Recreating the Big Bang with a quantum computer.
So /sci/ I'm not super tech savvy nor do I know a whole lot about computer science but I've been doing a lot of research on quantum computing and am wondering why there hasn't been an attempt yet to "recreate" the Big Bang with on of the new D-Wave 500QB computers.
From my understanding 500QB (or even the new 1000QB) computers are powerful enough to store more information then there are atoms in the universe. If this is true, then why not create a program that contains all the laws of quantum...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>7665249
this is pretty low quality shitposting desu
Too long
>I'm doing a lot of research in quantum computers
>I read a pop-sci article once
Reminder that math is really applied philosophy. Mathematicians are technically "philosophical engineers." All mathematicians do is plug things in and design logical systems according to axioms.
Why don't you switch to the major that actually requires original and creative thought, where you get to make the rules?
>>7665233
If you're so creative, why don't you post something original?
Of course it is. Also Philosophy = Reason = Logic > Mathematics.
wow you really persuaded me or something
mfw I'm 27
mfw I started watching pre-algebra videos by because I want to know math well (I've nearly forgotten everything except the basics since I graduated)
mfw I'm not ashamed of that and instead take great pleasure in learning something for the sake of learning
share your old guy/new knowledge story
>>7665231
I'm doing my master's at 25. I'm definitely more mature now and I have a 4.0 so I think things worked out for the best.
Keep on truckin' OP!
>>7665231
I myself am not old (yet) but a friend of mine went back to school and is currently in his senior year of physics at the ripe age of 35. Keep doing what you love OP
>tfw you beat Wolfram Alpha
Is anyone here smart enough to work out the closed form? I'll post the answer after 20 replies
[math]\frac{1}{n}-\frac{1}{n+1}\sum_{1}^{n}\frac{1}{n}(-1)^n [/math]
0
>>7665071
fail
Alright so I recently eared that in SOME instances DARKNESS can go faster than light.
1)Is it true?
2)In wich instances
3)Can we use this knowledge for something usefull or do I just need to shove it up my ass?
No, but there are some instances where the speed of heavy is faster than the speed of light. Such as when going downhill.
If by darkness you mean empty space then yes empty space expands faster than the speed of light.
>>7665040
why thank you kind sir
What is the "coolest" area of math research at the current moment? That is, is there a field in which most of the current math researchers are studying?
Pic unrelated
>>7665017
Triple integrals
Triple integrals
>>7665020
>>7665025
dank meem m420
>"Humans only use about 10% of their brains. If we used more we could do X"
Is anyone else fucking tired of this meme? How do you even begin to debate someone if they keep coming up with shit to back this up?
The same way you debate with people who say "Women get paid 70% for the same job that men do."
Say "that's been disproved time and time again and you're only regurgitating it because you WANT it to be true."
>>7664970
>Is anyone else fucking tired of this meme?
No one I have ever met, who wasn't completely retarded (or a child) has said this.
>How do you even begin to debate someone if they keep coming up with shit to back this up?
The answer is to never speak with such an adult ever again, and immediately moon walk out of the conversation. Such rare cases of complete retardation are impervious to logic, it's best not to waste time with them.
>>7664970
We use all of our brain. Every part has a different function. The accurate line is, we only have the capacity to use %8 percent of our brain simultaniously or something like that. Which means we are very well capable of using our entire brain, but we can hardly multitask.
Let's see who on /sci/ is actually good at the ultimate form of mathematics, integration.
>>7664932
I'm not, have done very little work with it, and it was all over the MAT this year, which fucked me because all my prep was in algebra, geometry, trig and functions/derivatives
>analytic integration
no thanks
>>7664932
Math you can do by typing it into a calculator is boring.
How do you deal with cold logic /sci/? I love engineering because of the creativity and personal touch involved, but for me math and science seems too impersonal. It seems that it heavily relies on some brain functions that can be named IQ. That is no artistry involved and the leap of genius is something impersonal that could be done by someone else in another time.
well i prefer mathematics and science and i think you have the wrong attitude
8/10, made me post
>>7664897
well engineering is a bit "artsy" and it does give a lot of freedom because you're dealing with matter and materials, but to make leaps in mathematics requires far more creativity than great mathematicians are ever credited with.
What are the best online/youtube courses out there for learning C++? Reddit seems to be of the opinion that you can't learn C++ on an online course, and the consensus I got was that the only way to learn it is from some thousand page reference book with very small print that goes into so much depth that it takes any joy out of programming.
I'm not looking for that. I'm just looking for a course that goes through the basic shit covered in a semester long intro to software engineering course (from loops and conditional statements, to dynamic memory allocation,...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>7664883
C++ primer
>>7664883
fuck off
Check out "newboston" (or something like that) channel on yt.
How do you study/memorize quickly?
This is a big dilemma in my life.
I'd like to have a system which allows me to remember anything I want to remember on command. I've delved into mnemonics and memory palaces and have only used them for things like remembering numbers.
Tell me your secrets.
i have poor memory for specifics, so i learn to derive everything in language from basic principles
languages like english are difficult because, unlike german or mathematics, just mashing together basic ideas doesn't lead to a coherent object
>>7664876
So you're a native german?
https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=sites&srcid=ZGVmYXVsdGRvbWFpbnxzdHJhaWdodGE0dnN1fGd4OjM1M2IwOGM4NjIyYmVhYw
Look past the religious stuff and its still solid advice
ok, so what if i came up with the solution to make things travel faster than light, would you recommend i submit it here; online. Or publish it in a paper with my name on it, because i fear that i may be a target if i submit this, because ive been sitting on the solution for about 2 days and i fear that my safety may be in jeopardy if i release it.
But you didn't
The pasta is stale m8
>>7664848
Just post op why would your safety be in danger? Your either a genius (unlikely) and you've figured it out (unlikely) or your an idiot and we'll laugh at you (likely) either way I don't see why anyone would try to hurt you.
What's a Banach Space?
>>7664838
that doesnt exist, you just made that up to troll /sci/
>>7664843
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n12bfWTw9Hk
a normed vector space whose set of cauchy sequences converge within the space
>Teach Automotive Electrical Systems at a community college
>Full of dumb students, have a good relationship with them though
>Last week, while evaluating tests realize one of the students literally scored 0
>Laughed profusely and wrote in the test , 'kill yourself desu senpai'
>Dumbass told everyone and the President (of the community college) wants to see me this afternoon
Hold me guys
you told a student to kill himself after getting a 0, whatre you expecting
Sounds like you're a shit teacher. I hope you get fired.
>>7664816
I joke with my students all the time ;_;
>>7664822
He's black so most likely yes, i will get fired
Has anyone here seen a reaction between Francium and water? What's it like?
>>7664709
>Has anyone here seen a reaction between Francium and water? What's it like?
There's 13g of Francium on the whole planet, so no
It's probably similar to the other alkali metals but not as energetic as Cesium since its highly radioactive. This might be why there's no videos of it because it decays quickly.
>>7664730
You could hypothetically synthesize francium and do it, so maybe.
Also where'd you get this 13g estimate? That's oddly specific.