That's the first time in my life (19) that I actually care about an election.
I am pretty sure that Clinton is just some reptile like jew creature wearing a human suit.
Also, if you are getting as much unjustified hate and media shitstorming as trump gets you HAVE to do something right.
Now PLEASE tell me he got a chance and some Hillary facts would be nice too.
>>80576063
Of course he has a chance. Protip: The double digit deal for Crooked Hillary polls are fraud. Look at the data. They have massive Democratic oversampling. (((They))) are screaming that Trump won't win just as they were screaming that Brexit won't win. They are in for a surprise.
>>80576063
Trump will win. We've known this since at least January.
>>80576242
>>80576266
The reason I am so insecure is because of the way he behaves.
Literally every tweet is anti Hillary.
But not in a "winning-style".
He seems like a desperate guy trying to make her look bad, but it doesm't seem to work.
To me, it seems like he lost control.
He literally assraped every other candidate with a fucking sword, but that fucking bitch....
she got the media, the celebs, the jews...
polls have repeatedly shown that they don't calculate angry voters well at all
look at any recent UK poll for examples, or the 2014 midterms that the pollsters thought were mostly safe blue/"too close to call" but was a clean sweep for the republicans.
The problem is that we really haven't had people as angry when formulating the methods behind these polls as we do now.
It's why Nate Silver was made a complete fool of repeatedly.
>>80576642
>she got the media,
he plays the media like a fiddle
literally everyone made fun of the media for the sixpointed star shit
>>80576809
Nate Silver made a fool out of himself because he actually ignored poll numbers in his pursuit of punditry.
>>80576063
If he picks a solid VP, continues to dominate the debate stage, and effectively mobilizes ground teams he definitely has a chance.
Trump has been survived:
>being called a Nazi/Fascist/Racist/Sexist/Xenophobe
>criticism from the Pope
>criticism from Obama
>nearly being banned from Britain
>16+ candidate primary
Hillary:
>barely beat Comrade Bernie "everything for free" Sanders.
And.....they're basically tied.
Her strategy has been to stay out of the ring as long as possible, that's why she has ballooned. She can't keep that up much longer, once the debates kick off she's back under the microscope.
also, did anyone else notice how no polls are being released since all the FBI shit and shootings?
You better believe he can win. Trump is only 4-5 points behind.
>>80576063
I don't believe he will win (although I hope he does). However you shouldn't give too much importance to polls imo. Look at what happened with brexit
>>80576063
It's definitely possible. It seems unlikely because the odds are stacked against him, but he likely has many tricks up his sleeve, and we haven't had a single debate yet.
>>80576063
>consensus electoral college projection based on numerous pundits
Not a chance
>>80577801
the US polls are even worse because many of the companies running them have a dog in the fight
e.g, reuters is one of clinton foundation's largest donors
the ones that claimed to be non-partisan and take no outside donations at all(e.g, Quinnipiac) find them to be statistically dead even.
also, national polls are meaningless because only 4-5 states actually matter and 4 of those states are in the rust belt where hillary is going to suffer due to her husband royally destroying the area.
For an example, go look at what happened to her in Michigan during the primaries.
>>80577998
>pundits
>>80576063
The 'official' polls are rigged to hell and back, they aren't representing the reality of the situation.
Right now there are two demographics that support hillary:
Single women and blacks.
If black turnout can be reduced (or even flipped to supporting trump - which is possible; hillary's always been extremely racist towards blacks) then trump wins the election.
Basically, what's needed right now is emotion-based memes that can easily be spread on social media to swing blacks and single-women voters. So, attacking hillary's character, trustworthiness, racist attitudes... honestly, she's pretty despicable to begin with so it's not even difficult to find ammo. She actually *IS* awful.
>>80577998
Clinton only leads PA, NH, and VA by a few points. Higher turnout and good debates for Trump could mean a red win in those states
Naw trump no chance, be cool though. Johnsons pulling at 10%, even if he dropped out, Clinton still has the minority vote, which means unless whites overwhelming choose trump he'll lose.
