Anarcho capitalism thread.
>major banks and corporations pool their resources for a military
>enslave the population
Your ideology turns into modern feudalism real quick
>>81397242
Anarcho capitalism is against big bankers and the military industrial complex. get you facts straight anon.
>>81397433
Lol how are you going to stop banks from gaining power without a state and what I described is not a MIC you retard.
>>81397663
>>81397663
>>81397242
Anarcho capitalism gives people the chance to grow a small business without the government large corporations and banks to keeping them from a chance to grow you anon confuse corporatism .
anarcho capitalism >corporatism
Retard
>>81397866
You have to be 12 years old. Awful punctuation and what you're saying really doesn't make sense.
>without the government large corporations and banks to keeping them from a chance to grow you anon confuse corporatism
This is complete nonsense.
>>81397770
I'm a left leaning independent, nowhere near communism.
Anarcho capitalism is also anti monopoly so this is by principle against large banks and corporations .>>81398070
btw English is not my first language i apologize.
>>81396872
How's middle school going for you bud?
>>81398070
It is also possible that you simply do not understand :)
>>81398070
does consent exist?
>>81398347
No your English is really bad and you're probably an idiot.
>>81396872
>Anarcho
>capitalism
>real
>>81398414
large banks and large corporations essentially "rape" the small business owners because t does not allow them to participate in the market.
The last time I came to /pol/ (last month), there was a ancap thread going.
You guys are doing this shit in what time basis?
>>81396872
Lets do this crazy thing where...
Money is actual money...
Like gold coins and shit.
And shit, is what you use cash to wipe up.
Because gold is worth a freaking fucking lot and if you have problems carrying gold in your pocket then you're carrying way too goddamn much money.
Because you'd carry a little piece of it, and you'd carry Silver Coins for anything short of it.
Its like Dungeons and Dragons in real life.
>>81398676
>>81398696
lmao keep em comin bud
>>81396872
As a national socialist I am appalled by your mere existence. Delete your account right nos.
Who prints the dollars and mints the coins in anarcho-capitalism? I'm genuinely curious.
>>81397242
fpbp
>>81398696
child workers couldn't exist in a Anarcho capitalist society because that would go against the child consent and natural born rights.
>>81398585
>We're going to allow small businesses to compete with corporations by letting them abuse the rights of the workers
>>81398769
More to come
>>81398848
It quickly descends into a feudalistic barter system as all currencies become worthless.
>>81398733
The us economy is based on almost entirely on debt and the dollar is basically a green piece of cotton worth nothing >>81398848 possibly cryto currency such as bitcoin.
>>81398769
best one
>>81399093
You are a true memesmith
>>81399018
and no this is not what we think comfag. olive garden is a private business that is willing giving they're money to provide the "bread sticks".
>>81399093
By far the best one
>>81399074
>>81399246
still no.
Any /narco-capitalists/ here?
>>81399561
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xVYnQyZWlik
>>81398495
>>81399716
>15 minutes of retard babble
no
You know what's way better? Pooling money for roads that we are all going to use anyway.
>>81399799
your argument doesn't make sense because that would go against free will. :)
>>81396872
The world is already anarcho-capitalist.
In order to defend yourself from China and Russia you need nukes.
And then you get private armies owning nukes who might sell them to wealthy people who might use them on other people just for shits and giggles.
To be fair, it would be worth it.
>>81399716
>people would pay private companies to build roads
Okay, I want a legitimate answer to this.
No one person would say, "I'm going to buy roads for everybody to use, for free.", You would either end up with:
1. Zero roads.
2. Every single road is a toll road.
You wouldn't even need roads in an A-C society though, because cars would be ludicrously expensive and literally none of them would meet any kind of standard, because there literally aould not be legally enforcable standards.
Anarco-capitalism is just "muh murica" mixed with "people are good, on the inside!"
Grow up, kid.
>>81399840
how about no,they wouldn't be high quality if it was pooled because they government would go with the cheapest route possible .
>>81396872
Fuck you guys.
You assholes give libertarians a bad name.
>>81398856
>>81399960
THAT WAS SO OFFENSIVE, I THINK IT BROKE THE NON AGGRESSION PRINCIPLE!
>>81400184
this is capitalism it appear to be a mix of imperialism and totalitarianism. and it goes against the innocents rights.
>>81400206
Fuck statists, you give liberty a bad name.
