Is it a biological reality?
Does it have any actual affect on society?
Off-topic and /b/-tier threads will be deleted (and possibly earn you a ban, if you persist). Unless they are quality, well thought out, well written posts, the following are examples of off-topic and/or /b/-tier threads:
>Red pill me on X. (with no extra content or input of your own)
>>80754591
If "aliens" exist, would world governments not desperately try and keep their existence a secret? The minute "aliens" were revealed, would racism not largely vanish, leaving only us humans together?
Up until then, negroes are subhumans, the Spanish conquest-by-proxy monkey races (Mexicans, Filipinos) are a bizarre product of Spanish scum DNA and what native vagina they poked, et cetera. Leaving the white master race on top of the heap. Oops, was that non-PC? So sorry.
>>80754591
>Is it a biological reality?
No. Skin color is completely random and has nothing to do with the parents.
>Is it a biological reality?
Yes, it is also a statistically proven reality.
>Does it have any actual affect on society?
You know how blacks used to say "white man be keepin me down"
It's actually the opposite. Picture related, they are literally an anchor to every other race.
Why is this? It is inherited, genetically. They are easily impressionable and will literally take media seriously. It is why fifty blacks killed each other during 4th of July weekend and no news is reported. Yet two deaths can cause them to act abuptly. Lower IQ's will always cling to the state. Lower IQ's also maintain a low tier tribal mentality where government replaces large sanctions of morality.
All media outlets have to do is report on cherry picked cases. All outlets are controlled by the government. Fox... Cnn... all of them. There is an agenda but fear not, for the most part they are simply trying to cause civil unrest to a point where they can remove freedoms from actual law abiding citizens. It's not a bad plan honestly, but they are poking a sleeping lion with a stick. They just don't know how bad the backlash will be because they haven't experienced it yet... or they simply have forgotten.
>>80755876
What the fuck? Do you live in your own little magical fantasy world
>>80754591
No. Race is a social construct.
>>80754591
>>80756113
Yes I do. Care to join me?
>>80754591
tfw 75% nigger according to this picture
>>80756375
I'd be delighted my fellow white brother.
>>80754591
if it didn't you wouldn't be shit posting so hard retard.
Race, as conventionally thoughyt of, does not exist. Populations do exist. An example being grouping all of those with the black skin phenotype under a single race is horribly ignorant of DNA.
Example: Person with black skin could have more genetic divergence from someone else with black skin, compared to that original black person to someone with white skin. And indeed, this is the case in many instances in Africa. But we treat those with Black skin as part as the same race as all others with black skin. If you think I'm trying to defend "the black race", I'm not. As I said, populations exist and have differing IQs and behavioral patters. We have populations with low IQ and tendency to violence and impulse, typically these are found associated with people with dark skin, but this is not always the case.
tl;dr race, especially basing it on physical phenotypes that are pretty minor on the DNA side of things, is wrong. populations exist.
>>80756278
Animals need to be put into categories.
Humans don't unless you're a nazi or a racist and want to put some races above or below others.
>>80756638
>heh you don't like german people? that's fine don't let any germans
>WHAT YOU DON'T LIKE (PROTECTED RACE)?! RACIST EVIL BIGOT THE WORST MORALITY!
>>80756113
>I don't know what sarcasm is
Cmon m8, it's 2016
>>80754591
Why is her/his face all white? Are you a damn racist fucking shitcunt?
>>80754591
>Read the Origin of species
Oh, wait. Youy have no free education. I read that when I was 10.
Fucking dumb fuck
>>80756740
kys
Biology has no relevance other than skin color. Evolution ends at the neck. We have no natural inclinations and we all start out as a blank slate with the capacity to become the next Einstein. Any scientific data to the contrary can be dismissed because it's racist.
Let me put it like this: anyone who tells you that aborigines are equally as smart as the Japanese are fucking idiots.
>>80756763
How can one species of jackal be better than the other
>>80757292
https://encrypted.google.com/search?q=define+racist
what is a better non negative word for racism?
>>80757292
>We have no natural inclinations and we all start out as a blank slate
Except that is entirely fucking wrong.
>>80757458
Your attempt to redefine racism is racist
>>80757631
Not an argument, racist.
>>80754591
Yes it is a biological reality.
Yes it has a major affect on society.
However, we can all overcome our differences and be excellent to one another.
