire point of what I was talking about then, it had nothing to do with picking games. there is an important difference between:
>stats that are descriptive
>stats that are predictive
>descriptive stats that happen to have a high correlative trend with actual results despite a lack of direct causality
the ratings above are designed as the first case, you're changing topics to the third one.
>>63772649
>>63772711
on second thought I could do it with just the "top 32" teams so long as those 32 teams are already decided beforehand, but the results wouldn't illustrate which 32 teams in college football have had the best results so far this season (and the hierarchy within that 32), it would just illustrate how those 32 teams fared against each other. if that's fine by you then I can do that, but it's a pretty fucking huge disclaimer the way I see it.
>>63772816
>feel when owner is a kike hater
>>63772816
the NFL is owned by kikes
>>63772154
>>63772816
Because they make the best owners
>>63772840
Thank you based Chiefs. You beat the Pats last year and they won the super bowl, beat us this year and we are currently undefeated since.
>>63772154
JUST
does anyone else here share the opinion that the panthers suck?
>>63772855
No problem senpai
>>63772831
>it would just illustrate how those 32 teams fared against each other.
That's all that really matters.
>>63772750
This is a lie
>>63772837
>Most NFL team owners are jews
>Most NFL commissioners are jews or crypto jews
>Fords own the only team to go 0-16
>Henry Ford knew jews were a cancerous race
A consipiracy
now some actually news about Ammendola
>>63769945
Interesting how that goes for the other undefeated team as well.
>>63772870
Trold u :]
>>63772880
Pls be minor
>>63772816
I don't, I support the only team who is owned by a former NFL player
>>63772880
Rest into pieces :(
Man the Patriots would have had an easy 19-0 this year if Lewis and edlemen didn't die
Feels fucky man p
>>63772692
Yea let's completely ignore the NE defense which is one of the best in the league against sub-20 ranked Denver offense
>>63772875
Henry Ford actually had a newspaper called something like "Jews: The Man's Common Enemy"
Hopefully these transgressions doesn't upset master Goodell.
>>63772826
Rex should start calling Bill dad its getting pretty pathetic how often he gets sonned
>>63772914
It was the "Dearborn What the fuck ever"
And it featured his hit series "The International Jew". Good read. I think that man was from the future.
>>63772869
well I got all the up to date results then, I can just apply the same algorithm, but it hinges on having to decide on which 32 teams get put in the sample to begin with, it doesn't select those 32 beforehand. so unless you got a list already, I don't really feel like wading through exercises today trying to determine who should even get included. I'm not really sure why it has to be 32 though, did you just assume that because the NFL one is? I can change the size of the sample set easily, it's just that once that set is decided, it can only include results between teams that are all in that set already.
>>63770665
We won't know about the asterisk until we see if the get caught at whatever it is they are doing this year.
>>63771113
Rarrrrrr, RRrrraaarrrrrrrr! *
(*Panther noises.)
>>63769890
I just want 2003-2004 back
hello, this is a native cardinals fan, letting you all know that we still exist
thanks
>>63772983
That's nice, but >>>/mlb/ is that way
>>63772941
>I'm not really sure why it has to be 32 though, did you just assume that because the NFL one is?
Well its similar to the AP top 25 plus the closest teams out.
Clemson (55)
2. Alabama (6)
3. Iowa
4. Notre Dame
5. Oklahoma
6. Michigan St.
7. Baylor
8. Ohio St.
9. Oklahoma St.
10. Florida
11. N. Carolina
12. Michigan
13. Stanford
14. Florida St.
15. TCU 9-2
16. Navy 9-1
17. Northwestern
18. Oregon
19. Mississippi
20. Washington St.
21. Houston
22. UCLA
23. Mississippi St.
24. Toledo
25. Temple
Utah 100, Pittsburgh 60, LSU 33, Texas A&M 27, Wisconsin 21, Air Force 15, USC 8, Arkansas 7, W. Kentucky 6, Georgia 5, BYU 3, Tennessee 2, South Florida 1, Arkansas St. 1, West Virginia 1
I guess it's 40 teams now. Here they are.
