>he chose an AR for le habbedin.
laughingwhores.betamax
>>80556044
That's a silly image, OP.
>>80556044
>>80556044
7.62x39 has been obsolete for a long time.
>>80556044
Kill yourself.
For the newfags that want ARs before Shillary bans them, read this.
>>80556044
All i have a ww1 issued Winchester model 1917 thats chambered in 30-06
>>80556134
5.56fag detected.
>>80556259
more 5.56 butthurt. oh lawd
>>80556044
What caliber is that on top or is this a shoop? That's way too tiny to be even a .22
>>80556205
>>80556393
.22 short aka (5.56x45 .22 caliber)
>>80556369
Russia uses 5.45 now
>>80556393
Its .22 Short and the bottom one appears to be 7.62x54r, or .303 Brit.
All my 7.62x54r is nickel plated so idk.
>>80556305
"""""""""""""""operator"""""""""""""""" detected
>>80556044
I like the 7.62 too many but the 5.56 will always be the most accurate.
>>80556044
>>.22 is a 5.56
Op is a fag and clearly has no understanding of caliber
>>80556044
Take your shit thread over to /k/ where it belongs. this has nothing to do with /pol/.
>>80556044
>Slavshit
>>80556044
Turkey uses 7.62mm
I stand with Turkey
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-XV9RbE8IWI
If it's not even a .308 you're not even operating
>>80556630
Weapons are quite a bit more /pol/ related than you'd think.
>>80556637
>>80556619
>.22 is a 5.56
EXACTLY
>>80556044
....And we chose a fucking Astromech droid.
>>80556630
How are we going to get rid of nogs, mudshits ands kikes without weapons?
>muh bigger bullet
what are you a nigger?
>>80556637
If you fired that into a chimpout mob, how many nogs could it penetrate?
>>80556862
y u mad doe
>muh caliber size
if that is so important then just get a x54r or .308 gun
below 50 meters shotgun shells are more lethal anyway
>>80556943
All of them.
But likely just one two at most.
>>80556270
>AR15 is the weapon of choice for the US Military
Stopped reading there.
>>80556205
You know the Constitution came first, right?
>>80556700
>not using the .338 Lapua
get with the times, grandpa
>>80556700
You mean .270 you pleb
>>80557085
This lol.
>>80556369
7.62x39 hasn't been issued by the Russian army in 40 years.
>>80557038
Well it is isn't it? Obviously its the military spec m16, but thats based of the AR15 platform.
>>80556369
7.62x39 hasn't been issued by the Russian army in 40 years.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5.45%C3%9739mm
>>80556555
sexy ruger. the grip is so comfy on those
>>80556044
But, the AR15 is perfect for the habbing OP
>>80556044
But that's a shitty .22 rat killer.
>>80556772
sort of
>>80556700
>inb4 upside down
>>80557234
Army uses M-4A1 and whatever for the DMR (often a modernized M-14)
Marines still used the M16A4 because they have a hardon for extra barrel length that makes almost no difference.
The other services are unimportant when talking about rifles.
>>80557363
is that a ghost gun? SPOOKY
>>80557234
>Well it is isn't it?
No it isn't. The military does not use the AR15.
>Obviously its the military spec m16, but thats based of the AR15 platform.
That's like saying the military's vehicle choice is the 1940s Willy's jeep because it eventually became the Humvee.
>>80557540
better comparison
>>80556044
>how can white men even compete
>>80556044
Bottom is 7.62x54r
>>80557540
It's 5.7x15.6mmR in metric
Stinger cases are a little longer
>>80556772
.223/5.56 is a .22 caliber.
0.223 of an inch or 5.56 mm is equal to 0.218 of an inch.
>not glorious 7.62x51
>high quality, not cheap Russian shit that's been sitting in a pkm tuna tun
>goes in glorious battle rifles, G3, scar-h, m14
>used by real men everywhere
>99% lethality, among highest of any common caliber
>7.62 NATO, real fucking neato, kills niggers dead with a shot to the head
When the happenings happen, I'm going deep into the woods. Lots of small game, lakes, and streams in my area.