>>81400510
im with this guy :)
>>81400169
>I WANT A LEGITIMATE ANSWER TO THIS: ROADS WON'T MATERIALIZE OUT OF NOWHERE FOR FREE????
Welcome to reality.
>>81400343
>Children are property
god what a fucking moron
>>81400698
How can Jews genocide whites under the non-aggression principle?
>>81400651
I mean I want to hear my point rebutted
>>81400801
What point? Are you implying that the state makes roads free?
>>81400343
>legal child sex slave trafficking
wtf
I like Fascism.
Why can't you like Fascism?
>>81400184
>Those people being killed are a bad thing
You've spent too much time in the shed, Tyrone's probably done with your boyfriend by now
>>81397242
^ this
>>81400755
Damn I completely forgot about that.
>>81400651
What is wrong with every road being a toll road?
Paying for the services needed is too much for people nowadays to understand?
>>81401121
>What is wrong with every road being a toll road?
Nothing.
>>81401121
>be poor
>too expensive to get to work
>>81401121
Because natural monopolies are a thing, and roads are a good example.
Anarcho-Capitalism is almost as dumb as..... I actually can't think of anything dumber than An-capism.
>>81401243
>not produce anything that anybody wants
>not get anything anybody else produces
What is wrong with that?
>>81400922
No, I'm implying that the most efficient and consistent way to make roads is with collective taxation.
>>81401253
>Road monopolies
You do realize that a competitor could build a road literally right next to a "monopoly" road and charge a lower price.
>>81401403
Not an argument.
>>81401121
I don't want to be paying 1/3 of my salary on transportation.
>>81401427
how are you supposed to produce anything if you can't get to work...
see
>>81399978
>>81401042
>n-no we'll all band together create a functioning military and all equipment before we get fucked, I swear!
or manybe
>so what if we get beat by Russia and China? something something darwin
>>81401439
If those roads were in demand, wouldn't the market pay for them? Do you understand how much debt and disrepair government roads are in?
Government roads are bankrupt.
>>81401493
Then don't. Nobody is forcing you to transport yourself anywhere.
Also, you people do realize ATVs exist, right?
>>81401042
>implying you wouldn't be conscripted into a private army to defend the owner's factories
You signed the contract, you defend the owner.
>>81401476
Arguments violate the NAP.
>>81401602
Are you really this stupid. Listen if you want a functioning economy that isn't a bunch of rural farming tribes you need well maintained large roads.
>>81401493
Why would transportation cost 1/3 of your salary? The state does not make transportation cheaper, it makes it more expensive. The free market makes transportation cheaper.
Your propaganda fueled fantasy of not being enslaved is quite amusing.
>>81401602
what are you going to do? ride on your ATV through someone's PRIVATE PROPERTY?! THAT VIOLATES THE NON AGGRESSION PRINCIPLE! SHOOT HIM!
>>81401525
People defend their property when it is worth defending. Banks have safes. Technology has passwords. You don't need the state to defend yourself from another state.
>>81401525
>so what if we get beat by Russia and China?
you don't really "get" white people do you?
>>81401574
The market at most might pay for highways since the corporations would need them to move goods. Residential roads would probably not get built. They would be to expensive for residents to build themselves and companies don't really have a need to build them. This is because we still need the goods anyways so we will travel to get them.
>>81401614
Or you could employ with literally anyone else that you don't sell yourself into slavery for?
>>81401574
>If those roads were in demand, wouldn't the market pay for them?
Yes, like I said, and they would all be toll roads.
>Do you understand how much debt and disrepair government roads are in?
Why don't you take a leaf out of your own book and fund private companies to repair the roads?
>Government roads are bankrupt.
If those roads were in demand, wouldn't the market pay for them?
>>81401803
>n-no we'll all band together create a functioning military and all equipment before we get fucked, I swear!
>>81401721
>buy all the roads in a city
>jack up the prices
>people try to leave the city because it's too expensive
>send private security to defend the borders of my private land so they can't leave the city
>>81396872
Anarcho-Syndicate or GTFO.
Literally Anarcho capitalism is slavery to Corperation states
>>81401710
>>81398856
Sure they could, with parental consent
>>81401871
And what are you going to do when a conglomerate of capitalists decide that the only employment terms they'll provide is slave ones?
Oh wait, I forgot, capitalists are good guys who don't care about things like money.
>>81399978
>but if the government isn't here to opress us, other people could opress us!
>if everyone tried to disrupt society, they could
Yeah - thats the point.
