[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Clinton and Trump are retards
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Thread replies: 22
Thread images: 2
File: johnson-weld.jpg (14 KB, 480x360) Image search: [Google]
johnson-weld.jpg
14 KB, 480x360
Do these absolute madmen actually have a chance to at least change two-party politics in America after this election?
>>
They support open borders?
Then no.
>>
Yes.

>INB4 butthurt Trumpsters and their Lolbertatian bullshit memes
>>
>>81448909
no. Johnson has about as much charisma and likeability as Jeb.
>>
>>81449098

They oppose welfare for illegals, and that's the only incentive for them being here.

It's like inviting homeless people to sit at a restaurant but you refuse to give them food

>>81449195

Johnson climbed a mountain, is more interesting as a person, and is less restrained in his words than !Yebito!.
>>
>>81448909
all they need is 5% of the vote to start getting federal funding for their party.

yea, this very well might be the year we finally get a third party on the national stage. I have lots of problems with johnson but he is infinitely better than trump or clinton
>>
>>81449529

Except companies will still hire them because they're subhumans who will work for less than Americans.

But I forgot, I'm talking to a libertarian, so a race to the bottom with slave wages is just dandy. Whites who don't want to live like roaches will lose their jobs, and the companies can invite as many shitskins as they like to replace them.

This is treason.
>>
>>81448909
Why would we abandon the two-party system? It isn't written into law that we have that system, it just seems to work better because it forces party platforms to appeal to at least half of the people otherwise they'll always lose.
We could wind up with some ridiculous multi-party clusterfuck like other countries in which you only need to get the support of 20% of the people to be the ruling party.
>>
File: wtfindeed.jpg (33 KB, 500x359) Image search: [Google]
wtfindeed.jpg
33 KB, 500x359
>>81453338
>muh two party shill
>>
>>81448909
Why are Hillshills getting paid to Promote Johnson???
>>
>>81452557
>race to the bottom
>slave wages
>high school level economic thought

Nationalists confirmed as leftists.
>>
Absofuckinglutely not.
Trump is going to win.
We're going to build a wall, and your lame ass is going back to mexico, along with the other 30 million illegals shitting up this country.

I'm so fucking tired of brown people.
Fuck this retarded Country.
TRUMP OR RIOT
>>
>>81453577
polls rigged in favour of cuckson because stein would take hillary voters
>>
>>81453576
>muh splinter ideology
>muh dreams of dominating even though the vast majority of people think i talk like a fag and my shit's all retarded
>muh divide and conquer
>>
>>81452557

Except companies will still outsource jobs overseas no matter what because they want more anarchy than libertarianism

But I forgot, I'm talking to a leaf, so not understanding the difference between libertarianism and a complete lack of any regulation whatsoever is just dandy. Whites who don't want to live like roaches will make their own small businesses without government intervention, and the big companies will begin to see a decrease in profit as they are replaced

>>81453338

Because it's easy to manipulate the two-party system. Both Democrats and Republicans have the same donors, same lobbyists, etc. And it allows one side a guarantee win when the other fucks up, and when they fuck up the other side wins, so it's an endless cycle of fucking up

>>81453577

> hurr muh shills

If you have nothing else to say other than accusing actual Trump critics as shills, do us a favor and drown in a pool of smegma.
>>
>>81454269
The two party system is what gives the US its remarkable political stability.
We have had the same government for 240 years now. France, Germany, or almost any country with multiple parties with narrow interests and niche appeal cannot say the same.
>>
>>81455025

We'd still be a stable society and political system, only with a party or two extra. People in the U.S. are way too cozy to do anything. Do you think Clinton and Trump supports would ever unite against a Johnson presidency?

Europe has a long history of deep cultural and political divides, while the U.S. can be grouped into leftist, moderate and right politics, opposed to giant socialist movements that caused an imbalance in European politics

We are immune to most of that because we have the rights to say we've always been a representative democracy.
>>
>>81456212
We have a party or two extra.

Which countries that have an "actual" multi-party system have had the same stability as the US?

And, yes, we have significant social and economic ideological differences in this country as well. The difference is that angry mobs are not represented in congress and find it hard to gain traction. This is a good thing.
The other difference is that the rifles we have behind every blade of grass prevent foreign invasion.
>>
>>81452557
Whites that do not pursue higher education deserve slave wages mixing with the inferior races. In order to secure the existence of our people and a future for white children we must make a sacrifice and purge the inferior whites of our gene pool.
>>
>>81452557
>Whites who don't want to live like roaches will lose their jobs

That's an argument for open borders. Lack of competition is dysgenic and leads to idiocracy. It's good when dumb people starve or at least don't have resources for kids.

Main sensible arguments against open borders are: destruction of trust and safety, hijacking of the state via new voters, etc.
>>
>>81457511

a higher education that can only be afforded by the children of the wealthy or the poor minorities that receive free school?
>>
>>81458635
What a bunch of shit.
I grew up poor and had to work a shit job for three years after high school to afford to go to college. I had to continue to work a shit job until I completed my degree and got a better job with it.

It isn't that people can't afford school, it's that they think everything should be easy to do and readily available to them the moment they decide they want it.
Thread replies: 22
Thread images: 2

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.