Erotic Roleplay thread (/erpg/)
No room invitation bullshit.
No Rory posting.
Minimal salt.
Post F-List profiles, IRC channels/handles, character ideas, porn and smut or whatever else you want. Discuss stuff.
To pick the conversation up.
Name one thing you thought would be very common in ERP but isn't.
For me it's definitely lovey dovey stuff. I'd have thought more people like indulging in fantasies about characters with mutual feelings for each other fucking their lover's brains out. But no. Apparently F-List at large seems to consist of emotionless sex robots. Maybe it's the problem of people mixing up IC feelings the characters have for each other and the OOC feelings the players have for each other? No only between the pair playing but also on the outside. And thus people prefer to just keep things lewd but not loving? What do you think?
Ok, this thread needs some salt now, so... What is your pet peeve? For me it is thongs. Why do people like thongs so much? Why does literally no one use a wide variety of lower female undergarments during ERP? Am I alone in being some sort of creepy and weird panty connoisseur? Speaking of which, do you have a favourite (that is not a thong)? I don't, I like the variety.
I thought actual exposition before fucking would be a bigger deal for more people. I don't mean lovey dovey stuff, necessarily, just more than a paragraph or two of setup. The situation, and the relationship between the characters, is 99% of ERP for me. Hence calling it Erotic Roleplay and not cybering or textual phone sex or something. Developing a boner is not developing your character, most of the time.
Salt: Incredibly detailed descriptions of physique for characters whose physique isn't all that important. Especially ridiculously specific descriptions of female bodies by males and vice versa. Sure, maybe your frail mage or stout smith sounds hot to me, but after you make them so specific only you could love them, I'm probably not going to be into them much.
>>23821693
Totally understand the exposition thing. There is a frightening amount of people doing ERP that never stop and ask the question of just why their characters are fucking. And yeaaah, I guess most people don't care, but having that sort of intro gives lots of opportunity to inject something interesting into the fucking itself.
First off, a profile.
>https://www.f-list.net/c/broadside%20belle/
Because literally, Fuck Patriotism. The only way sex with her could get more American is if you recite the Pledge of Allegiance before you cum. People have done that before though.
As for the topic, I honestly thought more people would be into some playful back and forth during the sex. Almost every time I try to have my character banter a bit, even though they say they're cool with it, my partner doesn't even say anything. Hell, it's actually worse when they do, mostly. Like, you wanted to typefuck a chatty character, but I can't talk to a brick wall grunting "Uhn, you're tight." Feels like she's banging some kind of sexual Hodor and that's all they know how to say
Bump for interest. Im relatively new to ERPG but I find it an interesting outlet and excercise of both my creativity and my sexual appetites. It's not easy to please a journalist that's going through a shitty af break-up but ERPG does the trick.
Salt: Two things. 1). Old, granny-like comfy underwear that the girl knows isnt hot but the guy thinks so. 2). Unreliable RPing partners (feels bad mane, real bad).
>>23821895
Completely understandable. Yeah. There is definitely some porn level dialogue about.
>>23821941
Yeah, it works pretty well for both. There is definitely a lot of stuff I am into sexually that I don't get to go at IRL or find porn off. Then again it can be hard to find people for some of it.
Though I will say that while yeah, it feels bad, people often have reasons for being unreliable. It's just typefucking, it shouldn't have a high priority in anyone's life.
>>23822110
Yeah, it's why I classified it as salt. Yesterday I had a million/10 girl to RP with but she got busy and left me hanging just as the story was working up to it's first climax. Is she at fault? Not at all, she has uh-a life? Nothing wrong with that. Thays why it leaves me salty, cuz it annoys me but I cant blame the other person. If someone's at fault is the universe for giving me free time, libido and passable writing skills.
If anything, my only objection would be that people overall can inform these things to their partner so she/he doesnt get his hopes up.
>tfw you thought you found the one
>tfw you lose it
>tfw you lose it again
>tfw after so much loss, you even lose an ideal RPing partner
>>23821895
I'm always afraid that I'm doing *too much* talking in a scene, even though it feels perfectly realistic to me. But then again, I once got a friend off by abusing her nipples while whispering dirty things in her ear for like half an hour, so maybe my perspective on what's "realistic" is skewed by odd experiences. Either way, I'm always good for sex banter. It's just too serious-business otherwise, and I just can't take ERP that seriously.
>>23822460
I sometimes have RPs where I post something around 60% banter and 40% descriptions. In others its 20% banter and 80% descriptions. Both have their charm to me.
What I'm really against though is just... nothing at all.
>>23822311
Rescheduling not working out?
>>23821895
Banter during sex is Top Tier, man. With one of my favorite partners the back-and-forth during the sex is almost half the fun, groan-worthy puns included. Lighthearted comfy shagging's a great niche.
>>23822572
Sadly, no. She didnt mentioned it in such a serious term. Like someone said above, can't blame others for not being as emthusiastic as you are.
Btw, wouls you guys please share examples of banter? Sounds like a great thing to do!
>>23824111
>>23821895
Good banter makes a scene much more enjoyable for me. Even just goofy hentai-tier lines or terrible puns are a good deal of the fun. Plus, the interaction tends to make it feel less like slapping two barbie dolls against one another and more like actual characters.
>>23824280
>Btw, wouls you guys please share examples of banter? Sounds like a great thing to do!
Sure, and this was a fun scene to play besides.
http://pastebin.com/tGK9H3qW
Contains: Anime, OCs, puns, a little bit of footgear stuff. Not the full log, I want to finish up the whole story arc it's a part of before I collect it all together.
>>23824984
> Her other foot lifts to step gently on his shoulder, its heel pressing into his collar bone and framing his face with her thighs, slick with sweat and the hints of more excited juices.
That. Filled. My. Dick. With. Blood.
Hnnng, getting really excited. No femanons here interested in helping me learn to RP properly?
>>23825238
We exist, but if you care about gender then it automatically steps into creepy territory for me, because I'm here for ERP, not desperate internet people looking for relationships.
This is me doing pet play even though it's not at all my fetish.
http://logs.omegle.com/47347b6e
Apparently she got turned on. I didn't in the slightest. Weird rp, had some nice drama and stuff though.
>>23825442
Some guys just don't want to help other guys masturbate. I like to think about the other person getting turned on by the scenes we're describing, and if that person is a dude, it ruins it for me.
>>23825497
I'm a creeper who's with you, the rest of the thread, as well as flist as a site isn't.
Hence why i rp on omegle instead where there's no pesky rules to worry about.
>>23825442
>I'm here for ERP, not desperate internet people looking for relationships
You're a mtf though.
Also it's possible to like getting to know girls ooc without wanting to be their lol internet bf lol.
That's what i like about omegle lots of girls don't mind ooc chat at all.
