SAB
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /r/ - Adult Request
You are currently reading a thread in /r/ - Adult Request
Ready to play "Strip a Bitch" for the next two hours.
Rules -- Post your picts; I will try to xray them in the order posted. For the most part, I will post my results, regardless of how good they are. If I don't get a result. I will explain what I think my problem was and whether I think someone else might get a better result.
No underage. I will skip any obvious underaged subjects. If no face, I will skip. I also don't do asses. If I have done the shot before (or if I recognize it as posted way too often), I will probably skip. I also don’t like cropped picts, or close-ups that are effectively crops, and may skip.
Tell me who she is to you. I may skip if you don't.
>>13920007
I use multiple methods. I start with color and contrast filters, rather than the normal level method. If that doesn't work, I will try curves (rather than levels) with color shift to match skintone for light or white clothes and sharpening/blending. I sometimes use an exposure/color shift method for black or dark clothes. I use unsharpen mask and highpass filtering rather than burn to bring out detail, although I do use a light burn/dodge to bring out nipple color as a finishing touch. I also use blurs, both at the start, to even out noise, and at the end as a finisher.
If my ordinary method does not work, I will use other, more advanced methods before giving up, including work with inverts and channels.
My method works better with dark clothes (especially black) then it does with white ones. Also, there are a lot of rayers who do white, and do white exclusively and very well. For that reason, I may skip white clothes just because my time is limited here.
Some rules. Shadows and light gradients are a problem. Dark clothes require brighter light (otherwise no data); and light clothes require more dim light (otherwise they are washed out). Layers and glossy fabric are serious problems. The key here is that light penetrates through clothes, to skin, and then gets reflected back. To get at this color data, first the light has to penetrate (layers and glossiness interfere with that -- and swimsuits are often both layered and glossy).
The picture is manipulated to remove color levels associated with clothes, leaving a very faint and often low quality image of bare skin, which can then be enriched through filters that duplicate and fill in pixel patterns. This is why patterned fabric, stripes, shadows, and color gradients are a problem. In such cases, you can't just remove some color levels to reach a few that show skin and not much else.
>>13920011
>that show skin
lol
you never show any skin you dumbfuck
all x-ray effect techniques are just bullshit shit-tier photoshopping
lrn2physics
dumb mother fucker is confirmed dumb
GTFO!
This >>13920032
It's always eurofags that do this gay xray stuff that died out everywhere else 10 years ago as a defect in a previous version of photoshop.
Europoors need to update to 2015 and move on.
Anybody who believes you can show flesh through a 1280 2D image because some tard on /r used photoshop on it is certified moron and probably needs to read a book and get off the internet.
>>13920032
OK --
Here is that pict after two steps in photoshop.
1. Autotone
2. Increase exposure.
Does it show skin? Yes. Is it shooped? No.
Idiot troll is idiot.
>>13920007
this?
>>13920040
>>13920040
Well. If you think this is a result of a PS bug from an earlier version -- open the pict in your version of PS and repeat the two steps described here.
>>13920044
>>13920044
Jeezus, are you really that dumb?
Posting a finished photoshopped pic and claiming that "because pic, therefore xray work, hurr durr" only reinforces you are a complete idiot.
Little-brained dude: get a fucking clue. You can't even logic either.
Analogy: Look at sun up in sky, therefore hurr-durr Sun God.
Jeezus, I didn't think people around here were literally that fucking dumb. So sad.
>>13920037
>>13920058
ignore that asshole
>>13920058
Really. Anyone who has PS and wants to verify who is right here -- the the unxrayed picture and do the two steps I stated. If you cannot duplicate result, then I am lying and xray might be the myth the trolls claim.
I do not mind peer review.
>>13920050
I'm not him, but honestly this has been proven to be just pure bs over and over again. It was well-settled long ago. You must be new here.
