File: image.jpg (65 KB, 480x639) Image search: [Google]

65 KB, 480x639

And her

File: image.jpg (111 KB, 491x724) Image search: [Google]

111 KB, 491x724

And

File: image.jpg (57 KB, 403x730) Image search: [Google]

57 KB, 403x730

Or

File: image.jpg (67 KB, 384x676) Image search: [Google]

67 KB, 384x676

And her

Worst fucking quailty ever shits not gonna work if u have a 640 x 800 pic fuckin noob

File: image.jpg (62 KB, 627x442) Image search: [Google]

62 KB, 627x442

And

File: Untitled-1.png (269 KB, 495x649) Image search: [Google]

269 KB, 495x649

>>13941605

File: image.jpg (66 KB, 386x627) Image search: [Google]

66 KB, 386x627

Heres another

>>13941605
Most of the these clothes are too thick and block much of the infrared that would have been picked up by the CMOS sensor. Thus when we try x-ray them, there is too much noise to decipher the signal to a usable degree.

Protip: Find thinner clothes faggot.

File: image.jpg (26 KB, 333x355) Image search: [Google]

26 KB, 333x355

Another

File: image.jpg (62 KB, 399x581) Image search: [Google]

62 KB, 399x581

Her

File: image.jpg (78 KB, 423x611) Image search: [Google]

78 KB, 423x611

This one

File: image.jpg (86 KB, 800x598) Image search: [Google]

86 KB, 800x598

.

File: image.jpg (175 KB, 782x1822) Image search: [Google]

175 KB, 782x1822

.

If you want xrays then find better pics.
Generally high quality with one thin layer covering, not a tank and bra underneath.
Otherwise youll only get fake rays