>>80577965
Hardly. The odds just seemed stacked because the media is pushing for Hillary. He has a better chance of beating her than he does of Bernie or Biden by far.
>>80578443
>Johnsons pulling at 10%, even if he dropped out, Clinton still has the minority vote
Johnson pulls more votes from Clinton than Trump you idiot
>>80578476
you're kidding rite m8? it's stein that's pulling from hillary
>>80577669
>Trump is only 4-5 points behind
Which statistically means his chances are less than 5% given a 3% MoE.
>>80578443
>Johnsons pulling at 10%
I wish he won't even get 2% but he pulls from Hillary because those are Berniebots
>>80578551
Look at the polls you dipshit, Johnson pulls more votes from Clinton than he does from Trump.
Trump struggles with the far-right cuckservatives who would never vote for Johnson because he's far left on social issues.
>>80578588
this
>>80578476
Yea, and trump needs those votes if he wants to win
>>80576063
All about the swing states baby. I mean, obviously these general election polls mean something, but its the statewide polls you should be looking at.
>>80578280
>Right now there are two demographics that support hillary:
>Single women and blacks.
Unfortunately it's minorities in general and democrats in general including men and women. Trump isn't going to get the latino vote. He's going to have the male consevative vote minus the mormons and that's not enough.
>>80578457
Hm, I don't know. I think Bernie would push away conservative white democrats and older people. They really don't like anything that smells of socialism or higher taxes.
Biden I think would lose to Trump to. He's boring and doesn't have Hillary's support. Her support network is insane, and reaches far beyond the media. It's not Clinton we have to beat, but her spider web of surrogates and allied groups that shill for her day in and day out.
>>80578730
>needing minorities
He literally just needs the whites to win. The minorities tend to not vote anyways and even if all of them did the white's would still win it in this election. Hillary's only real support is single women.
>>80578280
>The 'official' polls are rigged to hell and back
What about all the betting websites that given Hillary 1:3 odds and Trump 3:1 odds?
Rigging that shit would just cost the site itself money.
>>80578588
>>80578631
>>80578650
It really doesn't matter whether the votes are from deadbeat millennials or not, fact is they're not going to trump.
>>80578730
minorities barely live in the north where most swing states are
this is why the hispanic vote is completely worthless, btw. About 80% of them live in a handful of states already decided
>>80576063
Hey thanks for starting this thread OP instead of visiting any of like 5 constantly updated generals dealing with exactly this.
>>80578841
Hillary's support is a small group of people with lots of money and a media creation. She does not actually have fans with any of the masses she just has media engineered support that makes it look like people actually tolerate her. You can tell based on when you talk with people and you notice that nobody actually likes her.
>>80576063
Of course he has zero chance. He's a meme candidate that is only popular with rednecks and idiots. Without women and Latinos it is impossible to win the presidency.
>>80578887
as seen by Brexit millennials don't vote even when massive political decisions are on the line.
>>80579032
latinos don't live in states that matter
inb4 you think cubans are latino
>>80579193
I live in Florida and most cubans support Trump so you are right.
>>80579228
ofcourse they do, cubans hate mexicans because mexicans give them a bad name
Rasmussen. They said Romney woudl win too.
>>80579267
Romney was on track to win until he completely flubbed october and basically disappeared
>>80578557
A lot can still happen between now and November. Don't be ridiculous, of course Trump can still win.
>>80576063
Yes and the Brexit explains why
The bookies, the media, the polls, they all got it wrong and it's the exact sentiments that fueled the Brexit that are fueling Trump's rise
People are fed up with the status quo and the media and "intellectual elites" are so out of touch with the feelings of the average man that they might as well be reporting from Mars
>>80579308
>>80579267
also, that's not true. Rasmussen had Obama at +1 at the start of October and Romney at +1 at the start of November. Both within error.
