is it true that the entire NFL and national media attacked the Patriots for 8 months over "deflated" footballs? is it true that Roger tried to ban Tom "St. Brady" Brady for 4 games with no proof of wrong doing in a hand picked court? is it true Tom "10/10 looks" Brady BTFO Roger and the media and went 7-0?
No.
>>63359937
All true, except Brady hasn't been made a saint yet.... think the Pope is waiting to see if he wins another owl
The whole thing was the commissioner trying to show how he was ultimate power. He thought he could do anything, but a federal judge told Goodell to go fuck himself and his bullshit wells report
Brady has made Roger look inept to say the least
hes the GOAT
Patriots didn't do shit
i will always stand by the idea that it was a nothing story about nothing but happened to take place in the two weeks leading up to the superbowl
an expertly crafted "scandal" to keep people thinking about football during the off season
****
*
*
*
18-1
Kicker babby
Spy
Ball alterer
Carrol babby
Isn't it true the Patriots were fined and had draft picks taken?
>>63374710
>****** matter in the real world
>>63374874
yeah that was a joke considering the NFL got laughed out of their own hand picked court
everybody knows deflategate was complete shit
Pats are setting a record for least turnovers in NFL history lol
NFL hasn't released data because it exonerates the Patriots
>>63359937
>no proof of wrong doing
Brady destroyed his cellphone. spoliation of evidence always looks criminal to me
>>63387953
>cellphone
>evidence
pick only one
>>63387953
The phone wasn't considered evidence by the investigation though
>>63387953
What difference does it make? They had the phones of the guys Brady was texting with. What? The Wells report is so out of date they needed Brady's phone to double check it was his?
>>63359937
>brady
>clutch
>>63388059
did Wells not ask for it to be turned over? I'm pretty sure he did
>ball boy calls himself the deflator in texts
>talking about weightloss
ayyyy
>>63388195
Brady did turn it over and it was given back. Those con-artists at Wells needed it again because they're shit lawyers.
>>63388195
Wells said he did not need the phone
It doesn't matter because Brady provided all his calls, texts and emails from that time period. The NFL tried to hide that after the appeal, but it came public 2 months later.
The NFL tries to hide crucial information from the public, there is no integrity.
>>63388195
He initially asked for the phone records not the phone. He then agreed it wasn't needed to complete the investigation. He never asked for the physical phone, and Brady provided his phone records at his appeal
>>63388344
Exactly. I don't know why people think the phone was needed as Brady could easily wipe it. Can't wipe the phone companies records though. Too bad for the NFL it proved pic related
>>63388195
>millions spent
>thousands of man hours
>no proof
>get laughed out of court
10/10
>>63399397
>winning on a technicality
>not actually proven innocent.
>>63399490
It actually wasn't a technicality, the judge called the investigation and appeal fundamentally unfair. That's about as far from a technicality as you can get.
>>63400161
this
even if there was undeniable proof (video of someone with a needle in a ball in front of brady) he still would have won because the case was about the appeal process being unfair
>hypothetical
a man shoots a woman in a convenience store
he gets caught
he is immediately sent to prison (not jail)
he appeals for a trial with a new judge
the judge is the same guy and also the DA and the warden and the president