Also, he's right. Adobe patched what caused this like 10 years ago and it was a programming mistake. Plus just use common sense as literally there IS NOT DATA in an image that small (even one pixel) that could show skin between the threads of fabric such that extrapolation (even if possible, it's not) to expose skin. Seriously, not even multimillion dollar goverment equipment at airports or NMR in the best scientific labs, or MRI in hospital equipment can show surface flesh. If that expensive equipment can't show it live on a full body, full resolution imaging system in 3D, how can a little 2D image over the internet magically reveal flesh? It makes no sense and you have to abandon common sense.
Grow up.
Seriously.
If you want to deceive yourself, that's one thing. Just keep being stupid. You'll go far in life. But to sit here and pretend to the children and feeble-minded that you are showing flesh over the internet makes you about a predator scumbag peddling snake oil to 12 year olds.
Please
>>13920078
peer review was a million years ago on this
fact is this xray effect stuff is all nonsense
always has been
most grew out of this a long time ago
r u really that stupid to believe this?
>>13920041
>>13920069
thx OP
Thank you
>>13920093
Give up.
OP is obviously mentally-challenged just like the pathetic anons in this thread posting their infatuation they are too afraid to even talk to in real life.
All just defects of the human race obsessed with their lil pee-pees and unable to relate to others as normal human beings.
Welcome to the asshole of the internet and arguably it's stupidest board!
>>13920045
Having trouble with this. Can't get anything reliable.
>>13920049
Too glossy and bad fabric pattern.
>>13920052
>>13920057
Too much contrast.
>>13920062
Can't do bw
>>13920079
>>13920083
Not good at all.
>>13920087
Right looks young. Left is no go due to fabric pattern.
>>13920095
Bad lighting and poor pict quality. This is the best I can do.
>>13920099
Terrible lights and shadows.
>>13920104
Weird glossiness and fabric. Not able to get any clear skin image.
But I'm taking a break. May be back later. If anyone else wants to take over, feel free.
>>13920176
Thank you sir
Show us what they got.
>>13920106
Thank you for sharing,but, Bobby, is that really appropriate language or something you should say if you want to have any friends?
Please get the bra off the girl on the left. Hint of nipple.
still doing this?
not op
>>13920359
love you <3
other than op, feel free to do this
Please continue OP :'(
Xray the girl on the left (in pink) please
>>13920481
Bump
do this
this one should be doable
>>13920359
Can u show her pussy and tits pls
>>13920086
I'm not disagreeing but would like your thoughts on the following two atachments. Here's the first e....
>>13920086
And here's the second one..
>>13920876
Btw, aspiring xrayers....enjoy this one.
shoopers please
>>13920883
also bumping this
her please
>>13921353
>>13920481
girl on right? or both? classmates
girl on right is my neighbor!
girl on left? old vocal coach
roomate
>>13920252
used to work with her...one in grey
old classmate
girl on left is my friends gf
>>13920250
friend
Anything doable from either of these?
http://imgur.com/a/61Gus
http://imgur.com/a/DluZR
She's my best friend I have been dying to see her naked. She's a bartender
>>13921512
Will post pics of her panties in reward!
can you xray this upskirt..its a girl in my one class.
This please
Pls OP
this?
>>13921480
Not getting a clear image at all.
>>13921484
Bad angle causing a light gradation and a contrasting bra. Might be able to do middle, though.
>>13921488
Thick bra and light angle are serious problems. Haven't a done a workable picture of her before?
>>13921491
Not getting anything. I think faint pink nips and multiple layers of clothes -- that is the hardest.
>>13921495
Finally, a result. A quite bad result. But a result.
Possible?
This one please OP she's my aunt
old friend
my friends gf with the tattoos?
girl on left? i know...freaky pic..i did a theater show with her
friend
went to my school
Girls ass in middle please!
>>13921543
thanks!
strip my bosses wife....she is sexy
>>13921513
Please op do mine
Can you show her pussy please??
>>13920104
Nothing?
>>13921662
>>13921595
Please op
>>13921658
>>13921692
No face.