Currently, Hillary has 247 votes to Trump's 191 (and I'm being generous about Arizona).
Another 70 votes lean Hillary with 30 remaining in true tossup range.
>>80578930
>minorities barely live in the north where most swing states are
Wisconsin and Pennsylvania lean hard blue regardless, Florida, Nevada, and Colorado all have high Hispanic %s, Virginia also has a high minority %.
>>80578978
It's a small group of people with big money, businesses she backs, the media, and lots of politicians. When you consider that companies like Google, Facebook, and even Twitter are shilling for her, things look a little scarier.
But yeah, most people don't like her, and the ones that do support her for shallow reasons. I've even met a guy who works in her campaign, when I asked him what parts of her platform he liked, he told me he liked her because she was well-rounded.
>>80579051
They don't matter. Trump needs much much more support among women and even white men if he wants to win. It's extremely difficult to win without any minority support, and trumps public opinion is shit among the sheeple
>>80579421
>Wisconsin and Pennsylvania lean hard blue regardless,
>he thinks pennsylvania blue is the same as liberal blue
that's cute
What's wrong with reuters? Any burguer boy explain to me.
>>80579366
Well of course he can win, but the time argument and the % argument aren't the same thing.
If the election were being held today and I had to bet my life savings on one candidate, I'd bet on Hillary.
That he CAN change his position does not mean his position is not currently TERRIBLE.
>>80576063
yes
>>80579401
Get rich and put all your savings on Trump then.
>>80576063
and yes
>>80576242
Democrats are only oversampled by 6%.
>>80579522
reuters is one of the clinton foundation's top donors
http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2015/05/clinton-foundation-donors-include-dozens-of-media-organizations-individuals-207228
>>80579445
If Hillary does win she can't be any worse than Obama
I really just don't want a Democrat picking multiple SCOTUS justices and the next president will
Heller was one justice away from being "the 2nd Amendment refers solely to single-shot muzzle-loading smooth bore black powder flintlocks"
>>80577361
Is there an image collage?
>>80579515
>he thinks Pennsylvania is a swing state
http://www.270towin.com/states/Pennsylvania
>>80579510
I'm confident in saying he is not in as bad a position as the media portrays. Does he have an uphill battle? Yes, because American's are very shallow voters and will just see the media saying its hopeless and agree with it, but it is far from hopeless.
>>80579669
Despite what retards like you think, not everything is RED BLUE RED BLUE.
George Bush has far less appeal to PA than Trump does, and if you don't understand why then that's the problem.
>>80577998
>State he poll +7 in grey
>States he is polling ahead in blue
wew lad
>>80579558
is this 2008-12-16?
>>80579740
>not everything is RED BLUE RED BLUE.
As polarized as this country is, that's exactly wrong.
>>80579760
(you) for the keks
>>80579862
Yep, you have no idea what the state is like.
>>80579760
>>80579779
>+7
It's +11, but the poll was from fucking November.
Most recent poll has him down.
>>80579891
>voted Blue since Reagan
Yep, you have no idea what a trend is.
if the election was tomorrow
He just needs to flip PA and FL, both of which are very close, while hanging on to NC and OH, both of which are very close
It's a coinflip at this point
>>80579732
It's not hopeless, it's inspiring that he made it this far, but there's a long long way to the top of hill, and the fuckers are dug in deep.
>>80580023
>if the election was tomorrow
the polls assume turnout is even. So no, this map is incorrect.
See
>>80579558
I need more like this:
http://dailycaller.com/2016/05/04/7-times-nate-silver-was-hilariously-wrong-about-donald-trump/
>>80580018
Tell me, who was the last presidential candidate that ran on a pro-worker message?
You don't understand Pennsylvanian demographics you jackass.
