/erpg/ - Tasteful Dominance Edition
I think it's time we admit the usual copypaste thread intro doesn't work.
But let's talk about scenes of actual BDSM. How do you play them, have you enjoyed them, do you want to do them, and do you have one in mind?
If you're not a BDSM focused character, feel free to share your profile anyway, and talk about what scenes do interest you.
========================
JOIN 4CHAN /ERPG/ CHANNEL
========================
Just get on https://www.f-list.net/chat/ and type
/join ADH-59dc867b2b8dc5bf159d
That will take you right to the channel.
https://www.f-list.net/c/max%20willow/
Looking for:
- Nice cutesy hug-lewds
- "Big Sister" style stuff (18+ only tho)
- Back-alley beat 'n' fuck stuff
- Criminal stuff
- BDSM (Loving/Cruel)
p-pls respond
https://www.f-list.net/c/a%20passing%20traveller/
This is no longer a character hub and doesn't fit the theme of the thread, but I'll post her anyways because I like this image. None of you can stop me.
>>23246783
How good is f-list about finding partners? DPP is atrocious for msubs.
>>23247044
DPP?
Also, nowhere will be good for male subs. Male submissives will always be in high supply and low demand. That's why you have women who can get paid to be dominants.
>>23247044
I'd recommend being proactive on approaching people when you're an "unpopular" sort of character archetype like that. It's definitely not impossible, but don't expect much now.
>>23246850
also looking for thoughts on profile + advice to update profile
>>23247464
First paragraph of Appearance could use more sentence variety, every single one uses "and" at least once which gets a little jarring. The rest of that section is nice, second paragraph especially.
As far as kinks go, I'd say to perhaps include a couple of "guiding" ones to give a better idea of the sort of scenes you want. Probably not outright scene suggestions, but "Nice cutesy hug-lewds" and "Big Sister" stuff wasn't exactly the first thing that popped to mind when I read over the description or checked the kinks. The other stuff did though, so I suppose that's a good sign.
Overall it's decent quality, good job.
>>23246783
>Dominance
>Tasteful
Pick one
I'm looking for advice for these two profiles:
https://www.f-list.net/c/tony%20t/
https://www.f-list.net/c/sherman%20poindexter/
>>23248498
What's not tasteful about dominance?
>>23248720
Use gelbooru for pictures. It's really just a preference, but most people here are going to be a lot more comfortable with drawn images than real life images, and even among people who like real life images, you're still just using headless twinks.
Second, your characters aren't really characters, they're just avenues for your fetish. Sure, that's ultimately what F-list is for, but you have to entice someone to play with you first, and people are more likely to play with characters that are unique and interesting.
The Sherman character is also just really dumb and a stereotype/trope that I find increasingly more ridiculous as the world goes on. You're telling me that this "nerd" stock character has a massive cock and somehow never noticed? He's in the demographic most likely to look up internet porn, but he's somehow never so much as Googled his junk? You can end up learning about dicks by accident on the internet. I know the American education system is atrocious when it comes to sex ed, but come the fuck on, anyone over 16 is going to know what dicks are supposed to look like, and which dicks get labeled "Monster Cocks". Even guys who don't pour over Wikipedia articles will still Google around to learn what size is average to ensure themselves they aren't 'small'.
Anyway get better pictures. This might surprise you, but most women are attracted to faces anyway, so... Creepy headless images aren't going to get you much play.
>>23246783
>I think it's time we admit the usual copypaste thread intro doesn't work.
I think there's no harm in leaving it in, and taking it out leaves newcomers utterly confused. Bring it back, I say.
>>23249036
Well, the idea is we can use the starter for more if we take away the copypasta. Because it only has about 30 characters left to say anything.
>>23249023
Some of us (well, just me, okay) like fronting the more antisocial aspects of it outright. Just doesnt feel right to me dressing it up as something super-mystical.
I mean dressing it up like that can be fun, but in the back of my mind I am still thinking "Yeah... I'm just getting off on beating someone up, arn't I?"
>>23249066
Split it into two posts or something, then
>>23249284
>something super-mystical
>I'm just getting off on beating someone up
I'm pretty sure you're not even talking about BDSM.
>>23246783
Best BDSM scene I've done was barely even sexual. It started with 2 people who trust each other agreeing ahead of time, meeting up and then the Dom proceeding to beat the shit out of me in rather deliciously exotic ways while of course making sure every now and then my character was okay (particularly after the bamboo sword beating and the water-torture)
People seem to always forget that Masochists exist
>>23249284
That doesn't mean that dominance can't be tasteful. In fact, when I say "tasteful dominance" I mean "not brutal rape where you love it because this shemale has the biggest cock and girls love getting painfully raped with a foot long kidney puncher, right?"
>>23249605
You don't?
https://www.f-list.net/c/raven%20phoenix
Renovated an old profile's text. Kinks are to be edited. Any thoughts?
(Inb4 real pics -- I can't really get better art that looks similar.)
>>23249822
I feel like you repeat too many of your customs between profiles, such that it diminishes each different/individual profile's focus and impact, makes it hard to get a handle on who they are (sexually) and what you're after with them. If I were to read your kinks I'd think that almost every single one of your profiles was for abduction and vivisection by Lovecraftian aliens, and it distracts from any other message the profile might have.
Unless that is the intended message, in which case, rock on.
>>23249986
>>23249822
I think that every character should have unique kinks tailored to them.
This may be one of the reasons I haven't made any new profiles lately. My last really doesn't really have much in the way of customs https://www.f-list.net/c/lorelai%20walker/
Or anything else. One reason I haven't "used" it for anything but sitting around
>>23250068
> Kinks are to be edited.