>>80556044
Lightweight ammo means you can carry more of it though. Life isn't a game, having smaller bullets doesn't mean you're going to have to plink down someone's HP bar instead of 1-shotting them, a bullet is a bullet unless you're in some situation where you need the higher penetration of the 7.62 round.
The AR is more intuitive to use for a civilian population as well. Sure you may be an expert with your gun, but in a true, full on HAPPENING you may not be the only one who has to use it. You wouldn't want your daughter or wife fumbling around to rock the magazine in just right on an AK or fumbling with it's safety, or getting their aim knocked around by it's heavier recoil.
>>80557903
>kills niggers dead with a shot to the head
I'd hope so faggot, we're not fighting T1000s here
>>80556044
>>80557896
really? wow the moar you know
>>80556044
>Not using 5.45x45 for the happening
Idiot.
>>80557909
Enjoy the four months of not freezing to death.
>>80557234
No, the AR15 is based on the m16. The M16 used be called the AR15, but the name was changed, and the name AR15 is now used for the civilian model.
Why not branch out? Don't limit yourself to one caliber.
5.45x39 is best.
lots of tumbling and a ridiculous exit wound.
even so, 7.62x39 > 5.56x45
>>80558379
5.56mm FMJ tumbles just the same if it doesn't fragment
All spitzers do
>>80558379
7.62x54mmR > 7.62x63
>>80556044
7.62 x 51 is the king of battle rifle rounds.
>>80558379
my cock is best lots of cumming and leaves a huge exit wound. ask you're mom
>>80558557
Git Shrekt 7.62 x 54r is better
>>80558755
Only if we were as funny...
>>80559013
well a FUCKING LEAF can't be amusing
>>80559257
Dead fucking wrong faggot.
LOOKS LIKE YOU GOT
KEKED BY CANADIANS
>>80558379
>muh tumbling
ugh...seriously. that's 7.62x54r....5.56 has Wayyy better terminal performance on humans, flatter shooting, weighs less....do i need to go on.
>ITT
>intermediate rounds
7.62x51 NATO best round
Battle rifle best rifle.
>>80556044
7.62 is better
>Slavshit
pathetic.
>>80556044
>>>/k/
>>80556259
Lol obsolete... Youre retatded. 5.56 is designed to not kill you. Great choice there dipshit
>>80557644
>The military does not use the AR15.
Somebody needs to do some learnin'
>using anything other than 7.62x51/.308
fucking plebs
>>80556614
Assault rifle is for battle within 100 yards. 7.62 and 5.56 are EQUALLY accurate at that distance
>>80556044
Thats not x39 you moron
I get that this is b8 but 45mm as the case length is LONGER than 39mm
>>80556637
Sexy
>>80560038
You are a dipshit. 5.56 was chosen for a lot of reasons.
1. The high velocity causes fragmentation, which compared to a lot of other FMJ rounds is more deadly.
2. It is much lighter weight to carry a load of 210 rounds of 5.56. Weight means everything to an infantryman.
3. It is much more controllable in rapid fire due to less recoil.
>>80560145
>You need to read about ballistic coefficient.
7.62x51 has the flight characteristics of a brick. It's just widely known and used so it's shit bullet drop is well documented and predictable. There are much more efficient rounds with good stopping power out there. Not in favor or against .308 or 5.56.
>>80557644
>>80557234
>>80558148
DIAF NOGUNZ
https://www.americanrifleman.org/articles/2014/2/27/the-first-colt-ar-15-rifle/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Colt_AR-15_variants
learn the fucking difference between a manufacturer's design process and model number, and the military's testing and procurement process and its rifle pattern designations
>>80556555
A can of dip is the sign of someone that truly knows what they are doing with a gun.
Myself am a cope wintergreen fan. I only dip when I have my gun on me.
>>80560536
150 grain+ .308 is fine at the velocity its launched at
Supersonic at 1000 yards just fine.