>>80579643
She'll be worse than Obama is some areas, and better in a few. She'll get to appoint a ton of lefty pro business justices, push for gun legislation, aggress against Russia/ Iran and whomever else the Jews want. The best thing is she'll no doubt have some scandals and so nobody will want a female president for awhile, and I don't think she'll kow tow to sjw's as much as people think. She'll be good for big business and the American hegemony, but working class people and patriots will be left out in the rain for the most part.
>>80579614
The WaPo poll was 36-24-33 for D, R, I. That's a decent oversample of D, slight under for R, and large under for I. I makes up the largest group currently in the US. Reuters-Ipsos didn't have their methodology up, at least when it came out.
>>80580128
Bill Clinton, Borack Obama?
>>80579740
Except when you realize that PA has been hit hard by offshoring, and IIRC contains a lot of fracking jobs, which Clinton has dissed in the past
>>80579981
>Most (((recent))) poll
>Ignore the retarded statement about BLM
>That won't effect the poll numbers
wew lad just stop let me spell it out for you
NV, VA, PA grey
IA, CO, NH, ME split 1 red
FL blue
>>80580145
She won't kowtow to SJWs at all, despite her talking points she is no feminist and never has been. She's Machiavellian to the core
She's a neocon through and through and I don't understand why so many people fail to see this
>>80580414
nix the except, glanced at your post didn't realize you were vouching for Trump in PA
>>80577998
>penn, va, nevada
wew
>>80580106
I'm using a combination of polls and word on the ground. I have him winning Ohio even though Hillary is polling better there
FL is virtually tied but I think Hillary will edge it slightly just because of the anti racist voters. Trump will probably take the lead there after his "I'm not a racist" speech coming up soon
PA will rely on Pittsburgh and Philadelphia charter schools. If he adopts the position of allowing parents to send their children to charter schools rather than shitty unionized public schools as his advisers told him to recently, then he'll win PA handily.
Colorado is also close but it will be irrelevant if he wins PA and Fl, pic related
funny how a clinton outlier always slips in there to keep the average steady.
I wonder ((((why))))
>>80580375
Barack Obama certainly did not run on a pro worker platform since FDR because we really didn't need one during the Cold War
In fact Obama's 2008 campaign platform was devoid of any substance aside from healthcare and revolved around "hope and change"
>>80580529
yea, this is our target.
>>80580465
She will a little bit, just to cement her legacy and up her re-election chances. But she'll disappoint the shit out the far left Bern tier voters, which will make for some good lulz
>>80580529
Analysis for Tampa show that republican voting trend is more likely in Florida. I mean take what you will from that I live in Tampa which is pretty liberal in my opinion and I've seen a massive change in how people support Trump a lot more lately.
>>80580637
yeah, and it's always from WaPo/ABC and Reuters/Ipsos. I don't count them like I don't count Rasmussen.
>>80580742
My brother and his fat SJW girlfriend were hardcore Bernouts til the bitter end and they're saying there's no way in hell they'd vote for Hillary
They aren't gonna go vote Trump but they will stay home
Bernouts hate Trump because he's a rich white man but they hate Hillary because she is the system, and everything that's wrong with it, incarnate
It's funny because they can't really give a reason why they hate Trump other than "he's racist" but they can give you an entire manifesto on why Hillary sucks
>>80578868
Betting websites don't rig quotas mate. For any event, they don't care about the outcome, they just care about money. Therefore they adapt their quotas such that they make a profit either way the pendulum swings.
In other words: if a MMA Champion were to fight a small child, the quotas would be low for the champion and high for the child, but not because the bookmaker believes the Fighter to win but because more people (who believe the fighter to win) put higher money on him than on the child.
If it were any different, the bookmakers would effectively take a bet themselves and that is not a good business model.
Same goes for Clinton vs. Trump. More betters think that Clinton will win, therefore her Quotas are low and his are high. How these betters come to their collective opinion does not have to be based in reality. Constant media shilling for her might have something to do with it I guess.
>>80577998
VA's a red state, there's just a lot of black people there who came out to vote for King Nigger in 08 and 12, but that won't happen this time.
