Archived threads in /qa/ - Question & Answer - 21. page
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
Is Notch the most based vidya dev or what?
>indie dev: we should be able to spout our opinions without being harassed
>indie devs: look someone has an opinion we don't like, lets go harass him and he can't defend himself because he's richer than us
I want off this ride
Non-ironic cults of personality on 4chan should be exterminated.
Keep your cancer on /v/.
Does ">tfw" stand for "that face when" or "that feeling when"?
>>584905
Both. Now go away newfag.
Neither it's "Tits fucking when?"
It's actually a spin-off of ">tcw"
(that chair when)
I keep getting assigned the IP used by one of the guys who spams boards with the "how can white boys even compete" threads and porn.
He's starting to get entire IPv4 range bans but who ever did it did not get all the addresses in his range. The ISP he is using rotates IPv4 addresses very rapidly and uses IPv6. He may not actually be skilled enough to hide well via proxies and just resumes posting everytime the IPv4 address rotates. It looks like he is just burning through all the IP addresses his residential connection can be assigned.
I don't...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>584879
>Do mods ever file complaints with ISPs against long term spammers?
I guarantee ISPs won't care
>>584890
It's a pretty small ISP, nothing like the large American ones. Once I had an issue with routing to a game server going through a US ISP with connectivity issues, they actually fixed when I showed it to them via support tickets.
>it's a bbc meme poster
>he's using advanced chan magic to avoid ban
At some point I believed these threads to be original but now I'm fairly certain it's a professional shill. Thanks for the insight man.
Can Hiroyuki bring back W.T. Snacks?
Swaglord is pretty much the same as Snacks, banning people for fun or making silly stickies, yet all of you hate him.
Bringing back Snacks wouldn't change a damn thing (and he doesn't want to come back, either).
snacks is too busy with his meme DJ show
>>584835
God I don't think Hiro would be prepared for his magnitude of faggotry
Alright /qa/, how do we save 4chan?
>>584827
Delete it.
>>584827
make yotsuba relevant again
make hiro interact with us like moot did
>>584827
Delete /pol/ :^]
Why don't you just rename /sp/ to /pol2/?
>>584757
Because that's /his/
>>584782
kek
oh go cry about it on reddit
>RRRRREEEEE
>praise KEK
>"weebs"
>"normies"
>kys
>This.
>fpbp
>baka
>desu
>senpai
>lmao
Redditors, /b/tards and nu-robots are destroying this site.
>didn't include Nu/pol/
Or does that fall under reddit
>>584608
They're also destroying /pol among other boards. But they first came through /b/, /r9k/ in 2015, or lebbit first.
>>584607
Found the "how can /pol/ defend this" poster
>me? I only consume media from the glorious nippon! of course!
Who are you swampwriting?
>>584600
What a respectable black gentleman
>>584600
>I'd boku his pico if you know what I mean
-anon 7/7/2016
cowe
cowe is a niggere faggote
>>584559
Absolutely haram! Delete this!
milke
I need the knowledge of some (relative) 4chan veterans.
What did "Marked for deletion (old)" do when it was enabled on all boards? For years I was under the impression that it prevented bumping at a certain time after thread creation.
However, this is proven false when posting in an (old) thread on /f/, which bumps it to the top just like any other thread.
So what was it actually for? Is it a reminder for mods to manually delete stagnant threads? Is it a note for anons to start wrapping things up and politely make room for other threads?
I'm...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>584532
Threads used to have time limits that put them into the queue to be deleted when new threads were posted. If "Marked for deletion (old)" appeared on your thread, you had some N-number of threads that could be posted to the board before your thread would 404, regardless of what page it was on. 4chan replaced this with the bump limit. It's functionally the same.
>>584536
>it's functionally the same
Are you sure this is the case? The current system depends on the rhythm of posts inside a thread. An active thread can reach bumplimit within an hour then be on its way to page 10, but on the same board a thread can last for a day or two if anons only bump it from page 9/10 to prolong its life.
This effect is magnified to weeks and months on slower boards.
In the pruning system that you are describing, the latter situation wouldn't happen...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>584536
>4chan replaced this with the bump limit.
It worked in tandem with it. There was once upon a time where threads would be old and super dead on page 10 and if the board was slow enough, they would expire after a time.
>complains about certain percentage of board being shitposts
>any relevant topics to be discussed on said board is compartmentalized in a series of generals
>the shitposts are simply filling up a vacuum
Who even thought generals were a good practice for an anonymous imageboard anyway? They evidently aren't.
>>584511
So post in the generals. Lurk moar and so youll fit in and post in the generals.
>>584513
1) I enjoy filling up those vacuums
2) why would any reasonable anon ever participate in a general?
>>584516
to discuss a topic with other individuals
Is this Anon right?
>>584501
Close. Moot deleted /new/ because it became Stormforth 2.0 and brought in /pol/ with the warning that he'd shut it down again if it did.
>>584504
And he never did...
>>584512
Because /pol/ never became stormfront again...
Why do these people exist?
Because bad parenting exists.
>>584431
There's literally no better explanation than this
The absence of a strong male role model, brought upon by feminism, made legitimate by the Democratic Party.
Does /his/ even have moderators? Some asshats are spamming the same thread over and nothing is being done about it. Furthermore, there are frequent violations of the 25 year rule and many threads are severely off topic. What's going on?
>>584413
I'm pretty sure they didnt hire new jannies
>>584418
>jannies
>hired
are you implying they're compensated?
>>584467
He was, but he didn't mean to. He probably should have said "appointed".
Why are people on this board so mean?
I'm sorry
>>584345
Oh Anon, I can't stay mad at you.
Repeatedly linked on low quality boards.
Such is life.