Yeah, 6.5mm is better from a recoil and efficiency perspective, but you make a smaller wound.
>>80560536
>7.62x51 has the flight characteristics of a brick
I can already see you have no idea what you're talking about, but what rounds would you recommend out there that are better, cheap, and plausible for me to own en masse?
>>80560686
>Shoot Center mass
>You Shall not pass.
>>80560705
>>80560809
Communist rounds are only used by pinko and the like
>>80560805
>Cheap
>7.62x51
Lol There's you're problem. Honestly, most engagements occur under 300 yards so it isn't a valid argument to make but it's stupid to pretend like 7.62x51 is a death ray and 5.56 is completely impotent. If I put one or the other in your thoracic cavity at 150 yards, you wont know the difference.
>>80556044
>he still shoots marbles
>he doesnt shoot cannons
Kek
>>80560805
I'll answer. Pretty much anything else based on the .308 case with a higher BC. 260 rem, , 7mm-08 or even 243. 6.5 creedmore would also work even though its not based on the 308.
>>80560038
>Utoya
>Orlando
>Deadliest shooting in world history
>Deadliest shooting in American history
5.56 fucks shit up.
>>80556044
>buying brass nugget food
>>80561144
You also need to realize I live innawoods and use .308 for hunting dear, bear, and sometimes coyotes if they're annoying enough.
If society collapses, I'm perfectly safe where I live, but I'd be venturing out through the woods and would have a perfect overlook into the valley of the nearest city where I can sit atop.
5.56 works well obviously, the military uses it for most rifles, but a large number of military snipers use 7.62x51, which is the replacement for the 30-06
>>80560805
Oh sorry I forgot to point out why this is true. Go Google compare the flight path of .308 to 30-06 and get back to me. Any will do the job with good placement but that's all it takes. Good shot placement.
>>80561168
>dat small canadian dick
KEK
>>80561546
The .308 has a slightly lower velocity than the 30-06, and has slightly more bullet drop, but its a more accurate round.
>>80556555
>southern blend
>long cut
When will Copenhagen stop this blatant lie
>>80561403
Replacement is giving it too much credit. Long shots still use anything and everything with more powder or bullet than the 308. Of course 308 kills. No one is arguing it doesnt. It just isn't the death star of rifle rounds.
>>80561286
>orlando
he used 300blackout which is 7.62x39 wannabe
>>80561740
Everything comes down to application. Its cheap, plentiful, accurate, does just about a good of a job as the 30-06, both are the rounds of choice for military applications, as well as hunting.
>>80557120
Arma fag detected.
Pls leave Georgetown
>>80561677
That is an entirely unprovable statement. Accuracy is dependent on far too many variables. 30-06 has been a long range hunting round for years. But since you insist. Use any of the super 30 calibers if you want but 30-06 gets you more range, more energy, and less drop for not that much more money.
>>80561845
I don't even own a 30-06 but I do own a 308. I can still admit the 30-06 is better with the exception that there are few semi autos.
>>80557978
>Lightweight ammo means you can carry more of it though
Ah I see
Ruger 10-22> Ar
>>80556270
TLDR, but Ruger makes a Mini 30 chambered in 7.62 x 39. Quality build and bullets that will penetrate.
Plus you dont look like a fag running around with a plastic gun.
>>80562124
Only inside of 20 yards on soft targets duh.
>>80557038
Oh fuck off. I would MUCH RATHER have a well built civilian AR15 than an M4 or M16 in US Mil service.
>>80557234
Literally all parts other than the auto sear are interchangeable.
>>80557610
The Army uses SR-25s for DMRs, the EBR was a shit platform that was too heavy. All Combat marines have switched to M4s now.
>>80557644
Well no, you stupid fucking nigger, because an AR15 is almost completely analogous to a military AR15, or whatever they would like to call it. M16, M4, Mk18, its still a fucking AR15.
>>80561682
I don't mind.
>>80562307
The Mini 14 is a 4 MOA gun under optimal conditions, and is a 6 MOA gun after two magazines.
