She's widely considered to have been a very good secretary of state.
"All the lies and corruption" is a meaningless. Anybody who has held a public office for as long as she has is going to be involved with things that those who dislike her will interpret as "lies and corruption." It's part and parcel of being a politician.
It takes a level of maturity and insight to speak objectively about these matters, and you aren't making the grade.
There are plenty of things about Hillary Clinton that I don't care for and I didn't even support her way back 2000 when she ran for Senator of NY (I considered her an opportunistic carpet-bagger).
That said, the idea that she'd is a less qualified candidate or would be a less effective president than Donald Trump is a exercise in a pitiful level of ignorance. Hillary Clinton is a centrist, establishment-type candidate who will change nothing, but will also run the country reasonably well for however long she serves and who will not do anything reckless. She will also likely make excellent supreme court appointments.
>>73149918
A Hillary presidency would be anything but haphazard - it, in fact, would be ultra-competent. A person might not personally like what she stands for or what she wants to do, but the idea that someone who has spent the last 26 years either in the white house or in Congress would lead a "haphazard" administration is either a total fool with virtually no understanding of how government works, or is just trolling.
Hillary Clinton can rightly be criticized as likely not being a reformer and being beholden to a particular set of special interests, but the idea that her administration would lack competence and/or be filled with any but highly qualified individuals is utterly preposterous.
The gulf in competence, ability, presidential temperment and deal-making ability between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump is an impossibly wide chasm.
Meme magic cannot be bought. Begone shill.
>>73149918
>qualified candidate
Everyone would have been better off if she, and people like her, had done absolutely NOTHING in the middle east. They destabilized it and all their plans fell flat. How can you be competent if any random person would have done better than you by leaving it mostly as it is?
>>73150227
If she'll be just like Obama, then I'll do backlips. He's been ta really good president, IMO, especially in his 2nd term.
I bet you'll say "Nearly started civil wars?" I'll bite - what the heck are you talking about? A bunch of racists resent the fact that the president is an intelligent black man who cut from much greater cloth than they, and they hate him for it. Tough sh!t. He *is* better than they are.
>>73149918
>Why do you guys hate Hillary?
Because she ardently advocates for the demographic displacement of European peoples in their own countries. She is "white genocide" the candidate.
>>73150570
You must be a troll. You can't be this stupid. Are you just scared of the black man?
Fuck off cunt.
/pol/ will never vote a globalist shill.
>>73150845
Hillary is our only hope from avoiding pure totaltarian nightmare
>>73150998
Fuck off shill
Your favorite employer is the worst possible result of this election
>>73149918
women have 0 business in government, especially this corrupt shrew of a liar
>>73149918
>$0.02 has been deposited in you bank account
>>73149918
>>73149994
>>73150461
>>73150841
How much are you making per hour for posting this shit? I'm betting it's lower than the $12 minimum wage Hillary wants to put into law.
>>73150841
I am scared that the black man will flood into our civilized white countries and turn them into apocalyptic third world hell holes. Africans have significantly smaller brains than the humans that evolved in the north, consequently, Africans are not compatible with European civilization.
>>73151201
You know nothing about politics you racist hillbilly
The extent to which the Republican Congress has thwarted 2nd term Obama is almost totally unprecedented, but that would look like hands across America compared to what you'd have if there is a president loathed by most politicians in both parties.
It would be difficult enough for a third-party candidate (which, effectively, Trump is) to govern as president, but it could be done by an exceptional, pragmatic individual who genuinely cared about getting things done. Trump is none of these things, in spades..
His administration would also be haphazard, because Trump has displayed an appallingly low aptitude for most of the issues that he speaks about, and has wildly flailed, policy-wise, between divergent perspectives - somethings within the same speech/interview/debate, plus, there is almost nobody with any actual experience who wants to work with Trump.
The attitude that Trump as president would ultimately be more or less like anybody else that a particular liber/conservative/etc. is opposed to is so profoundly ignorant that it's scary. But so are most Trump supporters. And Trump himself.
>>73151483
>Union Jack
>Hillbilly
Maybe you should learn to read a map before you talk shit about politics.
>>73149918
Benghazi was a demonstration of competence?. She's a huge warmonger. She will attempt to further the legal discrimination against white males.
>>73151394
Almost nothing you said is either supportable or specific enough to be subject to debate.
I think you're just a troll.
Nobody could possibly be this stupid. Except, I guess, the blue-collar racist Trump supporters.
What a regrettable bunch of dead weight. Most of Kentucky, West Virginia, Western PA and upstate NY could be just gassed or fed to a meat grinder and the country would be none the worse.
>>73149918
>it's fine that she's corrupt; all career politicians are
sounds like a perfect reason to support trump even if you don't agree with his policies
>>73149918
>She's widely considered to have been a very good secretary of state.
>>73149918
Hillary farts during debate:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0aedNpZeOw
>>73151603
This doesn't in any way support your earlier hypothesis that she will be "bad."
It's about her campaigning skills. Which she'll require barely any of to defeat Donald Trump, anyway.
The qualities that make for a good candidate have little in common with the qualities that would make a good president. Hillary Clinton's potential weaknesses as a candidate are generally known and agreed upon by most commentators.
What did she mean by this, OP?
>>73149918
Because they've been spoonfed a steady diet of Wingnut Radio since birth.
>>73149918
hahahahahahahhahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahah shills these days amirite
>>73151551
YOU ARE SO FUCKING BAD AT THIS
>>73151611
Biological race differences are a fact of life. Non-whites must be expelled from our countries in order for our civilization to survive.
>>73149918
>widely considered good
can you name one source? because everything I can find is a disaster.
>Lost 6 BILLION dollars as sec of state
>fucked up egypt, lybia, arab spring, ISIS
>can't figure out how to work a MOTHERFUCKING BLACKBERRY to handle two email accounts, with any army of tech slaves at her disposal.
She's a war hawk, because the war machine pays her bills.
She's a big bank supporter, just look at her campaign contributions.
She will send people to the death in forign wars (like her voting record proves) for her campaign coffers next time, if elected.
She's the worst choice, for the American people. And we know it.
It's why you make these threads.
You're scared voters might win.
>>73149918
She had her goons demand the personal information of every comedian that made fun of her at the Laugh Factory, despite the fact the jokes made about her were incredibly tame in comparison to jokes made about literally every male politician ever.
That is the only reason I need to disapprove of her candidacy. If she's so insecure as to have her goons round up every last bit of dissent now, I don't want to see her in office with even more power at her disposal.
>>73151738
IF YOUR BOSS IS READING THIS. YOU SHOULD BE FIRED. YOU ARE SO FUCKING OBVIOUS IT'S (almost) NOT EVEN FUNNY ANYMORE
>>73151751
Blanket statement bullshit. You can fill in any 'important' persons name in there and it'd be the same shit.
>>73149918
Dude, you've been posting this shit for hours. Don't they even give you smoke breaks in the Hillary shill sweatshops?
why
>>73151846
As far as facts, that's all I've done is provide them.