>>23821693
I used to think I'd be into that, but as time goes on, I realize that in a lot of cases it's easier to just jump in and improvise. Every time I think about playing someone, I realize that about a third to half the time is going to be stuff that doesn't even come up in the play. Just jumping in with an intro paragraph that sets up who, where, how, why seems so much more exciting. Getting a good paragraph like that--provided it isn't something that ignores my profile or is badly written, like some shota gladiator in a white featureless plane randomly noticing my milfy schoolteacher and gesturing to her--is one of the few things that can pull me out of a rut.
>>23821654
Maybe it's because the few times I play are with friends, but I've never had emotionless sex robots. People who seem like they might be, I turn down. I've had a lot of lovey dovey scenes, or at least scenes where the two participants are clearly fond of each other and enjoying what they're doing. I've even done a bit of >>23821895 bantering, in fact.
>>23821895
Bantz is pretty good, especially when it comes to building character connections. But it's incredibly difficult to find, yeah.
Which is basically why I won't do romance play anymore. I'd rather just fulfil my kinks, and if I can find someone who can write great characters with actual interaction? That'd be fantastic! But I don't really expect it, and I'd much rather just write that sort of stuff.
>>23825508
>>23825497
But chances are even on Omegle you're with a dude. In fact, those femanons who say they're femanons?
[spoiler]Dudes[/spoiler]
>tfw you see a picture and get a character concept but there's only one good image
Then again, it's probably a niche concept. Upper class British boy who gets shipwrecked and has to fend for himself against nature and islanders. Mostly a sort of Robinson Crusoe sort of thing, for getting snusnu'd by amazons and buggered by pirates.
also posting my profile
https://www.f-list.net/c/shinade%20orthamorug/
androgynous albino monarch, known for enjoying sweets and anal
>>23825639
I've gotten enough nudes from girls on omegle to believe that there are in fact girls on omegle.
Have i rped with guys before though? Probably.
>>23825525
wat
>>23825442
Exactly what >>23825497 said. I am not looking for someone to fall in love with, specially given that we'll likely never see each other face to face, and Im not looking for an overly emotional attachment with my RPing partner. That said, Id like to believe a good RPing partner has at least to be reliable and respectful towards you. Asking for a relatively decent person with whom you can have proper communication is far from a "LOL WILL YOU MARRY ME ON SKYPE" kind of emotional attachment.
Ive RPed with men before and it does kinda ruin the fantasy, even if they can make up some of the nastiest and most exciting "dolls smashing against each other" scenarios.
Also, what tag did you guys use for ERP on omegle? Ive only tried with daddy and femdom: biggest waste of time ever.
>>23826139
Just enter roleplay and RP as tags, you'll find plenty. Granted, there's a lot of dudes to wade through, but then what did you expect?
>Emotionless sex robots
Funny. I know people who are into that.
I may be one of them.
>>23826160
Also, since I'm doing more than offering advice:
What I thought would be more common but isn't is actual, y'know, characterisation. Most partners I've found either have these completely one-dimensional sorts or are so passive and doormat-like I feel as if a sledge hammer to the sternum wouldn't stir some life into them. The times where someone does do their best to have an actual character around are also the times where I most love having some RP with them.
This also ties in to banter. Someone who goes entirely silent very much and only speaks when they're spoken to is a serious red flag for passivity and such. Not cool.
My actual salt I receive for just how haughty some sorts get. Being demanding and such is a source of a good chuckle when you're reading dating sites, but in people trying to find RP partners it's simultaneously hilarious and crushing to one's faith in humanity. If there were a devil, my soul would be sold right away in order for me to broadcast the following message to half the people out there:
YOU WRITING COMPLETE SENTENCES AND HAVING A BASIC GRASP OF THE ENGLISH FUCKING LANGUAGE DOES NOT ENTITLE YOU TO THIS GENERATION'S NSFW ERNEST HEMINGWAY
/end salt
(I have no preference in panties and/or thongs, alas)
>>23826383
>(I have no preference in panties and/or thongs, alas)
You monster.
>>23825945
They're just sharing the nudes they got from girls on Omegle.
>>23826139
The problem is that you asking a/s/l is a massive turn off for anyone else, even some of the women who would otherwise RP with you, so really you just have to use your imagination. After all, even if they're femanon, they might be ugly or grannies or trans or gingers or all sorts of things you might not be into.
>>23826383
>tfw you see boring profiles with shitty grammar doing profile play
Half the time when people share logs on their profile, they or their partner are garbage. Just remember that if you ever feel bad. Some of the best RPers will still feel proud of a scene they did with someone who was clearly typing with one hand and things lists are sexy.
>>23826616
I'm the worst, yes.
>>23826699
Nah, I don't feel bad. It just angers me, the sorts of feeling where you want to falcon punch your monitor and tear out a bitch's throat at the other end
>>23826692
Ugly ass elderly ginger trannies most likely. Lets be honest.
>>23826804
Am...am I the only one thinking this would be a worthwhile rpg?
P...please tell me I'm not.
>>23826816
I need to work on my old lady adventurer character.
Also, fun historical fact, Wu Zetian would make people eat her out if they wanted her to listen to them, well into her twilight years. You won't hear Morgan Sheppard tell you about that on the Civ V loading screen.
Hey /erp/, I'm an outsider to your community here so I don't quite know how this works, but I'm looking for someone who might be interested in an RP scenario about fucking my sister and thought this might be a place to ask. If you're interested, post your preferred communication method and I'll get ahold of you.
>>23828122
Is your sister hot? Nice tits?
>>23828148
Of course!
>>23828122
Do you mean you want to fuck us pretending to be your sister or do you mean you want a scenario where we fuck your sister and you watch?
Nonstandard cuckolding is interesting, but a lot of people in these threads don't like cuckolding fantasies.
>>23828167
I'll put it in her for sure.
>>23828171
Either one works, really. I know a lot of people have issues with the former because they don't like the idea of the girl in the scenario really being a guy, but whatever.
"Nonstandard cuckolding" is a pretty accurate description, yeah.
>>23828173
I'm sure you would, but I'm afraid I can't give you the real life opportunity, only an RP one.
>>23828188
I was just teasing really, like the person above posted the request was unclear so I just wanted to poke fun.
>>23828188
>Either one works, really.
Well what was your original intent? Also, I think most of us would be uncomfortable if we were RPing your actual sister as well, from a picture or even just a description, so you'll be let down in that regard (I think it also might be against F-list's rules).
But for something completely fantasy, I'm sure someone will be interested. I even know someone who's willing to play Your Big Sis and fuck her little brother (especially with a big fat shemale cock).
>>23828214
My bad, I was trying to explain it as simply and in as few words as possible.
Feel free to ask questions about it
>>23828224
I'm not familiar with F-list at all, so forgive me if I'm out of line. At a glance it seems like an elaborate, anime-esque thing, which is not really what I'm into.
My original intent was for me to RP her, but only because I assumed that's what other people would want. I don't really know which one I would actually be into more. Doesn't really matter, either works.