Its also less reliable of an action than an AR, or even an AK and cannot reliably shoot Steel case ammo.
Also, $40 dollar magazines.
>>80558239
>not having a mosin carbine instead
What a homo
>not using 9x39mm
>>80556044
>mfw I see what's going on in this picture
>>80562926
I actually desperately want this gun and 1k rounds for it. I've wanted 9x39 since I first read about it and idk even why.
>>80560038
This is true
The military philosophy at the time wanted a round that disabled combatants but allowed them to ultimately live with medical treatment. The problem was that 5.56 was a lighter projectile going at a faster speed that creates a much larger permanent wound cavity when it strikes. A wound from a 5.56 is much "nastier" than a wound from a 7.62 x 39
>>80557259
>I don't know shit, but I will cite English (kek) article on how it is in Russia
Neck yourself, you worthless piece of shit. AKMs and RPKs are still used to this day by scouting parties in Caucasus, and not because of lack of supplies.
>>80562730
I know... it makes me sad inside. I know where I could get one but I wouldn't pay the inflated price for what is still a mosin at heart. :(
>>80562730
>not buying a chinese flame thrower for close range encounters
>>80563310
Dumb.
No bullet outside of very large calibers will make up for your shit shot placement. It's much better just to train with your weapon and always hit what you aim at. A bullet wound to the heart and lungs kills from .22 up.
>>80562079
lel, didn't you get banned for posting this shit last time?
>>80562307
good luck finding magazines for a mini 30
>>80563623
That looks positively barbaric. How get?
>>80563623
Can I have your pillow?
>>80563623
>DAT OBREZ HNNNNNNG
>>80563727
i meant CLIPS
>>80563739
Hacksaw
Time
>>80557978
>bullets
>>80563310
Wanna source that?
Explain to us how a round designed to do massive ammounts of damage to a target isn't designed to kill it.
Vietnam M193 wounds WERE FUCKING DEVASTATING.
Here's what 5.56 does to people.
>>80563781
buy your own, cheap nigger.
>>80563623
I would be afraid the receiver would rip out of the "stock" when you fired it with no barrel bands and just that ancient screw in the bottom holding it together.
>>80564063
Like a DIY ak but sexier
>>80563714
That was me.
Mod are now pretty cancerous, the Janitors always were.
>>80564027
The least you could have done was give me a link for falsely accusing me of niggerdom.
Them's fightin words commie.
>>80564063
You can see the lug bolt there, it's probably intact and could fire just fine.
Mostly a bunch of fire would come out but that bullet would be traveling pretty quick already too.
>>80564153
Til you go to jail for illegal modifying it with an old ass receiver buried in your chest.
>>80564215
https://www.amazon.com/54r-Spam-Can-Collectable-Pillow/dp/B00LH4VIUO
Literally only had to type 7,62 pillow
>>80556044
fucking nigger you are retarded thats a 7.62X51
>>80563623
You need good sights though, and then you can develop a load with a handgun powder and lead bullets.
Fun.
>>80557644
The AR-15 is authorized as an alternate issue.
>>80564215
look up Plush Armory
>>80564329
That's why it's a flame thrower. The bullet keyholes at three feet. I don't think I want to be shot with it.
>>80564423
And I did not. See how well the internet works now?
>>80557644
The military has a shitload of AR-15s in inventory slim.
>>80564561
Read front of pillow; type into google
>>80564063
The entire receiver assembly passes through the stock. It's locked in there as tightly as the full size rifle. Those barrel bands are mostly just there to keep the stock and the barrel together.
>>80556044
Can i shoot you in the face with my 5.56 OP? If you die, you win. You live, i let you suck my dick. Either way, you win!
>>80564536
With a proper handload and projectile it'd be much better. Full power ammo will of course blow shit everywhere.
I would just use lead balls myself or Keith bullets or wadcutters, something flat, and made of softer lead, with a handgun poder like hs-6
>>80564731
I will try this, what could possibly go wrong?