>>81397242
What's wrong with feudalism?
I've always wanted to live out my fantasy as a Shadowrunner working for a corp in a private army murdering for money.
>>81398585
And big government aids the corporations by regulating small businesses out of the game
>>81401721
It would really depend on what the toll is. If the roads were monopolized I wouldn't be surprised if companies charged a dollar per mile.
>>81401998
>the businesses built roads
In what fucking country? The only privately built roads, ever, were toll roads.
>>81398856
Damn, I completely forgot that all people will believe in/follow a set of ethics that aren't enforced.
Do you know how fucking stupid you sound? You sound exactly like pic related.
>>81401950
Grats, all of your roads just became economically worthless. Great investment.
>>81401814
>MUH WHITE MASTER RACE
You do know whites have been beaten in battle before?
>>81396872
>>81397433
>anarcho capitalism is against big banks
Wew lad, it's literally Judaism: The Political Philosophy
Join the syndicate faggots
>>81401918
>Hey, there's a credible violent threat!
>There must be absolutely no way for defense to be monetized or performed by the free market
Wow.
>>81402175
You forget. Sometimes money itself isn't valuable, but rather the power to be a dick with it.
>>81401814
Our proud history of global warfare in an cap societies
>>81401839
>Might
>Probably
So you are just superstitious and don't have an actual reason why these things would happen in a free market.
>>81401998
The first roads ever built were mainly for government purposes. Romes massive road network was built with two purposes in mind. An easy way to collect taxes and an easy way to transport troops.
>>81398856
>Child consent
Who's going to to enforce this.
This is a parody thread, right? LMAO
>>81402313
In our society you could purchase all corn farms in the united states, and salt the land.
So what? People can be dicks, nothing will ever prevent that.
>>81401901
>Yes, like I said, and they would all be toll roads.
Okay
>Why don't you take a leaf out of your own book and fund private companies to repair the roads?
That's what I'm trying to convince you.
>If those roads were in demand, wouldn't the market pay for them?
Yeah, they would. Think of all the government roads that have been built that turn over economic loss instead of economic profit.
>>81402265
Yes. An anarchist society cannot protect itself from any real states. That is why there aren't any an-cap societies.
>>81401121
>drive 2 miles
>had to pull over 10 times to put cash in a toll booth
Can the sick faggot making memes please edit this so it says
"statism was terrible"
"Hordes of bureaucrats bursting into our... nothing"
"leaving behind collectively funded roads, hospitals, transport"
>>81402039
Then literally any startup competitor would outcompete them and attract all the best labor who don't want to become cannon fodder and instead want to make money.
>>81402120
How would roads be monopolized in a free market? Anyone could open up a competitor to compete with a monopoly and undercut them.
>>81400755
>governments can't exist because people will naturally abuse their power
>but everyone will just follow the non aggression principle duh
>>81398848
bitcoin m8 priting a currency is so 1200 ad
>>81402339
>So you are just superstitious and don't have an actual reason why these things would happen in a free market.
Aren't all an-cap arguments superstition by this standard since none of them have actually been put into practice since no an-cap societies exist. Other than somalia of course.
You can't combine the idea of anarchy with an economic policy, it's a fucking oxymoron.
Anyone else point out how stupid OP is for making this thread.
>>81402541
>Okay
No, that's not okay. Because the guy running the road can charge whatever he wants, and if you refuse to consent you're breaking the non ggression principal and are subject to whatever punishment he sees fit.
>That's what I'm trying to convince you.
Yes, you say the government roads are terrible, hy not go pay private construction companies to repave them? That's what you're arguing for, ahy won't you do that?
>Yeah, they would. Think of all the government roads that have been built that turn over economic loss instead of economic profit.
Roads are a necessity, they shouldn't be a profitable market.
>>81402783
Sure idiot
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A5xNGPtk7no
A Ayndicate works, but capitalism kills it
>>81396872
>best goyim that ever existed thread.
Let the (((free market))) sort everything out.
>humans naturally prefer familiarity and comfort to choice
>one company inevitably does better than others
>exponentially increases in power in a short time
>enslaves the disorganized micro enclaves surrounding it
>are now under an aristocratic moralless regime
>>81402832
>>81402652
Lad, I was talking to you.
>>81402611
>>81402652
>mfw when An-caps think child-prostitution wouldn't be rampant in an An-cap society
>>81402670
THrough coercion, violence and buyouts and corporations acting as a psuedo-state. Like has happened with any free-market society.