You, on the other hand, do nothing but provide written materials by others that you're too dumb to even understand well enough to properly use to support your arguments.
I mean, if you're a GED candidate with a resume thick on coal mining and slaugherhouse gigs and have a hard time with words larger than two syllables, then I understand why you're part of Trump's narrow swath of supporters.
Bernie Sanders does very well with the educated. Trump isn't winning *any* educated independents or Democrats.
I'm not completely writing off Trump because a terrorist attack would probably favor him, as would an an indictment against Clinton. Also, it's not unprecedented for negative television ads based purely on fiction to work (see: Willie Horton, Swift Boaters).
However, I also believe that in the very unlikely event that Trump enters the fall with any kind of a pucher's chance the CIA will probably have him killed.
Quite simply, there is virtually no possible way for him to ever actually become president.
>>73151611
>could be just gassed or fed to a meat grinder and the country would be none the worse.
Toss in Detroit, Flint, Southside Chicago, Ferguson, Gary IN, Nawlins, DC/Atlanta/Baltimore exurbs Mississippi river delta, New Mexico, borderland Texas, inland California, and you got yourself a deal.
It's literally impossible to shill on /pol/. I don't know if all these shills understand that.
We're not changing our minds, especially when you mention Hillary.
>>73149918
>>73149918
Please understand, I get that you're getting paid to virally clean up her wretched reputation, and that you have no conviction behind what you say.
But most of /pol/ has been inundated with viral "shilling" and can easily spot these posts.
Let your handlers know that the tactic is largely ineffectual and a waste of campaign dollars.
>>73149918
OP IS A PAID SHILL.
DOWN WITH THE CORRUPT CLINTON DYNASTY.
http://www.businessinsider.com/clinton-pac-spends-1-million-to-correct-people-online-2016-4
Keep coming, shills. You killed Americans in Benghazi. We'll see how supportive you are after the money dries up.
>>73149918
>he gulf in competence, ability, presidential temp
Canada learned how to use a proxy, nothing to see here bros.
>>73151989
Also, It's hard for me to envision Trump winning when there's at least a 30% chance he loses Utah.
>>73149918
>She's widely considered to have been a very good secretary of state.
Appeal to authority fallacy.
>"All the lies and corruption" is a meaningless. Anybody who has held a public office for as long as she has is going to be involved with things that those who dislike her will interpret as "lies and corruption." It's part and parcel of being a politician.
Politicians are corrupt, so she's just as good (bad) as anyone else
>It takes a level of maturity and insight to speak objectively about these matters, and you aren't making the grade.
Poorly constructed ad hom attack?
>There are plenty of things about Hillary Clinton that I don't care for and I didn't even support her way back 2000 when she ran for Senator of NY (I considered her an opportunistic carpet-bagger).
part 1 of good cop bad cop routine, this is the bad cop
>That said, the idea that she'd is a less qualified candidate or would be a less effective president than Donald Trump is a exercise in a pitiful level of ignorance. Hillary Clinton is a centrist, establishment-type candidate who will change nothing, but will also run the country reasonably well for however long she serves and who will not do anything reckless. She will also likely make excellent supreme court appointments.
Part 2 of good cop bad cop routine.
literally the only thing that isnt an outright lie in here is that she's an establishment candidate. go hang yourself on your modem cord you paid shill.
I'm with her!
>>73152110
No one is being paid to shill for Hillary by the way. It's a Republican-funded lie and a pathetic attempt to smear her campaign.
>>73151909
It's not really a 'blanket statement' if you look at facts.
He just didn't give the whole story.
>>73149918
Will she build a wall? No? Then we hate her.
If she says she will build a wall, we will love her
>>73149918
Except SCOTUS appts would be nullified by the TPP she helped write, paid faggot
>>73149918
Explain the russian federation, rostadom, uranium one, the aurora project, the Clinton foundation and their connection to hillary Clinton during her time in office as secretary of state.
Explain how she didn't fuck those guys in Benazir by denying support repeatedly the entire time precluding during and after the incident.
Explain how her emails weren't wrong.
Fucking shill.
I honestly think she would get things done if she were president. She is well respected experienced and qualified. I honestly think she would be a pretty good president.
>>73149918
What's not the hate about Hillary? She is the biggest two-faced cunt on the entire planet.
>>73152392
No one is being paid to shill for Hillary by the way. It's a Republican-funded lie and a pathetic attempt to smear her campaign.
>>73152392
Is this really the best job you could find? No wonder you want a welfare state.
>>73152386
see: >>73151989
>>73150061
How in any way is this a meme? This is literally one of the rare quality posts with thought and substance
>>73149994
>>73149918
The entire time hillary has been in politics, beginning when she was a secretary for nixon, she was crooked and incompetent and merely filled positions as an empty placeholder who accomplished nothing aside from holding the position and moving to the next vacancy.
>well qualified.
>>73151989
You've posted no facts, and your last post is proof of it.
Clinton is a racist and takes money from the KKK. This used to be on a dozen sites, and not it's here.
http://www.vocativ.com/312479/kkk-endorses-hillary-clinton-for-president/
Here is how she steal from the world.
https://pjmedia.com/blog/hillarys-laundromat-clinton-foundation-got-cash-from-u-s-development-aid-recipient-nations/
Here's when she stole money from taxpayers
http://freebeacon.com/politics/clinton-charities-raked-in-millions-of-taxpayer-dollars/
So what were your references again? I can't find them in any of your posts.
>>73151989
Highly educated Bernie lovers here.
>>73152655
I can't stand reflexive bashing of Goldman Sachs and other large investment banks. Wall Street firms have been responsible for a lot of shady and destructive behavior, which most certainly requires greater addressing than it currently does, but on the whole large investment firms such as Goldman Sachs are among the greatest forces for good in the history of mankind.
>>73152392
Get what done? Start more wars in the middle east and continue shitting on the rights of every American?
>>73152748
This is a lie being propagated by Trump and many low-information voters, by the way.
Trump has been just as pro-interventionist as Hillary when it mattered.
In Libya:
https://www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkaczynski/trump-claims-he-didnt-support-libya-intervention-but-he-did
In Iraq:
http://www.vox.com/2016/2/18/11057968/donald-trump-iraq-war-2002
He also called for 30,000 ground troops in Syria this year:
http://www.politico.com/blogs/2016-gop-primary-live-updates-and-results/2016/03/trump-iraq-syria-220608
Trump's "isolationism" is a total lie. Don't let anyone tell you otherwise.
>>73152738
He refused offer for more security from state dept
I think for Hillary to have done well at her job as secretary of state she would have needed to have been rocking a SCAR 17 singlehandedly killing dune coons attacking the ambassadors compound
>>73152910
You must be a newbie to politics. Any proof?
>>73153012
The real difference is that Trump is against nation building. The latter half of the 15 year long disaster that has been US involvement in the middle east was largely perpetrated by Hillary.
Here's some more of those high IQ Bernie lovers.