>>23250068
You don't use your profiles for anything to begin with.
>>23250141
Maybe one day I will! You don't know me!
I'll have you know I'm even technically running two games, when I'm not sleeping for hours on end. On that note, time for a nap.
>>23250193
'Technically' being a key word. How long has that first one been in set up without a single ACTUAL session run yet? The fact that you started a second game without actually doing much for the first is something I'd be a bit peeved about as a player after jumping through hoops to get a character made for exactly what you want to run.
https://www.f-list.net/c/deity%20of%20war%20bellona
Looking for partners, rather new character to booth. The best way to win my heart is sending me a note, since I am probably going to hit the chat a little less than usual these days.
I feel dirty for having made this, but I made it just the same
https://www.f-list.net/c/Caroline%20Cockslut
>>23250858
>https://www.f-list.net/c/Caroline%20Cockslut
Is the no males thing a genuine kink or a nod to her whole feminism angle?
>>23250858
>pansexual
>no males
>>23250882
mostly a joke, I have strange standards for men. Basically, I can't let them be on top if they come across like pussies.
>>23250858
>no male-type characters
>pansexual
>pictures mostly involve going down on male dick
If that was the joke, it's a pretty good one. There's a ton of 'pansexual' female profiles who do that and are completely serious about it.
>>23250961
Joke landed at a 10/10. I got a great laugh out of it. But makes sense, if you're looking for a man you want one that acts like one.
>>23250858
>tfw no ficki ficki to be redpilled by
>>23250961
Oh hey, it's you.
>>23251192
What?
>>23251197
"My mother is a dominatrix", etc?
>>23251203
I don't have a character who's mother is a dominatrix
>>23251219
Mistook you for someone else, then. Not a character, a player. They had a similar attitude about men, and claimed that it was for the extremely plausible and definitely not made-up reason that their mother (that is, the player's actual RL mother) is a dominatrix.
Yeah. It was pretty much hilarious.
>>23250858
Honestly I think it's dumb. I "get" the "joke", but it's still dumb. It also just feels inconsistent. Also, Poison makes handcuffs as a bracelet work.
I feel like you can't decide whether you want an actual Redpiller's strawman of a feminist something else. And you shouldn't write an in-character intro if your character's personality is annoying. I'm also not sure why you used [big] for all of it. Or why you put the last bit in a [quote].
I wish someone would link the Elzi edit of that image, too. The one with smegma on the dick.
Also you've copied your kinks over from another profile instead of rewriting them, so your Toilet Play kink is dominant, and refers to "the hideout", probably from some supervillain profile.
In fact, most of your kinks refer to the reader, not your character.
Honestly, I feel like if you're going to do something you should do it right.
>>23251234
That might be the best bullshit f-list story ever. Right up there with that murderhobo elf chick that was like a legal council, dying of literally every disease, got locked in a freezer, shot in the head, and was part of a gang.
>>23251269
I think some of what Kliss says is true. The trouble is figuring out what. Ironically, "I'm a clinical sociopath", while ridiculous sounding, is the most plausible.
>>23250733
Less than usual? who are you? Or did you mean the /tg/chat?
>In poetry the name Bellona is often used simply as a synonym for war, but the goddess often appears as a character in the Thebaid of Statius, symbolising war’s destructive and belligerent aspect. There she is represented as carrying a spear and a flaming torch or waving a blood-stained sword and riding in a chariot.[5]
Brutal
> Her priests were known as Bellonarii and used to wound their own arms or legs as a blood sacrifice to her.[2]
Wicked.
Also, your guestbook is a testament to how easymode canons are, especially MOBA characters. Three days old and already more Guestbook posts than most Bitchbreakers.
Main advice is to not just copy kinks, though. First one I hit on looks like the generic "Kink References" kink for Bad Ends. Same with Ass to Mouth.
>>23251340
Kliss is still around? I honestly was affraid she kicked it.
>>23249284
> but in the back of my mind I am still thinking "Yeah... I'm just getting off on beating someone up, arn't I?"
and your point is...?
>>23250230
Ahaha he did whaaat?
Fucking priceless.
Finding these incidental updates in the thread is glorious free circus.
>>23252002
>>23250230
What?
I've run the three preludes and Thursday the game starts for real. I just happen to have also started doing a one on one for someone.
None of my current players have had to jump through hoops. The one person who made ME jump through hoops is no longer part of the game.
>>23251710
Maybe for some people theres some real fancyness involving concepts like trust or control... but I just dont see it all that way I suppose.
>>23252156
That's not called "dominance", that's just called "being a selfish jerk".
>>23251340
Ehy, thanks for the feedback! I know about copying kinks and I am sorry, but I am slowly adding my own. I just felt like I needed some custom to better specify what I am looking for.
>>23252451
>other peoples sexual tastes are disgusting because i say so
>>23252664
At no point did I say that. Rape is a perfectly legitimate fetish too, as is cannibalism, or scat, or soul vore (look it up, it's a thing). But what's being discussed in this reply chain is not "dominance" in the sense that F-List (and the broader BDSM community) understands it.
Some people get off on (roleplaying) being a selfish jerk. Some people get off on (roleplaying) having it done to them. Neither fact changes the definition of any of the words involved. You can't point at a duck and say "that's a cupcake". I mean, you can, but it'd be false.
>>23252701
you're literally saying
>you're a cunt because i dont like how you express your sexuality
>>23252734
man whats with this guy
>>23252701
Naw naw. Its more that people like to dress these things up as something much more there. Trust is a pretty big thing even if you are looking at it casually but I guess if I had to put things bluntly, I don't get or understand the 'tastefull' side of it.
>>23252822
well, if it makes you feel any better i've never heard of a bigot who is into bdsm before
>>23252830
shucks man, its like you barely know me.
