Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 200. page
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
What is the possibility of someone with Autism/Asperger syndrome having a high IQ or just being highly intelligent (implying that they haven't taken an IQ test yet)?
It's actually just a stereotype that people with autism or aspergers are intelligent. Most of them are below average intelligence but when they actually are intelligent they are VERY intelligent.
>>8016235
Having a brain that makes it exceptionally easy to identify types of rocks won't help you very much if you want to interact with society in a nonparasitic fashion.
>>8016671
Can confirm, I have aspergers and I'm a fucking dumbass.
tau or pi? and why?
also math discussion general thread I guess
Pi. Tau refers to Pi.
![eq203[1].gif](https://i.imgur.com/IRgy1yv.gif "eq203[1].gif")
How come this is more fundamental than Newton's laws of motion? Some textbooks goes as far as claim that particles "smell" their way beforehand and you need quantum physics to explain it.
But when I solve problems, I usually get (with a constraint [math]g(x,y,z)=0[/math]):
[math]- \nabla U -m \ddot \bar{r}+\lamda (t) \nabla g=\bar{0}[/math]
But [math]\nabla g[/math] is just a normal vector to the path the particle takes, so [math] \lamda (t) \nabla g[/math] is a force that is normal to the path, which makes sense as you need some force to...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
[math]- \nabla U -m \frac{d^2}{dt^2} \bar{r}+\lambda (t) \nabla g=\bar{0}[/math]
>>8016099
Because it holds in so much more general situations.
i.e. Works for this [math] S = \int {\operatorname{dt} \left[ {\frac{1}{2}m{{\dot x}^2} - V\left( x \right)} \right]} [/math]
And also works for this, [math]S = - {T_{Dp}}\int {{d^{p + 1}}\sigma } {e^{ - {\Phi _0}}}\sqrt { - \det \left( {{g_{\alpha \beta }} + {B_{\alpha \beta }} + k{F_{\alpha \beta }} + k{b_{\alpha \beta }}} \right)} + {\mu _p}\int {{{\left( {C \wedge {e^{B + kF}}} \right)}_{p + 1}}} [/math]
>>8016491
Even if it works, can it still be fundamental?
is there a mathematical explanation for this?
explain the prob of 12 times zero in series part?
1/81 = (1/9)^2
= (0.111...)^2
= something about infinite sums
>>8016013
thats just a trashy calculation for assumption of random distribution of numbers in a run. 10^(-12) * 100%
why is graph theory such a raging meme?
What does this even mean? Are you asking why graph theory is becoming increasingly popular in the past 50 years?
>>8017136
No, OP is asking why it's such a raging meme.
Try reading next time buddy.
Because you are still not developed enough to understand its applications.
I got part A and B, but I don't understand part C. I have the solution but I don't understand it.
For (c), suppose that e_1 is in W. Then, there would exist N such that
[math] e_1=\sum_{k=1}^N c_k\sigma_k [/math]
But you showed in (b) that the e_n(k) were an orthonormal basis, so you start taking <·|e_N> on the relation and going down you will discover that all the c_k are 0. This is a contradicition so [math] e_1 \notin W [/math]
For (b), notice that e_n is NOT in W for each n, because <e_n|\sigma_n>≠0. Therefore, W perp is 0. Then you are done
>>8015899
What class is this? Senior level linear algebra?
>>8017428
fuck off, this is a great exercise for a first course in proof based linear algebra, so for mathematics sophomores