>>73153131
Proof? You're the one who made a claim, you provide proof she would get anything done. I was just asking you if she was going to be a shitheel like the last President.
>>73149918
how much do they pay you shills
>>73153231
A bunch of racists resent the fact that the president is an intelligent black man who cut from much greater cloth than they, and they hate him for it. Tough sh!t. He *is* better than they are.
>>73149918
>>73153374
>A bunch of racists
We don't take kindly to yer kind round here.
>>73153012
No one said anything about trump, my little clintorors.
Nice try to deflect from the fact she's a murderous war hawk, that is funded by countries that behead homosexuals, while she is claiming to give them rights.
She wants to take away American rights to bear arms, but wants to ship full automatic weapons overseas.
You've addressed none of my points about the anti Christ, so let me read what you posted for a minute.
>>73153374
>Tough sh!t
made me laugh, thank you
>>73149918
>millions of ruined lives and wasted tax dollars was just a prank bro
fuck off
Dumping Anti Clinton ammunition in this thread
Use it to destroy the paid Clinton Shills.
>>73149686
This stuff is for Trump Warriors and Bernie Bros
Fight the good fight. Save America.
Destroy the most evil person in US politics.
>>73153507
This is rich coming from a gullible buffoon who believes everything he reads on 4chan and Breitbart and directly copy/pastes meme "arguments."
The Buzzfeed article merely provided a video and transcript of his Trump's own words on the topic, which are unambiguous. In order to refute them, you'd have to prove the video they provided, which is a matter of public record, is fabricated.
Of course, you can't do that. You're the typical 4chan troll who spends his miserable life online and swallows any piece of right-wing propaganda you're fed.
>>73151909
Why is Hillary a racist?
High Energy Bernie lovers
>>73153012
OK, read it.
ALL of your sources uses the words "maby, possibly, I guess, Forecasted, my tarro cards."
Go back and look at my sources. You are promoting a criminal. you might as well sell crack to school kids. You have no counter, you just push your agenda with
>possibly, could, might, hopefully
Educated people are onto your lies. i wish I could lick the tears off your face on election night.
Her lies will be revealed.
>>73153883
Meme pics from the interwebs isn't proof dipshit
>>73153883
whats wrong with racism, cuck?
>>73152821
And that is why nobody takes you seriously. Please vacate the website, and do not return.
>>73151989
*Bernie does well with millennials that don't want to pay loans.*
Fixed.
>>73154125
> cuck
I bet you're intelligent.
>>73154213
Here's some more of Bernie's millenials.
>>73154213
Can someone translate
>>73153966
>TFW their taxes have to pay for all the vandalism repairs and new police cars
>>73151382
He ignores this post of course.
SHILL.
>>73154193
It's not so much pro-Hillary as pro-capitalism. Wall Street is awesome.
>>73154272
I bet you love having niggers fuck your wife.
>>73154213
Real nigga hours here.
Don't fucking pretend to speak for me.
Kill yourself, I'm not shitposting or anything, I'am fucking serious.
>>73154213
*unable to pay 5-figure debt because student loans are greater than the stagnated wage/salary of the job their major qualifies them for
>inb4 just STEM faggot
>>73154020
Most of this has been disproven by the BOFA report
Hillary's hillarious joke about Ghandi working a gas station.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rs2GopErUZ4
>>73154371
Yes but saying Goldman isn't an issue and going farther by saying it benefits mankind is absurd. Nobody here is railing against capitalism, but corruption is corruption. Why is that there iz a revolving door between Goldman and the White House, or the Treasury dept? And no I don't want to hear about how they are in the know or qualified, etc. It's ALWAYS Goldman. And when they fleeced the American public, nobody went to jail because the justice department decided they were above the law and nobody went to jail? Just stop..
>>73154544
Checked.
you still haven't countered one argument from my first post.
I post sources and you post capitol letters.
That shows how much faith you have in those reports.
Hillary Clinton will take care of the super predator problem.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VN1tY70aYDo
Hillary's VP is most likely going to be Elizabeth Warren.
If you follow both of them on Twitter, and have paid attention to their behavior over the last year, you know why.
1) Hillary wrote this article on Warren a year ago:
http://time.com/3823064/elizabeth-warren-2015-time-100/
2) Hillary hinted last month that she'd be working closely with Warren in the future:
http://www.politicususa.com/2016/04/06/hillary-clinton-hints-closely-working-elizabeth-warren.html
3) Warren has remained neutral during the primaries, but this makes sense from a strategic perspective. If she had endorsed Hillary, the Bernie faction would've accused her of being a sell-out. By staying neutral, she can more effectively act as a mediator between the two factions when she accepts the VP slot.
4) Warren is also free of the Cold War baggage that Bernie has. Her background -- Oklahoma native who was a Republican until the 1990s -- means she's not as much a liability in the VP slot as Bernie and other hard left candidates might be.
5) Hillary has said she wants a VP who can function as an attack dog. Warren has repeatedly attacked Trump and Cruz on Twitter. She first did this around a month ago, which I think was a test run to see how Trump might attack her during the general election. Her latest round came this week right after Trump won Indiana. Hillary's Twitter account retweeted this:
https://twitter.com/elizabethforma/status/727692197148119040
Note that, as far as I can see, Hillary only retweets her campaign staff/advisers. Warren has been the exception. This is what convinced me that Warren's probably getting the VP nod. (I know Hillary doesn't handle all of her tweets manually, but that retweet was likely approved by her.)
>>73154807
6) I know this choice seems to contradict "conventional wisdom" in many ways, but that's exactly why I think Hillary will go through with it. Recall that Bill's selection of Al Gore in 1992 also violated the "conventional wisdom" at the time. The CW -- that she needs someone from a swing state, that she needs a male or an ethnic minority for balance, that she needs someone much younger -- is mostly bunk anyway and not supported by data.
Hillary knows people think of her as a "safe, centrist, establishment-friendly" candidate, and she'll want a bold VP choice who'll force people to reconsider that image of her. A two female ticket with a progressive like Warren accomplishes that.
Likewise, a two female ticket will send Republican misogyny into overdrive, especially with Trump as the nominee with his high disapproval ratings among women. It'll bait them into alienating more and more female voters.
I also think President Hillary will govern to the left of her husband, for the reasons outlined here:
http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2016/04/thankfully-the-90s-are-over
>>73149918
>She's widely considered to have been a very good secretary of state.
Stopped reading right there. Are you a Shillary or an ex-CruzMissile?
>>73149918
not at all, is i had a fountain of youth i would use it on shillary to enact my desires
>>73154293
why do people think tattoos increase HP
>>73152535
You don't remember the threads during the whole militia in OR where we stumbled upon the whole connection with RF and Clinton were you?
The information is publicly available, hopefully one of the anon here has the link to the repositories for links and data that we generated still because it was a mountain of info.
All publicly available.
All very straightforwardly pointing the finger to Hillary as Sec. Of State signing off on a Russian Federation owned corporate entity gaining mining and export rights for a strategic resource called uranium in return for large contributions to the Clinton foundation.