And big fat shemale cocks are also just a little bit outside my realm of interest.
>>23828234
>At a glance it seems like an elaborate, anime-esque thing
That's not necessarily true, but it's also not necessarily inaccurate, either.
Basically it's for slightly more involved than Omegle (erotic) roleplaying. No matter how much the people in charge try to say otherwise, it's a furry roleplaying site that got co-opted by people who think they're this generations NSFW Ernest Hemingway, and as such there is a lot of anime-esque stuff. Unlike the "faceclaim" heavy world of AIM and YIM roleplaying--which often had to rely on off-site profiles like Wix--F-list and similar sites tend to have a large demographic of users that aren't comfortable with real life situations. That's not to say that *IM platforms didn't have their fair share of unrealistic cartoony set ups, just that they were under the veneer of faceclaims and wordswordswords that served as a masturbatory pretext to justify the sex itself as more than just fap fodder. It's worth noting though that while a lot of people will use drawn art, anime or otherwise, a lot of people do tend to like more grounded and realistic scenarios--even the people who want ones that take place in a fantasy or science fiction setting and trade "realism" for the much more accurate "verisimilitude". So you likely could find several people willing to play out simple at-home incest scenarios with no frills: No dragons, no superpowers, and a take it or leave it attitude to weeaboo slapstick. It's worth noting, though, that these people often tend to be very boring, and the worst, most generic roleplayers are the ones playing male characters who want to fuck their sister, real or imagined.
tl;dr: "Kinda"
Anyway, if you want to be the big sister character and get fucked by regular boys (or if you're less picky, ones with huge dicks, because 8" is often small for F-list) you'll find quite a few takers if you put so much as a modicum of effort into your profile. And that holds true for whichever kind you want to play.
https://www.f-list.net/c/syia%20revlari/
Hate mail goes in the notes~
>>23828424
>because 8" is often small for F-list
Yeah, this is what I'm trying to avoid. To each their own, I suppose, but really, realism is hottest to me. And I would feel really strange about developing a profile for someone who is effectively an actual person.
And not that it really matters, but for the record, she's the little sister.
i'm not new to ERP, but I am new to this group. I have a few characters, I have some things I enjoy to write, and I do consider myself a good writer.
Is there anyone out there who writes multiple paragraph responses, using good grammar, that would be interested in going the long haul with a new person?
I love jumping right into the erotic stuff right off the bat as much as the next person, but the longer and more intricate roleplays are far more fulfilling imo.
>>23828508
Depends on what you're looking for character and setting wise, give a few examples or ideas?
>>23828518
i love fantasy settings, historical settings... I love writing combat, intrigue, drama... basically I love writing the non smut almost as much as I love writing the smut.
And really, as long as my writing partner is good, I can do pretty much anything. Probably not furry stuff, but anything human is ok by my, with few exceptions.
>>23828471
Well, yeah, it really is creepy to create a profile that's your own little sister, but that's because it's creepy to have thoughts about her in the first place. But a generic little sister? Not all that creepy.
As for realism, yeah, people tend to go for porn star measurements.
>>23828508
I don't know if anyone here does super long term roleplay (other than a few people I won't namedrop), but there should be at least a few who are willing to RP something more than jumping straight to sex. I've had a few scenes where there was lead up myself. That said "multi para" tends to be disliked here. I'll quote >>23826383 again on the people who think they're this generations NSFW Ernest Hemingway.
THIS group at least very much prefers single paragraph replies. Between 200 and 300 words. Detailed, but not an overbearing wall of text that's hard to reply to. Here we tend to focus on the interaction most, though there are people on F-list (often those who came from the *IM circles I mentioned before) who seem much more interested in sending and receiving long detailed and descriptive replies that can take upwards of an hour to write.
>>23828527
I need to do more fantasy. I've only done modern and urban fantasy stuff lately, but fantasy is so much easier to scene with.The tropes are more cultural, and it's easy to jump into the world. Plus it feels more natural for itinerant and mercenary adventurers to fuck at the drop of a hat with random strangers, whether in nice warm inns or out in the cold damp wilderness.
>>23828539
That's the sort of thing I'd love to do. Perhaps my most well developed character is a mercenary and I'd love to do something along the lines of two mercenaries easing tension in an inn or giving in to frustrations in the field.
>>23828122
>>23828527
Im in the same situation as you two and maybe we could make some fun scenarios. Pretty much a beginer but like Ive said earlier, pretty eager to have an outlet for both creativity and desire.
Kik: asahibushi / skype: asahianon.
>>23828705
I'll message you on skype here in a second. Putting some coffee on first.
So I finally broke down and joined F list. however this is a character i have been kicking around for a while and threw her together for the moment. (she still needs polishing but its 2 am here, ill save the fancy coding and details for another day) Still tell me if you guys like the general premise i am going with.
https://www.f-list.net/c/faye%20queen%20gisela/
Bump for interest. Already had a more than decent and fun play with someone from this thread so it's got some hope.
Come on anons and femanons, join the fun!
>>23830362
So, I am trying this Omegle thing with "roleplay, rp, erp" as terms, and so far, I only ran into underage boys or people pretending to be underage boys, with none of them being above board literate.
>>23830388
>people pretending to be underage boys
Elaborate.
>>23830476
A Shota is fine too
>>23829516
I feel as though I'm missing some context, but I only played the very first Legend of Zelda game on the NES.
With that said, your avatar looks stretched, you hid everything inside collapses, and there are no custom kinks.
>>23831102
The Great faeries generally have little back story so i made some up and fiddled with it a bit to make her something that isint locked into the zeldaverse. I will edit out the collapses then, as for custom kinks? I need some time to develop those
First time poster with an F-list profile. I'm glad these threads aren't totally gone.
I was hoping to find a Pathfinder or other rules-based fantasy ERPG for this character.
https://www.f-list.net/c/madalina
>Name one thing you thought would be very common in ERP but isn't.
One thing that surprises me is the lack of silly, tongue-in-cheek porno pardy RPs. The kind with horrible, punny character names, and consensual sex at the drop of a hat. Plus cheesy dialog that makes you wonder when the 70's funk music will start.
I think it's the same reason that lovey dovey play is so rare. Most ERPers were first exposed to sex through hentai, which is all about male domination and making the woman feel ashamed and humiliated by her own body in the course of sex, so that's what ERPers imitate.
I once tried to run a porno parody campaign "Sir Richard and the Knights of the Purple Helmet" but sadly nobody was interested.
>>23831102
ok took some of your criticism into account. De collapsed her main description, added a few kinks (ill add more as time goes on and im not busy with life to write better) sadly i cant really fix the avatar since im bad at art manipulation
>>23831242
I think people are more focused on getting off than being funny or romancy. The hentai thing is interesting but its not about "male domination" or shaming the woman. That's feminist talk right there. Its about people having their imaginary sex and kinks played out to ease their sexual needs/possible frustration or in my case i just really like helping people get off
>>23831242
From personal experiance, its easy to have "Silly hentai-porn plots" move to "Cringe" levels of silly. Because face it, those super-fetishie hentai plots are often sorta... weird as hell.