>>13921523
please?
>>13921642
B u m p plz op
Op that's the only one that looks that can be X-ray this is her if it helps please help me out I have been trying to get close to a win for a year now. If you can nude shop this you will be my hero but I will be fine with an X-ray at the one of her with her phone covering her face
>>13921642
No, but ...
>>13920207
Please OP, this it not FB. This is a hard one, but please try, I can't figure it out myself :/
>>13921686
Damn! Try this one please
>>13920207
Seriously? Cropped. Stripes. Bikini.
No.
>>13921692
The tilted kilt girl is her please doit op
please?
>>13921725
Okay, how about this one then? :)
This one then
>>13921715
That's my buddy's girl. Thanks anyway. Here's her ass for you
Please op this is her
>>13921723
Not really.
please??
anything from her?
>>13921740
>>13921715
Long shot! Can you do this?
>>13921741
Please op
>>13921765
She's hot. I want to see her pussy.
>>13921728
Bad contrasts.
>>13921739
Please op
>>13921740
Sorry -- I don't do asses.
>>13921741
>>13920099
>>13921793
Thank you so much op can you do a fake nude if I email you?
It's my gf's mom
>>13921747
Not op but will help with some of this i can do some stuff op prob cant
>>13921744
Damn thanks
>>13921757
Those aren't real faces.
>>13921764
Bad crop.
>>13921765
Not really.
>>13921833
Nothing on her underwear?
>>13921777
She has no bra. I can show her face if you want...
>>13921786
>>13921846
That worked better. Thank you OP!
Plz
>>13921862
How old is she??
The one in the pic is 18 that was at my house shes hot as fuck
>>13921811
>>13921797
Bad pattern and bikini.
>>13921805
No
>>13921819
Ambitious. If you can do a legit xray I can't, I'll be very impressed.
>>13921811
Hey OP try this
Please!!!
>>13921896
If my gf had this tits!
>>13921855
Bump OP
>>13921862
Looks young.
>>13921868
Please OP
Please
>>13921902
No face
>>13921905
Bad light contrast and thick bra.
>>13921924
>>13920007
Done for now. Maybe the ambitious rayer can take over.
This one pls, she's my ex
Please op
>>13920007
Hello friend. I do xrays sometimes and saw something yesterday that was interesting. A guy did a fake that was pretty realistic looking.
Upon looking it and trying to deconstruct what his technique was, I'm pretty sure he created a second level with the original image at something like 30% opacity and laid that overtop of a nudeshop where he'd used liquefy/warp to create fake boobs on the girl.
Just saw your thread and that you're doing the often thankless work of taking requests so thought I'd share that with you in case it's of any interest .
>>13922031
Best i was able to do
>>13922055
Cant be done cause of the clothing and quaility
>>13922062
Yeah -- that is a standard fake-ray technique. I don't do fake-rays (or even understand fake-rays). If I want a fake, I want something more dramatic than a overlay -- so headswaps make sense. Xraying is completely different.
One, both, take your pick
Thanks in advance, OP.
can you expose this beauty
>>13922133
Look too young
Please OP
Thanks in advance :D
>>13922148
Can't do much with the pixelation.That happens with dark clothes in faint (inside) light.
>>13922148
Srry to dissapoint but im not tht great at black clothes
>>13922164
>>13922167
Plz get better quaility pics
this one possible?
please,please. and thank you
>>13922184
Same girl
Lab partner (:<
>>13922184
Whoops, forgot to mention who she is...
classmate in college who tends to walk around wearing spandex all the time
The one in the center if you don't mind, OP. Can provide proof she's in college if required.
Thanks man.
>>13922163
The one on the left is a young 18, the other is her 16 yr old sister. Just ignore the 16 yr old, I guess.
>>13922208
Whoops forgot to say who she is. Gf from high school, won't return txts or calls any more and won't say why.
Godspeed, OP.
Excellent stuff OP
Please x-Ray . Thanks op.
>>13922272
