I am an atheist debate me.
4chan is a japanese imageboard
japanese are mostly atheist
>>80881787
>p-please, someone t-t-talk to me
Here's your (you) attention whore.
/POL/ IS NOT A CATHOLIC/FASCIST BOARD. WE ARE PROTESTANT/ANARCHIST
*tip*
>>80881787
Why do we exist?
>>80881787
>lol guys let's debate unfalsifiable concepts
fuck off
>>80881787
Why aren't you on Ask a Mormon - mormon.org, where you can actually make a difference? You have no answer to this crucial question, I suspect.
>>80881977
>implying not shaman masterrace
>>80881977
The Japanese are Shinto or Buddhism.
>>80881787
Prove that the laws of logic are correct
>>80882224
Demonstrably unfalsifiable?
>>80881787
To be honest, I pretty much only meme and shitpost on /pol/ except when debating christcucks
>>80882148
We are the result of a macrocosm reaction and probability.
>>80882601
why
>>80882601
Not "how we exist?"
Why do we exist?
>>80882708
>>80882816
There is no why. Asking why implies that you have meaning. You don't.
>>80883176
Do you have any proof that we have no objective meaning?
>>80883397
Meaning is your own subjective concept that you force on the world. It does not naturally have it.
>>80883968
That is your definition for meaning.
Absolute objective meaning is perfectly possible with the existence of God
Banana. Checkmate.
>>80884721
That's nothing more than wishful thinking. Retard level logic.
>I want it to be true so it is
>>80885369
I didn't say it was true. I said it was possible true
>>80885449
Possibly true*
>>80885449
Yes it's a possibility. Lots of things are a possibility but probability eliminates the far out possibilities.
>>80881787
ok lets debate,
why do you suck cocks and when do you kill yourself.
>>80886077
Mathematically calculate the probability of God existing
>>80882105
>WE ARE PROTESTANT/ANARCHIST
>14%
>We
Nope.
>>80886077
>>80886697
Now you stupid ass bitch
>>80886697
Basically 0%. The macrocosm does not require a god for it to exist. God is a superfluous concept.
>>80882105
We are a Unity Church board
>board of peace
kek
>>80881787
>I am an atheist debate me.
Even if your position is true, it is killing white birthrates. You're failing at Darwinism more than fucktard Christians who don't believe in Darwinism.
>>80881787
>I am an atheist debate me.
As a fellow atheist, I'd like to ask why the fuck any of us should care about your disbelief? I mean, does your life have value or your words any worth?
>>80887420
>He doesn't know.
>Making excuses this hard
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miracle_of_the_Sun
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Our_Lady_of_Zeitoun
>>80887420
>The macrocosm does not require a god for it to exist
What about the microcosm then?
>>80881787
Good for you lad.
Don't care if you believe in God or not, we're all on the sane team here, brother.
>>80882394
As defined by me, or you? Who's interpretation are you looking for?
Everyone here may have a different idea of the steps of logic.
>>80887420
>Basically 0%.
Based on what scientific analysis? Is your own wishful thinking tainting your objectivity? What's the probability of reality itself existing at all without a prime creator?
>>80888144
Macrocosm is a reflection of the microcosm. It's the same thing.
>>80887825
nobody is forcing you to care
>>80888866
Why do you believe the universe doesn't require God to exist?
>>80888558
So far everything in the universe can be explained without the existence of a god. There is no reason to think as our understanding grows that it suddenly becomes about magic.
>>80889233
Tell me in which step of a reaction does the god part happen.
>>80889828
I'm telling you that He may have intervened (the default position)
You're telling me He couldn't have
The burden of proof is on you
>>80881787
politics is about government and its way of ruling of a nation. it originated with communities like tribes or villages and their wanting to be together or be with their "god". therefore politics has a strong origin from religion. politics is less related to religion but it was definitely started by it.
>>80887325
>/pol/ polls
>representative data
pick one
>>80889828
>So far everything in the universe can be explained without the existence of a god
No, it can't. You can't tell me why the Big Bang happened if God wasn't involved, as everything about it defies every physical and natural law. Your quaint little cookie cutter responses don't hold up to scrutiny.
>>80890300
You are assuming there is a default position so you think someone must of started it.
I'm assuming reality emerges from a natural chaotic free floating system. Which is more probable from what we already know about the universe.
>>80891607
>reality emerges from a natural chaotic free floating system
>>80889828
do you believe in luck or coincidence? how would you explain that ? , random chance? there might be scientific exceptions that allows some things to happen but there are definitely some that cannot be explained. and if so, how would you explain that coincidence?
>>80891607
>natural chaotic free floating system.
Nice pseudo-scientific word salad, m8. Say enough sciency words and you might fool people into believe you know what the fuck you're talking about.
>>80890433
>>80881787
also i proved how pol is related to religion, please notice me
>wilfully disregarding the Word of God and spending eternity in Hell
Wew lad
>>80882105
kill yourself now
>>80881787
>implying you aren't Catholic like everyone else
>>80887325
>Catholic
>Shitodox
Pick one
>>80881787
wew
Debate pic related if you dare
>>80881787
How can you be a good person when you are not catholic? Explain please.
>>80891819
>life exists on earth because of probability in a free floating system
>but the universe exists because of magic jesus
>>80891607
>Which is more probable from what we already know about the universe.
Can you demonstrate this probability?
>from what we already know about the universe.
Can there be more than what "we" already know?
>>80881787
You don't know anything. You just think you do.
>>80892471
You tried.
>>80881787
>implying you can debate with an atheist
How can you dabate someone with no ethics or sense of morale?
>>80892820
>Can you demonstrate this probability?
basically what I said here >>80892471
>Can there be more than what "we" already know?
Yes but things tend to have a natural pattern to them. Things we already know are connected to things we don't know.
No more replies? Christfags BTFO.
I'm going to go take my dog for a walk in our godless universe now.
>>80895439
>Constantly pulled half assed, nonsensical "answers" out of his ass
>Surprised when people get bored and stop posting
>"Looks like I win again!"
>>80881787
If you have been baptised you are not an atheist but an apostate.
>>80881787
GODFATHER PART 2 IS WAY BETTER THAN THE FIRST
>>80895439
>never noticed how i proved religion is related to politics
>ignored constantly
nice try CUC K you have been defeated
>>80881787
>>80881787
(You)
>>80887663
Goddamit, I didn't see this
You win brazil
>>80881787
No.
>>80881787
Debating atheists is easy
This is all you have to do to win every time
<<<
>>80898010
yep, same principle as in pic related.
