any feminist on /soc/?
>anal anna
sounds like a classy girl
i can't imagine why she'd be treated like a whore
I'm probably the most laid back radfem you'll ever meet, hello
>>23580055
what is a radfem mean?
>>23580271
What is a google?
>>23579966
No, i'm not a Feminist.
>>23580271
Radical Feminism.
>>23579976
Also, anal has more than one meaning.
Feminism is cancer
>>23580293
Yet there are more people who like feminism than people who like you.
>>23580823
There are probably more people that like cancer than likes them, as well.
>>23580055
Hi me too let's be friends :)
>>23581787
Sure! I don't follow all the radfem ideals though, I don't hate men and I don't hate trans people, I also quite like BDSM which tends to be a big no for radfems, I like to spank qts I can't help it. Basically all other things about radical feminism appeals to me though
>>23583397
All the radfems I know are pretty intersectional and I always thought the whole "all men must die" thing was kind of a joke towards people who don't understand feminism haha. I don't hate men either (I'm engaged to a pretty awesome one) and IMO the partiarchy is also damaging to men (obviously in a completely different way, for example the alpha/beta male mentality, toxic masculinity, pressures to be stereotypically masculine etc I could go on and on). I don't hate trans people either, and while I'm not into BDSM myself I'm all about sexual freedom and empowerment (as long as it's consensual).
>>23580273
it have a different meaning to different feminist, so im asking what radical feminism mean to that anon
>>23583489
The all men must die thing is a joke but I know a lot of radfems who think all men are evil because they've been conditioned this way by society and that they want women only spaces like women only cities. I agree with you on the rest of this though completely, I'm anti gender, anti porn(because it makes for bad sex and it's just terrible in general) my interest in bdsm is one of my shameful radfem things
>>23583497
This picture isn't very accurate, but I would say that I'm both equal pay and patriarchy feminist if we're going by this picture, but mostly equal pay
>>23583547
women already have equal pay, the wage gap is a myth.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrbS537nnso
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58arQIr882w
>>23583567
No it isn't and mostly I was just saying I agreed with the "equal pay" woman, also I'm not about to argue with you on 4chan or watch any stupid inaccurate videos that you think will change my mind sorry buddy
>>23583567
>stupid inaccurate videos
videos by an actual feminist academic. ok, enjoy your ignorance then!
>>23583625
Oh sweetie if you think every feminist agrees with each other you have another thing coming
>>23583635
when did I ever say that? the difference is that there are feminists who actually rely on facts, and feminists who exist in a state of perpetual victimhood and shout "patriarchy" and "misogyny" at everything.
>>23583497
I'm a feminist whose beliefs fall more in line with the first and second wave. I'm also a male.
>>23583660
Good! A lot of the third wave feminism bothers me because they use "slut shaming" as actual feminism discourse and they think adopting a million different genders and ~identities~ is helpful in any way, they also ignore sex based oppression which bothers the fuck out of me. Like are the girls in Africa getting FGM performed on them able to just ~identify~ out of being female so they don't have to deal with it? No, it's bullshit
>>23583625
>>23583567
Here's another video by an actual feminist explaining why the wage gap being a myth, is a myth.
http://everydayfeminism.com/2015/06/wage-gap-not-a-myth/
Also, with regards to the end of this video I'm ALL for paid paternity leave for new fathers as well as maternity leave. Many countries have already adopted this but unfortunately the US is pretty far behind for both.
>>23583397
the only reason radfem dislike BDSM is becuase 70 to 80 percent of women into it are subs, keeping up the idea women are subordinate to men
I'd say I'm a feminist, but certainly not a radfem.
I think I'd be put in the third wave from this post, >>23583497 but I'd like to clarify why.
I believe that sexual violence disproportionately affects women, and I believe that the male victims of these crimes (especially violence perpetrated by women) are treated terribly, primarily because society believes that for a man to be victimized by a woman is somehow emasculating. I believe a primary cause of this is societal perceptions of the genders.
My feminism is trans inclusive, and while I personally cannot understand gender fluidity and non binary genders, I don't think I have the right to speak for these people or tell them whether their experiences with gender are valid.
I have a Tumblr account which almost immediately makes everything I say invalid.
Not American nor middle/upper class by any stretch.
I believe rape culture exists.
>>23580055
Hahahahahahahahaha.
>unironically being a "RADFEM"
How about that