>>80754591
Nigger arms are longer, their teeth are bigger, their bones are thicker and their brains are 200cc's smaller
>>80754591
>>80757923
a racist black person? now I've seen everything
>>80754591
not
even
human
>>80756451
Mizrahi gypsy scum
>>80757990
racist study
I believe in evolution and gene pools
but not for humans lol
>>80754591
>Is it a biological reality?
For IQ, probably not. There have been plenty of cases where babies were raised in a household of a completely different race, where the results strongly suggest that overwhelming factors for IQ are culture, nutrition, affluence, etc.
For physical factors (athletic ability and so forth), yes, race has been shown to be a biological factor.
> Does it have any actual affect on society?
Well, of course it does. For example, look at all the self-segregation that goes on -- i.e. whites living in white neighborhoods and blacks living in black neighborhoods. If race didn't have any effect on society, then we would have far less segregation than we do. Most people move around several times during their lives -- and if all that moving around was race-neutral, it would vastly reduce racial geographic patterns. But that doesn't happen -- because people deliberately choose where to live based on race.
>>80756278
Well, for one thing the East Africa Jackal is actually a Wolf, and the Eurasia one is actually a Jackal. They evolve to look similiar by happenstance, happens a lot in evolution.
This is an ignorant view of genetics, especially when you consider right is just a ginger, which those with black skin can also be. The phenotype for many physical features that differentiate your two homo sapiens (on the physical side) is not as much as you'd thing. Look at Albino black people, only a few genes are out of whack and suddenly they hate pale skin, pale hair, and pale eyes, a disposition to sun burns and all that comes with it.
Again, that is not to say there aren't big differences between populations, but a first glance at physical features to determine species differentiation is poor form, and not enough to put them as "different" species. Learn what species are, and then try to argue to change the definition of species to fit your agenda if you'd like.
>>80758146
>40-32/2
>40-16
>24
>4*3*2*1
>4!
what's the problem here?
>>80758146
>>80758634
you do x and / before + and -
>>80758634
>what's the problem here?
No problem. It's just clever because if you apply incorrect operator precedence then you will get a result of 4, in which case you would interpret the exclamation point as an indicator of surprise rather than as the factorial operator.
>>80754591
Here's the truth, it will get shat on because it's racist /pol/ though.
There are different ethnic groups, but the broad idea of race people have based on skin color is wrong. There ARE biological differences in people, but they are not actually distinct enough along any specific line to qualify even as a different subspecies. Humans hit a genetic bottleneck at a point in our history and became close genetically, after spreading out we were beginning to adapt differently, but ultimately humans were not separated for long enough to become truly distinct. That said we were separated for long enough to have some general changes such as different food tolerance, different disease resistance, and some bone structure differences in populations... but once again the differences are not solid among race lines.
For the most part what people see as race really is skin deep, although race exists as a social construct and a self-fulfilling prophecy of sorts. Class and culture is generally more important than biological differences.
>>80758051
Niggers can't swim well because their bones are denser, they're more likely to sink.
Niggers also have greater prognathous, common in many pre-hominids
Genetic differences between Blacks and Caucasoids (West Asians and Europeans) are currently at 0.2%. Whereas genetic differences between ancient pure Neanderthals and Caucasoids are 0.125%. Genetic differences between Grey wolves and timber wolves 9diffrent sub-species) is at 0.15%
Either neanderthals are exactly like modern humans or blacks aern't really modern humans.
>>80755487
Thanks bro! Saved me some bans.
>>80754591
It's not really that much biological. I mean, the differences between race, compared to other animals, is very insignificant. But rather than sugar coating things, let's not compare ourselves to other animals. I'm part native myself; I think purity of race is impossible; but I think it's important that we remain genetically healthy, and that would include not race mixing, because the native population is also the most unhealthy, and they are a very mixed people now. I don't want this to happen for other people.
People of Asian decent would much rather go to an Asian barber, because they are the only people equipped to deal with their hair type; likewise, a black person should go to a black barber, and a white person to a white barber.
Color blindness isn't real. I mean, some colored fellow isn't going to come in without you thinking something racially biased. Nobody says "Oh, I didn't notice that you were black". It's immediately an identifying factor about someone. If you get a signed autograph, nobody can convince you that the autograph doesn't hold any power, because it does. Likewise, race objectively holds value, and you'd be a fool to think that liberal propaganda can change it.
