/qtit/ - QT Infograph Thread
who just finished finals here?
Blessed be ye OP.
Almost died yesterday, feeling frisky. Ain't no room in hell good people.
>>22992825
me, whoop-dee-fucking-doo
>>22992860
I don't think I'm what you're looking for but you sound like really cool person
I'll never be noticed, its all lies. All of it.
>>22993246
that feeling of freedom though. even if it only lasts for a few weeks.
Howdy!
Maybe one day
sup nerds
how were your weeks
Chanelling all QT's
Introducing the greatest thing since beanbags
Standing 5'8 inches with a weight of 170ish pounds
He's unanimously been voted funniest chair of 2014 3 consecutive times
He's raced and beat the fastest snail on the planet
He has mastered the art of fart
Ladies and gentlemen I present to you elllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllatedlaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaawnnnnnchair *confetti*
Slavs on the moon.
Finals done! Now I just have to put up with family members till the new year!
>Having a penis
>Expecting to meet someone here
Sorry to post slightly off topic here, but I'm wondering. I've lurked in these threads for a while, and I've considered making a new "doll maker" type thing specifically for qtit threads as I kind of have the art skills to do so I guess (though I'd have to learn the computer game making skills to actually make it functionable).
Mostly because my beef with the current one used doesn't have many options at all, especially with the singular body type (I know thats what the infograph is for but whatever), and the other tinerme one people sometime use is way too complicated and difficult to use. (And still doesn't solve the body diversity issue anyways)
IDK, basically what I'm asking is does this idea sound good to anyone else? If I actually made such a thing do you think it would be accepted and used? Or is the current dollmaker doing the job fine?
Anyways, continue thread sorry to derail.
>>22999040
I feel like these charts make it quite hard to capture the essence of a person. Perhaps a more varied dollmaker could help with that a little bit.
>>22999085
Agreed lol. I mean in all honesty if we're going for accuracy we'd all just post actual pictures, but the "ideal mate" picture would still have to be something else. And I get why people would want to hide behind an avatar for a little while, because I know how it is. People are too quick to judge on appearance alone and they wouldn't even be given a chance otherwise.
I'd be aiming for something a little more inbetween the two. More realistic than the current system, but still not quite as real as an actual picture.
Thanks for the input friend
>>22999126
Actual pictures don't really fit well within the chart anyway. Best of luck on your attempt anon
>>22999040
I would definitely use that. Honestly the template needs an update as well but this one is getting the job done. I'd use it if you made it.
i met some cool people before, so eh.