>>23831242
>which is all about male domination and making the woman feel ashamed and humiliated by her own body in the course of sex, so that's what ERPers imitate.
While that's true, most of the people who approach me are spineless wimps who want to be dominated by my chicks.
>>23831285
>That's feminist talk right there.
Almost every hentai manga involves women (or sometimes womanly boys) getting cockdrunk. There's literally a term in hentai for "fucked stupid". Not to mention just how many hentai have plots that amount to someone becoming addicted to dick from being fucked by a giant cock. There is an incredibly strong male dominance subtext to most porn, especially hentai. Hell, netorari is a genre all about roughly fucking someone to the point that they "switch" allegiance.
Of course, most of the people who've approached me with similar plot ideas tend to be less male dominance for the sake of male dominance and more "you become addicted to my cock because I don't want to have to make any effort".
>>23821654
I haven't done any ERP stuff for years, but Rory's still around? How's he doing these days?
>>23831425
Yes, Unfortunetly, Dont speak on it anymore.
>>23821654
>tfw finally got to do a scene you've wanted to do for a year now
Feels fucking fantastic, man
>>23831419
>Almost every hentai manga involves women (or sometimes womanly boys) getting cockdrunk
>Almost every
You've got an entire internet in front of you, you could hop on EXHentai or TheDoujin or wherever else easily and see the amount of variety that exists, and you still manage to reduce it to a clueless generalization. That's a level of dumb I really didn't expect from you, and it makes me sad.
>>23831691
IT BEGINS!
>>23831705
>autism or OCD or whatever
Please stop digging the hole deeper. You were wrong and now you're resorting to personal attacks.
>>23831705
Rory let's not attack people.
>>23831691
True, there is some variety but one of the main draw for me is hentai featuring fantasy themes or monsters and that us almost UNIVERSALLY based on male domination and rape.
>>23821654
Why is the /tg/ chat so tumblresque complete with using phrases like "ugh, can you not?"
>>23831721
I wasn't "wrong". You chose to read what I wrote in such a way. Your post was also a personal attack. But >>23831713 is right.
>>23831735
A lot of just normal slice of life school stuff is, too. But clearly this is too contentious a topic.
>>23831735
That's the draw for you. The draw for me is different. The draw for some third party is probably something else entirely.
>>23831749
"I'm not wrong, you just read it wrong" is a terrible lazy cop-out and I really hope you don't expect someone to buy it.
>>23831767
You know who I am. I've repeatedly had to explain that I am not being 100% literal when I use figurative phrases like "always". Regardless, this isn't an argument that needs to be had. I've clarified myself. In this case I mean "a very large number of works that is probably the majority".
Also, going back to the original post, >>23831242 is complaining that a lot of people seem to want that ShindoL or John K Peta or generic hentai fantasy of women being super submissive and swayed easily by the dick. I remember someone complaining at length about how they hate when strong confident canon characters are reduced to raving drooling sluts at the mere presence of a dick.
>>23831813
>You know who I am.
Yes and I'm Lili. Way to go on the personal attacks, champ.
>>23831813
Jesus, did the results of the survey tell you nothing at all? Here you go shitting on people then blaming the thread and its occupants for being fed up with you CONSTANTLY doing this and refusing to accept any responsibility for the state of things. Yes, people shitposting about you are a problem and the survey reflected that. But a huge portion said that you're the direct problem. Idly pretending to 'hide' and then throwing the cloak off like this every thread is the absolute worst way to handle it. Grow the fuck up.
>>23831813
I don't even hate you, Rory, but "Probably the Majority" is still pretty iffy, especially with the huge dearth of hentai doujins out there.
It's pretty fucking easy to never have to see a doujin with any of the content you're low-key insulting.
It's /porn/. It's porn of FAKE PEOPLE. ~Who Cares?~
Was the request for no Rory posting (either by or about Rory) that hard to follow?
Welp, it was a nice calm thread while it lasted.
Kik. GraceMHart
>>23831820
Then you should even more know my tendency for figurative language :T
>>23831833
Fine, whatever. This is not an argument the thread needs.
>>23831869
What this thread didn't need is YOU.
I intend to make another thread once you thoroughly kill this one. I have a request, please just show you are capable of acting like a responsible human being and honour it.
Don't post. Just don't. No hiding, none of that nonsense. Just you not posting in the thread. Can we agree on that? Please?
>>23831881
If you want to exclude specific people for the thread's health, that list is extremely incomplete.
>>23831906
You're right. Please don't post here again too.
>>23831915
Alright. Good to finally know the community's real opinion of me, guess that unpleasantness a few months back was more than just a trio of dedicated shitposters.
The thread also doesn't need this argument, either.
>>23831933
You should just stay in the channel. I thought of someone you might want to scene with, but they say you don't like them.
Last time I visited the chat it felt pretty unfriendly
>>23831965
You mean F-Chat in general or some specific channel?
>>23831972
Some channel which holds zero relevance and uh, should not be mentioned again! In fact, I forget what we were talking about. Who here likes healsluts?
>>23831972
/tg/ chat
>>23831933
Considering you and Rory were the ones that caused the instantaneous decline here not but a few minutes ago....
>>23831991
I like healsluts on my cock, but I also like to play the dominant healer that threatens to withhold healing if you misbehave. They can also heal the harm they do during fun.
>>23831992
/tg/ Chat is fairly bad, yeah. There are good people there, but for the major part they just get drowned out by the people who actually post there. It's a bit like 4chan in general, most of the content is trash. Using it to fish for looking people is fine, but if you actually want a room to talk in with people you need to find one you fit in with.
>>23832004
Good advice, I guess. Last time I went in I felt like I got jumped for my fetish, despite never mentioning it myself
>>23832019
Sounds about right for that group.
>>23832019
Just curious, what fetish would that be?
WAS IT NTR? YOU BASTARD!? WAS IT?!
>>23832025
Snuff, which I understand icks a lot of people, but I wasn't advertising it or anything.
>>23831991
/join ADH-59dc867b2b8dc5bf159d
>>23832019
Well, this IS a fetish chat.
Or do you mean "jumped" as in harassed, like >>23832025 is joking? Also, what was the fetish?
>>23832025
Oh god, don't even mention NTR around /tg/ their waifus are too precious.
>>23832031
Hot.
>>23832032
This channel is worse than /tg/ Chat, don't go there if you value your sanity and mental well-being in any way.
>>23832038
Is she gonna be okay?
>>23832056
>File: She's just sleeping.jpg (190 KB, 800x603)
Sure.
>>23832056
It's ok, gingers don't need to breath.