>>80758634
PEMDAS: Parentheses, Exponents, Multiplication and Division, and Addition and Subtraction
>40-32/2
>40-16
>24
The image uses this method:
>40-32 / 2
>8 / 2
>4
>>80758955
T H I S
H
I
S
Genetic tests don't lie
>>80758553
I hate typing on a non-backlit laptop.
*hate = have, not that it wasn't apparent.
Also a good way to put it would be if someone who has been white for generations suddenly mutated and got a sort of reverse albinism gene. Where their skin got chocolate black, dark eyes, black hair. Suddenly they would be grouped under "the black race", as would their children. That seems retarded, because it is. Maybe they wouldn't be if people knew about it, but if that happened to some family living in the woods for a few generations nobody would really think otherwise about shoving these people with everyone else that was black. This is why skin color is a very poor way to group a large number of populations together. There's much more genetic diversity going around, but we can't really "see" that at first glance, so we do groupings in the most simplistic way possible.
>>80754591
>>80758420
>>80758420
>For IQ, probably not. There have been plenty of cases where babies were raised in a household of a completely different race, where the results strongly suggest that overwhelming factors for IQ are culture, nutrition, affluence, etc.
Which cases? The MTRS for one showed that it's mostly race with culture and economics secondary.
>For physical factors (athletic ability and so forth),
Why isn't this one also "environmental reasons and culcha"?
>>80758077
I'm Romanian
>>80759138
Men hur jävla trög får man vara? Utropstecknet betyder fakultet.
>>80759172
>>80758955
Google the numbers yourself if you don't believe me. genetic drift and biological cut offs for species, blacks aern't human
>>80759138
>>80758723
>>80758934
who does that retarded subtraction before division?
>For IQ, probably not. There have been plenty of cases where babies were raised in a household of a completely different race, where the results strongly suggest that overwhelming factors for IQ are culture, nutrition, affluence, etc.
I can only assume you are a shill or have not studied this issue. The correlation between genetics and IQ has been consistently shown to be in the area of 0.75 to 0.8
The correlation between environment and IQ is somewhere around 0.05.
This is widely accepted science.
>>80759377
>gypsie kikes
So you don't even bother to rip people off, you just outright steal from them
>>80759495
This is a boy isn't it
>>80756740
it took you that many words to say nothing.
Can someone debunk that "more genetic variance between two country men than two men from different continents" meme?
>>80759570
Don't underestimate my abilities, Pedro
Gypsies are good thieves
Tfw I don't even look Romanian, I just look like a shitskin
>>80754591
Look at a black person and look at a white person.
Do they look different to you? Then they're biologically different. You fucking idiot.
>>80754591
>Is it a biological reality?
Yes, demonstrably so -- for example, forensic anthropologists can determine race from skeletal remains, some medical treatments/procedures are race-sensitive. Race is a real thing, humans, like many other creatures, come in several varieties.
>Does it have any actual affect on society?
Of course, racial divisions are obvious in society, race issues are obvious societal problems.
Were you meaning to ask "SHOULD it have any affect on society?" Harder question -- but ideally, no, it would not. Ideal may not be practical in this case, however.
>>80758955
niggers are literal orc men they arent even human you fucking libcuck piece of shit. ever seen a white woman give birth to a nigger baby? they cant even breed.
>>80759789
It's not a meme by itself it's how it is interpreted that is stupid.
Basically if you look at some locations in human DNA(perhaps related to things like blood/phenotype/etc...) and check for differences, you may find that higher differences are observed between individuals than between races.
Point is that the more locations you look at at the same time, the more you start to see some <<correlation>> with geography, and this can be observed using statistical tools like cluster analysis.
>>80759789
You can't "debunk" something that has no proof to begin with. That's the point. They spew such uneducated, retarded shit that is so nonsensical there's no way to even talk about it.
>>80759789
>Can someone debunk that "more genetic variance between two country men than two men from different continents" meme?
Weight span among women is 100-200. Among men it's 150-250.
But look at these two people, the woman weighs 140. And the guy 145! More variation among groups than between them! These categories are useless!
>>80759789
I don't know how it became that such a stupid idea started to need debunking.
It can be concluded as bad evidence from basic logic.
But here's an infograph I guess.
>>80755824
>If "aliens" exist, would world governments not desperately try and keep their existence a secret?
No, why?
>The minute "aliens" were revealed, would racism not largely vanish, leaving only us humans together?
