[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Why do left-wing politicians promote immigration?
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Thread replies: 68
Thread images: 6
File: Untitled.png.jpg (51 KB, 640x360) Image search: [Google]
Untitled.png.jpg
51 KB, 640x360
Why do left-wing politicians across Europe and America continue to promote immigration from the middle-east when it is a hugely unpopular policy, is an obvious security risk, and is leading to a clear resurgence in far-right politics? Is it really just because of muh diversity muh multiculturalism? I refuse to believe the politicians are that stupid and suspect something more perfidious is at play - but what is it?
>>
>>81105000
>Why do left-wing politicians promote immigration?

Free vote.
>>
>>81105000
cheap labor
>>
>>81105000

Their worldview is a feedback cycle. They bend over backwards for niggers and mudslimes to prove that everyone is equal. Said people are still scum. So they say "oh shit they still suck! It must be because we're oppressing them! Bend over harder!"

Which only makes them act shittier.

Enough... just fucking... enough.
>>
>>81105000
Easy votes
>>
>>81105115
>Free vote.

yes.

>>81105196
>cheap labor

true, but that's why the business owners support immigration. it's why the usa is overrun with mexicans, even though "everyone" is against it.

but as for OP, one of the truest things one will ever learn is that you should never attribute to malice anything that can be attributed to stupidity.
>>
>>81105000
there's nothing wrong with immigration per se

it's unchecked, unregulated immigration that's the problem

immigration should be metered, controlled and have caps, that's all there is to it
>>
>>81105000
>I refuse to believe the politicians are that stupid
Uh-oh.
>>
>>81105000

To battle declining birth rates and keep the economy going in a society where white chilren are raised to aspire becoming something greater than part of the much needed labour force. It's the counter meassure to changes the industry has worked towards in the last 40 years, not forseeing that they would eventually shoot themselves in the leg. (Women working full time, 'high qualified' workers, competitive education.... )
>>
It can't be about multiculturalism, if it were theyd import from more cultures than just shitskins
>>
>>81105000
They want to disingrate nation states and white people.

Basically they want their brown one world government utopia, where they can teach everyone in the world how to think
>>
>>81105000
Divide and conquer
>>
The only explanation I can think of is that they want to dilute and ultimately destroy groups of people who have a certain level of dignity they demand. It's easy to control a population that isn't financially secure or organized

Short answer: drive down the cost of labor for the elites
>>
>>81105000

To create a godless, homosexual, communist utopia.
>>
File: 1392144145112.jpg (199 KB, 962x681) Image search: [Google]
1392144145112.jpg
199 KB, 962x681
It will keep them in power forever in the long run, since the rightwing voters will die out

whatever resurgence of far right politics you are seeing means nothing since it will be quelled and stopped, white people are a minority on this planet and endless mass immigration will easily destroy them

there are some flukes though, like the biggest actual uncompromising rightwing party in Germany is a Turkish Nationalist party, but they are all for mass immigration.

and yes, the whites that are doing this knows they will kill their bloodline and their people, leftism is basically a death cult.
>>
Because it's a lot cheaper to import working age adults to fill the worker shortage than it is to pay for a child to be raised from birth.

Left-wing government spent too much on social programs from it's current population (ie family benefits, public schooling etc) that trying to increase it from birth is ridiculously expensive.
>>
>>81105115
>>81105387
>>81105431
But that clearly isn't working anymore. It's why Brexit happened, it's why far-right parties are on the rise throughout Europe and America, it's why Front National have a good chance of getting elected in France. With all of the political data analysis that happens nowadays, surely they are aware of just how much people (idiot lefty millennials aside) hate this level of immigration.
>>
>>81105000

1. They get more votes in the long term.

2. Many left-wing politicians are not traditionally left-wing anymore. Many are neoliberals who believe in the free movement of goods, services, and people. The Democratic party has been center right economically for quite a long time. Paul Krugman is a hell of a lot closer to Milton Freedman than to any true socialist.

3. The activist wing of left-wing politics has been corrupted by neoliberal money, especially the cultural left. Remember that people like Soros are not socialists. Soros is a capitalist. He is a globalist and socially liberal. He fought communism many times. Ask yourself why so many left wing activist groups were against Brexit. Five, ten years ago they were against globalism. Brexit should have appealed to the far-right and the far-left. Soros and others essentially bought off these organizations and got them to promote globalism, just usually under a different name (anti-racism usually).

