Dear /sci/, I propose that lipid membranes do not exist. Here is some of my reasoning:
http://jp.physoc.org/content/280/1/105.short
>Cutting a cell in half and exposing the cut face to a solution of sodium and potassium does not change solute concentrations significantly
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1072717/pdf/jcinvest00750-0067.pdf
>Rubidium replaces potassium within a cell. Cesium replaces both. If potassium is accumulated due to an inward pumping, other solutes should not affect this.
http://www.gilbertling.org/PCP40_ling_ochsenfeld.pdfComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>7686589
WAT ARE MICELLES
>>7686605
What is your point? or are you just spouting buzzwords?
I propose you should stop posting the same thing
>here is experimental evidence against the membrane-pump theory for the maintenance of high K+ and low Na+ concentrations in resting cells. Ling has shown (1962) that under specified conditions, the Na pump alone would consume 1530 times the total energy available to the cell.
>This objection to the steady-state model, presented in detail fifteen years ago (Ling, 1962), has been confirmed in general principle by Jones (1965) and Minkoff & Damadian (1973, 1974). A...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>The worry is that changing the DNA of the next generation is unsafe and a slippery slope toward eugenics. Yet many of the scientists attending the Washington meeting won’t be there to ban the technology, but to trade tips about how, exactly, they might be able to do it right.
>One scientist who thinks he knows is Jinsong Li, a biologist at the Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences. Earlier this year, Li managed to use CRISPR to edit a gene that causes eye cataracts in mice, creating healthy newborn animals...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>7686436
>So editing embryos is out, editing sperm cells is in. This is the future of human gene editing.
What about defects that are in the egg cells?
>>7686439
Use a "healthy" mother I guess I don't know desu.
>>7686439
There is a 50/50 chance that a defective gene from an egg will be passed on, I think. So create embryos until one doesn't have that gene. That doesn't require gene editing, only gene screening.
http://gender.stanford.edu/news/2014/why-does-john-get-stem-job-rather-jennifer
Science isn't that objective now, is it?
>mathematics not even it's own category
>trash man meme
Women don't go into some fields, whereas men do.
>>7686465
What does that have to do with anything?
How can something collapse in on itself and still produce an immense gravitational pull?
>>7686275
Okay so the mass equivalence of a photon with a wavelength of 589nm is 3.75*10^(-36) kg.
I imagine that something with the density of a black hole pulls in shittons of those.
Answering the question: BECAUSE IT'S SO FUCKING DENSE.
It is called singularity for a reason.
We simply don't know what happens inside a black hole.
Why don't electrical appliances have two sockets in order to create a circuit?
like pic related
>>7686272
Is this bait?
>>7686272
A single socket already creates a circuit. The input and output wires are contained within one cable, this is why sockets have two prongs (and sometimes a third for grounding).
>>7686272
>bundle the wires
>put the sockets closer togheter (pic related)
what if humans are raised for a specific reason?
Why did you make this thread?
This isn't even science fiction, it's a basic question we've been asking for nearly as we've existed and recorded our history.
Yeah, what if? What if man?! WHAT IF WHAT IF?
DUNNO MAN. WHY DON'T YOU GO THINK ABOUT IT ON YOUR OWN FOR A WHILE?
>>7686219
Then you'd have to tackle most of modern science's biggest philosophical issues: The question of Final Causality.
If Final Causality exists then humanity has a "reason" and if not, they don't.
Yeah. Actually, you are right. Sorry for ruining your day. But you almost broke my heart.
How do you train your brains? I mean exercises and whatnot. Currently i'm playing this BrainWars apps but can't tell if increasing scores may have any influence on daily activities. Do you maybe know any better free apps for android?
Brain training games don't help you in general. They help you become good at those specific games. The only proven brain training technique is N back tests.
Jigsaws. Helps you recognise patterns and visualise future outcomes.
>>7686046
Reading books and learning science and mathematics will do more than anything else.
Why is gene therapy theortically sound but realistically impossible?
>>768592
I need answers
>>7685920
Cause what if the patients don't like jeans? You would have to have khaki therapy, pants therapy, skirt therapy etc.
its relatively easy to accidentally give the patient cancer
Couldn't one simply grow a superintelligent mind by growing neurons in a large enough vat with a built-in vascular network to bring in nutrients and oxygen and remove carbon dioxide?