>>81402734
What are there a lot of Jews robbing liquor stores or something? What exactly is your point.
>>81402670
Same way Standard oil formed a monopoly. Same way American Bell did. Once one corporation seizes enough market share it doesn't matter any more how much another company under sells them.
>>81402623
>startup competitor
Perhaps you weren't listening. In your magic dreamworld the infinitely powerful corporations would set up massive megamalls next to the tiny corner shops the startup ran. He'd be blown out of the market before he started.
>>81402783
Capitalism isn't an "Economic Policy"
It's freedom of trade. It requires no rulers, so it can occur under anarchy.
>live in ancap paradise
>protect my private property with web of land mines as is my right
>neighbors' 10-year-old son wanders into my lawn to get his baseball and gets blown up
>parents come to me to complain
>tell them he deserved it for not respecting my property rights and would've probably grown up to be a statist anyway
>dad punches me
>sue him for violating the NAP
Thank Rand there was no state to oppress me
>>81402611
>>81402973
I'm on it. Also, @ me
>>81402968
This is essentially Walmart/Amazon in an An-cap society
>>81403268
ta lad, truly, the free meme market works.
>>81403046
>tfw when the goyim fall for anarcho-capitalism
>>81403187
Capitalism requires private property rights. There are no property rights without government protection.
>>81402905
>Because the guy running the road can charge whatever he wants
You are free to refuse. Unlike the state, who charges whatever the state wants and takes it from you by force.
>and if you refuse to consent you're breaking the non ggression principal and are subject to whatever punishment he sees fit.
No, you just aren't allowed to use his road. He can't punish you for not wanting to use his road because it's too expensive.
>Yes, you say the government roads are terrible, hy not go pay private construction companies to repave them? That's what you're arguing for, ahy won't you do that?
Not an argument.
>Roads are a necessity
If there is demand, the free market creates it.
>>81402985
>Like has happened with any free-market society.
Provide one example of a monopoly that has occurred in the free market.
>inb4 you post a government created monopoly and call it the free market
>>81403565
>You are free to refuse.
No you can't. That's the problem with monopolies
>Unlike the state, who charges whatever the state wants and takes it from you by force.
The state makes me pay a few cents tax on gas. It's not really raping my wallet.
>If there is demand, the free market creates it.
There's demand for cheap affordable healthcare. Why hasn't that been created by the free-market.
>>81403143
Then people prefer the lower prices and better service that megamalls provide more than the higher prices that tiny corner shops charge. Win-win.
>>81403676
>Provide one example of a monopoly that has occurred in the free market.
Standard oil, American Bell, De beers, U.S. Steel, Monsanto.
>>81403545
The government doesn't defend property rights. Governments are actually the largest offenders of property rights.
>>81402611
American version
>>81403964
>lower prices
They're not going to have lower prices when they have a monopoly.
>>81404000
>The government doesn't defend property rights.
Who does then?
>>81404010
Thanks, lad, this is great. Nice touch on the recolouring of the balls.
>>81403189
And that's how you weed out the kids who don't respect private property.
What's the free market solution to competing with super massive banks that have ATMs everywhere for only their customers? How do you compete with huge credit card companies?
Ancap is a meme for edgy 16-20yr olds prove me wrong.
I have an ancap friend every argument with him ends with "You wouldn't understand anyway i'am telling you it would work"
"Threatening not paying taxes with violence" is the best one.
country is "Owned" by the people living in it.
Rules are made by those people trough their representatives.
One of the rules was to pay taxes or face the consequences.
>THEFT, ITS THEFT
Come the fuck on...
>>81403676
>If government was so much as looks at something, it created it
>>81403811
>No you can't. That's the problem with monopolies
If there was a monopoly on a service and the service was bad or overpriced, competitors will open to beat the existing service.
>The state makes me pay a few cents tax on gas. It's not really raping my wallet.
$20 trillion debt. The largest theft in human history. It rapes your wallet.
>There's demand for cheap affordable healthcare. Why hasn't that been created by the free-market.
Because the government has made it illegal to practice medicine without a government license?
I think it says a lot about an-capism that their serious arguments are indistinguishable from troll bait.
>>81404277
A mom and pop bank will open up and under-sell them. Also you don't have to use banks.
>>81402973
>>81402611
>>81403268
>>81404277
bitcoin try keep up pleb
>>81403991
>Standard oil
No lol
>American Bell
Gov't, not free market
>De beers
No, lol...