Even movements like Occupy were partially taken down and limited by other, usually cultural, elements of the left. Why do things like the progressive stack? Well, the cultural elements of the left were undermining the economic elements of the left, and it just so happens that people like Soros are the biggest funders of the cultural left. Coincidence. Would you rather have a former wall street analyst speak or a drop out who was majoring in African American studies? If you are a capitalist like Soros, obviously having the drop out represent the anti-capitalist movement is beneficial.
>>
>>81105000
>Why do left-wing politicians across Europe and America continue to promote immigration from the middle-east

At least in the US the Democrats are losing ground with the middle class and even the poor for decades,so they literally have to import voters
>>
>>81105000
Politicians will never admit they fucked up, they will push their bullshit bad policy until they are dragged out of their homes and lynched.
>>
I don't think they have an evil plan behind it. They truly believe the "diversity" propaganda, and think that migrants will assimilate and just add colour to local societies through ethnic restaurants and sports players.

Most of these people are shielded to the harmful effects of migration, like rape gangs and losing jobs.
>>
>>81105000
Because the ones voting for them is not blue collar workers, it's spoiled kids who go to universities, the kind of middle class kids that would be executed in a real socialist revolution.

They go there, life comfortable lives and have such an easy time to tell others how they should live. It's really easy to live up to your ideals when you don't have to deal with the consequences like they do.

They live in mostly white neighbourhoods and the only foreigners they meet are the ones intelligent enough to make it into university. They don't have to deal with the low class shits that live in the poor areas. Workers have to deal with them and their shit, though, since they have to live with them. Workers have to deal with their violence and overall criminality, it's their money they drain through taxes and their children they threaten.

You can clearly see it in Sweden. The Sweden Democrats is huge among workers, and small among university people because workers have to live with the dumb decisions these "intellectuals" make. Shitty decisions they can take because they don't have to deal with the negative parts.
>>
>>81105000
More (cheap) workforce and population growth, which is linked to the concept of economic growth.
It's not that you couldn't have alternative economic models, but right now it's politically easier to import 3rd world immigrants.

Some genocidal/racemixing motives might be there as well, but they're much smaller, no matter what /pol/ says.
>>
We have a party here in Norway called "Arbeiderpariet" (Literally The Worker Party". No one in their right mind is voting for them, but schools are promoting them and SV(social leftist), so their only way of getting new voters is importing them from Syria
>>
>>81105000
the traditional theory i think is that left-wing politics has a focus on the quality of life of the individuals inside its country. the problem is that the line gets blurred with being overly compassionate with people outside one's own system. it is thought by the voter: 'well if this politician doesn't care about a poor little refugee family down on their luck, why would they care about a small-timer like me?'.

There nothing inherently wrong at the core of left wing politics, in fact its essential in two party systems. the problem is a left wing party is super easy to tear down by the media, and they have to absolutely avoid being seen in the publics eye as not compassionate, because mainstream media tears down every other card in their deck.
>>
>>81105000
import poor, poor votes left
ethnic diversity substitute for social equality/virtue signalling
diversity corrodes civic fabric and 'power structures'
>>
>>81106001
>They truly believe the "diversity" propaganda

Some young leftists probably do believe that, but you think someone like Angela Merkel gives a flying fuck about some sandniggers?
Nah, she's just being told that the economy will go to shit if they don't let them in.
The humanitarian aspect and cultural enrichment are convenient excuses.
>>
>>81106627
Doesn't this always inherently backfire when the left doesn't do what it promised and the poor are left poor and polarised? Pulling the pendulum further to the left, makes it swing harder to the right.

>Chile
>Argentina
>Germany
>Austria
>Hungary
>Spain
>>
>>81105508

THIS x 100
>>
>Why do left-wing politicians across Europe and America

I don't know why these get grouped together. America has been way more successful in the integration of most of its immigrants. There aren't calais jungles or whatever in the USA, are there?
>>
>>81107317
>way more successful

>9/11
well shit I guess it doesn't count.
>>
The biggest fuckup they did was doing this when the internet is bigger than ever. People are waking up and rejecting the mainstream news. It's quite heartening.