>>23832071
Why would you sleep with your eyes open?
>>23832092
She had a very strenuous day.
Oh hey, this thread exists again
Anyone interested in dropping a colony with me?
https://www.f-list.net/c/kate%20verloren/
>>23831991
Hey i used to be a member of the community but left about a year or so ago and it seems everything changed. Why is mention /tg/ chat so taboo? This thread at one point did link to their. I knew there were a few elitist in /tg/ chat but what did everybody just decided they are too good for everybody else to join in my absence?
>>23832410
I'm assuming it likely turned into an easily triggered circlejerk. Last time I went there it reminded my a lot of tumblr and not in the hyperbole sense.
>>23832417
I'm not overly surprised, F list by itself discourages talking about anything that might spark even a bit of debate (religion and plitics or even having an opinion that isint the mainstream media's) back when i was there people were dealt with pretty quick if they challenged the status quo, but still people overall seemed inviting and kind. Being in the chat the last two days tho its so much more boring, plus alot of people i liked seem to have fled the room
>>23832197
I'd bring feddie justice to you if I ever did more than lurk these threads.
Wtf happened to this thread? It was coming along nicely until some dickheads came and shitposted it away. Why the fuck ruining someone else's fun instead of joining? Ffs...
BTW: How does F-list thing work? Your profile is just a character or can it be a username for various characters? Does it need to be fantasy-themed? Is it any fun?
>>23832651
>Your profile is just a character
Yes,exactly that. You have an account, which nobody sees or knows, and then you make character profiles. You can make lists of them if you ant but you don't have to.
>Does it need to be fantasy-themed?
Not at all. You've got fantasy, modern, sci-fi, furry, anime, basically anything.
>Is it any fun?
Loads, if you can snare the right partner or at least one that clicks well with you.
>>23832410
That poster actually assumed they meant the 4chan/erpg/ channel, linked >>23832032 there's quite a bit of drama between the thread and the channel that's honestly not necessary to bring up. The channel has actually had no real incident since last week. We'd like to keep it that way.
>>23832651
It's all "fantasy" in the sense of a sexual fantasy, which could be as mundane as schoolgirls making out. It's as fun as any other sort of roleplaying. A lot of our original number came from /tg/, so we were used to playing pretend.
>>23832671
>>23832978
Holy macka-fucking-rel balls!
The list of "traits" you can choose is definitely a paradise of kinks!
>>23833619
Yep.
You don't need to include all of them, by the way. Just do the ones that are important to that character/what you want to play. Look at other people's profiles for examples of layouts and custom kinks and such.
https://www.f-list.net/c/savannah%20scott/
Finally broke down and made an F-List profile. Struggling to find character art for "normal" girls, but whatever. Seems mediocre to me, but let me know what you think.
>>23833785
Use Gelbooru. Also, needs more customs.
>>23833994
>Also, needs more customs.
I thought so too, but the kink list they have is so damn exhaustive to begin with, it's hard to imagine anything that isn't already on there.
>>23834028
It's less about being exhaustive and more about embellishing what you want and why you like it.
>>23834044
I'd like to add, don't over do it. People who have nothing but custom kink profiles are honestly pretty off putting.
>>23834028
Custom kinks are for explaining the hows and whys and wheres and whats. And also advertising. Tell me how why you like creampies. Describe a creampie in your own words. Make me want to give you one. What kind of sexual pain do you like? Do you like needles in the nipples? Clamps? Pussy slapping? Choking? Facial slaps? Huge dildos crammed into your ass and splitting your seems? What sort of verbal abuse gets you off? Is there anything that ruins a scene? Do you feel being called a whore is a turn off but being insulted and degraded is hot?
You don't like shemales and transgender characters, but you've got "Females" in Maybe despite being Straight. That's definitely something to be elaborated on. What situations are you willing to play with other girls, even though your character (and I always assume player) is straight?
What do you like about inexperienced partners and virginity? Write about these and tell us what turns you on. If you really want to do good, write your kinks so well that even if we're NOT into them, we really want to do them with you.
>>23834095
You mean arousing.
I give these threads my blessing.
>>23834141
>even though your character (and I always assume player) is straight
That's sort of part of the issue I think is that to me, the player and the character are two different things, and the character can be sort of malleable depending on what the other RPer is into. I'unno, I'm probably overthinking stuff.
Regardless, I've updated with a few more custom kinks. They're kind of meh, but it's surprisingly difficult to explain why I'm into the things I'm into. I also added the best pictures I could find. Because apparently she's genderswapped Iniesta.
>>23834387
Most people will assume this.
If people start treating you as if you and your character is the same chances are you do not want to keep hanging out and/or playing with those people.
>>23834624
>>23834387
Character and player are different, but there's a lot of baggage associated with "Straight" that makes me assume the player is as well.
Also, since everyone knows it's me, I might as well link a few sample profiles to show off my hot as fuck kinks:
https://www.f-list.net/c/makoto%20inoue
https://www.f-list.net/c/hime%20morveuse
https://www.f-list.net/c/madison%20alexis%20dylan
https://www.f-list.net/c/alicia%20night
https://www.f-list.net/c/jamie%20bailey
https://www.f-list.net/c/hayley%20hayden
https://www.f-list.net/c/enzo%20marcone
https://www.f-list.net/c/chastity%20belmont
https://www.f-list.net/c/mutsumu%20valencia
And a few that aren't me that I like to show off:
https://www.f-list.net/c/rose%20blush
https://www.f-list.net/c/casey%20clark
https://www.f-list.net/c/adrianna
https://www.f-list.net/c/geeky%20nerdgirl
https://www.f-list.net/c/francisca%20valero
https://www.f-list.net/c/celli
^^ Those are the kind of people I bookmark. Their kinks are super good and if I weren't always tired and currently sick and also had nothing in common with them characterwise, I'd play with these people.
>>23831275
>sadly i cant really fix the avatar since im bad at art manipulation
You just need to understand that you must crop a square area, so that when the picture is resized by F-List to 100x100, it won't be stretched.
>>23834387
Don't think about it too much, Rory is triggered by any profile that lists 'Straight' as an orientation.
>>23835476
Please stop trying to start an argument. Not only is that completely unrelated to what I said, it's not adding anything to the thread for you to call me out.
>>23835480
Please stop replaying to this thread.
>>23835113
A...anon...some of your character seem like fun. Care to show me the ropes of F-List and test driving my first character?
>>23821654
Was this the previous thread? >>23756779
Was there really a 4 day gap of nothread in between? How was the vacation?
>>23836315
The vacation was clearly not enough.
>>23836238
I don't tend to RP often these days, and I'm really looking for a specific type of scene. Also unfortunately for you none of my transgender characters are older than mid twenties, and I none of them are even redheads. Although that last bit is a bit surprising, come to think of it.