>U.S. Steel
>Monsanto
Please. Provide a monopoly that occurs in the free market. Naming existing or previous government backed corps does not count.
>>81404368
>>81404010
I just realised the hospital one doesn't really work in America, as you have private healthcare.
Woops.
>>81396872
LOL
>>81404485
We don't. Healthcare was socialized in the early 1900s. You can't practice medicine without a government license.
>>81404485
Our healthcare is a bit of a mess as it's collectively funded for some people but not for others, and also depends where you live how privatized it is. IIRC a lot of the hospitals are state subsidized anyway so it fits
>>81404295
>If there was a monopoly on a service and the service was bad or overpriced, competitors will open to beat the existing service.
No they wouldn't. That's why monopolies are dangerous. Once one exists it can do whatever it wants. Monopolies don't obey regular market principles.
>$20 trillion debt. The largest theft in human history. It rapes your wallet.
That 20 trillion wasn't roads. It's also not theft. I agree to pay the taxes by living hear. I do disagree on how it's spent though. That's stupidity not theft. If you don't want to pay tax go to Somalia or vote to change the law.
>Because the government has made it illegal to practice medicine without a government license?
That's the solution. Privately licensed doctors. No fucking way anything could go wrong with that
>>81404441
These were actual monopolies. If you don't want to believe it that's your problem.
>>81404693
>posted at exactly 00:00:00
wew
>>81404680
Thank fuck for that.
>be an cap
>get operated on by a person with no degree who says he's a doctor, because it's cheaper than going to the graduated doctors
>the free market does it again
>die of MRSA
>>81404693
How do you get collectivised healthcare? Can you sign up or something and agree to pay more taxes for it?
>>81396872
>political systems that can't withstand defectors and degenerate into tyranny
>>81396872
"Anarcho" capitalism.
You misspelled "contradiction thread." What's next, anarcho-feudalism?
>>81404680
Government license to practice medicine doesn't make it socialized. That's like saying the automotive industry is socialized because a need a government licence to drive.
Vid related you roleplaying autists
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ir9LhF01KtA
>>81404920
You can't die of MRSA in an An-cap society. That would be a violation of the NAP.
>>81404934
>free association
>contradictory to anarchy
L E L
E
L
>>81404920
In certain places you get it automatically like Massachusetts and certain cities I think. Otherwise certain groups get it like Indians, veterans, poor kids, disabled, etc.
>>81404708
>No they wouldn't. That's why monopolies are dangerous. Once one exists it can do whatever it wants. Monopolies don't obey regular market principles.
If you have a monopoly on any item/service, what stops me from opening up a business and selling it for a lower price or better quality/service?
> I agree to pay the taxes by living hear.
I didn't agree though.
>That's the solution. Privately licensed doctors. No fucking way anything could go wrong with that
Sarcasm isn't an argument.
>>81397242
>citizens choose different ways of acquiring loans and such similar things that banks do
>also: competition
or
>citizens raise a PMC to combat this newfound enemy
>>81404816
You can't say that monopolies created by the government are the reason that we need a government to protect people from monopolies.
>>81400343
Q U O T E M I N E
U
O
E
M
I
N
E
>>81404920
>get operated on by a person with no degree who says he's a doctor, because it's cheaper than going to the graduated doctors
>the free market does it again
>die of MRSA
You deserve it for choosing a guy with a hacksaw over a reputable physician.
>>81405091
>If you have a monopoly on any item/service, what stops me from opening up a business and selling it for a lower price or better quality/service?
Same thing Standard oil did. In the area you opened up I could just lower my prices below yours. I can afford to operate at a loss in that one region because I still make a profit everywhere else. Soon you go out of business and I can raise my prices as much as I want. Or since there isn't even a government in an An-cap society I could just hire a militia to kill you.
>I didn't agree though.
Your consent is implied by living here. If you don't like it don't pay and suffer the consequences or leave.
>Sarcasm isn't an argument.
It is when the thing it's responding to is stupid.
>>81404939
>Government license to practice medicine doesn't make it socialized.
When the government decides which jobs people are allowed to do and which ones they are not allowed to do, that's socialism.
>That's like saying the automotive industry is socialized because a need a government licence to drive.
It is.
>>81405061
>leave in will to sue if i die from MRSA
>there are literally no courts
>WAKE ME UP
>>81405089
Seems like an okay system, if not easily abusable. We have a similar system in Britain with dentistry, kids, students and I think maybe pensioners get it free.
