New study by black harvard economist proves no racial bias in police shootings.
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/07/12/upshot/surprising-new-evidence-shows-bias-in-police-use-of-force-but-not-in-shootings.html
This is nothing new or suprusing for intelligebt people but for thus to be printed in NY Times of all places! Has the media finally realized they have overplayed their hand and are now attempting to turn 180°?
I still disagrea that the data proves blacks are treated differently or at least in the sense that it is just because of racists but this is a huge acknowledgement by a major left wing news source.
>>80599299
Does this """"study"""" take into account the circumstances of these uses of force? Isn't it possible that blacks are more combative and beligerant when confronted by police which would explain why force is used, or are we just going to chalk it up as racial bias......
>>80599299
You don't need a fucking study you dumb niggers, just look at the race of victims of police shootings over the last 10 years and you have your fucking answer. If you don't want to get shot, then don't act like a nigger
>>80600918
oy vey are you saying different races act differently
it's another shoah!
>>80599299
>New study by black harvard economist proves no racial bias in police shootings.
Is this news? You can literally look at the stats on the BJS, for free, at home. Cops kill more whites than blacks (and of course blacks kill whites in droves, all the time), but it's always Jamal and Darius on the news and not the white six-year-old Laquisha burned to death with a blowtorch.
>>80599299
Who cares if there's no racism bias. There stupid shootings by these idiots are a big problem.
And it doesn't matter if he's black or orange, you inconsistent lying racist /pol/ crowd will say "There is no racial bias in police shooting!!" then turn right around and say, "niggers do more crime and are more violent and etc etc, so police should and do treat them as such/act harsher, etc.," which would be racial bias. /pol/ and racists btfo
Blacks 5x as likely to commit crime then whites.
Obvious Conclusion: racist muthafuckers!
>>80602191
you are completely retarded, congratulations.
>>80602191
>There stupid shootings by these idiots are a big problem.
No evidence of such. There a very few unjustified shootings and they dont go unpunished. Even if one slips through the cracks, its not evidence of a wide spread epidemic.
If you try to kill cops, you end up dead, regardless of color. If you think they are using to much for, i ask that the next time they have to arrest a combative 300lb gorrila of a man who is resisting and has a gun that you please show us how to do it.
>>80602450
>oh shit he's pointed it out and I have no legit retort, i'll just call him retarded
>>80601413
yeah but there are 160 something million more white people in the country. You need to adjust the population to be statistically accurate you troglodyte.
>>80602873
nah, there is no police shooting bias, but even if there was they would deserve it because they are obnoxiously anti-authority. Black people are far more likely to be verbally and physically confrontational with police, not to mention they commit homicide and other crimes at multiple times the level of white Americans.
Your post was actually retarded so I was just pointing it out
>>80599299
>high-achieving black and Hispanic students have fewer friends.
>mfw not black/spic but still 0 friend
>>80602768
>No evidence of such.
There is evidence of such, many incidents, with many of them captured video.
>There are many unjustified shootings and they go unpunished.
Fixed that for you. Not just shooting. But all around unjustified violence.
>>80603076
why the fuck do you think that is? Cant be because of the systemic racism that they have endured for decades could it?
>>80603076
Yep there's racial bias in police shootings. Blacks are not anymore anti-authority than anyone else, nor does anyone have any obligation to respect authority just because, you entitled moron. Cops are very often obscene thugs, highly anti-"the people," on an "authority"-complex high, invasive, violent, dishonest, with no respect for the people they involve themselves with or their rights.
>>80600918
>Does this """"study"""" take into account the circumstances of these uses of force? Isn't it possible that blacks are more combative and beligerant when confronted by police which would explain why force is used, or are we just going to chalk it up as racial bias......
It doesn't do either, it just states that blacks are more likely to receive physical force and be stopped by cops, but are actually slightly less likely to be shot.
>>80599299
>This is nothing new or suprusing for intelligebt people but for thus to be printed in NY Times of all places! Has the media finally realized they have overplayed their hand and are now attempting to turn 180°?
No. the NYT does publish this stuff, it's just not what people read. As much as the NYT has fallen it is an actual news site, whether or not you agree with its left-leaning writers
>>80599299
>I still disagrea that the data proves blacks are treated differently or at least in the sense that it is just because of racists but this is a huge acknowledgement by a major left wing news source.
They are though. Police are racist. But it's not white-on-black it's Blue-on-black because black cops are just as likely to act that way.
>>80603223
Most cases that go to court the cops are exonerated. The rest get punished. A 5 sec video doesnt give tou all the facts. Once these things make it to trial the real facts are laid out and cops are usually justified, many times by black judges and juries.
Some people just have issues with anyone in authority and will be butthurt no matter what.
>>80599299
us kangs and queens don't need to listen to no uncle tom
>>80603866
>Yep there's racial bias in police shootings
Do you have a scientific study to prove this, or just facebook postings?
Because the OP's study, done by someone who tried to prove there is bias in police shootings, actually proved that there isn't.
>>80603315
It's due to the dangerous excess of testosterone production that hits them like a brick wall the instant they hit puberty. It makes them permanently aggressive. You'd know this if you grew up in a multicultural environment.
As a child, my best friend was black. As soon as his voice changed, he went full ooga booga and stopped talking to me.
It's tragic, they are just normal kids, curious and inquisitive and wanting to learn, but then they hit puberty, and they turn into retarded violent animals. It's like being on PCP 24/7, or a roid rage that never ends. You can't really imagine what it's like.
Blacks here can confirm this, especially the mixed ones who are embarrassed by the behavior of the full ones.