CAROLINAFAGS BTFO
>Already getting lobbied to place the Panthers over the Patriots. The reason? Carolina's blowout win over the Redskins coupled with New England's close call versus the Bills. What's ironic about this argument is that Bill Belichick's group won in the same fashion Monday night that Carolina has employed much of this year. Think about the Panthers' one-score wins: over the Texans, Saints, Seahawks, Colts and Packers. Sure, there are fine football teams in that group, but it's not as though the Panthers have sprinted through their schedule. Oh, and by the way, the Patriots are the defending Super Bowl champs.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000587012/article/nfl-power-rankings-week-12-cards-jump-bengals-eagles-sink
>>63769890
>23. Eagles (-4)
>>63772880
I hope he's fucked for the season.
>>63772998
well alright, I'll work on that then. it might be an hour or so, once it's made it's super easy to update but re-making the template will require just a bit of modification.
>>63773006
Umad at the 10-0 club?
>>63771798
You mean, like, the London Loyalists or something?
>>63772951
>>63770665
Didn't they have to cheat in the very first game? Against the steelers I think?
>rodgers is a dumpster fire
>green bay rodgers fans blame his lack of WR depth
>Brady is currently 10-0 with literally 2 WRs on the entire depth chart
>LITERALLY 2
Glad that debate is in the trash where it belongs desu
>>63773051
well technically Special teams specialist Matthew Slater is listed as a WR
I hope he can catch
>>63773051
Rodgers is so overrated it hurts
>>63773061
I thought slater was kill
>>63773045
no Tomlin just cried bitch tears because he couldn't trip anyone in the game
>>63772154
...or at all.
>>63772154
Sweet I get to reply to this.
>>63773045
Did they add the Leave Gronk Wide Open Defense into the Steelers playbook?
>>63773025
If you could drop those by /cfb/ that would be great.
>>63773025
Dude, you need to kiss a girl, get your own keys, maybe apply for a credit card or learn to drive....
No, I'm just playin', you're great.
Is The Patriots won another owl this year with Brady and Moss would the NFL shut down completely and give up and trying to stop Brady?
>>63773061
Keshawn martin
>>63773155
injured
>>63773099
>entire plays where literally no one was even near gronk by 15 yds
Yo the steelers fucked themselves that game, no cheating required
Ray Lewis is a better criminal than commentator
BOLD BRAVE BERRY up in this nigga who hype as fuck for that CHIEFS PLAYOFF RUN?! I'm talking 11-5 niggas. We taking that wild card spot at the very least, homies. We're going to absolutely demolish the competition and bring world championship trophies from both of America's sports back to the heartland.
KC Royals Wold Champions
KC Chiefs World Champions
Try me, bitch I'll fuck your world up in 4 quarters flat nigga.
>>63773167
Coming back family
>>63773239
>Jamal charles
>>63772941
Pppd is how you determine who will win games versus who.
Meaning it's a power scale bro. You rate each teams pppd and you get a true power rating for a season.
Go to a 4 week read to get a more current
>>63770716
Is that his tail?
>A new take on the inadvertent whistle: Ref may have been "skittish" when players approached because in week 1 he was trampled by a Ravens player and suffered nine broken ribs, a broken collarbone, and a partially collapsed lung.
Do the panthers have yiff parties after games?
>>63773252
I don't think you quite understand how deep the KC RB roster is, Jamaal Charles is a legendary running back. But, even our backup that we cut from last year would be a #1 starter for at least 20 other teams.
Not to mention what West and Ware have been doing in Charles' absence.
>>63772914
>>63772936
The man personally bankrolled several translations and publications of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion
80 Danny Amendola KR- pos ded
17 Aaron Dobson-o god why
11 Julian Edelman PR-ded
14 Chris Harper- hopeful
19 Brandon LaFell-strugled first game back but looking good
82 Keshawn Martin-inj
18 Matthew Slater-special used in case of emergency
well fuck
>>63773045
They had a bold strategy to leave Gronk wide open and not cover him
>>63773300
>You now remember knile davis
Also nice triple dubs
>>63773327
James White looked good out there
>mfw playoffs
>>63773327
heh
>>63771201
Tell that to the '48 Browns