That's only cosmetic, of course, if you actually have something physically wrong with you you can just go to the doctors and get it free.
>>81405250
How do I know the physician is reputable?
>>81405250
>save all my money up to go to a licenced doctor
>spend it all on toll sidewalkss getting there
>>81405423
>When the government decides which jobs people are allowed to do and which ones they are not allowed to do, that's socialism.
Anyone can be a doctor if the pass the requirements. Same with any other job.
>>81405468
What are consumer reviews.
>>81404984
That your video?
>>81405557
You can fake consumer reviews.
>>81405429
Is the system in the UK overall better than a privatized system? The only thing I've really heard against that sort of healthcare system is generally longer wait times.
>>81405646
You can fake any reviews.
>>81398256
What language is your main language?
Spanish?
>>81405519
>>81405687
Exactly. When going to a doctor I don't check reviews. I check to see if they are licensed and their education and years of experience.
>>81405392
>Same thing Standard oil did. In the area you opened up I could just lower my prices below yours. I can afford to operate at a loss in that one region because I still make a profit everywhere else. Soon you go out of business and I can raise my prices as much as I want.
You can't operate at a loss indefinitely to keep someone from outcompeting you.
>Your consent is implied by living here.
Location is not a means of consent.
>>81405557
>10/10, "I didn't die due to gross negligence, lack of legally enforcable standards, and all I had to so was sign my 6 year old daughter up as a DocTec™ comfort woman™"
>>81405780
check his credentials you fucking spook
>>81405519
>toll sidewalks
kek
pic unrelated
>implying that's not a basketball hoop
>>81405468
>How do I know the physician is reputable?
He has living, happy patients.
>>81405780
You're trusting in completely random strangers in the same way by doing that. Except in that case you're putting faith into a non-competitive monopoly who has no incentive to produce quality doctors, since you'll be blindly trusting whoever they license regardless like the sheep drone you are.
>>81405660
The system is better, in my opinion. Sure, you may have to wait a week to get a cough looked at but it won't cost you £2,390 for the consultation.
Our emergency care is second to none, though. I broke my toe a year or two ago, went to A&E and they X-rayed it and bandaged it up in a single hour.
>>81405815
>I don't know what civil courts are: the post
>>81402832
Why not try and find a cheaper route or bulk buy passes.
It's almost as if you autists just want to bitches and not even give it a seconds thought.
>>81405806
>You can't operate at a loss indefinitely to keep someone from outcompeting you.
I don't have to. All I have to do is do it for a month until your small smart up can't pay the lease.
>>81406028
How do I meet those patients?
>>81406136
Why not have a system where everyone collectively pays a small amount to pay for the road so we don't all have to pay $50K to drive to fucking work.
>>81406028
>go to doctors
>see pile of corpses being wheeled out of room
>try to walk out of door
>he sues me for slander
>his private court finds me guilty
>sentences me to be his assistance
>mfw im wheeling the corpses out now
>>81406113
>implying they're not ordained and subsidised by the government
>>81406420
Then how would the capitalists afford to build new toll roads to charge you to use?
>>81406420
If they charge 50k the roads would be a worthless investment. The roads would have to at least be more affordable than other routes that require greater fuel costs.
I'll just leave this here:
Roads in an Anarcho-Capitalist Society -
[http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xVYnQyZWlik]
>>81406726
Idk, maybe get a government bailout
wait......
>>81396872
Capitalism is pure cancer.
>>81397242
> corporations existing
> without government protections
ha ha
>>81400343
If you actually double checked any of your meme pictures, you would see that is not what Rothbard said:
> what was in your picture
Suppose now that the baby has been born. Then what? First, we may
say that the parents-or rather the mother, who is the only certain and
visible parent-as the creators of the baby become its owners. A newborn
baby cannot be an existent self-owner in any sense. Therefore, either
the mother or some other party or parties may be the baby's owner,
but to assert that a third party can claim his "ownership" over
the baby would give that person the right to seize the baby by force
from its natural or "homesteading" owner, its mother. The mother,
then, is the natural and rightful owner of the baby, and any attempt
to seize the baby by force is an invasion of her property right.
