How much jet fuel does it take to melt steel beams?
first post best post
bout tree fiddy
9/11
A 9:11 ratio
>>80958223
Hijacking this thread before the shills and shitposting
"Who what where when why and how" of 9/11.
War by deception full film
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=UoB80Yk9NYg
Basic info ignored by kosher media
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=sNY-obz8_1w
28 min condensed version of War by deception with all the most important evidence/info on 9/11
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Y8EweNlo8LA
48 min section specifically on Iraq and why we invaded and who was responsible
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=TMW7x0fLaLA
Hour long radio interview on the subject
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Rw27TOgHgkU
Debunking of the outright dismissal of the Israelis caught in trucks with explosives
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=z02QrY-jcdk
More debunking of disinfo like Alex Jones and loose change.
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dxcWstUwl9U
Even more debunking of the 9/11 kook movement mainly the "missile hit the pentagon" morons
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kccd1EvObNI
And just for the super dense missile crowd.
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=UjLDBArHy1Y
Ry going over the infamous 28redacted pages" of the official senate investigation which states that "foreign governments" with an S were responsible for funding and providing operational support for the hijackers which debunks the 9/11 commissions claim of "19 Muslims and a guy in a cave in Afghanistan did the attack alone" conspiracy theory.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=oU769fPCWSo
A written article with tons of links to the extreme detail documents and sources
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/9-11neocon.php?q=9-11neocon.php
Physical evidence that immediately debunks the top tier retards that claim no planes in NYC
http://911research.wtc7.net/planes/evidence/photos/index.html
>>80958223
Steel is still soft and bendable at way lower temperatures than it's melting point. It doesn't have to be fucking liquid before it loses structural integrity.
I know it's a meme, but a lot of people use it as a legitimate argument for conspiracy theories. What do they teach you people in school?
>>80959094
The point I'm personally more aware of is when they talk about a molten liquid coming out of one of the buildings (purported to be lithium from computers or something.)
As far as I'm personally concerned, the official story is a hunk of shit until NIST actually releases their fucking model data.
lets find out.
One
>>80958898
wow...huh...really made me think
I am now #MentallyHill
>>80959304
tahoo
>>80959348
Three jet fuels to melt steel beams.
>>80958223
>How much jet fuel does it take to melt steel beams?
For a fire that burns hot enough to melt stealbeams you need to add extra oxigen to the fire. A LOT of extra oxigen.
>>80958898
You need to include the link where a demolitionist looks at WTC-7 and says it looks like a controlled explosion and then explains how he would replicate it.
>>80958223
>steel
huge category
specify
>jet fuel
likewise, specify
you also need to specify conditions
>>80959623
>countless experts in all sorts of fields say it was planes and jet fuel
>a few "experts" say it was a controlled demolition
Hm, then it MUST be the controlled demolition!
>>80958223
Really tho how did the towers collapse? I watched the video the other day and I was like wtf that isn't normal...
>>80958223
The jet fuel evaporated in the explosion right after the aircraft collided with the buildings.
There wasn't any left to burn up.
>>80958223
stop bringing up this terrible accident
>>80959928
you clearly have this backwards. there are 100's of engineers and other experts who came fwd to say the towers collapsing due to jet fuel burning was BS. Towers were engineered to take direct hits from a Boeing 707.Care to guess which plane is bigger between 757 or 707???? 707 is heavier, carried more people, more fuel and could achieve higher speed.....AND THE BUILDINGS were engineered to take a direct hit from it. try again sunshine.
>>80961879
>Care to take a guess which plane is bigger between 757 or 707???? 707 is heavier...
The 707 is smaller than the 757, fuckhead, and no 757's ever hit the WTC, 767's did, which are also bigger than 707's.
>>80958223
Typical jet fuel can't melt construction steel, because it burns at a lower temperature. However, burning fuel can make the steel more flexible/elastic, so it's not able to support the same load anymore.
>>80958223
CRASHING THESE PLANES
>>80958223
If you manage to somehow turn 100% of chemical energy in jet fuel into heat energy, and focus all of that without losses into 100 kg of steel, you will manage to increase the temperature by about 1100 °C.
>>80963247
This.
It's called annealing. You don't need to melt the metal to make it weaker you fucking idiots. The real sheep are the dumbfucks who eat up this jet fuel can't melt steel beams bullshit.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annealing_%28metallurgy%29
>>80958223
Terrorits>>>use explosives>>>boum>>>towers destroyed
Is that so incredible to admit?
>>80958223
13,000 gallons.