>>80580989
Betters are not all knowing just like that massive Brexit disappointment. They fail to see just how pissed off the average person is right now and assume their usual guesses keep holding true.
>>80576887
I now want a sweating man meme where the two options on the buttons are:
"The media is biased against Trump!"
and
"Trump plays the media like a fiddle!"
>>80576063
If Trump picks a good VP, starts hitting Hillary HARD on the ads and demolishes her in the debates it's much more likely than these early polls suggest.
>>80580753
That's good to hear. Having a southern city on Trump's side would counter Miami, Orlando, and Palm Beach nicely
>>80576063
Keep in mind you have to look at the aggregate of polls and even take into account that some of them have oversampled democrats or certain demos. Take the aggregate between Trump and Hilary and if it's like +7 for Hilary remember even if this is spot on then Trump only needs half that like 3 or 4 points to vote for him to close that gap not 7. One other thing that isn't being accounted for is the draw of the LP this time around perhaps even the sleazy greens. People voting for those third parties are more of a detriment to Hilary than to Trump and will eat into her numbers.
>>80581188
The problem is there are no good VP candidates for Trump
He needs to pick a political veteran who sits on the fence but that guy just doesn't exist
>>80581261
what is wrong with Flynn?
>>80581158
That's the not a contradiction mate. The media is biased and Trump uses that bias to his advantage.
Take the six pointed star shit. They called him racist over it so he took down and they freaked out and plastered an anti Hillary ad on their screens all day for free just to call Trump racist
>>80581188
>debates
>>80581304
Doesn't come from a swing state, not a career politician, and lack of name recognition
Swing voters would feel a lot safer voting Trump if they knew he had someone who knows the ins and outs of Washington by his side
>>80581158
Both of those things are true and don't contradict one another. You must be dense.
>>80581534
So what are his best options right now? Just curious because I haven't kept track of who is trying to be his vp.
>LIES LIES THE POLLS ARE FAAAAAKE!!!!!!! (unless they say Trump is winning of course)
Haha, you are such fucking faggots.
>>80576642
oyyy weyyyy... shilling is here
>>80581728
Look at oversampling bias if you have an ability to LOOK.....
>>80581700
he's thrown out so many names that no one knows who he's going to pick. We're less than ten days to the convention though
>>80581728
>the polls are biased towards Hillary
>if Trump wins the biased polls then he must really be winning
have you shills really run out of things to talk about? It's only July. What will you be complaining about in September?
>>80581700
I can't think of one
Brexit polls said it was going to be close and the result turned out to be close. Someone explain to me how this invalidates Trump kind of not polling very good right now.
It does seem sus that every time a decent or not bad poll for trump pops up it is immediately followed by another where Hillary has a double digit lead, keeping him abysmally low in the averages.
I do believe that she has an obvious lead over him but not by the margin we are being shown, I guess they want people to believe that Trump is universally hated.
>mfw Trump will still be president in 2025
>mfw good chance his successor will be just as based
I don't understand how Clinton is leading in the polls. Judging from facebook and twitter, Trump appears to have three times the support.
>>80582596
Hillary supporters aren't nearly as jazzed up about her as Trump supporters are about him or Bernie supporters were about him
She's a low energy candidate and that reflects in her supporters presence online
>>80581997
Wasn't Brexit losing at this point out? Before the vote it was winning, then after that MP was killed it swung back in favor of remain. Remain was about 2 points ahead and ended up losing by about 2 points, 4~ point difference. Good debate performances, campaigning towards the center and a little pandering towards equality could easily spell a Trump win. You have to remember to that Republican voter turnout is way up, Democrat turnout is down. We also have a lot of social unrest which could work in Trump's favor as well, moderate voters really don't like BLM and their shenanigans.