> how the text actually continued
But surely the mother
or parents may not receive the ownership of the child in absolute fee
simple, because that would imply the bizarre state of affairs that a
fifty-year old adult would be subject to the absolute and unquestioned
jurisdiction of his seventy-year-old parent. So the parental property
right must be limited in time. But it also must be limited in kind,
for it surely would be grotesque for a libertarian who believes in the
right of self-ownership to advocate the right of a parent to murder
or torture his or her children. We must therefore state that, even
from birth, the parental ownership is not absolute but of a "trustee"
or guardianship kind. In short, every baby as soon as it is born and
is therefore no longer contained within his mother's body possesses the
right of self-ownership by virtue of being a separate entity and a
potential adult. It must therefore be illegal and a violation of the
child's rights for a parent to aggress against his person by mutilating,
torturing, murdering him, etc.
>>81402532
I'm pretty sure that would be illegal or soon to be illegal if a billionaire bought up farm lands just to salt them.
But I suppose in anarcho-capitalism it would be fine.
>>81406745
Someone already posted that.
Also the first comment in the comment section completely debunks your argument.
>>81406469
>be bong
>exist in house
>TV licensing patrol knocks down my door in the middle of the night
>in flash of regret, I recall that I forgot to buy my license for the day
>"No please have mercy!" I cry out, but angry Arabic chants sound out from the armed patrol
>they beat me within inches of my life with their privilege dildos before carrying me out into the streets
>shouts of "Fascist government traitor!" ring out from xirs lining the sidewalks, with occasional spitting and tranny ejaculation aimed at my face
>I find myself soon in the court of bongs, where I am summarily forced to sign a few million documents before I am executed under Sharia law
Takbir.
>>81402066
fucking autist.
>>81406576
>implying they need be
>>81402670
I'm pretty sure it would be capital intensive to build roads. Also someone could buy up swaves of land preventing you from building competing roads.
But to be fair, you could just waltz in and take the lands with your private army.
Also you could just extract tolls from the plebs who can't afford guns without having to build roads.
>>81402160
That's not the meaning, stupid.
The existence of the businesses provided the reason to have roads.
>>81406995
Fucking libertarian actually thinks this justifies his insanity.
>>81407171
>ad hominem
>not knowing the tv licence is a private company, that has a monopoly, with it's own goons
Wow, amazingly you not only made yourself look like an idiot but you also rebutted your own argument. Guess the free market ain't so great, huh?
>>81407804
>>81406469
>>81406469
Who would actually agree to live in rape town though?
Stop strawmanning people you fucking autist.
>>81407432
Yes, and who builds the roads? The businesses would NOT do it for free. I mean, look at parking lots for malls and shit, you have to pay to park there or buy something for them to "validate your parking". No single entity has ever bought a road for everyone.
>>81407900
>i have no counter point so i decided to post a smug anime face which proves I'm right
Fuggin ebin, my man.
>>81407993
Protip: every town is rape town if the guy raping you can afford a better lawyer or you can't afford one
>>81407121
Self interested reason?
Tolls and advertising as explained in the video.
The free market doesn't need to be perfect it just needs to be more efficient than gubmint which it is.
>>81406469
^
>>81407171
^
>>81407804
>>81408199
>>81407804
A private monopoly backed by the state!!! Tell me how much you love fascism again you fucking tard.
>>81408344
Right, right, right. "Roads" is a confusing term, as it can mean anything, but let's get this sorted.
Say there's a row of businesses, every new business builds a bit of road for cars to xome to their business, right?
Who builds the fucking highways? What gets you from that tiny shopping street to another place?
There is no self interest to huild a highway.
>>81408270
Buy a gun, or a body cam.
>>81408434
>the peak of an-cap philosophy
>>81408511
I suppose you'd prefer to watch adverts, like in America?
>hey leanord?
>advert
>yeah?
>advert
>bazinga
>advert
>>81406469
>living in rapetown if you don't want to get raped
>>81408629
>get sued for breaking the non aggressive principle for nefarious recording of a sovereign citizen
>>81408610
Companies that need to transport materials from source to factory or otherwise transport goods across country would contract out the work or do it themselves.
Tourists visiting beauty spots.
>>81408822
>>81407993
Rapists. Also people who were forced to live there by private armed groups since they were paid by the rapists to deliver the booty.
>>81408948
Filming people isn't initiating violence you contrarian twat. Fucking hell
>>81408955
It would be cheaper to buy a transport plane than build miles of road, so that argument's wrong.
>>81408964
Oh fugg, hail Keynes.
>>81408948
>Live in a anarchist society
>Neighbor wants your shit
>He just kills you and takes it