>>23836315
Unrelated thread about the same topic. I'm not related to Rory in any way. Just hoped that it would be possible to get a normal thread going while he was gone... didn't work.
>>23836393
And what a time to attempt a fresh start on life.
https://fgts.jp/
>>23836393
Please stop trying to start arguments.
>>23836528
Interesting. Aren't there other archives? I never actually use them, but isn't there an official one?
Also, >>23836238 I don't really play as much as I should, but I will still hear you out, so if you're still around feel free to give me your idea. Or just tell me which of those characters in particular you liked.
I should probably just give up trying to find what I'm looking for and do femdom. I'm good at that and people want it.
>>23836652
I find it hilarious that you complain about people sitting in your room to report you, then sit in another room to report people. You insane fucking hypocrite.
>>23837047
What are you replying to.
And can we not.
>>23837074
Rory sat in one of our counterpart rooms on an alt and waited for people to shittalk him so he could report them. That's all.
>>23837086
But shittalking is only against the rules if the person isn't in the room and they don't know about it...
By observing the shittalking, the shittalking ceases to be reportable. This is some quantum physics-like shit here.
>>23837115
>on an alt
>>23837206
Still means he was present for it. Plus this is more ridiculous irony.
[21:32] Makoto Inoue: Kregasmia, please don't lurk the channel and PM the users to insult them. I didn't do that to you, and I would appreciate that same courtesy.
I love the use of the word courtesy here. Because courtesy is key when he's starting a petty flamewar between the chans.
Better topic.
A riddle: How many catboys would a Lactation Milf bring to the yard.
>>23837210
>Flamewar
Please stop being dramatic. For the record, she said she wasn't trying to start shit, so I unbanned her.
>>23837255
Enough that "NO MALES WHATSOEVER STOP PMING ME" won't change a damned thing.
>>23837255
The answer is 69, of course!
>>23837255
But she only has two breasts. She can only service two at once. There's going to be a huge line of catboys. Think of the mewling!
>>23837332
That's why you use bottles!
>>23837332
She lactates into a saucer, obviously.
>>23824111
For me it's not so much the banter as it is the little bits of conversation that actually happen during the real act when you're not movie characters. Stuff like "too hard?" "a little" or "hold on, the couch cushion keeps sliding" or "not right there, I'm ticklish" or so on.
>>23836652
Shut up and go away.
>>23838199
The slightly-awkward physical considerations of sex and the logistics involved are also Top Tier material for writing. Hair getting in the way, adjusting how you're sitting or lying to get more comfortable, sheets getting ruffled, actually keeping track of where everybody's limbs are, those sorts of things. Good shit.
I'm waffling between this name and 24601
https://www.f-list.net/c/jail-bait
(I really just made it for Malice's cop Elizabeth)
>>23838591
>Kicking your partner in the face
>1:5 bookmarks/views ratio
What's your conversion rate at?
>>23839152
no bookmarks allowed / 10
I am a bookmark hipster.
>>23839152
I've always felt like bookmarks are a poor indicator of interest.
Also the first PM Jail-Bait got was a non-name shota who's profile was just a kink list and "looking for a dominant female" saying "hi". Fuck me I remember why I stopped trying.
>>23839152
>>23839159
Yea fuck bookmarks just friend request since it's like a two-way bookmark. Plus it's like a take it or leave it thing. I don't want people bookmarking for later if I'm trying to play now.
I thought these threads were dead.
Oh well.
Rate my stupid monster pls
https://www.f-list.net/c/miami%20disco/
>>23840458
Eternally dead yet can never die.
Also, I saw it earlier and meant to say something. It seems like a neat idea when you get to the tl;dr explanation part, and I've been wanting to do "has some strange oddity but you don't notice" for a while (mostly with a demon girl's horns or a kitsune's tail), but the top half is just confusing.
Kind of reminds me of Song of Saya.
>>23840828
>has some strange oddity but you don't notice
I want a catgirl where her tail is barely visible under her skirt and her hair covers her ears.
>>23841098
What I mean is more like it exists and it should be obvious, but there's a sort of "Someone Else's Problem Field" that keeps anyone from noticing. That's how some of the stories of kitsune were. They'd have an obvious fox tail, but most people just never noticed it. For huldra (which are essentially Scandanavian kitsune, though sometimes they've got cow tails instead of fox tails, and they look like hollow logs from behind) if you notice, you're supposed to slightly say something like "ma'am, your slip is showing".
For the profile in question, it would be using this photoset and essentially she'd be a demon and have very obvious horns, but people aren't meant to notice or comment on them. Kind of hard to pull off in an RP, though, on top of my usual problems, so I've never bothered.
Threads on page 9, so I thought I'd give it a friendly bump.
Anyone ERPing anything interesting tonight?
>>23842303
Four words: Really gay demon sex.
>>23842321
Sounds about par for the course for this community.
>>23842303
>Wanting to bump it
I created a new profile and was super disappointed and remembered why I don't try. my basically-a-hub was PMed by another definitely-a-hub focused on misogyny play. I'm always uncomfortable with those type of profiles, but they seemed like they were able to distinguish IC from OOC. Unfortunately they wanted a long term scene that amounted to "that thing your profile is for" without anything at all specific in mind.
I just wanna get groped and frisked while wearing striped pajamas, is that so much to ask? I honestly thought the name alone would get me more attention.
I had a few other high concept profiles, too, but now I feel less enthused.
>>23840828
Yeah, I don't really know what I was doing with the first half of the profile. I was originally going to make it some sort of SCP type thing, but I realized that SCP is fucking gay and lame. I already wrote the whole thing by that time, and I felt like it'd be kind of a waste, so I added in the dumb conversation thing at the end.
I'll rewrite it eventually.
>>23842388
>while wearing striped pajamas
That part is oddly specific.
Which seems to be the problem in general in this community.
>>23842303
I did some first date sex ERP. It was fun to play out an inexperienced character bumbling about with another inexperienced character.
why?
>>23842856
>>23842671
That sounds really awesome. Virginity is one of my biggest fetishes, plus ERP needs more realistic portrayals of sex in general. It's cute and fun.
>>23842981
Yeah, realistic sex generally works for me the best. I wouldn't necessarily call it cute by default. There is realistic non-cute sex. But it's just the layer of complexity it adds to a scene that clicks with me. More "pornographic" or over the top scenes just seem too automatic, too mechanical.
>>23842401
Prison uniform, you dork.
>>23843418
It can be cute. Or it can be sexy as hell. Or both. But I'll take any of those options over the over the top pornographic stuff.
>>23843490
The thought crossed my mind, but for some reason I only considered that in the context of the Holocaust. I thought that was pretty fucked up, even for this community.
>>23843515
Hey, there are Nazi profiles. And yeah I'm mostly trying to avoid a "boy in the striped pajamas" direct reference, but I really do love me them old timey prison uniforms. As it says on my profile, though, I'm also good with oranges or greys or browns, or even fantasy prison outfits like potato sacks. Or patient scrubs for a mental institute.