>>23252822
"Tasteful" as in "treating the other person as a person and using proper safety techniques, or at the very least some sense of verisimilitude to make the whole affair more than just beating someone".
>>23252830
Well I mean, I have.
>>23252734
No, you're a cunt because you're bitching up the thread. But to the point at hand, >>23252701 is saying that >>23252156 >>23249284 is a selfish jerk for "fronting the antisocial aspect of it", and failing to understand th--Oh Goddamnit that's Bunchacrunch.
Bunchacrunch you missed the whole fucking point.
>>23252880
>I like to whinge: The post
>>23252880
Most likely (concepts just not that tasteful to me) but I imagine its a big 'thing' for some people. They just seem silly to me.
>>23252945 however is either even more oblivious - or a troll. But probably both!
>>23252967
You've literally told someone their sexuality is wrong, mate you're an idiot
>How i feel knowing there are people this stupid
>>23253017
I like you.
This thread is off to a lovely start.
>>23253058
Indeed. Let's derail it with lewds (from our characters)
>>23253093
You think I have lewds of my characters?
>>23253126
I sure hope you do!
>>23253145
I wish! Maybe one day.
>>23253218
This is what I enjoy about Canon Characters, you find lewd without having to commission it. Though I also have characters based around images I've found, like this one (warning: might be a little strong for someone)
I really like to play a female sub in hardcore bdsm.
The problem i allways encounter are that
a) if i am bound i cant really say anything else then i wiggle around and what i feel. Oftentimes doms get bored that they controle the hole action.
or
b) that i have to dom myself because the dominant partner has no idea what he wants in the scene or is afraid that i bail ship if he gets to extreme.
Anyone have an idea to get around these things?
>https://www.f-list.net/c/kiboshi%20seishiro
How're these Screenshots for Images? It'll probably be a long road to finding art of the specific hair style, color, horn, etc. so hopefully they're serviceably erotic until then.
>>23253348
a)gitgud and find better partners
b)find better partners and gitgud
More seriously though: yes, wiggling and feelings is what you do. No way around it, doms just have to accept it if they do this degree of bondage. Read some Aislinne's logs, even if latex isn't your jam, she restraints victims pretty severely so you can pick up some hints.
On b, be more explicit with stuff you like in profile text and actual discussion with partner.
What's the appropriate amount of times you should message people before giving them a chance to either message you first or take a break from you? This is my concern 24/7 when talking to partners.
>>23252144
You mean they didn't have to all get their characters tweaked and okay-ed by you to fit into a stupid setting because you felt that using Batman mythos would help you avoid world building?
>>23254425
>tweaking characters and getting them OK'd by the GM for the setting pre-game
Sounds like Tabletop Gaming to me, mate.
>>23254425
No more so than they'd need to get their characters tweaked and okayed by me to fit into a New York setting.
I had one character who was proving problematic, and he was the one most interested in the Batman aspects. The problem is he wasn't as interested in the Werewolf aspects, and felt that it was my place to get his character into that world, as opposed to working with me on it to make someone who had the system-assumed ties.
Plus, >>23254499 that's how RPGs work.
Looking for your big break, trying to get into the movie business, or something more risqué? Will is the guy to know, if you're willing to work for it.
>https://www.f-list.net/c/william%20dancer/
>tfw too lazy to work on the profile I came up with almost a month ago
kill me pls
>>23254634
N'bad at all. I'm surprised the good ol' casting couch doesn't see more use around here.
>>23254425
You are trying real hard to shitpost here. As one of the aforementioned players, I knew what the assumptions of setting and system were, and made a character to fit them. Just like I do any time I make a character for a game.
You're just really reaching.
>>23251203
>>23251234
>>23251269
What's extra hilarious is they probably stole it from a webcomic.
>>23255089
Hrm. Which is that? Menage a 3?
No, it's that one with the transgirl and the robot buddies and the dumb nerd main character. Shortstack? It's one of those long running comics that's mostly slice of life but somehow still popular. Gets cross referenced on TVTropes a lot.
>>23255289
questionable content
its walky/shortpacked/dumbing of age is another guy
>>23255337
Dumbing of Age was actually pretty neat. That's the one with the blatantly autistic dinosaur obsessed lesbian, and the girl who is a wannabe superhero?
>>23255348
Yes that's the one.
Although Dina is probably less "LESBIAAAAANISM HO" and more "I don't see the big deal about orientations. And also not very good at borders between types of attraction.".
>>23253093
>Let's derail it with lewds (from our characters)
>>23255659
...I don't get it
>>23253058
How do you call this kind of art? It's the sexiest in my opinion.
>>23254107
>noteplay with someone
>sudden hiatus
>wait a bit before asking if they lost interest or just busy
>thought she had sent a note when she hadn't
>goes on for a little while longer happens again
>too afraid to seem pushy to ask again
>months go by
>profile is deleted
>half a year later other two profiles i knew of are deleted
Never figured out why, but the latter disappearance came somewhat after i personally felt my own notes weren't quite good enough. Not knowing annoys me.
Kinda happened again more recently, pretty much exactly the same way, me feeling my latest note was fucking terrible after things having gone so well. Still no profile deletion so i still have time. But course for me to believe it's something i'm doing wrong.
>>23255939
The hiatus bits are why I never really do noteplay. The alternative of chat-based RP feels a bit forcefull at times to try and churn out a post in 10 minutes, but honestly I think it keeps the momentum going.
>>23256096
The thing i came to like about noteplays was coming home pr waking up to see what was new. That and screwy unreliable oppertunities to chat was an issue.
>>23256096
So much this. The shame of sitting on a reply for 20 minutes is the only thing that keeps me from taking literally forever. Notes would just never happen.
