go back to /lgbt/ with this bullshit faggot. stop advertising the concept of "transgenderism" like it's worth talking about it or something, especially on a science board.

>>7663112
If you're asking whether gender dysphoria is a thing then yes

Psychology is (in most cases) medicine at best and a pseudo-science at worst. Terms like "mental illness", "mental disorder" and "personality complex" are entirely unscientific.

greedy

>>7663110
>what's the first thing you would do to solve it?
I would solve it.

>>7663158
/thread

>>7663094
I'd rather have no answers than no questions

>>7663097
you're gay

>>7663098
And you're probably from straya

wat

File: Counter+strike_821b88_5238752[1].webm (2 MB, 1280x720) Image search: [Google]

2 MB, 1280x720

I don't know if you played the latest mods of counterstrike source, but the bots they modified act nothing like bots. They taunt, they coordinate with other bots, they anticipate your moves and cunningly trick you. They are modified to imitate the actual behaviours of pro players.

I'd say research into that, see how they made it so.

>>7663108
Thanks for feedback. I think it's not so bad idea to record movements and behavior of a player depending of state in game(doing task, not doing task) and then analyzing and then somehow applying those settings. I will look deeper into that.

>>7662975
but anon, abortion IS morally wrong
the legalization is just a pragmatic necessity in order for the society to have a control over it, since it obviously existed since forver

>>7662975
You forgot IUD.

>>7662975
>Let's assume for a moment that abortion is morally wrong
Ok.

>Is using the morning after pill ok?
Grey area, leaning towards no.

>What about condoms?
Effectively the same as masturbation, see next answer.

>Is masturbation ok? That glob of semen you leaked onto your moms kitchen tile floor has sperm in it which could have fertilized an egg.

This is terrible...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>7662890
I dont really know what you mean. Even engineers only Proof that a system they came up with works and not that the system is Perfect. So applying that to computer sience would be like making sure the logic and syntax is correct.
so i assume his answer is correct >>7662894

File: BornMad.jpg (187 KB, 600x480) Image search: [Google]

187 KB, 600x480

>engineering
>mathematical proof for the correctness of the architecture of a software system?

also
>2015
>no user friendly all purpose dependently typed language

>>7662903
I'm not talking about algorithmic correction.

I'm talking about design/architecture. Designing software as a problem and being able to prove your chosen design is "correct"

>>7662913
I give you permission to make sense.

>>7662883

It could well be that religiousness increased inclusive fitness at the expense of individual fitness, by strengthening group cohesion and by making altruistic acts towards the group and spiteful acts towards competing groups seemingly rational even on the individual level (through blessings or an improved afterlife).

A bit like how psychopathy increasing individual fitness at the expense of inclusive fitness, would explain why we aren't all psychopaths.

religiousness is appeal to majority and has its benefits.

>>7662901
Wouldn't having a lot of children be an example of its benefits to individual fitness?

>>7662812
It could and it will.

For the same reason why computers can get high scores in an IQ test.

>>7662812

Im pretty sure a super computer will produce an opera that sounds amazing but the thing at its core art is about expressing YOUR emotions and thoughts that's why music sounds a lot better if you know the context which was written for.

if you really want to do more you can use Euclidean division to simplify it, but other than that i dont think you can do anything

>>7662816
So yeah, that will probably be my final answer. thank you anon!

File: 1447693391805.jpg (2 MB, 4128x2322) Image search: [Google]

2 MB, 4128x2322

I have another question is its okay,
Am I allowed to ln this ine and solve for x? Or because there is a 0 ln is out of the picture here?
(Exercise c)

>>7662780
lol every time i've heard of anyone interacting with wolfram they've all said he has an enormous ego

An excessive use of hyphens when commas, semicolons, and colons are more appropriate (or at least would have created more visible segmenting), but otherwise it's fine.

Feynman has clearly mental problems, as in, he doesn't understand common English.

>>7662770
Clinical trials.

>>7662773
What kind of intelligences do you need to execute clinical trials competently?

>>7662770

The evidence indicates that there are high correlations between the different 'types' of intelligence; people who are good at math are often good at spatial reasoning and given the proper resources can learn to write better than the average pleb. This is just a wishy-washy theory to make proles think they're smart.

Life isn't a fucking RPG where everyone gets the same amount of points to distribute, some people are just bad at most things because their neurons myelinate and repair slower...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

Because something went very wrong with american education. Where are all the geniuses from last 50 years? I mean actual giants like Einstein, Feynmann, Bohr, Oppenheimer. They just not there. Where did they all go? I'm not even saying education became hierarchical, conformist bureaucracies where all people who can't color in the lines are kicked out. There are deeper underlying issues. Also highly commercialized higher education with tuition rising much faster than inflation rates, but that's just since 1970.
And rest of the world is irrelevant since 1945.

>>7662799
And because now there's geniuses that never get to go to college or get recognized because of the capitalistic education system. The best robotic engineer in the world probably lives off Ramen and gets his resume rejected because his only experience is as a burger King manager.

>>7662799
Scientific advancements always have lulls (varying from field to field). Physical models remained both stagnant and inadequate to explain new phenomena for over a hundred years before Einstein.

>>7662724
think about what numbers are divisible by 3 and their relation to each other.

By way of contradiction, I'd wager

>>7662724

Given an integer X, we can consider its remainder when divided by 3. This remainder can only be 0, 1, or 2. That is, there exists an integer k such that X = 3k, X = 3k + 1, or X = 3k + 2.

Case 1: X = 3k

Then X is divisible by 3.

Case 2: X = 3k + 1

Then X + 2 = 3k + 3 = 3 (k + 1) is divisible by 3, as desired.

Case 3: X = 3k + 2

Then X + 4 = 3k + 6 = 3 (k + 2) is divisible by 3, as desired.

yeah, for a bit at least

>>7662681

Are you looking to heat it up for a good reason or are you just having a larf?

>>7662686
I'm trying to replicate the taste of Cocio. They claim that they submerge their bottles, caps on, in 100 degree water for 20 mins.
The boiling point for milk is higher than that of water, am i right? (=will it even cause pressure inside the bottle?)

Every developed discovery has been entirely novel. Newton exhibiting great creativity during the synthesis of observation and mathematics during his development of calculus back in mid 17th century England. Especially during the bubonic plague.

Ask all engineers and you'll find a mix of answers.


Depends on what success means to you bloke.

>>7662642
Creativity is the rafined form of imagination that is necessary for some fields, other than that it's absolute useless as imagination is.
Intelligence does not have a direct relationship with your creativity, with your imagination.
You can live all your life in the cold reality as it is without imagining anything and still discover something that will change out the course of reality.
Imagination is really a disease of human brain.

>>7662675
Lying to these people.