Really it's all about BDSM and uniforms.
http://www.xvideos.com/video19648929/hot_emo_teen_punished_exploited_and_anally_fingered_by_doctor
Do we still post bad profiles here and make fun of them?
Because look at this stupid bullshit.
https://www.f-list.net/c/Tiberiosity%20Shade
>>23843638
That is pretty bad, but not nearly the worst thing I've seen on the site. Not even as bad as that god of death fellow who hung around /tg/ Chat.
>>23843714
Oh hey, found the profile.
https://www.f-list.net/c/d%20e%20a%20t%20h
Not nearly as bad as it used to be.
Got rid of all the custom No kinks that were whining about how people would not play with him or ignore him.
>>23843638
There was a girl in F-Chat earlier posting a profile of an anthropomorphic toilet, so, yeah, far from the worst profile I've seen.
>>23843724
.... Because whining about ignores is against F-Lists rules.
so uh. lol?
>>23843775
No. Not ignoring as in putting him on ignore.
Ignoring as in not responding to his RP requests.
Whining around this is incredibly common.
>>23843730
http://gelbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=2886499
No relation?
>>23843730
The other /erp/ has a profile called Preheated Oven
>>23844330
>Preheated Oven
>>23844330
I don't even need context, but this amuses me.
An anthro-toilet however, disgusts me.
>>23844513
That's probably a joke profile
>>23843775
What. Whining isn't disallowed, it's gloating about it or saying you're doing it that's verboten. Unless I missed something.
>Publicly announcing ignores or reports about another user
>announcing that you are ignoring someone in chat is malicious, and will result in action against you.
>>23843638
I've seen this guy around in the elf chat, he's always trying to pick someone up in the chat itself. Glad to know I'm not the only one who thinks his profile is retarded.
>>23845143
>the elf chat,
Is that a euphemism for Force/Non-Con?
No, you mean Elf Lovers. Didn't realize that existed. How bad is he in there.
>>23845192
He literally just sits there for most of the day schmoozing and trying to pick up any elf women that show up in the chat. I've had that chat pinned for months and he's been in there every single time I look.
Probably afk some of the time of course, but he's there 24/7.
>Player approaches me, compliments me on interesting profile and ad.
>Talks about how he also likes strong character driven stories.
>Aww yes, sounding good.
>Check his profile, simple but no red flags, a few customs mentioning etiquette.
>Nothing outstanding, don't be a jerk, don't poof without saying goodbye, don't hate when you can politely refuse.
>Start talking scene ideas.
>He mentions his characters are all macros.
>Recheck profile, macros never mentioned.
>Ask about the macro thing, if that's a big deal for him.
>He says it is, but if I'm not into it he can just go, no biggie.
>Politely agree, macro isn't my thing, no offense.
>Immediately throws raging hissy fit about how I wasted his time and was a huge let down and he hates me for ruining his day.
>Laugh and point out that he came to me, macros aren't mentioned on either of our profiles, and I was being exactly as polite as his profile demanded.
Why are some people such flakes. I'm glad I caught it early, someone who only pretends to be polite until you don't have anything they want, then reveals themselves as colossal assholes is not someone I want to play with.
Any girls into wearing latex/masks and playing with anthro males here?
>>23845838
>anthro
>>23845920
I'm looking at your f-list... says you like latex, and that furries are okay, eh?
>>23845838
>>23845945
How much knotting is involved? Assuming werewolf or horse.
Also it'd be easier to post your profile when advertising but I can see being shy about that at first.
>>23845961
Nah I'm fine with it, just didn't feel like posting it right out the gate.
https://www.f-list.net/c/eddie%20gusthorn/
No knots, even on my canine character. And no sheaths in general with any of my characters.
>>23845945
I only have it to "Furries okay" because some people are weird and think that monstergirls/boys are furries for whatever reason.
>>23845987
Ah, then they're dumb and you're a cocktease.
>>23845989
I know I'm literally a hitler
Sieg Zeon
>>23846013
Well I bookmarked you anyway. You may get unsolicited messages.
>>23845987
I've literally never run into anyone who's seen "no furries" and thought monstergirls didn't count, and it's not like you couldn't put that on a custom.
>>23845967
>No knots, even on my canine character. And no sheaths in general with any of my characters.
Literally why
>>23846041
I don't like 'em, that's why! I like having a flaccid dong swing free.
>>23846041
>literally never run into anyone who's seen "no furries" and thought monstergirls didn't count,
There are too many negatives in this sentence.
Assuming you meant 'thought monsterfolk count as furries'.
>>23846041
I've asked a 'no furries' person as my naga before and the person sounded conflicted as to my furry status so I dunno, though it is a male character. Furries themselves always seem to think I'm furry for some reason and try to get me to go super feral.
>>23846181
Nagas are anthro-ish, and taur-ish
>>23846190
They're also monsterpeople-ish, much like lamia. Mine's actually pretty close to being like a lamia, just a bit more scaly, but there are no real male lamia as far as I know.
Anyway, the line's pretty blurry and as someone who roleplays one, it can be tough to tell if someone who's not into furries (or doesn't even have a preference listed) would be into you unless they have Monsters listed as a kink.
>>23846181
>male naga
Naga like human from waist up, or a full ophidian scaley snek man with hemipenes.
I'm gonna leave my Skype here since I'm gonna be going for the night soon, and maybe not all the ERPers here have an f-list. I can be a dom of varying degrees.
Skype: danzigmf310
>>23846333
More the latter, but with humanlike facial features.
>>23846063
I've never seen a catgirl go "oh, I guess they don't want me" when someone had No Furries.
>>23846181
>the person sounded conflicted as to my furry status
But why would that even matter? Whether a naga is or isn't a furry should have no bearing on whether they want or don't want to fuck you.
>>23846333
No one actually plays traditional naga, which are just snakes with human heads, basically
>>23846423
People are weird and picky af, it really can't be explained. She ended up saying sure because she was curious about being coiled up and we had a longterm RP for a while.
>>23846423
Dood, you don't even play. You have no idea how people on F-List at large behave.
>>23847964
Whether I play or not has no bearing on whether I know how other people behave. I've looked at a couple thousand profiles.
>>23848590
How does that possibly equal knowing how other people interpret or react to profiles?
>never seen a catgirl go "oh, I guess they don't want me" when someone had No Furries.
>Whether a naga is or isn't a furry should have no bearing on whether they want or don't want to fuck you.
Simply never seeing custom kinks that say "I will react this way in this hypothetical situation" doesn't mean anything.
The only statement that makes sense based on passive profile-browsing alone is "No one actually plays traditional naga".
>>23848627
>traditional naga
SNAK BLOWJORBS?
>>23848590
Soooo... what you're saying is that you've never interacted with the people. So speaking otherwise - you don't know shit.