>>23256118
>screwy unreliable oppertunities to chat
But this is also a thing, and it makes me wish I thought for even a moment that I was capable of notes. I am so not.
>>23256118
Yeah, that's the big thing that makes noteplay viable at all. Still doesn't outbalance the ease of loss and funked-up flow, for me.
>>23253348
>a) if i am bound i cant really say anything else then i wiggle around and what i feel
Cheat. Look at people with eyes that almost say something, have expressions that ask questions, take advantage of the written medium. There is a limited pool of things to do without speech or agency, but you can play around with things you technically can't do, but do anyway.
You know what just ruins my day? .jpg artifacts
>>23257763
Me too.
Hey /erp/, how do I make this profile good? I got really excited when I was making it, but the interest is... minimal. Is yandere just not a thing? Are mimics just not a thing?
https://www.f-list.net/c/yandere%20mimic/
>>23258116
>Is yandere just not a thing?
Anything that implies killing generally cuts the audience pretty substantially, from what I've seen, unless it's an audience that's already pretty okay with the idea (like vore furries or something). In this case, you're primarily angling for /tg/ and related sorts, and they're generally more the happy ending sorts (or at least, the more formulaic bad endings, breeding and enslavement and the like).
>>23258136
Huh. I guess I didn't think of it that way; I figured the RP'd be more about the desperate affection and less about actually eating the competition, but I can see how it'd come off otherwise. Time for an overhaul.
>>23258136
Plenty of people like yandere. 4chan NEETs think having a clingy girlfriend who exists only as a cipher for their own neediness and insecurities would be just the best. The "murder you" part is not the big attraction, the "obsessed about you" part is.
>>23258161
Yeah, which means I probably ought to find a way to make it seem less about the brutality and more about the clinginess. I don't think it's really clear enough what the profile's geared toward; it needs better focus.
>>23258185
Honestly it looks fine to me. You only made it yesterday, don't worry if you're not getting swarmed, especially when your character is niche and doesn't even have genitals.
Although on that note: Keyhole
>>23258192
Problem is, I sort of did get swarmed. Just by the wrong types. Two blank profiles, a generic anime boy who described himself on his profile as 'bland,' and an OC League of Legends character. That's... not the sort I want to attract. Like >>23258136 said, I'm angling for /tg/ sorts, and right now it looks like I might be using the wrong kind of bait. Unless I'm just overthinking the whole thing, since I get paranoid about stuff like this.
>>23258231
If you make a good profile, you're going to get shitters.
If you make a bad profile, you're going to get shitters.
I don't want to sound rude, I am just wondering what the rationality behind role playing is? Do you mostly view it as a chance to be someone else because you dislike your self? Or is it just innocent fun to pass the time? I've tried rp before but I just felt silly and awkward. Again, I don't want to sound rude or be offensive, I'm just curious as to the rationality behind it for people, cause maybe I'm just looking at it wrong
>>23258394
It's fun, mostly. Like improvisational acting and character writing all in one. Building up a character and developing them and bouncing them off of other people's ideas and characters to see what falls out.
And then, of course, the fetishes.
>>23258405
I can dig that. I don't think it's for me, but I can respect it enough
>>23258394
>Do you mostly view it as a chance to be someone else because you dislike your self?
Do you play video games because you view it as a chance to be someone else because you dislike your self?
In a way, this is a video game not confined to the limitations of coding. And also >>23258405
>And then, of course, the fetishes.
"I hate myself" isn't uncommon, especially in our first world of antidepressants and psychological illnesses, but that's not the root of escapism. "I want to experience something different" is. The reason is the thing itself.
>>23258424
So most of you just view it as a way to express stuff you would find hard to do other wise? Like with your fetishes or character traits? I usually play comp games tho, so it's more about improving my skills in the confines of the game, not improving my character in the game. But I'm not unfamiliar with the game tropes of rpgs, so I do understand your point
>>23258463
Imagine being able to custom tailor pornography to exactly your desire every time, no matter how outlandish it is. No restrictions, no rules, just the full freedom to fuck whatever you want, however you want.
See that dick? You can climb it.
>>23258470
I think, while that might draw some people, creative types probably, it doesn't hold a lot of stock with me just because of the way I think about things. The entire time I would just focus on how undeniably fake it is. Like I tried dnd for a while with friends, but I always did things in 3rd person and was just in it for the cool battles. It wasn't that enjoyable to me, I guess.
>>23258498
Different folks, different strokes--nothing wrong with not liking it if it's not your thing. These threads originated on /tg/, if that gives you any idea of the type of people you're dealing with.
>>23258498
The vast majority of us do all our work in third person, too. Self-insertion, at least amongst our little group, tends to be regarded as rather gauche.
>>23258506
/tg/ was one of my favorite boards to read. They always made me chuckle one way or another.
>>23258507
Buy you still imagine yourself as partaking in the experience, right? Even if you use 3rd person to talk to each other?
>>23258470
The world even adapts to everything you do. You see that woman? if you impregnate her then when you come back she'll have children and they'll want to know where their dickgirl mother has been.
>>23258463
>>23258498
Do you not get immersed in the setting or story of a video game? Have you never enjoyed something interactive beyond the flashy lights and the combat?
If you ever get the chance to do D&D again, put on an accent. Trust me when I say that it's really helpful.
Also, you really might want to ask this question on /tg/, although you'll probably get trolled for asking a dumb question.
>>23258507
My problem has less to do with self insertion--in doing 1on1 GMing I keep trying to avoid "you", and when I'm 1on1 as a player I go full first person noir, same as my usual writing--and more to do with narrative flow. If I use "I" to refer to my character and you use "I" to refer to your character, it gets really awkward. Plus, /me doesn't flow well except in third person.