Brain tumors are made up of neurons or glial cells and they replicate very well:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain_tumor
And they can already grow tiny brains with all the right specialized tissues in labs:
http://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/aug/18/first-almost-fully-formed-human-brain-grown-in-lab-researchers-claim
The researchers above claim that its difficult to grow brains any bigger without a vascular network. However, blood vessels have been successfully made from stem cells:
http://www.medicaldaily.com/new-blood-vessel-grows-1-week-when-using-stem-cells-2-tablespoons-blood-307941
And two-way transmission of electrical signals between neurons and computer chips have been shown to work as well which should provide the "super-brain" with efferent and afferent processes as well as a way to receive and send out information:
http://news.discovery.com/tech/computer-chips-nerve-cells-110321.htm
Put all of these together and a superintelligent brain grown in a lab should be possible, no?
And if superintelligence is possible then the Singularity as predicted by Kurzweil and Vinge should be possible today as well, right?
>>7685820
What singularity? You mean a black hole? How does that tie in with artificial brain material.
>>7685820
I am a monument for all your sins
>brain size =/= intelligence
slowly accelerate subject to significant percentage of light speed with acceptable g force
there's no reason why this can't be done
much more feasible than space travel because you don't have to worry about fuel
How do you plan on gathering enough energy for that thing?
the force that the wall would have to exert on your body to keep you in that shit "time machine" would kill you
>>7685771
what force? you are accelerating it slowly so the person will live
at constant speed the person won't know it's spinning
Does anyone else feel that genetics and especially molecular genetics as a field has become a failure?
Looking at the progress we made between the early 80s and late 90s, you'd think that we'd be living in a Gattaca-esque society by now.
In the 80s, we had the first PCR machines, Sanger sequencing, and sequencing of the first non-human genomes.
In the 90s, we had the first cloned mammals, then the first cloned large human-like mammal (Dolly), the first DNA microarrays, the Human Genome Project was in full swing, the first genetically modified foods...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>7685741
>field requiring human experimentation have a hard time advancing in our ethics madness world
STOP THE PRESSES
I feel it has become a failure in that it can be used to promote racism. We live in a gattaca-esque society but not to those extremes. Eugenics is a big part of our diet. I remember one of my Jewish teachers whose parents suffered in Germany because of their very dark skin always used to accuse Gerber of promoting racial inequality; comparable to Nazi Germany. When I was little, I had abs and was pretty buff, naturally. So we would go to places and people would start praising it. My mother hated it. She saw it as wrong for society to treat people different because of their appearance...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>7685766
People do not want to exceed a certain point nor create an unnatural way of life. Sure people enjoy the idea of structure in their living. But chaos is always the homeliest.
When the treaty preventing Antarctic development expires in 2050 I expect there will be some attempts to properly settle it by Russia at least
What technologies would it require to build a stable, safe city on top of ice, to power it and keep shit from freezing? Would you want to live someplace with a remarkable view, but where it is difficult/dangerous to go outdoors? Assume the interiors of the buildings are all super attractive and cozy.
yeah
>>7685732
With global warming in full swing by them some of it might become Svalbard-tier
>>7685732
No government will let it happen because people will discover the truth about the Earth's shape.
Any books on how to optimally lead a nation and manage resources and security. Perferably something unlike a your business management / corporate strategy books. More math based strategizing techniques.Im really interested in this concept.
>>7685625
sun tzu art of war
The Prince by Machiavelli is close enough
>>7685625
>manage resources
Die pinko scum.
What are some applications of Dawkins' meme theory? How does a meme differ from an idea? Is "pure mathematics" a meme because math is not empirical?
>>7685515
Memes are like computer viruses, but for people.
It is a clear example of why science is a patriarchal construct of a male dominated society. It boils down the cultural identity of minorty groups into ideas that anyone can use! A clear example of white people appropriating the ideas of oppressed colored people.
>>7685525
This
Physics dummy here.
Please explain to me why gravitational mass and inertial mass are the same.
In principle they don't have to be the same, do they?
A hot anime grill for your trouble /sci/.
>>7685434
gravity is energy warping space
inertia is difficulty to move energy
>>7685446
Why is it difficult to move energy?
>>7685463
Because it's condensed into matter, wich is dense? Because you don't move energy, energy moves you? I'm affraid you might have to ask the higgs boson for more information on this...Matter.