>>16271521
Diana Lee
>>16271521
Yes, please.
Id go back in time and start up a pussy hair saloon. Would have been a killer startup. Imagine a good landing strip or a worthy triangle on these ladies posted here. Me drooling.
>>16271521
all these images are not high-res. They're high size. learn the difference
>>16276901
Same here.
>>16276914
no, you need to learn what certain expressions mean
'high size' is bullshit expression never used when it comes to pictures, it would mean photo with high hight. so, yea you're stupid, and I can't help you with that
high res = high resolution, ie. large number of pixels per picture, that's what i posted
you could basically resized 60x40pix to 2k and it would be high res by itself. quality of picture is irrelevant when talking about resolution, but it is taken for granted to mean high quality as well, so I did post high quality high resolution photos.
anyways, seeing a tinny bit of interest, i'll post a few more:
>>16277450
>>16277452
>>16277455
Already had iPads back then!?
>>16277474
you just went full retard. never go full retard
>>16271571
Wtf is up with the quality on this?
>>16277474
That is a mirror.
up
>>16278299
I believe it's a scanned magazine page. The dots are just the different colors from the offset printing.
>>16277424
Good God. Who is this fine looking goddess?
Good thread showing that Playboy wasn't the only magazine in the '70s and '80s. This was a good mag called 'club.' Don't know if it is still published.
These are scanned magazine pages. Posting some of the /s/ safe images.
>>16285944
One of many I saved from those days
>>16285944
Nice!