>>23258529
I don't really get immersed in games' universes. I can get into a book, but that's usually just to see if I can guess what happens next correctly. I just don't think my brain is weird to think that way, ya know?
>>23258521
Honestly? Kinda depends on who I am with. If its with someone whos mostly a stranger, I imagine myself controlling the character then rather then being the character.
On the flipside, if its with someone who I really care about (almost-love levels) or if the scene setup lends itself to it, I do then tend to gravitate towards 'being' that character for the moment of the scene. It's quite nice, although the only way I think I could compare it without either being or feeling like an utter weirdo (too late) is to just compare it to acting. The best actors out there are able to 'pretend' to be their character on something so long as the camera is rolling.
I getcha though, although honestly I think you should still try it. If it still feels overly weird to you then that's that, but you might enjoy it, iunno. Or if its any consolation? I don't get SnM in the way some people above have pointed it out to me.
>>23258614
As another note on more masochistic stuff like the guy above was getting at? I actually enjoy that stuff when I'm really turned on. There's probobly some messed-up bit of psychology there, but really I don't like to question those sorts of things.
I like to have fun.
Seeking female slave and ideally a fellow dragon who lives in Australia
https://www.f-list.net/c/serceina/
>>23259569
>To prevent fraud, people impersonating me or stealing my art claming it as thier own I have this account.
What
Your profile tells me nothing, says something confusing, has no pictures, has no info, and every single thing that you've written has at least one typo or awkward phrasing.
>>23259569
I don't see anything that'd make you interesting enough to impersonate in the first place.
A quick Google search suggests the name is attached to a transphobic creeper with a shitty, uncreative fursona. I suspect your very short time here is going to be extremely interesting.
>>23253348
(a). Focus on what you're thinking, how you're feeling. Try to pick a position which allows you to move a little; it takes practice!
(b). Really, this is the big problem. Some doms don't know how to dom but it is possible for a sub to lead a scene, by hinting at what they want.
>NO LIMITS, ALL IS PERMITTED
>The No list is longer than all the other columns combined
>Just nine kinks in Fav
Yeah, no.
>>23258521
>Even if you use 3rd person to talk to each other?
Yes, when in character
>"Suck on it bitch", declared the bitchbreaker, brandishing her cock.
Like that.
OOC discussion is just regular chat, like we're having here. If it's in the middle of the scene it's denoted somehow, often by parenthesis.
I.e.
>username: [post with some actions]
>username: (Oh sorry, I have to run off for a minute, the cat is on fire.)
>>23259939
http://furry-fandom-jerks.tumblr.com/post/76887279811/furaffinity-user-serceina-is-a-transphobe-after-i
>People steal fursuits
>Redneck furries
Looking over this tumblr reminds me of Dreaming Of Utopia.
Where are all the female Kilngons on F-list? They'd be perfect for dommes. Is anyone interested in this idea like I am?
>>23261246
I wasn't, but now I kind of am.
Doing a quick character search, there are a handful. Only about seven, and one is submissive. Seems to be more females than males.
Of course, this is only searching "Klingon" so I think anyone with something like a caste name instead (I don't know how Klingon work) wouldn't show up.
>>23261969
When I searched I seem to remember that most of them hadn't logged on in months or years. I'll check again to make sure.
>>23261969
>>23262048
Okay, I searched for Female, Transgender, Herm and Shemale Klingons. The first result is gay, the second has a blank profile and hasn't been online in over a year, the third hasn't been on in five months but seems fine otherwise, fourth hasn't been on in over a year, fifth is online but isn't a Klingon, sixth is gay, and the last one is confusing, not to mention she hasn't been on in two months.
So basically nothing.
>>23262110
Wonder why. You'd think Star Trek is a natural fit for ERP, what with all the boldly coming.
Actually I'm sorta surprised there aren't more space captains and such in general, at least in the /tg/ crowd. Such an obvious setup for banging hot alien babes.
>>23262131
I think the focus is skewed much more towards fantasy than sci-fi. Sad, since this is the best option for RP.
>>23262131
>>23262143
Most of /tg/ is focused on fantasy. Scifi doesn't get as much love in terms of RPGs. I bet the reason for that is Elves and Dwarves and Orcs are cultural touchstones at this point, and common among multiple settings, while Star Trek and Star Wars and Mass Effect and so on don't really have similarities. Sure, you've got Proud Warrior Races, but they're not as similar as Orcs will be across franchises.
Basically, despite ostensibly being more open, Science Fiction is actually more niche and closed off for players. Even if Sindorei and Altmer and Eladrin are radically different, you still know quite a bit about them just from them being (High) Elves.
>>23262195
I guess you're right. Any sci-fi race is basically just going to be the same in terms of recognition as specific canon characters, no matter how well-known.
>>23262195
Sci-fi is love; sci-fi is life. We need more sci-fi.
>>23255718
>>23262387
You've explained nothing
>>23263055
Good lord. Gorgeous.
First time making a profile in a long time, feel free to take a look and tell me everything I've done wrong.
https://www.f-list.net/c/ulamar%20brokgrak
Fat Orc NEET who certainly isn't interested in any 3DPD sluts.
>>23263136
You have a "no" under your faves and that's pretty confusing.
>>23263148
God dammit, forgot to switch that down to No. Didn't even notice it, thanks for pointing that out.
>>23263164
No problem.
>>23263136
What makes your ork a NEET? Does he have WAAAAAAGHTISM?
>>23263183
Shouldn't have laughed at that as much as I did. You'za git, but you'ze an alright git.
>>23263235
Thank you, thank you. I'm here all week. Tip your grotz and squigs.
