>>4255135
bad shoop would hav taken 3 seconds to move the bottom image up 3 more inches to line up better

>>4255174
there's nothing wrong with it.

is this PPTM home?

>>4255174
i'm more concerned with the two white stripes in the bottom left of the image

but im bumpin this gem regardless. because it's not often i see a thread that i truly LOVE @ first site. i should take careful note of them all from now on and do a mockup of my ideal s4s catalog. that'd make a nice thread in and of itself.

irregardless first appeared in print in 1795