When gorillas were discovered, did all humans unite in brotherhood? When the Europeans arrived in the New World, did indigenous tribes all unite as one people?
We don't have any idea of how humanity would react to the discovery of alien life, but the closest analogues we have indicate it would have little impact on us in terms of how we view one another.
>>80759620
Nah m8, retards started that meme in 2014 after Rose got doxxed. Old-fags can confirm she's a girl
>>80754591
Race has two meanings. In the older biological sense it meant the different groups of Man, distinguished by outward appearances. As we learned more about evolution and our development, it became clear that we all descended from a population in Africa, with the Europeans and Asian branches having mixed with Neanderthals in some small way. Therefore, race has no strong biological meaning any longer except for the archaic use.
The colloquial use is similar to the previous one but takes on the connotation of species separation. This is incorrect. The problem with supposing that the races are this separate is that you must explain our ability to interbreed, and you must explain away our common humanity (i.e. If you hate Race A then you must explain how you can love your own race since it shares the biological features, mostly, of race A).
>>80756113
>newfagging this hard
I mean, come on, it's %CURRENTYEAR%.
>>80760063
conceived Hybrid sterilization occurs in females sometimes. It's known to occur in abbo-female/caucasion-male unions (the abbo-female becomes sterile after giving birth)
>>80760579
thats because niggers dont have souls. They are powered by a dark magic.
>>80756278
>>80756234
Somewhat unrelated, my favorite bit of scientific nonsense was how the left got their panties all moist for the "Northern Spotted Owl." There was a small population of Spotted Owls in some forest that somebody wanted to log -- if logging happened, it might diminish the population of owls there, who preferred old-growth dead snags to nest in.
The owls were more plentiful elsewhere, but tree-huggers wanted to stop the logging, so they got the small population of Spotted Owls declared a "genetically identical subspecies." And so they were not just a small population of owls who would be inconvenienced by logging, they were now a protected threatened species (the "sub" part got dropped quickly) and the logging, and logging jobs, went away.
So that owls who were indistinguishable in any way from other plentiful owls that lived elsewhere would not become "extinct."
>>80759138
Somali detected
>>80760579
Abbo hybrids are often sterile? That is very interesting. Do you have a link for that?
>>80757122
>Youy have no free education
Wat?
>>80759995
Race has no biological meaning except in a very informal sense. That is because we are all the same species, with the physical differences being explained as different distributions of traits within the more isolated gene pools. Not to mention that these populations branched off from each other.
Thinking of humans in racial categories is misleading at best, and at worst it forces us to group each other on the most superficial qualities while ignoring the more profound social differences.
>>80760329
this is satire right?
you do understand we share a fuckhuge amount of similarity with plants and fruits as well right? or with mammals and higher apes right? how does this imply anything about hating something or not?
moreover, race doesn't normally refer to species but sub-species, which is a classification that includes the possibility of successfull interbreeding
and furthermore, the fact that we evolved from a common ancestor in Africa doesn't disprove race at all
>>80757352
"Better" is a judgement call. Distinguyishing different biological groups does not imply one is superior.
Though obviously Asian Jackal is Best Jackal. Because horizontal vaginas.
>>80754591
yes, science has proven this time and time and time and time again.
When you look at populations as a whole, there are significant IQ differences, as well as a host of physical differences.
Nogs cant function in western civilizaiton
euros dont fit in in Africa
Thats as logical as it gets
>Does it have any actual affect on society?
no,everything is cultural
no matter what race you are you are heavily influenced by your culture.
that's why loos poo, that's why blacks steal, that's why whites post on 4chan, because they don't understand that in the right environment they would poo in the loo and steal too
>>80759301
The only non-retarded reply on this thread. Thank you my amerifat friend.
>>80761115
who is that semen demon?
>>80757458
Racism has been defined down to "saying something I do not like that is vaguely associated with race." As such, the term is meaningless, I have quit using it.
If I want to discuss issues related to race, I use "bigotry" or "prejudice" exclusively, to avoid falling into the "it's race + power" movable goalpost fest that the left has contrived.
>>80761115
who is this trouser arouser?
>>80760813
Google it, I'm on my phone. It was a well documented occurrence
>>80761115
that has to be the most disgusting thing i have seen all day
white women have far superior intelligence than any other women on earth and should be with white men to increase the intelligence of their children, not fuck them over with inferior genes
>>80760972
You answered your own question without even thinking about it:
We cannot breed with fruits or the rest of the animal kingdom, now can we?