>>73151735
No, Trump's policies as he's currently outlined them would be an utter disaster -- his tax policy, his foreign policy, his trade policy, etc. Basically the only people who support him are dim-witted teenagers on 4chan and Reddit, blue-collar morons, and Deep South rednecks. It's an alliance of this country's genetic garbage.
>>73154807
>let me post the script that I'm required to, to get my shekels.
Put one of your handlers on the screen pajit, because you are cat food.
Challenge por favor?
>>73149918
I like how the paid hillary shills are coming here in force now that they realize they actually have to beat Trump.
It's pretty sad that they think they can use memes to promote things that aren't meme.
They won't be able to channel memes until they realize that nobody is in control of them. But if they realized that then they would realize that they weren't in control of it either and that would bruise their stupid little meatspace egos.
It'll be fun figuratively scraping their hearts off of our shoes when memes destroy everything they love and hold dear.
>>73149918
I couldn't even make it past the first sentence.
She was a terrible Secretary of State.
>>73153130
Kek offer for security from state dept.
Listen here nigger, dept. Of state denied reinforcements and augmented for six months prior, the six months leading up to, during, and after the incident in bengazi. The poor fuckers at those sites knew what was coming and asked for help from the dept. Of state. and it was denied every time.
>>73155116
Who the fuck said it was a script? I was just describing the facts. Trump supporters are not intelligent people and they're a drag on the country.
Latest poll has Clinton beating Trump by 13% points, btw.
>>73149918
> $0.02 USD has been deposited to your paypal account
> Thank you for your efforts on behalf of the Hillary 2016 Memetics PAC, a subsidiary of The Goldman Sachs Group Inc. GS (NYSE) $160.01 -0.06 (-0.04%)
>>73149918
She voted for the Iraq War authorization.
She is literally bought and paid for by the big banks and many others.
She was involved in the crafting of TPP as Sec. of State, and "supported it before I read it", then why did she support it if she hadn't read it? Now she says she doesn't like some of the language or some bullshit. She will push through the TPP, and the TPP is horrible for America, it is only good for corporations.
Who knows what war-profiteering she will get us involved it, given that she is corrupt.
I will not vote for her.
>>73154512
>not having scholarships
Dumb cuck. Bachelor's in CIS here, I owe nothing.
>>73150841
You need to go back
I don't hate her. I'm WITH her. My pastebin explains why.
http://pastebin.com/v7WHnG6b
>>73155367
Look, it's not my fault most right-wingers are dim-witted cavemen who are repulsive to most people.
You losers have no impulse control or self-awareness whatsoever. That's why the more people see what the right-wing really represents, the more they reject it:
https://twitter.com/wpjenna/status/727311924187283457
>>73155316
>Trump supporters are not intelligent people
Big words from somebody supporting a candidate who's only held on this long because she's so popular with uneducated minority welfare leeches. People talk about Trump's unfavorability ratings, but he's been getting more popular. If anybody needs to worry about a ceiling now, it's Cliton.
>>73155316
Funny how you can't counter any on of my points, claim I'm wrong, (without countering anything, because it's true) and reference polls you can't post.
Hey shill.
Ask your bosses how that FBI investigation is going.
Pretty funny how you fucks won't even MENTION it lately.
>>73154807
I think you're right. I like Elizabeth Warren and hate Hillary. Dammit.
>>73149918
"Anybody who has held a public office for as long as she has is going to be involved with things that those who dislike her will interpret as "lies and corruption." It's part and parcel of being a politician"
> Implying Bernie sanders is thought to be involved in cirruption considering he has been in congress for so long. Time spent in congress doesn't lead to being associated with corruption, policy changing, deal making, large scale fundraising from corporations and actually being corrupt give the appearance of corruption, not time spent in government office.
>>73155080
Interesting, so rather than give a breakdown of what is flawed with the policy proposals and ideas... you attack the character of those who support him... character assassination is violation of one of the ten commandments of debate and rational argument good sir
>>73149994
>Can't use email correctly
>Ultra-competent
Pick one.
>>73155825
"Like with a rag?"
>>73155570
>i can't defend my candidate so i'll just attack your character on an anonymous imageboard
>>73155570
>You losers have no impulse control or self-awareness whatsoever.
Says the group who always chimps out and vandalizes city blocks whenever some white male triggers them.
>>73150461
Obvious shill with the self-censorship of shit. Try harder, faggot.
>>73155644
Supposedly the FBI interviewed one of her top aides yesterday.
>>73151613
You're just jealous of the Jewish people
>>73156001
http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/278916-fbi-interviewed-clinton-aide-huma-abedin-in-email-probe-report
>>73155677
Tim Kaine would've made a great VP for Obama if Biden declined, but he's too "safe" and uninspiring for this election. He's affable and has a solid resume, but he won't bring any excitement to the ticket, and I can't imagine him faring well if Trump goes after him. Kaine suffers from the same charisma deficit that Jeb did. Mark Warner likewise.
I actually do think Al Franken would be a solid choice, insofar as he's unconventional and has populist appeal. His comedian background would make it difficult for Trump's jabs to stick. And unlike Trump, he's smart and substantial on policy and holds a statewide office, so he wouldn't damage the credibility of the ticket.
Amy Klobuchar, also from Minnesota, is an intriguing possibility if Clinton wants a two female ticket with someone besides Warren.
Julian Castro was a popular choice back when it was thought Jeb Bush or Marco Rubio might be the nominee, but he's fallen out of favor. I think he'd be a disaster anyway because his resume is so thin and he's such an obviously pandering choice. I don't think Clinton needs a Hispanic VP with Trump on the opposing side, but if she does, Tom Perez is the better pick.
I think the irony of this election is that a daring choice which might prove risky in a normal election year is actually less risky this year, while playing it too safe could potentially backfire on Clinton by deflating the base's enthusiasm.
>>73149918
How much of the money did she pay you, you corrupt goddamn traitor?
http://www.businessinsider.com/clinton-pac-spends-1-million-to-correct-people-online-2016-4
>>73155715
"And she couldn't even stay in as Secretary of State."
???
Most cabinet members only stay on for a term. She wanted to run for president in 2016, so it would make perfect sense to not be working for the current administration when she started the campaign season.
She's widely considered to have been a very good secretary of state.
"All the lies and corruption" is a meaningless. Anybody who has held a public office for as long as she has is going to be involved with things that those who dislike her will interpret as "lies and corruption." It's part and parcel of being a politician.
It takes a level of maturity and insight to speak objectively about these matters, and you aren't making the grade.
There are plenty of things about Hillary Clinton that I don't care for and I didn't even support her way back 2000 when she ran for Senator of NY (I considered her an opportunistic carpet-bagger).
That said, the idea that she'd is a less qualified candidate or would be a less effective president than Donald Trump is a exercise in a pitiful level of ignorance. Hillary Clinton is a centrist, establishment-type candidate who will change nothing, but will also run the country reasonably well for however long she serves and who will not do anything reckless. She will also likely make excellent supreme court appointments.