What worries me is the way they're trying to clamp down on free speech by labeling everything as hate speech.

Which is why, in an insane world, 4Chan is more important than ever.
>>
>>81107317
there were in 1980's in Florida, like the beginning of Scarface.
>>
>>81105000
Votes and cheap labor.
>>
>>81105351
>They bend over backwards for niggers and mudslimes to prove that everyone is equal.
They don't give a fuck about any of this shit, they just do it to profit from it.
It is known that Hillary hates fags/niggers/mexicans and yet she panders anyway, there are multiple videos of KKK members endorsing her.
>>
>>81105000

Because they work for the globalists, and not the people.

They are traitors, that sold out. How do you think people get to be politicians in the first place?

Our democracy is a sham.
>>
>>81105843
Because there is time yet, just look at London, the muslims already took over there, it was a matter of time before they kept expanding.
Britain can recover if they stop completely the immigration of military aged males and make it extremely hard for them to get work/benefits.
>>
>>81105760
I see 2 kids and 3 females in that picture, really disgusting.
>>
>>81106910
last I checked blacks in USA are still voting democrat. as immigrants improve their socio-economic standing they vote right eg. Sikhs vote conservative in UK, while muslims (who never elevated above dole bludgers) continue to vote left.
>>
>>81107485
i would have agreed a few years ago, but i think corporations that fund mainstream media have also 'woken up' and are now controlling the internet.

People can't get enough of outrage click-bait for example which is just making a ton of advertising money. getting people into a hive mind those who label everything hate speech, and those who get outraged by the ridiculousness of it help turn the wheel also. and as we know, even this site was sold to a notorious data-miner which none of us even discuss anymore.
>>
>>81105000
Nice trips. Now let me explain.

Divide and conquer tactics.
>They make migrants citizens
>They brand their opposition as racists
>They hold that citizenship hostage to the lefty vote
>The migrants vote left everytime.

Rinse and repeat.
>>
>>81105000
I don't know but it looks liek its a huge, insanely big false flag. I mena just look at these people yelling to accept niggers, homos, pedos, shitskins etc. They cannot be THAT dense to support immigration after a sandnigger kills 80 ppl with a truck in the middle of the city. Also checked.
>>
I'd argue it was to cause destabilization.

Endless terror attacks with countless dead, while importing the people who commit these attacks on mass seems like a great way to destabilize the western world.

Without going full /x/, I would not be surprised if our kids saw a global government in their lifetimes.
>>
>>81105000

Because the burgeois fags have no idea of what its like to live alongside minorities with alien cultures and an hostile attitude.

Those people, despite self proclaiming themselves as left-wing, are usualy elitist as fuck when it comes to interactions with their citizens and have a posh lifestyle!
>>
Pragmatic social democrats? Getting votes, around 90 % of Muslims in France and Belgium vote for socialist parties.

Radical leftists? Google what insurrectionism is. They dislike the Western society (capitalism, Christianity, traditional values, etc. what they see as oppressive structures). So force like mass immigration will inevitably cause large social changes and tear down old systems one way or another. It's subversion, pretty much, let's destroy old structures so we can build our utopia on the ruins.
>>
>>81105000
the truth, then?

listen up. by 2018 we'll have functioning artificial intelligence. by 2030s we'll have either full mind uploading or biological immortality treatments. anyone who follows these areas closely knows this is accurate predictions.

but there's only so much resources on earth, and rocketry is lagging behind. it's still too expensive to exploit resources in space. the ruling kikes knew this since 70s or 80s when ai theory first was plausibly formulated. therefore they have been demolishing every highly advanced society(every western country) which could compete with them for resources and living space. the immigration is speeding up because of recent advances in deep learning.
it is a deliberate war of extermination, waged through media.
>>
File: 1468507299406.jpg (42 KB, 473x280) Image search: [Google]
1468507299406.jpg
42 KB, 473x280
Correct me if I'm wrong brothers.

