We won every war we were in until the 60s, now all of a sudden we get btfo everywhere we go. We beat the Qing Dynasty for fucks sake. And we can't kill a couple thousand sand niggers in Syria? What's up?
Pic related is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_the_United_States
>>81434530
Liberals
>>81434530
You started fighting someone other than Copper Age native tribes.
>we won't kill a few thousand sandniggers in Syria because we trained them
FTFY
>>81434530
>. And we can't kill a couple thousand sand niggers in Syria?
modern communication meant that we couldn't dresden or hiroshima any more so we try to be somewhat humane and only occasionally destroy an afghan wedding party.
we could of course destroy any small nation, but then russia and china would be threatened and they would start destroying small nations.
proxy wars. that's all we'll ever have, and you don't win those. you don't actually fight them to win. you fight them to test equipment and to bluff everyone.
It's high time we fought for world peace, but there's no profit in that so the powerful people don't support it.
>>81434530
You are not meant to win anymore you're meant to stir it up shit for your overlords
>>81434530
>We won every war we were in until the 60s
We started electing smiling faggots for president instead of real men.
>>81435598
>Presidents started smiling
This isn't rocket surgery you dumb yank faggot
You're not at war with nations anymore
>>81435639
Fucking Eisenhower, one of the most overrated cunts in our history.
>>81434530
>Beat the Qing dinasty
what a dumb redneck, you forget about every other western power involved in the rebellion
>>81434717
This we would have won Vietnam until libtards in washington said it would be "unethical" to destroy the vietcong's main base and the hippie movement saying every soldier kills babies over there didn't help the pentagon's case to blow the shit out of them and end this war. I fucking hate these commiefags looking out for their fellow commies, they can all die.
>And we can't kill a couple thousand sand niggers in Syria? What's up?
You can. You won't because to Israel and USA removing Assad is more important.
>>81434530
But you lost the most important war, 1861-1865.
Just realised the only actual war that America has fought in for more than just the final round was its war of independence which France won.
>>81435639
Kennedy was good and had good plans but it was a shame he was killed before he enacted most his plans.
>>81434530
Armyfag here.
The number 1 reason we don't utterly btfo any other nation effortlessly is lawyers trying to sue us after every accidental civilian death, bleeding heart liberals bitching at home, and faggot ass politicians.
We are truly the strongest fighting force, we gotta fight the enemy and ourselves.
The more that's at stake the more we can fight unhindered, example is ww2. We had our entire country backing the war effort and nobody had to worry about getting sued for killing a civilian.
>>81434530
because its not about killing mass amounts of bodies you dumb shit. its about planting people in strategic political and economical positions that will give its countries resources over for practically nothing
you messed with the wrong guys burger
you should have sticked to fighting mexicucks, gooks and penis worshipping japs
>>81434530
usa only pick fights with weakened countries, otherwise it only tries to manipulate and excert economic pressure
youre basically cowards and now that many nations are getting stronger youre gonna win less
>>81434530
Because after Vietnam TV cover you invented the concept of "clean war" and "proportionnal response".
War is now only played half on the battlefield, the other half is in the medias.
>>81436742
>Because after Vietnam TV cover you invented the concept of "clean war" and "proportionnal response".
>War is now only played half on the battlefield, the other half is in the medias.
*sigh* It's true. If one side tries to fight a politically correct war and the other side doesn't give a shit, there is no doubt about which side has the advantage.
>>81436080
Though I like america I do have to admit that the whole reason why we broke away from you fags wasn't because you were oppressing us ,it was because richfag families like the Washington family got pissed that they had to start paying taxes (a lot of rich families from England came here to avoid paying taxes at all) and over here they teach that you fags taxed us heavily but in reality the taxes over here were next to nothing compared to someone living in England. The no taxation without representation is bullshit too because they only wanted it so they could try passing shit in London that makes it were they don't pay taxes at all. Now why would people whom are mainly poorfags care so much about taxes on luxury shit that mainly the rich can afford? legit the only "high" taxes where on shit like high class furniture and property taxes and shit which the poorfags couldn't own property and buy that shit either too. The only tax that did affect poorfags was the stamp act which basically was a sales tax on things like a news paper or tea or something of that sort and ironically again it only really effected the rich due to them buying crates of fucking tea and the tax was high due to them buying a fucking crate of the shit because Peter the Poorfag is only going to spend fuck all on a small bag of tea leaves while richie rich who is buying a crate for 2000 pounds has to pay an additional 500 pounds. One last thing the rich families got pissed they couldn't have lands to the west (Britain made treaties with the Natives and they honored it since the French and Indian war) and this was the last straw so they told Peter the Poorfag that the british are going to tax you 1000000000000 pounds a second and I know this because I am from a rich family in that was in London. Peter the Poorfag chimps out and King George III who was literally autistic thought that to prove that these richfags were lying he should tax them more! and sorry for the wall of text too.
>>81436742
yup - war is not a nice thing and there are casualties, etc. But a sob story about some little girl who lost her family or whatever and we put the brakes on winning. We have endless 'human interest' stories in the media, instead of focusing on the bigger picture.
No one wants war, but it is necessary.
>>81436742
Basically leftists
>>81438855
that too
>>81434530
Total war is no longer an option the USA has to hold backand constantly and can't really fight. If the USA were to really fight without all these restrictions they would win without a problem.
I don't understand how the US and the Great Britain became Co-Belligerents so quick in 1798 when they were in conflict in the Northwest Indian War (1785 - 1793). What changed for the French to turn against the US in this time?
>>81434530
Kennedy assassination