>>80582794
>moderate voters really don't like BLM and their shenanigans
And neither does Hillary which is who they will vote for
>>80582924
>Hillary not liking BLM
She runs part of it to create social unrest mate
>>80582794
I mean, going from a prediction of a 51:49 win to a result of a 49:51 loss still means you're hovering around the "50:50 shit could go either way easily" -point. Saying " look how the brexit poll turned out!", when the brexit poll turned out about as precise as a poll can be, feels a bit weird.
WAITFORDEBATE
AITFORDEBATE
ITFORDEBATE
TFORDBATE
FORDEBATE
ORDEBATE
RDEBATE
DEBATE
EBATE
BATE
ATE
TE
E
HOLY SHIT YOU GUYS
>>80576063
pro tip. both Reuters and The Economist are Rothschild owned at least partly
>>80576063
Yes, but he needs to pick Rick Santorum to win.
>>80583309
Trump will find a way to avoid having to debate Hillary, just like he did with Sanders.
>>80583587
you've got that backwards mate
>>80583137
BLM is Soros-funded and directed
That tweet isn't evidence of BLM support it's virtue signaling and pandering to the black vote
>>80583712
notice the date. The day after BLM shoots police officers, she takes their side. How is this not support?
She and Soros are on the same team. She may not direct them herself and BLM may be too disorganized to fully back her but certain elements of the organization are 100% working with her and for her
>Trump
>Winning
Everyone here is a dumbass.
She currently leads in Florida, North Carolina, Virginia, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and New Hampshire.
Sadly, they also say the polls are skewed. (t. Romney in 2012)
Hillary is doing far better in those states w/ white women and white college grads.
Sure Trump is doing better among non-college educated men and that's about it.
Then everyone cites "HIGHER TURNOUT!!"
Higher turnout on the Republican side was b/c the primary race was FAR more competitive and covered far more by the media.
Ask Dukakis was higher turnout really meant, although I'm sure barely 3/4 of the people here are old enough to remember who Dukakis was.
>>80584153
what higher turnout*
>>80583231
If you look at Brexit poll trackers and compare them with the GE averages right now on HuffPo or RCP, there's less than a 2 point difference between where Brexit was at this point and where Trump is. That coupled with the factors I've outlined above makes an easy case for a possible Trump win.
>>80576063
You guys, I'm looking into this Reuters poll....this shit is fucked up
First of all their party Demographics are:
>Republican: 33%
>Democrat: 43%
>Independent: 12%
>Other: 9%
This is way out of whack with actual voting demographics, they're giving the Dems a huge advantage here
Also, they say that 23% of the voters will be between 18-29, when in 2012 only 19% were, a 4 point gap.
Remember, the way they work is they just take lots of data, then they weight the results by demographic artificially. So they are manually putting in these disparities.
And now here's where it starts to get weird. Only 56% of their respondents said they voted for Romney or Obama last time around. That means they expect 44% of the electorate to be new voters, where is this coming from?
And the strangest thing is that for some reason they only make Hispanics 2% of the electorate. What the fuck???
Why is this poll being included in the RCP average??
Here's the link to their data if you want to sift through it.
>http://polling.reuters.com/#poll/TM651Y15_13/filters/RESP_AGE:-99
Use the filters at the bottom to narrow down demographics.
>mfw delusional idiots think Trump will win
FL is a lost cause and Hillary will squeak out PA.
Virginia, Colorado, NH are solid locks for the Dems.
>>80584326
Hillary is tied with independents.
If she truly tied with independents, she actually is up 8 points.
Obama lost independents by 5 points and won nationally by 4.
Another Pew Research poll has shown Hillary up by 9. (which correctly predicted the 2008 and 2012 election)
http://www.people-press.org/2016/07/07/vote-preference-over-time/
>>80584439
Colorado is now a lost cause.
More registered dems than republicans.
>>80578868
On the day of the brexit referendum, bookies were offering 1:2 Remain, 5:1 Leave.