>>23263235
I didn't know we spoke in character here.
>>23263136
I need to fix up my Shadowrun character.
Also, you should really get better pictures. At least a better avatar.
>>23263289
we speak in character whenever it's funny
>>23263289
We do now!
Having trouble finding appropriate futa pictures on gelbooru. Where do you get images?
>>23263357
I have no idea how you're having trouble finding futa on Gelbooru. I sometimes have trouble NOT finding futa, when I'm after particular sexually explicit things for profiles.
>>23263400
Well I'm finding tons, but nothing that seems right for a character I'm making. It's hard to search specifically.
>>23263400
>>23263418
You two need to tell 4chan to change the color of your user ID's because I keep thinking someone is talking to themselves.
>>23263428
I'm not going to discount the possibility.
>>23263438
You can't fuck with my head like this. I won't have it.
>>23263463
I thought fucking was what we did around here, heads and otherwise.
>>23263474
At least buy me a drink first!
I just looked at the tags, and it says 107 for "futa on futa", but I click on it and there's only one.
>>23263517
Interaction tags like that were changed, it's now "with", presumably to avoid having twice as many tags depending on who's doing the fucking. futa_with_futa, futa_with_female, futa_with_male, so on and so forth.
>>23263561
Okay, I think I found something that works.
https://www.f-list.net/c/astrid%20nerys
>>23263688
You really need more than "no description set yet" and almost every one of your Faves is "when I'm dominant", despite you being set to "Usually Submissive". Just how submissive can you be if that's the case?
>>23262195
Fantasy is closer to us. If there have been people at one location for a couple of hundred years, you can bet your ass there are tales about fairies, spirits, ghosts, monsters, elves, gremlins, and other things just a stones throw away from a location. It's easy to relate to because you have likely heard tales through grandparents or childrens books of the knight saving the princess from the horrible dragon, while it's rare to hear about Johnny Austronaut saving Digital Princess from the evil existentiall threat Kli-Klongs in childrens books.
Well shit, might as well.
Tasteful BDSM you say? (I mean apart from the OP being not tasteful at all.)
I'd totally do a new sub character due to being sorta tired of doming all the time.
My interests can be summed up as:
Classy and tasteful BDSM between consenting (and loving) partners with a focus on anal. I have a tendency towards really eager and active submissive, or ones that flop between being active and passive depending on the situation. (I'll also note that I prefer pink, orange and blue character, in that order, over different colours, but if you have a good idea I might go with it anyway.)
If you have an idea for a character you'd like someone to make for you that fits with that I miiight be up for it. Just try to sell me on the idea.
Also have a cute.
>Love everything about a profile
>Except for footplay, which is always on faves
>Can't get over that one kink, even Scat Torture would be better
What one kink kills all your interest in a profile /erpg/?
>>23264155
Thank you for the suggestions. I'll get on that.
Lili, haven't seen you in a while. You good for the game tonight?
Time to finally get this train barreling off the tracks and into the civilians.
>>23265558
Mandatory futa/shemale/herms. It's so fucking oversaturated, and I didn't like it to begin with.
At first I was interested but then I realised this is includes furries.
I hope furries burn in hell.
>>23265503
You generally want a profile link with the ads.
>>23266043
You don't have to play with furries.
But if their mere presence in the vicinity triggers you oh well ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
>>23250858
I should have seen this coming, but I've been positively flooded by shitters on this profile
>blank profile
>no idea
>ey bby wan sum fuk
>no images
>no customs
>predominantly males
>>23266082
>post pictures of girls going down on dicks
>this is 4chan
Also, the fact that males is a huge dislike of yours and you blatantly post heterosexual hentai makes me question if you're serious or not.
>>23266132
It's much harder to find girls sucking girldick than it is to find girls sucking guy dick.
But still, it could at least be well made male profiles.
>>23266154
>googles shemale blowjob hentai
>all the lesbian blowjobs
And I get you, but remember that most people don't acre about impressions and just "wan sum fuk"
>>23266154
>But still, it could at least be well made male profiles.
Well made males see your no, chuckle at a pansexual with no:males and move along.
>>23266045
There is no profile. I'm trying to get an idea for one. That is the whole point.
Have a profile I made a while ago though.
https://www.f-list.net/c/annah%20fairweather
>>23266230
Ooh, I missed the line saying "would do a new character"
>>23266257
Aye. I'm just not feeling anything too specific to try to make and put out for adoption. (Like pink vs. lavender vs. orange, young vs. old, eager vs. reluctant, etc., etc.) So I thought I'd see if someone has a nice idea they want to sell and I can get into.
>>23266154
You set yourself up for failure because >>23266157 >>23266163. On top of that, all the things I said >>23251268
You've made a bad profile and you're confused why people with good profiles haven't contacted you. Why would they? I don't understand why you'd make a bad profile and expect glorious effort from anyone. You really did set yourself up to only get approached by shitters.
You made a meme profile with confusing kinks and barely any information.
>>23266301
>You made a meme profile
I feel like people doing this should get shamed a lot harder than they do around here. But hey, JET BEAMS CAN'T MELT STEEL FUEL guy gets away with being /pol/ memes and smug about it, so clearly nobody gives a fuck.
>>23265714
Not that you actually want to run, as I recall you sort of hope she's too sick to play so you can put this off for the rest of forever and never follow through.
>>23266499
Oh snap.
>>23266497
>I feel like people doing this should get shamed a lot harder than they do around here
Yeah, how dare they have fun on their own time? Who cares if that /pol/ person actually plays, how dare they?
There's nothing wrong with meme profiles, stop trying to kill fun.