>>73155677
It's total bullshit. Warren has come out a bunch of times and said she's committed to staying in the senate.
>>73156192
You should re-read >>73149918
Are you really just copy pasting talking points?
>>73155570
I'm a progressive-populist, idiot. Cherrypicking your opposition's poster-monster is a lazy fallacy and that crutch is great when you're surrounding yourself with like minds but in the sunshine of reality the self-delusion shines. Propaganda gunna propaganda.
>>73156192
>>73149918
>literally repeating yourself
#ShillMissile
>>73149918
We don't hate Shillary (NYSE:GS), in fact when she becomes the demicuck nominee, it'll make it all the easier for Trump to win. Berniecucks will be so buttblasted they'll either [a] become politically apathetic or [b] vote for Trump out of spite and outsource their smear campaign of the Shill to the SJW's lmao.
THEY'RE HERE
>>73152177
The election is in November, numbnuts. Reagan was down by like 10 points, at least, at this point. George H.W. was down by 17 to Dukakis. Get a grip, shill. We're impervious to your faggotry.
>>73151989
1. Why is HiLIARy capable when 4 US citizens were killed in Bengazi under her watch..?. Which resulted in the creation of ISIS (yes, Hillary created ISIS...) that has cost millions of people's lives including terror attacks in Europe and many countless casualties in the 100s of THOUSANDS in Iraq and Syria
2. How is Hillary capable when she established a private e-mail server which she used for top secret information and State - department business... A server which has been hacked by entities outside of the US using off the shelf scripts??? And she deleted 30,000 emails!! Obstruction of justice...
3. She defended a rapist who raped a 12 year old girl and was gloating and laughing about it... Does this strike you as a person with a conscience? Does this strike you as a person who would think before putting Americans lives in danger? Who has even a SHRED of empathy???
4. She's a closet racist and her dearest friend Robert Byrd is an example of that (former KKK and Hillary supporter).
5. Mountains of evidence regarding Watergate scandal... Further proof of her disingenuous character.
6. Using Bill Clinton for political means... She didn't stay with him for love... Just for personal gain... She's worse than Frank/Claire Underwood.
7. Bill chooses others over her. Why should we choose her over others.
GET FUCKED...
>>73156347
Racism pertains to hating someone for how they were born. Hating people for who they choose to be? There's a fundamental difference there, you pathetically ignorant fool.
I hope when the killing starts, your head is sliced off early and displayed on a pole for all to urinate on. You add nothing to this world, although your death could at least provide us with some momentary amusement.
>>73156120
Not getting anything done is *not* business as usual. The extent to which the Republican Congress has thwarted 2nd term Obama is almost totally unprecedented, but that would look like hands across America compared to what you'd have if there is a president loathed by most politicians in both parties.
It would be difficult enough for a third-party candidate (which, effectively, Trump is) to govern as president, but it could be done by an exceptional, pragmatic individual who genuinely cared about getting things done. Trump is none of these things, in spades..
His administration would also be haphazard, because Trump has displayed an appallingly low aptitude for most of the issues that he speaks about, and has wildly flailed, policy-wise, between divergent perspectives - somethings within the same speech/interview/debate, plus, there is almost nobody with any actual experience who wants to work with Trump.
The attitude that Trump as president would ultimately be more or less like anybody else that a particular liber/conservative/etc. is opposed to is so profoundly ignorant that it's scary. But so are most Trump supporters. And Trump himself.
>>73156339
Yeah, a copy-pasting paid shill. It would be awesome if the FBI really does pull the trigger on this fucking investigation they are dragging out. Maybe Bernie's camp has an inside tip.
>>73156373
LOL
The number of Sanders supporters who switch to Trump will be miniscule. Why would they switch? Trump stands for nearly the opposite of Bernie's platform.
As far as facts, that's all I've done is provide them.
You, on the other hand, do nothing but provide written materials by others that you're too dumb to even understand well enough to properly use to support your arguments.
I mean, if you're a GED candidate with a resume thick on coal mining and slaugherhouse gigs and have a hard time with words larger than two syllables, then I understand why you're part of Trump's narrow swath of supporters.
Bernie Sanders does very well with the educated. Trump isn't winning *any* educated independents or Democrats.
I'm not completely writing off Trump because a terrorist attack would probably favor him, as would an an indictment against Clinton. Also, it's not unprecedented for negative television ads based purely on fiction to work (see: Willie Horton, Swift Boaters).
However, I also believe that in the very unlikely event that Trump enters the fall with any kind of a pucher's chance the CIA will probably have him killed.
Quite simply, there is virtually no possible way for him to ever actually become president.
>>73156510
>Racism pertains to hating someone for how they were born. Hating people for who they choose to be? There's a fundamental difference there, you pathetically ignorant fool.
I'm going to use this pasta the next time one of you bring up how Trump is "racist" for wanting to take control of illegal and muslim immigrants.
Also, less than a minute after that post, you posted another copy-pasted response
>>73151551
>>73156561
Interesting digits, but you're still striking out.
You've learned that unhindered hatred is the norm here though, so props for that at least.
>>73156475
Lol did you write that all yourself? Nice lack of sources
>>73156289
If Trump beats Hillary, that sets Warren up for a run in 2020.
>>73156641
I'm a firm Bernie supporter, and you better fucking believe I'll vote for Trump over Shillary.
She's absolutely every-fucking-thing wrong about modern politics wrapped up in one sour old package.
At least with Trump there's the slim possibility that he MIGHT actually do some good in spite of himself.
With Shillary, the country is GUARANTEED to get worse, and vastly so.
>>73155677
Isn't she the bitch that was trying to claim to be partially Native American for some gibsmedat bullshit?
>>73156192
She was forced to resign from sec. Of state.
That's the same shirt as when a general or colonel retires early (forced retirement) instead of being charged and kicked out due to a huge fuck-up.
Same as when you fuck up at your job and your asked to leave.
Not only that, but you also have to consider the massive amount of failures surrounding the entire Clinton history on both parts that both hillary and bill were involved in.
>>73156641
>Class warfare
So, you guys say you stand for the black and white working class, but, uhh... Then you spit on them for having GEDs. One day, the tide's gonna turn, and you're gonna come face to face with an angry nigger and his white, working class buddy. Just lettin ya know. Potsting my pastebin, again. This is not a great place to shill, especially when the plan to do so is all over the news.
http://pastebin.com/v7WHnG6b
>>73156561
We heard all of the same things about Trump when his campaign began.
Barry Obama was a measly community organizer before holding the highest office in the land.
Trump has headed multiple National and multinational organizations in his long career.
I'd say he's more qualified than most
>>73156510
Huh? I think you copy-pasted the wrong canned response shill.
>>73149918
>She's widely considered to have been a very good secretary of state.
by literally no one
look at Libya
sage
>>73157068
She granted one term which is extremely common. There hasn't been a person who served longer than one for decades
>>73156983
You know how many white americans are told "oh we have some cherokee in us" or some bullshit when they're kids? Tons. I'm one of them. Supposedly on my dad's side there is a bit of indian from somewhere in new york state. I'm almost certain that's bullshit. So I can see how she was mislead.