And I say this very specifically due to having problems with the monster-girl/monster-guy vs. furry distinction myself. On both sides of it at that. Monsters really are a grey area on F-List and how people interpret it is an individual thing. Not something you can make board, sweeping and (as is usual in your case) uninformed blanket statements about.
You got shit on in this exact thread for making a dumb and uninformed statement of this sort once already. Maybe take that as a clue?
>>23848627
Because I've seen catgirl profiles that want to play with other catgirls but have No Furries. I've also seen plenty of people playing catgirls. Whether I play or not has no bearing on whether I see other people doing things.
>>23848924
>I've never seen
>I, personally, have never witnessed that incident within my experience
I'm not even using figurative language here. Even if I was, what purpose does it even serve to go "well nuh uh!" in the first place?
In my personal sphere of experiences, I have more often seen people explicitly saying they're okay with catgirls even though they're set to No Furries than I have say that catgirls should stay away because they're furry. I've seen plenty of people complain that catgirls are weeaboo, but I can't recall seeing anyone call them furry outside of /d/. To reiterate and make explicitly clear, I am only talking about what I have observed for myself.
And frankly the argument is ridiculous anyway. If you want catgirls or monstergirls to play with you regardless of your furry preferences, just put it in a custom. Most monster rape profiles I've seen are No Furries anyway.
>>23848958
Yes and as it was pointed out you have shit all experience.
Thank you for admitting it.
>>23848966
Look, you know my profiles, so in the future please just Note or PM me instead of starting arguments in the thread.
>>23848987
You were asked nicely not to post, the leading post mentioned it. You even said the threads needed time off. There was a huge survey about you being a negative influence. And you still made it obvious who you are and refused to leave. Just go.
>>23848926
They prefer to be called nekomimis or cats-of-flesh! Jesus, how insensitive!
>>23848924
This, it can be difficult to interpret what someone thinks of monsterpeople in relation to furries. Even in a fantasy setting things can seem vague.
Furries themselves usually fuck anything that moves though, so they aren't as hard to approach.
>>23848987
No. I have no interest in interacting with you at all. That's why from the start of the thread I requested that you DO NOT POST.
Now please. Stop posting and go away.
>>23849001
There were 3 different surveys, all of them showed people don't want him around. And he made one of them himself. (But then completely ignored what it had to say because he didn't like the outcome.)
>F-list
https://www.f-list.net/c/monica%20leksak/
https://www.f-list.net/c/paul%20tuff/
Pretty much self explanatory, feel free to send me a note.
>>23849062
>young boy
>Age: 15
Pick a side! We're at war. Shota or teenage boy in high school?
>>23849078
Everything below 18 years old is a child. But the second it ticks over to 18... BAM! Adult.
I'm going to continue posting. Whether my presence upsets you or not doesn't matter. Ignore my post ID instead of trying to chase me out of the thread. I'm not going to keep arguing with you.
>>23849005
>cats-of-flesh
Jesus, what a terrifying mental image.
And yet somewhat arousing all the same...
>>23849078
15 is pretty young.
>>23849062
You have a lot of spelling and grammatical errors, and your characters don't really have much to them beyond "they're young". You really should at least get some pictures (folks here tend to like using Gelbooru, and I'd recommend rule34.xxx, though that site is getting sketchier and sketchier, so make sure you've got a good adblock).
As a suggestion, you also might want to not list a definite age for your ageplay characters. As >>23849078 implies, people can be rather particular about the specific ages. Some people want explicit loli or shota, while other people don't want anyone younger than high school age, even if they seem way under age.
>>23849109
Yep, sure. Just stay where no one wants you. Nothing different for you.
>>23849115
"No one" is an exaggeration.
>>23849171
True. Most people are indifferent.
But otherwise the polls show that the people who don't want him around outnumber the people who do by a factor of 5 to 10. And that's quite a gap.
Look, I know he's mentally challenged and can't help himself. But he also happens to be basically the biggest problems with this threads. Insisting he stays here is insisting that he has the right to ruin other people's fun.
And he doesn't. Just saying in case it's not obvious.
>>23849248
Your argument is pretty flimsy when he's actually posting on topic and you're just sperg-flailing at him.
Shut up and ignore him, you're not the fucking Thread Police.
Related to the subject of the actual thread instead of me:
Normies talk about SFM porn
https://youtu.be/0NqR75PLa7s
I really hate you guys sometimes
http://www.strawpoll.me/10345950
Bump
>>23849451
What did Lili do this time?
>>23852091
That is Lili. Basically doing her same old same old.
>>23852108
What a dork.
ERP TTRPG games when
>>23852091
>>23852108
People are always bitching that Rory's the problem, and that the thread and community would be better if he left. Earlier in this thread it was demonstrated that *I'm* the problem too, and we all know I'm just mini-Rory, or Rory's puppy or whatever else. And since I'm clearly not making any ERP happen (so there's no particular reason for me to want to make you all suffer for my enjoyment), and a lot of people have a problem with me, and all I can seem to do is provide lulz for the shitposters, I figured maybe I should clean up the thread/community a bit and remove the one problem I can affect. That being, me.
>>23852485
I'm not a regular here, but from what I can gather, the problem is mostly that everyone won't stop bitching.
Come on guys. ERP is about love.
It's occasionally violent and hateful, but it's still love.
>>23852485
>I'm not making ERP happen
Because you're not messaging me, that's why :^)
Quit sperging out, it's unbecoming. This is a typefucking thread on an anime imageboard. Stop taking it so seriously.
>>23852485
Your attention whoring is a problem, yes. Every time I see you posting you bitch about leaving. Then you don't. You just keep posting and bitching about how you are leaving. And when you "leave" you come back just a bit later and bitch some more.
>it's an erpg comes into other chat to try to start shit episode
lel you kikes are sad, getting Oppa banned for a day because Rory was asshurt was pretty funny
>>23852961
>for a day
Three days, wasn't it? After his spergtastic argument with Nantei, I'm sorta glad karma came back to bite him :^)
>>23852961
Also, tell one of your mods to retroactively ban buncha already. Fuck he's annoying.
Why is everyone but me so autistic
Is there a handy dandy guide on how to F-List?
>>23853122
Having just figured it out this week, my advice would be to look at as many other profiles as you can for inspiration and to get an idea of what a "good" profile looks like. I thought it was silly but it's proven completely true that a good profile goes a long way. After that, I tend to just lurk F-Chat and respond to ads I'm interested in. Most people are surprisingly straightforward.
>>23828452
>no furry characters
>likes knotted cock
pick one
>>23852961
The only one who got Oppa banned is Oppa.
>>23852492
>the problem is mostly that everyone won't stop bitching.
This is an accurate assessment. Although to be fair, ERPing does encourage bitching. It wouldn't be so bad if we were actually bitching about those parts. I really want to get play on my new profile, but I feel so discouraged by F-list and the people who use it.