>>23266499
Is there some reason you like following me around to just be a dick? Yeah, part of me hopes I don't have to run. I've been sleeping more awkwardly than usual and feeling like shit lately. I've got problems. I'm not going "WELP GAME'S CANCELED".
Didn't Lili herself (or maybe it was Caeleb) tell you off for bitching about the game? You're not one of the players who was asked to sit out, are you?
>>23266497
I don't think they actually get any play. Being a meme profile makes it hard to get play.
>>23266568
Being worried about starting a game comes part and parcel with being the ST
>>23266728
[02:55] Lorelai Walker: Damn, tomorrow is game night. Part of me hopes Lili is still sick. Then I can sleep all day.
This coupled with the fact that you haven't planned anything, always express distress over the game, and beg people to watch anything you do run to achieve some petty validation just make you insufferable as a GM.
>>23266761
I have things planned. I just don't know if they're good plans. Beginnings are hard.
>make you insufferable as a GM.
Good thing you're not one of my players, then, eh?
>>23266866
Anymore.
>>23266886
You're lying here, or the former player is lying on chat.
Either way, why are you so upset if you clearly dodged a bullet? PM me and we can talk about this like adults, instead of dragging drama all over the thread (even if that does mean it gets bumped)
>>23266728
You gigglingly skip past typical GM stage fright and straight into realms of utter fuckuppery and it's hilarious to watch.
>>23266964
But that would imply I don't actually run things. I've got logs from the last three weeks, though.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gDh48J7fLhjE_8pWtu81_1rOLBPiqHwNFlayFbCKWL8/edit#heading=h.kgead6g3efm
Also, on the subject of being hilarious to watch, I've never heard of anyone complaining that someone likes lurkers when they run a game. Usually I have people PM me asking if they can watch, so I make it known that, yes, anyone can watch.
>>23266886
>>23266964
It's like watching politicians at a debate: you invent "facts" from thin air, and then build off them as if they're true.
It'd be more believable if actual facts and actual players didn't contradict you, but I guess that's not how 4chan conditions people to conduct arguments. More the "plug your ears with your fingers and scream la la la can't hear you" sorts, I guess.
But hey, you'll just point at me, yell "circlejerk" and declare yourselves the victors, so, y'know. You do you. I'm obviously not able to stop you.
>Rory just realized tonight is wednesday, not thursday
sheer gold desu
>>23267510
Suck my diiiiiiiiiick
This is what happens when you sleep all day. Your scheduling gets fucked up. I must have looked at the clock at 1am or something and saw that it was Wednesday, but thought it was midnight.
In the words of Scrooge: There's still time!
>>23267510
>>23267538
Amazing.
>>23267538
Get your sleep schedule together for fuck sake.
>>23267700
Easier said than done!
I can never feel rested. I may have sleep apnea.
>>23266082
Memes get meme'd on.
>>23267700
>mfw i live near alaska and can never lock down a schedule because the sun keeps fucking changing
>>23267795
Get over yourself and stick to a schedule. Nobody ever feels fully rested.
>>23268480
Use blinds and an alarm to make the sun irrelevant.
>>23268480
Buy some melatonin bruh
>>23268480
You could try getting some of those Lumie lights/alarm clocks.
>>23268667
No joke, I use a blindfold to sleep, coupled with an egg timer for an alarm.[
>>23267109
>It'd be more believable if actual facts and actual players didn't contradict you
Absolutely nothing contradicts the quote I'm laughing at here
[02:55] Lorelai Walker: Damn, tomorrow is game night. Part of me hopes Lili is still sick. Then I can sleep all day.
>>23269045
"Gee I hope my friend is still sick" is not the kind of thought most people have. Even if they want to get out of something.
>>23246850
I wonder what it is about cutesy romantic hug-lewds that make female characters interested in it seemingly rarer than the males?
>>23269068
>>23269045
You're acting like I was wishing harm on someone out of laziness.
>>23268667
Plenty of people feel well rested. They just don't live in first world countries with tons of light pollution and lifestyles that discourage proper sleep. But I feel LESS well rested than the average person. I have trouble doing basic tasks because I'm fatigued.
>>23269653
Those words are pretty cut and dry.
>>23269653
Yes yes dindunuffin at all times.
>>23269676
>>23269677
As the person being talked about... maybe stop getting offended on behalf of other people? It makes you look pretentious.
>>23269708
Naaaah.
Your faithful puppyness to him is part of the circus.
>>23269708
You get offended on his behalf often enough. So I mean, you're one to talk.
>>23269719
>>23269722
>>23267109
>But hey, you'll just point at me, yell "circlejerk" and declare yourselves the victors, so, y'know.
Your script is boring and predictable.
>>23269729
We aren't the entertainment here, you are.
>>23269729
So is your hypocrisy.
pls
>>23269747
I'm supposed to just sit by and let you talk shit about me?
I'm learning new rules all the time.
>>23269708
No, no. I hope you've got Cholera, clearly.
>>23269755
pls indeed. This is why no one comes around anymore. Because every day two or three people jump out of the woodwork to start drama about how terrible a human being I am.
>>23269756
Actually yes, that is how you deal with people on 4chan talking shit about you.
>>23269762
Is that all one body?
>>23269762
Everybody else has long left after your constant shitarguments with anybody who dared to say anything contrary to your stances.
Now it's just you, your circus and the laughing audience.
>>23269762
You can tell where the artist realized should be covering up the titshe spent so long on, and just looooowered the leg-layer about 60 or so dozen pixels.
>>23269765
>respond
>you cry circlejerk and keep going
>don't respond
>you declare yourself the winner and keep going
>>23269774
holy fucking shit my grammar
>>23269778
>you declare yourself the winner and keep going
When did that actually happen? Seriously, point me to one self-congratulating post that isn't a reply to your defensive dances anywhere in recent threads.
