>>14247403
She's not wearing a bra...
you get what im meaning
>>14247403
>>14247456
>Saving as a png.
absolutely disgusting.
you needlessly increased the files size by over 6 times.
>>14247495
not everyone likes .potatopg
is this x-rayable?
Can anyone shop her nude, tits?
Thanx in adv
>>14247495
Srsly? You are still concerned with file size?
>>14248077
lol it's a huge file and you can already see her tits
>>14248059
she's cute I don't have skills to do it though
>>14247971
nah not rly, it's too dark, the bra
>>14248077
>Srsly? You are still concerned with file size?
only when a person goes full fucking retard and uses png for a photograph. The original source is 260k, if you were concerned about lossy compression you could have bumped up the quality a bit and maybe hit 400k. There is absolutely no reason to use png, it offers no benefits.
>>14248402
>it offers no benefits
>xray thread
gtfo you stupid cunt
>>14248402
There are benefits to png. The technique involves rebuilding data after filtering -- and png works better for that process as it allows the new data (from processes like highpass filter, etc.) to be preserved better.
Shoop fakes -- format may not matter. Xraying -- format matters.
This pict is not a good candidate for xraying for several reasons. The texture primarily -- but jpeg format is also a problem.
nudeshop this, please