>>73157223
You have trouble with reading comprehension?
PAID SHILLS
PAID SHILLS
PAID SHILLS
PAID SHILLS
>>73155587
"welfare leeches"
Who stroke down welfare (which was reasonable at the time)? Bill Clinton.
Who put minorities (who deserve it) into jail cells. Bill Clinton.
You're basically yelling the same shit this fat walmart cunt is.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iwrNiRngMhc
>>73151588
You could easialy be welsh.
>>73157514
Because people on welfare aren't told to vote straight Democrat because otherwise "they're voting against their own self-interest", right? Sanders's biggest problem has been with black voters, because they see "Clinton" and press the button. They're not even as well educated as single-issue voters.
>>73156863
I'm considering voting Trump because he is so strongly against TPP and NAFTA. TPP must be stopped at all costs.
But also illegal immigration is a problem. It hurts all Americans. It is hurting the black community most of all. And illegal immigration is used as a weapon to undermine unions.
Liberals like illegal immigration because they need cheap servants. They buy the house to big for them to clean then hire a cheap housekeeper. They have kids they're too busy to raise then hire a cheap nanny.
>>73157075
I am disgusted with liberals' hypocritical classism. I used to be able to distance myself from these nasty fools by calling myself a progressive, but as they gradually poisoned "liberal" with their antics they've moved on to calling themselves "progressive" and are poisoning it too.
Classist as fuck and they are completely unconscious about it.
>>73157632
The majority of impoverished people don't vote. Politifact has a stat if you're interested in.
What state do you live in. If it's Arizona, you can only be on welfare for a year IIRC. And that's for your entire life's existence. I believe in most states it's 5 and can not be consecutive and are sugjecated to being kicked off if you aren't looking for work.
>>73149918
>>73156373
I always think its funny..
when people who don't live in the US try to act like they understand politics here. I don't act like I understand politics in other peoples' countries (unless I have worked in those countries long enough to have a vague understanding via friends that live there/are from there).
>>73157335
Number of terms isn't the fucking point, quit dodging the points being raised and address those fuckass
>>73157439
The copy-pasta had no relevance to what was being responding to. I see you've changed IPs.
I feel for the Sanders people; I really do.
Bernie Sanders entered the campaign for the purpose of bringing his touchstone issues to the general political discussion. That's why he entered the race early. He knew that the Democratic Party was not going to run any credible candidate against her, so if there was going to be smattering of crackpots and also-rans entering the race for the purpose of saying their bit and getting to be a warm body at a debate podium, he wanted to be the best of the crackpots and also-rans and get the most air time. He was an old man at the end of his political career and had nothing to lose. And, frankly, if a Jewish socialist-leaning politician from Brooklyn by way of Vermont was ever going to give the presidency a shot, those are pretty much the only conditions under which one would do it.
Never did Bernie Sanders, 10 months ago, think for a moment that he had any chance of actually winning the nomination.
Which is why his close loss stings him and his supporters all the more. He actually *did* have a chance to win, against a candidate who turned out to be more flawed than the Democratic Party handlers thought, but he didn't do enough things right to make it happen. It's practically crazy to think of Bernie Sanders mulling over the one or two things he could have done differently in two or three states that could have flipped the whole race in his favor, but it's true. He really did come that close.
All that said, all you really need to know about this article to peg how little the writer actually knows about politics, is right here:
"The idea that only Clinton can defeat Trump is a myth, promulgated by Hillary supporters. Polls taken over the last nine months in fact show Sanders faring better than Clinton in a hypothetical match-up against Trump."
>>73158036
This is an utter joke. Bernie Sanders is not a national political figure. The primaries - even a primary season as crazy and which got as much media coverage as this year's - engage only a small fraction of the general election electorate. A huge segment of the people who will vote for president in November have almost no idea who Bernie Sanders is and what he stands for. Any national general election polling on Bernie Sanders would be very nearly useless at this stage. Conversely, polling on Hillary Clinton (and Trump, though admittedly to a lesser extent) is much more accurate because she's been a national political figure for so many years. Sanders even had the built-in benefit of Hillary Clinton not running a negative campaign against him. Whatever the polls say about Bernie Sanders right now simply aren't based on anything solid.
Bernie Sanders would be a weaker general election candidate than Hillary Clinton. Significantly weaker. Which is not to say that he could not beat Donald Trump. However, the odds would be against it, IMO. Trump would rip him to shreds and his numbers against Trump would plummet down to about even in a fairly short period of time. There is nothing that Sanders can do to change the fact that 1) he's a Brooklyn Jewish socialist, and 2) he doesn't perform well with his party's go-to Demographics (women and minorities). Those things make him a weaker national candidate than Hillary Clinton, no matter who he is running against.
>>73158036
>>73158068
So you're splitting up your copy pasta to double your pennies-per-post?
>>73157986
Its relevant because Trump supporters are clearly racists who hate Hispanics and Muslims
>>73157853
People know how to work the system dude. I've met people who've been on welfare for 10+ years and still are to this day
>>73157851
Yeah, that's what happens when you get so far up your own ass. You can't see the shit, anymore and you get used to the smell.
>>73158175
You're foolish to generalize. Just because one recognizes the damage illegal immigration does to Americans doesn't mean they hate Hispanics.
I hate Scientology, does that make me a racist?
>>73158168
No I wrote this and just pasted it from a different board.
>>73158296
This 'white privilege' bs that keeps getting pushed is just them mislabeling their class privilege because they are just completely blind to their own classism.
>>73158304
Why single Out those 2 races? Whites are also a drain on the system
>>73158340
Yeah you copy-pasted it. Fucking shill.
>>73149918
I love it how Trump and Sanders fans paint her as the fucking bringer of the end of America.
Hillary means continuism more than anything... She practically is "Obama 2 Social Democracy Boogaloo"...
If you like the status quo, Hillary should be your choice, otherwise pick a different poison... It is as simple as that.
>>73158175
I love latinos, clearly you're an igo rant fuck who doesn't understand the difference between Hispanic and latino.
Also, illegals are the problem, not legals.
Lastly, go read the qur'an cover to cover and mull on it for a bit, then go visit some of the middle east.
Tell me that Islam is not a danger to any developed nation.
Go to Dearborn, MI and tell me that it's not actually a Sharia Law zone with actual No-Go zones, because it fucking is, and it fucking does.
>>73158458
No one is being paid to shill for Hillary. It's a Republican-funded lie and a pathetic attempt to smear her campaign.
begone shill
>>73158479
Exactly. Clinton will keep up status quo, Trump would be a fucking disaster
>>73158535
liar
>>73158218
I love anecdotes too.