So no. We just die down until he does new hilariously shitty thing.
>>23269773
You're not exactly wrong, but that doesn't make you any better.
>>23269766
She's a limber slut
>>23269778
To be fair just let them. The real problem is that they keep popping up.
>>23269773
You're sitting here proving me right. I get complaints on chat of "ugh, the thread is being dumb" or "the thread is shit" and most of the time it's someone bitching about me apropos of nothing. Most of the day here we've had bitching because someone decided to take things I said in chat and then make a big deal out of them in the thread. Currently, you're shitflinging with Lili because she pointed out how fucking stupid that was, especially since it concerned her.
This is why no one posts. No one wants to get involved with this shit. You've got old names who've either left or just avoid the threads because they don't want to deal with this. These threads are dying because you and >>23269747 just want to fucking bitch.
For fucks sake, you people will bitch about me even if I don't say a fucking thing, but you act like I'm shitting up the Goddamned threads. You can't leave well enough alone and your hateboner for me is so massive that you have to ruin a good thing for everyone.
>>23269795
If you stick around when people hate you, and you stick around when people ignore you, then you can't really claim any high ground about teaching people "important 4chan life lessons" or whatever it is you think you're doing with posts like >>23269765 that.
But hey, you'll just chuckle about le circus and pretend you're not just grasping for straws to bitch about. So have fun I guess?
>>23269836
Soo I see a total lack of example in here that would disprove the "important 4chan life lessons".
>>23269878
If you're not even going to read the posts you reply to then you really can't expect me to take you seriously.
>>23269922
I have asked for an example of
>and you stick around when people ignore you
And you have failed to deliver. As such you are failing to dispove "don't feed the troll" axiom.
>>23269944
The fact that you're still here after wasting I-don't-even-know-how-many threads desperately trying to troll your way into Rory-sempai's attentions and contributing nothing topical isn't evidence enough? Do I really need to spell it out to you when you know what you're doing and you know the answer to your own question?
>>23246783
Is OKCUPID a good place to find people into dom/sub but not all the way kinky?
>>23269976
Define all the way kinky?
mfw
>>23269979
I think I wrote that sentence in the poorest way.
What I mean is that if OKCUPID can work to find a girl that could be into kinky stuff, but not all the way into the kinkiest shit.
I mean, there's already a social network for people who are absolutely into those things. I guess I want someone who's more casual about?
>>23269954
>desperately trying to troll your way into Rory-sempai's attentions
lolwat
And obviously I ain't going to vanish in a puff of smoke because you stopped replying for once.
He's still hilarious.
But do you really not see the difference?
>hey look rory did a thing
>lol
>silence
>hey look rory did a thing
>lol
>hundred of posts arguing that the thing he did is Just and Right and everybody disagreeing is Bad and Evil
>>23269983
A fucking disaster, that's what.
>>23269993
Oh my sweet, summer child. This is not the place for you.
>>23270000
Except that doesn't happen, you just come back a few hours later and try again, and again, and again. I've seen you go all day with nobody replying to you and you'll still repost your shitpost with slight alterations every few hours. You're trying to act like the wise troll master teaching the padawan the arcane ways of 4chan, but none of it's true.
>>23269993
Maybe, though this thread isn't really the place for real-life hookups like that.
>>23270000
We really don't need 'rory did a thing' posts, whether to mock them or defend them
>>23269976
>>23269993
No, not really. As far as I'm aware people on OKCupid want to get dates and relationships. I'm sure there are people with kink desires on their profiles, but that's not exactly the main thing. I would suggest Fetlife, but that site is sort of skeevy and I've never really heard anything good about it.
Honestly if you want that kind of thing you're in the wrong thread, though. This is for roleplaying, not actual sex having. For that you'd want one of the other hook up threads.
>>23270000
Or we could cut out that first step where people ride my nuts for some reason.
>>23270019
>you just come back a few hours later and try again, and again, and again
Really, where?
Are you gonna claim that me, bKOqguzE and dK5UfMAU are same guy using separate networks for maximum rusing too?
>>23270027
>>23270021
>>23270018
Oh, my bad, I didn't know. I'm sorry.
>>23270034
>t-that wasn't me last thread, that was some other guy doing the exact same thing in the exact same way
Whatever you say, man.
>>23270050
Exceept there was NO ONE doing the thing at all.
Keep barking, pup.
>>23270027
Stop being a whiny shitter.
>>23270070
Whatever you say, man.
Whatever you say.
>>23270072
It's like watching politicians at a debate: you invent "facts" from thin air, and then build off them as if they're true.
>>23270092
Exactly! And you're still doing it. Glad you're finally starting to see my point, at least.
Lili, just stop. You know they aren't, and something tells me they're enjoying it more than you are.
>>23270092
>>23270109
Would you two please either fuck or shut the fuck up?
>>23270124
I like this pairing no matter who's on top.
Although Mami does do the bondage thing well.
>>23270132
>>23270135
Infinite ribbons combined with an intensely dependent personality is a hell of a drug, yeah.
>>23270148
Intensely independent, you mean.
>>23270174
No, I think dependent is on the money for someone whose crippling fear is losing the affection of others and being alone.
Also god Damn that is a nice pic.
>>23270194
>>23270124
I was actually going at some point, but after she started going full rory that kinda died.
>>23270233
>>23270271
>>23270252
I would've thought the "No: Big Dicks" would be a problem there.
>>23270314
And with this, I'm spent on not sfw pics. Good hustle.
>leave for a couple hours
>thread becomes a shitshow
So just a regular Thursday then?
>>23270364
Just another day in paradise, yeah.