And in biology race is not the name for a subspecies. Subspecies is that name.
You should really pay more attention there.
>>80761194
so do you think there are average intelligence differences between those 3 groups or not? Apparently not, because you seem to trying to use the "it's just a culture thing" cop out. Culture differences are mostly because of intelligence differences.
>>80761608
Spot the obvious butthurt white girl
>>80761106
There is no scientific definition of race, it is instead self-identifying. All you are doing is testing the IQ of people who identify as archaic racial categories with no genetic standard.
>>80761608
What about some asian women?
>>80760232
Yes, but they're all retarded so they worship Prince Charles.
>>80761910
I WANT WHITE MEN FOR WHITE WOMEN!!!
>>80761959
In biology we refer to race as subspecies, they have the same definition
>>80761719
You're just debating semantics. When people talk about race, they are referring to the different skin colours.
>>80761964
no
asian women for asian men
whiete somen for white men
nigger for nigger
kike for kike
shitskin for shitskin
>>80761723
Race has no biological definition. It is a subjective, self-identity. Hence racial IQ tests mean diddly.
Race is the name for sub-species when you're not really sure what the criteria for sub-species is and you're really uncomfortable using sub-species when talking about humans.
>>80761719
don't strawman my points by mixing them up, I was replying to your paragraph about hate
of course the more diversity you have the less compatible you are, but classification is still very possible, and sub-species is the one we are looking for here
as with definitions, it doesn't really matter as long as we understand each other, race is often used as a modern synonym with subspecies
differences exist and can lead to different outcomes, pretending they don't is obscurantism
>>80754591
Both. Pure biological because there's always an explanation for it, pic related. But also affects society otherwise we wouldn't have chimpouts and suicide bombings.
>ctrl + f "Warrior gene", "MAO-A" and "Monoamine"
>0 results
goddamnit /pol/
>>80762135
You are using archaic definitions there. It doesn't work that way any longer.
>>80755876
>leaked pic of OP
>>80762256
race=subspecies
look up the definition of subspecies
biologist here
>>80762410
because we come from neanderthals
neanderthals were not warriors; they were hunters, but not warriors.
That's why we can kill so cold bloodedly, when it is justified, because we don't really have a warrior gene to the same extent; we more have a hunter gene. When war is justified, we look at it like we are hunting.
>>80762448
science has always work one way
prove your arguments correct
subspecies is subspecies and the cultural term "race" describes the exact definition of subspecies
look it up
biologist here
>>80759475
Why do you cunt Swedes always have to write in Swedish? It's not special to see another Swede on the Internet, speak English you mongoloid.
>Implying that I was taught this bullshit in school.
>>80759138
You do (40-32)/2 if you want to do the substraction first.
There are no more methods, all other methods are imaginary fairies, kill yourself.
>>80760889
>Race has no biological meaning except in a very informal sense.
Yet you point out in a previous post that there are recognizable differences in the genetics of the populations that remained in Africa and those that spread out to other continents, including an admixture of H. neandertalensis.
>>80760889
>That is because we are all the same species,
Well yes, that would be true of any species with different racial groups.
>with the physical differences being explained as different distributions of traits within the more isolated gene pools.
Yes, exactly, the differences are genetic. They are "real."
>Not to mention that these populations branched off from each other.
Of course, that is how different groups foprm, by separating from erach other. You are describing axactly the process through which races formed but some SJW professor taught you that it was BAD to then put the name "races" on the resulting groups. I don't think it is bad, it just names an observed phenomenon.
Notice at no point did I assert that any of these observed differences, nor the genetic basis for them, nor the processes of evolution that led to them, make one racial group better or worse.
>Thinking of humans in racial categories is misleading at best,
Pretending that observable differences are just made up is, I think, worse.
>and at worst it forces us to group each other on the most superficial qualities while ignoring the more profound social differences.
It does not, unless you assume that "different" has got to mean "better" and "worse." And if you start from THAT assumption, then it does not matter what you call the differences between groups of humans, does it?
>Thinking of humans in racial categories is misleading at best, and at worst it forces us to group each other on the most superficial qualities while ignoring the more profound social differences.
>>80762256
There are different groups of people with origins in different parts of the world that have different skin colours. Nothing subjective about it. No idea what you think your picture proves.