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Fsearch%3Fq%3Dreport%2Bwelfare%2Bfraud%26oq%3Dreport%2Bwelfar%26aqs%3Dchrome.0.0j69i57j0l4.4178j0j7%26sourceid%3Dchrome%26ie%3DUTF-8
>>73158340
Okay, let's talk about this then.
What is it about Trump specifically that you don't like?
This is an attempt by Shillary and her goons to storm the beaches of Trumps Emipre!
>>73149918
Hide shillary threads, do not respond to shillary posts.
Sage
>>73158456
What two races? Are you just randomizing your copy-pasting now?
>>73158575
Not getting anything done is *not* business as usual. The extent to which the Republican Congress has thwarted 2nd term Obama is almost totally unprecedented, but that would look like hands across America compared to what you'd have if there is a president loathed by most politicians in both parties.
It would be difficult enough for a third-party candidate (which, effectively, Trump is) to govern as president, but it could be done by an exceptional, pragmatic individual who genuinely cared about getting things done. Trump is none of these things, in spades..
His administration would also be haphazard, because Trump has displayed an appallingly low aptitude for most of the issues that he speaks about, and has wildly flailed, policy-wise, between divergent perspectives - somethings within the same speech/interview/debate, plus, there is almost nobody with any actual experience who wants to work with Trump.
The attitude that Trump as president would ultimately be more or less like anybody else that a particular liber/conservative/etc. is opposed to is so profoundly ignorant that it's scary. But so are most Trump supporters. And Trump himself.
>>73158567
Broken link.
fix:
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=report+welfare+fraud
Go away Shillary
>>73158558
>His administration would also be haphazard
You're not being specific at all.
>Congress wouldn't cooperate with him
That's the same argument used against Bernie.
It doesn't work for Trump.
>Jeff Sessions
>Newt Gingrich
>Ben Carson
>Rand Paul
>Chris Christie
and soon Rick Perry, and many others in congress will be on Trumps side.
The "it's pointless to try" argument is actually a pointless argument when used against Trump.
Republicans in congress WANT a good immigration reform, they want secure borders.
Even Cruz started promising a wall when he realized that's what people wanted.
>>73158654
meant for
>>73158897
>>73149918
Paid Hillary shill please fucking kill yourself. I hope your whole family gets cancer you faggot. If Hillary dropped dead tomorrow I would have a fucking party to celebrate.
A vote for Hillary is a vote for a Wal-Mart executive, whose campaign is funded by Goldman Sachs. As secretary of state she backed military coups against democracies in Egypt and Honduras, while fostering the chaos that led to the rise of jihadis in Syria and Libya. She's also never voted against a war - and if elected, she'll drag us into another Kosovo, Iraq or Afghanistan.
I'm voting third party this election. I don't want the blood of hundreds of thousands on my hands.
>>73149918
>Ill and dehydrated while suffering from a stomach virus in December 2012, Clinton fainted and fell at her home, sustaining a concussion, her spokesman and doctors announced. After a follow-up exam revealed a blood clot in her head, requiring blood thinners and another hospital stay, Clinton returned work Jan. 7, 2013.
she was good until the stroke, hasnt been the same since
used to be more subtle in the manipulation
>>73158897
It's about her campaigning skills. Which she'll require barely any of to defeat Donald Trump, anyway.
The qualities that make for a good candidate have little in common with the qualities that would make a good president. Hillary Clinton's potential weaknesses as a candidate are generally known and agreed upon by most commentators.
>>73159035
I can't stand reflexive bashing of Goldman Sachs and other large investment banks. Wall Street firms have been responsible for a lot of shady and destructive behavior, which most certainly requires greater addressing than it currently does, but on the whole large investment firms such as Goldman Sachs are among the greatest forces for good in the history of mankind.
>>73159047
>It's about her campaigning skills
So using the same measures that have been used for decades will be the thing that finally stumps Trump? God, liberals really are out of ammunition, all they can do is act indignant.
>>73159047
>The qualities that make for a good candidate have little in common with the qualities that would make a good president. Hillary Clinton's potential weaknesses as a candidate are generally known and agreed upon by most commentators.
he took down 16 people that hated him with a media against him
now all that's left is a stroke survivor with an open federal investigation against her?
pathetic
she is a reptoid/build a bear
>>73152016
> inland california
The liberals and Mexicans are along the coast you fucking dumbass.
>>73159047
>It's about her campaigning skills.
First of all, campaigning skills do not equate to quality in Presidential leadership.
Second of all, Trump is better at campaigning than Hillary is.
His crowds are bigger, he's way more popular, and he will be covered by the media 24/7
Any publicity is good publicity, and that publicity forces people to look at his views.
Haven't you heard the people on /r/sandersforpresident saying that they'll vote for Trump over Bernie?
The reason for that is that Trump and Bernie are actually more alike than people think.
As for your argument that Trump isn't conservative enough, it's already clear that a traditional republican and/or a traditional democrat will not win this election.
People are thinking beyond that now.
You can shill and be as obvious as you want.
But when it comes to actual comprehensive arguments about whether or not Trump has a chance, you're going to lose.
Trump DOES have a chance, that's not something you can make people stop believing.
You can't facilitate lies about his chances like was done with the Bernie supporters.
and you ESPECIALLY can't convince /pol/ to stop with their support.
>>73159157
I don't consider looting economies, creating recessions through massive fraud and theft, and plunging millions of people into poverty to be good things, but then again I guess that's why I'm not voting for Hillary.
Haha what a shill.
note the skull fragments in this version
>>73159307
A handful of the older white men might switch, in an "FU" move, but that's it. None of the younger Bernie supporters will. Trump is generally viewed as toxic to people under 30, from virtually any background to begin with, and young Bernie supporters would actually have to live in a world scarred by a Trump presidency for decades to come. At worst, they stay home. Staying home won't be enough for Trump to beat Hillary.
>>73159378
bretty good subliminal leaf
If hillary can't handle gmail, and doesn't notice her Husband having dozens of affairs, how can we trust her to remove. kebab. ?
>>73159431
>A handful of the older white men might switch
>None of the younger Bernie supporters will
You're delusional if you truly believe that.
Go read /r/sandersforpresident for a while.
You'll see their true attitude about it.
They are split. There's a reason you see a 15% DNC going for Trump with only an 8% of GOP going for Hillary.
Those high voting numbers Bernie got?
Yea, get ready to see that cut in half at LEAST, because Bernie got more young people to turn out than any other candidate will.
Are you autists still replying to a shillbot thread?
200 replies? You newfags are fucking moronic.
Do not reply to shillary threads
Hide all shillary threads
If you must reply, sage all shillary thread posts
Their goal is simply to get replies.
>>73159553
She's going to need a helluva lot more than a million dollars in shills to come to this dance
>>73159578
I think it will be slightly more than miniscule but I think that those who are predicting a mass exodus from Sanders to Trump are delusional. The few who do jump to Trump will vote for Trump on the idea that, if Trump gets elected, he will fuck up the country so badly that it will lead to revolution and the overthrow of corporatist society.
>>73159047
Way to completely ignore my posts here: >>73155644 and here: >>73156863.
