Can we report gorilla poster(s) on /sci/? The same shitposter(s) makes the same threads daily.
These are the active threads right now.
>>>/sci/8206884
>>>/sci/8207906
>>>/sci/8207648
>>>/sci/8205261
>>>/sci/8198000
>>>/sci/8204497
>>>/sci/8206389
>>>/sci/8206464
>>in-depth 223 reply conversation on science and race
>>one of the longest threads going
>muh gorrilla posters r cancer
>*lists /qa/ on a listed board*
>>592777
>in-depth
Look in the /sci/ archives. Every thread on race plays out the same.
>/sci/ users posting >>>/pol/
>/pol/ users becoming outraged and posting social science and making basic terminology mistakes.
>/sci/ users calling them retards.
>Thread gets deleted a few hundred posts in and then the cycle begins again in a new thread.
>>592788
Evidence that it's an active topic /sci/ likes discussing
>>592796
The only thing /sci/ likes about those threads is blowing the fuck out of dumb /pol/ users.
>>592809
Yes, yes. You are perfectly representative of the whole board, and the ones who disagree aren't TRUE members of your board. We all know. They're all anti-scientific idiot bigots for holding a different viewpoint, aren't they
>viewpoints
Sure, if pointing out that an individual with a flawed layman's understanding of science is formally incorrect about something can be considered having a different viewpoint. Then yes. /sci/ users who have formally studied the topics at hand have a different viewpoint than crossboarders who do not.
/sci/ is a board where mathfags and sciencefags can discuss math and science. It is not a board where crossboarders can go to have their ideas validated by "smart guys".
