[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Can we report gorilla poster(s) on /sci/? The same shitposter(s)
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /qa/ - Question & Answer

Thread replies: 7
Thread images: 2
Can we report gorilla poster(s) on /sci/? The same shitposter(s) makes the same threads daily.

These are the active threads right now.

>>>/sci/8206884
>>>/sci/8207906
>>>/sci/8207648
>>>/sci/8205261
>>>/sci/8198000
>>>/sci/8204497
>>>/sci/8206389
>>>/sci/8206464
>>
File: 1467672038292.jpg (84 KB, 721x720) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1467672038292.jpg
84 KB, 721x720
>>in-depth 223 reply conversation on science and race
>>one of the longest threads going
>muh gorrilla posters r cancer
>*lists /qa/ on a listed board*
>>
>>592777
>in-depth
Look in the /sci/ archives. Every thread on race plays out the same.

>/sci/ users posting >>>/pol/
>/pol/ users becoming outraged and posting social science and making basic terminology mistakes.
>/sci/ users calling them retards.
>Thread gets deleted a few hundred posts in and then the cycle begins again in a new thread.
>>
>>592788
Evidence that it's an active topic /sci/ likes discussing
>>
>>592796
The only thing /sci/ likes about those threads is blowing the fuck out of dumb /pol/ users.
>>
>>592809
Yes, yes. You are perfectly representative of the whole board, and the ones who disagree aren't TRUE members of your board. We all know. They're all anti-scientific idiot bigots for holding a different viewpoint, aren't they
>>
>viewpoints

Sure, if pointing out that an individual with a flawed layman's understanding of science is formally incorrect about something can be considered having a different viewpoint. Then yes. /sci/ users who have formally studied the topics at hand have a different viewpoint than crossboarders who do not.

/sci/ is a board where mathfags and sciencefags can discuss math and science. It is not a board where crossboarders can go to have their ideas validated by "smart guys".
Thread replies: 7
Thread images: 2

[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at imagescucc@gmail.com with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.