Oops! Facts are racist!
>>80599299
he's just an uncle tom
>>80606717
>Most cases that go to court the cops are exonerated
No one said otherwise. What was said is that there are many unjustified shootings and violence that go unpunished.
>A 5 sec video doesnt give tou all the facts.
One can watch what was recorded and see whether the cops actions were justified or not. Tons of times they are not. One can also read reports on the story and further that the cops are not justified and are very often violent impulsive street thugs.
>Once these things make it to trial the real facts are laid out and cops are usually justified,
Doubtful. But they are usually ruled not guilty even if their actions were unjustified, which is very often.
>many times by black judges and juries.
Not so. They may sometimes be one or two black judges on jury, but not often and not many times. This still doesn't mean a cop's actions were justified.
>Some people just have issues with anyone in authority and will be butthurt no matter what.
This is irrelevant to the subject at hand. It's hardly true, but doesn't matter anyway.
>>80599299
Wait... why is an economist doing a study on this? Its kind of like Bill Nye giving his opinion on race despite being a mechanical engineer.
All that being said, I do agree with this, however I'm surprised to see nytimes to print this.
>>80607488
Who cares about racial bias? Police are shooting too much period. They're reckless, stupid, dangerous, villanous, and highly paranoid chimps when it comes to gun usage. Way too many people getting shot and dying when it was uncalled for.
>done by someone who tried to prove there is bias in police shootings
No he didn't. He just stuffed them. Which is fine.
>>80609299
Economists are more than qualified to do a study on this. Statistics are a fundamental aspect of their field.
>>80599299
yfw /pol/ is bootlicker first racist next and not the other way around
>>80599299
>(((left wing news source)))
>>80610187
>>80609603
How much is too much?
>Way too many people getting shot and dying when it was uncalled for.
How many people do you think it is?
>>80610440
>>80599299
>no supposed racial bias in police shootings
still doesn't mean all these whack job police shootings are good
>study finds that cops treat blacks (and other minorities undoubtedly, but especially blacks) much harsher physically
>no words though because no supposed racial bias in whack job shootings
>racists pretend study is legit for that but as soon as some points out the racially motivated physical mistreatment of blacks using the same study, it will suddenly become illegitimate
fickle hooligans
>>80610567
Its not a guessing game. It's very frequent and too many.
>>80611499
>I make shit up and have no numbers to support my arguments
Typical leftist
>>80599299
He looks just like pic related.
He's also researched the link between race, genetics, and IQ. Confirmed for Stefan Molyneux-tier red-pilled.
Where were you when you realized that the alt-right's "man on the inside", the one to redpill the masses, would himself be a based AF black guy who knows and speaks the truth, and has worked his way into Harvard to do it.
>>80611764
>He's also researched the link between race, genetics, and IQ
His study was safe as fuck and only did 8-12 month babies so he wouldn't find any difference.
I've yet to see anyone on TV who acknowledges that groids behave differently that humans. So things will get much worse
>>80611859
They're distributed randomly but biased toward more heavily-trafficked spots based on geolocation data from people's phones.
>>80602191
>There is no racial bias in police shooting
>niggers do more crime and are more violent so police should and do treat them as such/act harsher
These are not mutually exclusive statements you dumb nigger. A police officer can come into situations bias free, and then react violently more often to blacks just because they are acting violently more often in the first place. Police shootings are reactive not presumptive you mongoloid.
Harvard is a biased school when it comes to black people, why should I believe their results?
>>80609603
>Police are shooting too much period.
And you base this statement on what facts? Because if you actually would have looked, you would see the opposite.
Pic related.
http://www.nyc.gov/html/nypd/downloads/pdf/analysis_and_planning/nypd_annual_firearms_discharge_report_2014V3.pdf
But of course, when the media tries to spin a narrative that runs counter to reality, you fell for it because you are a gullible idiot.
Enjoy your confirmation bias, faggot.
>>80610746
>>racists pretend study is legit for that but as soon as some points out the racially motivated physical mistreatment of blacks using the same study, it will suddenly become illegitimate
Because the issue du jour is #BlackLivesMatter, implying that black lives are being lost, not #BlackFeelingsHurt.
If blacks don't want to be hassled by the police as much, they need to stop disproportionally committing so much crime.
>>80599299
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ss7BvSb3AEw
>>80611859
He references Hernstein & Murray, as well as Rushton & Jensen, and he stopped far short of stating that demonstrated IQ differences are solely environmental in origin.
Essentially, he's clearly read the studies that matter, and he knows just how incontrovertible the evidence that Murray, Hernstein, Rushton, and Jensen have prepared is.
He also understands just how incredibly blue-pilled his audience at Harvard is. I grew up in Cambridge, MA, and most every Harvard (outside of the old guaat the Psychology department) are willingly ignorant of even the fact that there are ANY differences between the races beyond hair color.
So he understands that to come out of the gate treating even the well-documented racial differences as gospel, much less demonstrating that those variances are overwhelmingly genetic, will be met with nothing but furor and condemnation from a Harvard establishment that doesn't want to even believe that those differences exist in the first place.
So what he does is he subtly mentions that the IQ differences exist, on the way to reaching a less-than-conclusive conclusion that they are "environmental" in origin. This serves to soften up his pearl-clutchingly blue-pilled audience, so that they are aware of racial differences in IQ, and so that they might be more receptive to the real truth once he goes after the far more compelling evidence that the differences are genetic, rather than environmental in origin.
>>80612222
Because one look at what this guy has researched will tell you that it's a classic case of "only Nixon could go to China"