>>80576063
>Americans would rather vote a bloodthirsty terrorist war criminal into Office
Good good goyim
>>80584153
obvious shill is obvious
She leads those states by a few points. We haven't seen any debates, and Hillary is due for a huge scandal. Her surrogate network and her evasion can't prevent that forever.
Why would you mention Dukakis? That just points out that you're fucking old. If you're old and voting democrat, there'd be no reason for you to be on /pol/ other than to shill.
>>80584547
>brexit is similar to the U.S.
holy fuck stop with this meme
polling is Britain is consistently shitty unlike the U.S.
>>80584642
>unlike the US
You're suggesting the US is even worse?
I mean all the "experts and pundits" sure saw a Trump candidacy from a mile away.
>>80584633
>Why would you mention Dukakis? That just points out that you're fucking old. If you're old and voting democrat, there'd be no reason for you to be on /pol/ other than to shill.
>mfw
Yeah, keep pushing scandals against Hillary.
The email shit and Benghazi barely have done anything to her poll numbers.
>>80584712
Polls sure saw a Trump candidacy.
>>80584712
He thinks Hillary is tied with Independents (she's not, she's behind Johnson), thinks a few points lead in swing states means Clinton has them locked down
the guy is retarded, ignore him
>>80584770
>email shit and Benghazi
Those are controlled opposition. Wait until Clinton Foundation breaks
>>80584642
>>80584770
He was talking about odds you fucking schlamiel, implying bookies are some kind of infallible soothsayers who don't cuck themselves out of millions of dollars every single year.
>>80584859
>(she's not, she's behind Johnson)
Holy fuck, don't call me retarded when the polls aren't showing that.
This confirmation bias among Trump supporters is horrifying.
If you even DARED to open the link I showed you instead of being an ignorant fuckwit, you'd see she's up +2 with independents.
>>80576063
Of course not. Everyone expects him to lose.
>>80584949
It doesn't even have to be a specific scandal. If the media loses control of the narrative, Clinton can lose support hard. Trump has gone his entire campaign, every gaff magnified into a scandal of epic proportions by the media. Clinton has a holocaust's worth of skeletons in her closet, continually flubs, flips, and evades and she gets off easy from most publications. She has a glass jaw and Trump won't pull punches like the media does.
>>80584960
expecting me to open up the links of some wannabe CTR shill, GB2reddit. You stink of shill, and if you were on 8/pol/ you'd be eviscerated like a rat
>>80584513
why lie?
Colorado registered voters by party:
Dem: 980,352
Rep: 988,410
http://www.sos.state.co.us/pubs/elections/VoterRegNumbers/2016/July/VotersByPartyStatus.pdf
So legitimate question from someone who doesn't follow politics really close. How did Hillary win the demo nomination over bernie? During the race I knew so many people that did actually vote bernie in several different states and not a single Hillary supporter ever.
As a reference I'm for trump but I just don't get it, are the polls rigged so that bernie had no chance In hell?
>>80578730
>democrats in general including men and women.
Hillary's gap between men and women is just as bad as Trumps
>>80585694
From what I've seen, Trump has an overwhelming support of white men, and isn't that far off from Hillary with white women. He obviously is way behind with minorities of all kinds, but Hispanics (who normally don't turnout but probably will this cycle) only play a big part in a few states like FL, and blacks have low turnout for the most part.
>>80585566
Hillary had the support of the elderly while Bernie's support was mainly millennials. Elderly vote more than millennials.
US elections are also rigged. Trump beat it by winning by such large margins but it's honestly a miracle he got this far. There are multiple videos showing Democrats committing election fraud in Hillary's favor and the end results were often suspiciously off from exit polls by multiple sigma deviations while the Republican exit polls were close. Bernie's too big of a cuck to do anything about it. He didn't even have the intention of winning until around March.
>>80585807
Hispanics will literally have no effect on this election. Florida Hispanics are mainly assimilated Cubans who vote on issues not on identity. Hispanics will only guarantee Hillary wins Miami which was already assumed