Your little gang of crooks totally underestimated how popular Bernie was going to become, and your stupid asses are completely underestimating how strong of a campaign Trump can wage against you in the general.
For people who get piad so much fucking money to play politics, your whore and her crew are profoundly bad at it.
>>73159702
However, I also believe that in the very unlikely event that Trump enters the fall with any kind of a pucher's chance the CIA will probably have him killed.
Quite simply, there is virtually no possible way for him to ever actually become president.
>>73159677
> those who are predicting a mass exodus from Sanders to Trump are delusional
It won't be a mass exodus, but more Sanders people will vote for Trump than Hillary
and even more of them will just stay home.
That's what it comes down to.
>He will fuck up the country so badly that it will lead to revolution
Which one of Trumps policies do you think will do this?
Be specific now.
Get the fuck off my board you neocon faggot.
/pol/ is not the place for your quasi-intellectual tripe, and this election cycle is certainly not the time.
Trump runs circles around hillary in both terms of personal ability and intellect.
Hillary Clinton was a complete and total faliure as Secretary of State, from her unsecured emails with top secret data, to getting innocent american diplomats killed.
I fucking DARE you to name to me the central theme of obama/clinton's foreign policy, and what good any of their moves have made for AMERICAN citizens.
You can't, because our foreign policy theme is nonexistent, discordant, and puts other countries and people first.
I want america to be first. If you disagree than I have no respect for you, not that it matters, since I have none to begin with.
Now go collect your two cents from your PayPal, Benji.
Don't forget to respond calling me names since you can't make a coherent argument without sounding like a fucking cunt. Z
Shills will be BTFO everyfucking time its just too fucking easy.
>>73159804
No no no
Actually engage them, see if you can talk to them.
A lot of shills come here to shill, and then later come back out of curiosity
>>73159762
Lmao. Oh shill, you so funny.
But you've been THOROUGHLY fucking destroyed in this thread and have done more damage for your candidate (especially in this young voters mind) than your stupid ass realizes.
I suggest you stop.
>>73159792
His administration would also be haphazard, because Trump has displayed an appallingly low aptitude for most of the issues that he speaks about, and has wildly flailed, policy-wise, between divergent perspectives - somethings within the same speech/interview/debate, plus, there is almost nobody with any actual experience who wants to work with Trump.
The attitude that Trump as president would ultimately be more or less like anybody else that a particular liber/conservative/etc. is opposed to is so profoundly ignorant that it's scary. But so are most Trump supporters. And Trump himself.
>>73159861
But what if I don't want them to come back?
Why would I want to flood the site with people dumb enough to shill for hillary?
>>73159861
This is true. Most shills come here because they are being paid to post here. But in the long run its the shills who switch sides and not the people they are trying convince.
>>73159954
You're not being specific.
Be specific.
Consult pic related if you need to
Here is the question
>Which one of Trumps policies do you think will fuck up the country
Be specific.
>>73159954
Your posts read like a shitty nate silver article.
>>73159804
>failure
"failure" isnt something that belongs in an actual discussion about politics or policy. You have to state with a lot more specificity what aspects you are talking about. My posts were about the specific topic of a haphazard administration.
>>73160089
Which is why you should say EXACTLY which one of Trumps policies you think are haphazard.
Not his attitude.
Not his tone.
But the policies themselves.
>>73160067
He won't be able to balance any coherent policy, is what I'm getting at. He has no experience in politics and is a buffoon. He'd employ Chris Christie for safety traffic enforcer
>>73160042
We shill the shills with our meme magic.
>>73160089
Why are you ignoring me, shill?
I'm the voter most valued by your golden girl's handlers.
Don't you want to try and influence a potentially disenfranchised Bernie supporter?
>>73160089
Maybe you don't understand,
Hillary Clinton did not do a good job as secratary of state. She failed to properly execute her duties
Henceforth, since she failed to do things she is a F A L I U R E
Funny how words work, right?
Trump has a proven track record of success with very minimal faliure, and thusly he is a success.
I would rather have a sucess than a faliure.
>>73160191
>any coherent policy
You're not being specific.
Hillary!
> Here we see the wild neocon, shilling in its natural habitat
> ah yes, now it is performing it's mating call, a complex form of pointing out supposed character flaws, yet blustering whenever asked to point one out
> unfortunately it doesn't seem like the females are taking the bait today
> he will go back to his cave and accept the 2 cents in his personal bank account
>>73149918
She is a wife of a war criminal, corrupt to the core, participated treason several times, compromised US security, which lead to death of an ambassador, and she got a bunch of people assasinated that would cause her political troubles, she supported a war that cost several trillion dollar of taxpayer money, with no positive result, and she is partially responsible for the migrant invasion in Europe.
Hillary for death row!
You guys know that if you ignore these threads the shills will eventually leave right?
>>73150841
Go suck a nigger dick.
>>73154807
Citing politicususa is like citing the DailyNewsBin or thepeoplesview - shill harder, paid troll
>>73149918
>will change nothing
>will also run the country reasonably well
Pick one
>>73149918
She makes Bernie Sanders look good.
Actually parse that. She makes an evil, snivelling, twisted kike socialist look good.
Fuck Hillary. Trump 2016
>>73149918
>>73149994
>she's really competent at being a total shill for the massive corporations who are fucking you ever
Why are you trying to make this sound like a good thing? Having an employee of goldman sachs running your country is a negative no matter how competent they are, I don't care how competent she is at being a corrupt piece of shit, that's not a good thing.
>>73149918
Seriously, no one is being paid to shill for Hillary. It's a Republican-funded lie and a pathetic attempt to smear her campaign.
>>73158563
No one is being paid to shill for Hillary by the way. It's a Republican-funded lie and a pathetic attempt to smear her campaign.
>>73151738
>her campaigning skills
What those amazing campaigning skills that almost lost her the primary to a 74 year old socialist nobody who no-one had ever heard of up til a year ago? Those amazing campaigning skills?
>>73161101
That said, the idea that she'd is a less qualified candidate or would be a less effective president than Donald Trump is a exercise in a pitiful level of ignorance. Hillary Clinton is a centrist, establishment-type candidate who will change nothing, but will also run the country reasonably well for however long she serves and who will not do anything reckless. She will also likely make excellent supreme court appointments.
>>73149918
No one is being paid to shill for Hillary by the way. It's a Republican-funded lie and a pathetic attempt to smear her campaign.
>>73149918
you shill paid fuckface gtfo here
>>73161370
Hillary will win wheather you like it or not
>>73161238
Stop ignoring me shill.
Hillary has proven time and again to be against basically the ENTIRE bill of rights, while simultaneously trying to be perceived as their champion.
She thoroughly dropped the ball as Secretary of State on several occasions, and then has the temerity to say she's the most qualified to be POTUS.
She didn't just sell out women everywhere with the way she handled her husbands repeated affairs, she actively tried to undermine the very women that wanted Bill held to account.
She's a BAD politician, a BAD human being, and BAD for America.
