>>6668744
Cause it's the next evolution of deathcore, which is the more awful successor of metalcore. They each become more awful than their predecessors

>>6668752
If we're talking about music, it depends what you are calling deathcore. Bands like Emmure and I Declare War is shit, but bands like All Shall Perish and Whitechapel are really worth listening to. But still, what the fuck "Common Core" is?

of all the things you could ask a science board..

>>6667943
>So, since 'time' is just a convenient concoction we use to make communication easier, how do things like space-time make any sense?
Well that means either you aren't making sense or people much smarter than you like Albert Einstein aren't making sense. I wonder which one it is?

>>6667951
I just see no evidence that 'time' has any meaning.

>>6667960
Care to explain how relativity is observable if time is only a concept or idea?

Most women have an ingrained emotional support structure and talk about their feelings, most men don't. Bottle that for 20 years and Bob blows his brains out over the same stuff Alice let go a decade ago.

Standards.
Less privileged.

Men are more likely to be lonely than women.

>>6664342
Analytical philosophy?
Yes.
Basically what remains of philosophy as a field is just article writing and political idealism.

I'd say mathematics killed the most of philosophy with it's contributions to logic.

My philosopher father keeps trying to convince me that science will never come close to addressing any of the hard questions. But I maintain that it is dangerously close to addressing some of the ones the answers to which will be of most use to us. There's no sense in turning around now.

>>6664342

repost

> cf. nietzsche circa 1882

Because your original guess had a 1/3 chance of being correct.

>>6658253

but the fact there's 3 doors initially is a non-factor, because one of the empty ones gets removed.

the goat is still either in your door or the other door whether you switch or not, which is 50/50

Two out of three doors get chosen. Why wouldn't the probability be 2/3?

Your focus shouldn't be on the door you initially choose; it's a red herring.

Maybe the resources in earth.

>>6665487
What's so special about the resources of our planet? There are asteroids and other planets with far more resources.

>>6665487
what resources are there on earth that are not available on an uninhabited world?

Why can't neuroscientists make the perfect drug? You feel bliss, no negative side effects, no dopamine downregulation or anything of the sort.

You take one pill it lasts for 30 minutes maybe. When the time has passed you can go on with your day or take another pill and go for another just as good 30 minutes.

>>6662679
That's not really a job for neuroscientists

bump for potentially good thread

Depends what you mean by "stability of the world."

>>6656688
"The long-term stability of the environment", in regards to humans living in it.

>>6656685
>rapid speed at which we are increasing in technological advancement
you mean moores law? its gonna end in 10 years, and no it wont do shit

>>6666009
god

>>6666013
OK besides that

>>6666009
Super-Earths?
Earths the size of Jupiter.

Fusion power

Space elevator.

We have the engineering capabilities, and materials science to pull it off currently. We just don't have the mass production capabilities or quality control for the materials nor the massive amount of infrastructure and and capital needed to actually do it.

Fusion power is an endless pipe dream and R&D money pit that likely will never come to fruition in a meaningful or reliable positive output way. We don't have the technical knowledge nor the materials science necessary.

>>6661556
>We don't have the technical knowledge nor the materials science necessary.

I doubt materials of sufficient durability for reliable output are even possible with fusion power.

>>6666439
dams

>>6666439
Burning trees

Well, I'd guess society will just start over and do the same thing we did to get to harvesting sustainable energy..

>>6658067
It's hilarious when they set themselves on fire.

File: d6d03585700d14c09c930b265b44d71b.gif (1 MB, 300x225) Image search: [Google]

1 MB, 300x225

>vsauce

>>6658067
vsauce is good, veritasium disappointed me once when they tried an experiment with a bullet and a piece of wood, so i'm more careful with their statements

>>6665542
>Fahrenheit
I'd like to remind you that you are on the scientific board, so please refer to scientific measurements.

To answer your question, the error lies most probably here
>ice cream
it most probably isn't ice cream (and most probably it is unhealthier than ordinary ice cream).

Please carry your murrican issues somewhere else next time. Thanks.

>>6665542
>Fahrenheit
This is a science and math dedicated board, you use celsius or kelvin here.

>>6665542
>Walmart brand ice cream sandwiches
i bet its just ice cream flavoring and some sort of gelatin shit.

It's called studying.

>>6668115
genetics
>>6668118
lol

>>6668118
I really should have put >inb4 just studying in the OP, because I realize that is the most important part. What I'm asking I suppose is if there's anything that made everything clearer, like a fog was lifted and you suddenly understood everything a bit more intricately?

Constant nuclear fusion...
Fire is a form of plasma, so if you cover something in say rubbing alcohol and light it on fire, you have created a plasma shield. But this form of plasma won't do shit for stopping things, what you want is plasma at a few million or billion degrees, that way it will destroy damn near anything that is launched at it.
I don't know much about plasma physics though

>>6667361
Density is just as important as temperature.

How will you prevent the surface covered in plasma from being destroyed itself though?
I say its impossible due to insanely high temperatures of the "shield"