>Free vote
>Agenda to destroy Western European Hegemony
>Socialistic/Communistic theory of "revolution" (The reason why Obama didnt quench racial tension, united, but instead increased tension, for violent "revolution") See Mao or that Che guevera homo

Correct me if I'm wrong. Europe is going to turn ugly, hold tight to your guns america, dont allow these cocksuckers to regulate anything. 1st ammendment, freedom of speech is gone in shitgermany.

Bad times are coming.
>>
>>81105929
Why is anyone bringing the voting argument? It's nonsense. Firstly, they hate everything that the lefty parties stand for, such as gays, transgenders, feminism. Secondly, they will found their own party once their number is big enough to take over.
>>
every immigrant is a voter absolutely opposed to nationalist uprisings, so the left will embrace them.
>>
>>81112244
The non-working migrants will know where their money comes from and vote accordingly.

I'd say it's a smaller part of the reason to bring them in, as a bigger reason is simply a big enough labor pool to exploit, but it's there.
>>
File: CAM00744.jpg (2 MB, 2448x3264) Image search: [Google]
CAM00744.jpg
2 MB, 2448x3264
I think they want to polarize the population. They want to see a sjw vs right wing war because they feel they have the numbers and means to win this.
>>
>>81105196
It's incredible because lefties are brainwashed into thinking cheap labor was a republican thing
>>
>>81105000

Probably because it's extremely practical and economically profitable. We call it brain drain.

The immigrants who can afford to leave usually have skills and education. 60% learn English and 100% of their kids do.

They cross rivers, deserts, mountains. Amazing tenacity.

They work their asses off when they get here and keep their heads down. Ideal workers and citizens.

They are generally underemployed, but they are almost always a net positive to the GDP.

You probably think they're lazy, smell bad and other stereotypes, but 96% turn out to be great Americans and fiercely loyal to the US.
>>
left wing = anti white

look at any policy whatsoever and leftists will support the one that is more anti white

when non whites chimp out and kill other non whites they find a way to blame it on white people like how the NRA was blamed for the orlando shooting
>>
>>81105000
>Minimum wage laws don't apply
>No documents
>Can't return home
The Jews needed slaves
>>
>>81105000
It imports a dependent class of people who will vote left-wing for life. It is nothing but power consolidation. They know the right can never red-pill them fast enough to keep up.
>>
>>81113029
I'm sure the people of France are celebrating this net positive to their GDP right now. Who cares if there's been a terrorist attack in France every other month for the last 18 months? They're the fifth-largest economy in the world now!
>>
>>81113029
>96%
Your numbers are off.
>>
>>81113029
This has to be a joke.
>>
>>81105760

Except that the muslims arent going to vote for white liberals once they completely take over sweden
>>
>>81105000
leftwing is communist spy
>>
It's basic fucking economics.

For the past 100 years, native population birth rates have plummeted to below replacement, because it turns out that having a highly educated, happy population sucks ass for population growth.

Population growth is the center pin of capitalism. If your birth rate falls below replacement, it's gg no re, time to come up with a new system.

This is really, really, not good for all the people who are currently at the top, i.e. in power or rich. So in order to maintain the status quo, they completely decimate the working class by importing brown people who have 20 kids each. They'll never have to deal with the issues because they live in gated communities and have bodyguards.
>>
>>81105000
because white ppl don't make babies desu
>>
>>81114718
No you're retarded. It's not about education. Birthrates went to shit in the 60s when sexual liberation and open immigration was announced.
>>
>>81114967
Who gives a shit about the cause of it. You can't put the genie back in the bottle anyway.
>>
>>81105000
They want to create a left oligarchy in all our nations.non-whites vote left and it's why their nations suck. Now they want ours to suck because it will give them power the rest of their lives.

Every last one of them is a traitor to their nation's people. They have sold us out for power.
>>
>>81112419
Could also backfire. Many came with expectations like they instantly get a house and a car here. So maybe when they sit in their tiny rancid welfare-money appartment, they will condemn the ones that "let them down"
>>
>>81114424
That's what i don't understand

muslims get in

muslims join left wing parties

muslims outnumber

muslims create islamic parties

muslims make sharia law

muslims kill left wing infidels

How are they too stupid to realize that they will die for helping them?
Thread replies: 68
Thread images: 6

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.