Why does /pol oppose men wearing women clothing? (Most) clothes are identified with one gender or the other only as a consequence of tradition (Of course there are exceptions; e.g. brassiere).
High heels and skirts were used by men for example. Women didn't wear trousers until very recently too.
I, personally, wouldn't use women's clothing (They look way too uncomfortable), but i can't see any logical reason to criticize men that would like to.
I would be more than glad to change my mind if somebody presents a reasonable argument.
>>80906184
Pedro, look at the man in the picture. The Sun King is a faggot by today's standards. And rightfully so.
I swear to god, we need the wall now more than ever.
>>80906390
>One of the most powerful men ever was a faggot just because a burger said so.
I said logical arguments, amerifat. Appeal to emotion is idiotic
>>80906390
And good luck with getting the resources to build that wall bt-w.
>>80906732
>high heels
>skirt
>panty hose
i do believe you posted a cross-dressing faggot anon
>>80907219
You do realize it wasn't cross-dressing in his time, right?
Again, no argument from you besides name calling. I expected too much from /pol it seems.
>>80907549
>men didn't wear boots
>men didn't wear pants
keep telling yourself that
>>80907960
>Never said that.
>Never said that.
I don't tell myself anything but you do.
>>80907960
>>80906889
We have the resources--we're going to mortar the walls with the pulverized bones of your 30,000,000+ countrymen here illegally.
>>80907960
>'Murica
>>80908690
>"we're going to mortar the walls with the pulverized bones of your 30,000,000+ countrymen here illegally"
Such an edgy teen.
>>80907960
>>80908434
>>80908523
man the i love 17th century clothing
Changing standards of dress != dress dysphoria
The men in these pics were not wearing women's clothing by contemporary standards.
>>80907960
>>80908434
>>80908523
>>80908818
>all men wearing pants and waistcoats
>none of them in 3 inch high heels
>wearing knee-high stockings instead of tights
meanwhile, here's your fuccoi in another skirt and high heels picture
>>80909395
The point is why should people maintain contemporary standards that have only tradition and no logic behind?
>>80909402
So stockings and "short" high heels are o.k.?
What is the difference, burger?
>>80909883
heeled shoes are just stylish, but high-heeled shoes are for women
stockings cover as much as they need to. panty hose are designed for skirts to prevent chaffing of women's thighs
your boi was a cross-dressing homo
>>80910729
>1.Fashionably elegant and sophisticated.
Subjective. I do wear Oxford shoes though.
>"High-heeled shoes are for women."
Where does a heeled shoe becomes a high-heeled shoe? Great circular logic bt-w.
>"panty hose are designed for skirts to prevent chaffing of women's thighs"
O.K.
>"your boi was a cross-dressing homo"
Still not giving any logical argument. You are just saying: "it is because it is" and "it is because i like it that way".
It's almost as if fashion changes over time.
>>80911607
Women wear high heeled shoes to extend their posterior and look more attractive to men.
That's why it would be odd for men to wear high heels.