>>80754591
It's a biological reality.
But it doesn't matter. Let society collapse. Let the races fight it out and figure which is the best of the best. No more talking.
Gas the kikes, race war now.
>>80762368
That was not a strawman. I answered your question straightforwardly: If we can interbreed we are the same species, and hence the question of races loses meaning especially since we now understand evolution on a scale involving populations and phenotypic distributions. You'd at best be quibbling over how things like height and skin color must affect basic humanity.
>>80761608
>that has to be the most disgusting thing i have seen all day
Then this has been an exceptionally disgust-free day for you.
Also, I love being a mammal.
It's fucking hillarious seing people argue against races.
Look at our fucking pets.
Same species, different attributes.
But muh we're all the same because I believe in Equality.
Same argument with feminism btw.
>>80761959
But if you then find a difference, that would seem top validate the archaic categories, yes?
Because height and skin color are the only traits which came under selection pressure in 60,000 years.
>>80762256
>I re-define a word to prove that the concept it denotes does not exist.
>>80762316
>>80763024
>If we can interbreed we are the same species
ok
>and hence the question of races loses meaning
non sequitur, unless you keep closing your ears, you've already been told that race isn't used as a synonymous with species, but with sub-species
what you could say is that the old tools, before DNA, were not completely satisfying as we would only rely on few markers to try and distinguish humans into groups, but now we can clearly do this with computers and statistics, which confirms the fundamental reality that groups which are separated by time and space for a long time diverge, and humans aren't special in that regard
>>80762621
You seem to be making a lot of stew out of not too may oysters there.
>>80758953
This isn't the truth lad.
The differences aren't as clear cut as "race" but there are differences in populations from region to region and these differences are clinal to varying degrees.
Following liberal logic you'd believe that because of this clinal nature let's say between red to orange to yellow that yellow and red are the same.
It's really more a game of semantics arguing against race.
I for one go along and abandon the term race when arguing against them since there are many studies and different terminology that more adequately and accurately describes the differences in human populations.
>>80763024
>If we can interbreed we are the same species, and hence the question of races loses meaning
Wait, you think that different races means different species? Of course different races within a species can interbreed, are you, and I ask this now in all seriousness, just trolling us? If not, I am unable to follow why you think being the same species means there can be no racial differences -- ANY race (or subspecies) within a species will of course be the same species.
>>80758953
Not true at all cuck. Black people are genetically mentally inferior on average also they are more prone to violence
>>80763509
Under-rated post, go read it again.
>>80763973
>for one go along and abandon the term race when arguing against them since there are many studies and different terminology that more adequately and accurately describes the differences in human populations.
What term do you then use? I would think "sub-species" would make them even madder, especially since "sub" can be mistakenly taken to mean "lesser" and to be implying that one group is inferior.
>>80764304
If the term is accurate I can hardly give a shit if it makes them angry.
The point is to cover all your basis on the side of accuracy in terminology which of course has the fault of making it seem verbose at times.
>>80755824
you completely missed chinks, poo in loo pajeets, slavs, persians, turbanheads and turkroaches.
You know, race isn't really the problem with the world.
It's fucking culture and religion.
I'd take an educated nigger over a muslim white shit.
>>80763745
>>80764115
Nice refutation there.
>>80764115
People like you keep making the error in assuming that racial IQ tests mean anything. They don't. You are just testing people who IDENTIFY as something.
On top of that there is no scientific definition of race.
So congratulations, you just made a conclusion from spurious data.
>>80765455
>You are just testing people who IDENTIFY as something.
you are basically grasping at everything you can now, assuming the tests done somehow have to be completely wrong because suddenly the majority of people tested identify as something they aren't
reality is, 99.99% of Swedes tested will be caucasian aka west Eurasian and 99.99% of Cameroonese tested will be capoid, and the differences in IQ will be statistically significant, and they are
>>80766420
*congoid
>>80756234
Why am I so turned on by this chink bitches teeth
http://bmcevolbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2148-11-16
A good read if you want the real scientific answer.
>>80754591
if you have to ask the question then you're probably a nigger
>Is it biological reality
YES.
>Does it affect culture?
Culture and race are one and the same.
Bonus: >Why are Jews evil?
Jews try to prevent everyone from what they have with Israel. A nationalistic ethno-state. Because they know it works.