>>80564536
I would still rather be shot with that than a bow/crossbow with one of those broadhead razor bladed tips. Fuck that shit. At least ol spunky up there might kill me instantly.
>>80564848
>we blunderbluss noa
>>80560136
That someone would be you.
AR15s are a semi auto civillian rifle.
Military uses M4 and other variants.
>>80556044
5.45 is better than both, prove me wrong
>>80563982
LIES! that is obviously .45 ACP
>>80565023
Dude.
Stop posting.
>>80565071
Kek
>>80564848
Trail Boss would be the safest powder, it's designed to be basically un-blow-up-able if you use lead bullets. Put the powder in first then some kapok or artificial pillow stuffing in the case to keep the powder by the primer. It will melt into a little ball and shoot out the barrel after the bullet.
http://guns.connect.fi/gow/arcane1.html
Read all that site too, before you do anything.
>>80564725
deal
>>80565048
you are correct
What is it about the gun community that attracts so much autism? Not anti-gun at all but I've noticed there is a shitload of autism among gun enthusiasts.
>>80565534
Not every involved interest is autism there chummie.
I think you're projecting here.
>>80565534
Don't confuse autism with ammosexuality you shitlord.
>>80558054
GIGA NIGGA HAS APPEARED
ONLY 7.62 NATO CAN KILL HIM
>>80565792
>tfw no big guns to use in the race war
>>80557540
.45, 9mm, 22lr, Penny, .223, 7.62x39mm
>mfw the next shootout happens with a guy carrying a bunch of muskets
>>80565534
I know what you mean. Lurking /k/ for a while made me want to ditch my lone rem 870 just to avoid being associated with that kind of people.
>>80565618
Go look at the semantics involved with ar vs m16 right in this thread and tell me that isn't autistic as fuck.
>>80565023
k thanks
>>80566143
Its one or two retards trying to play mental gymnastics about what is or isn't "milspec"
A good equivalent is if the army used a computer A and called it the M-1.
And the M1 had a 3rd mouse botton, and then the Army claimed that the Computer A is "functionality" different than what it uses, even when we all know it isn't.
>>80566143
The ones who aren't autistic just don't post. You only see the bad sample groups with no control set to compare and contrast. This is the same in almost any and everything except sonic and MLP. Sonic is debatable but when you consider the original fan base was supposed to be young kids it's safe to assume that fully grown adults really liking sonic are probably fucked up somehow.
>>80563310
>A wound from a 5.56 is much "nastier" than a wound from a 7.62 x 39
Said no one. Ever.
>>80557978
>having smaller bullets doesn't mean you're going to have to plink down someone's HP bar instead of 1-shotting them
It does mean exactly that though. That is one of the longest standing and most worriesome objections to the .223 rifle, It fails to reliably neutralize targets in a single hit. Soldiers have been reporting that exact complaint from vietnam to the present. and the military went back to 7.62x51 for this very reason.
>>80563310
>A wound from a 5.56 is much "nastier" than a wound from a 7.62 x 39
No it's not.
>happening
>might need to dip out indawoods for a spot
>going to lug a heavy ass rifle and less ammo bc "le stopping power"
When you're done jerking off over pictures of Rhodesians in short shorts with FALs, we'll have a serious discussion.
>>80567144
>>80568505
It has the capacity to.
A 55g 5.56 round that fragments and tumbles on impact can do extreme damage to human targets, whereas 7.62x39 simply pushes through fresh with minimal expansion or change of course.
>>80565534
so they work very well
many moving parts gas that burns
they make bad things die
>>80569254
>whereas 7.62x39 simply pushes through fresh with minimal expansion or change of course.
what are holler points. same with 9mm
>>80569510
Hollow Point loads for 7.62x39 are inefficient; its a short, stubby round that travels pretty slow.
Whereas .223 expanding hollow point rounds can consistently expand to .51 caliber squash heads, and FMJ/OTM 5.56 loads violently fragment and break apart at reasonable velocities.
>>80569390
>>80569390
I watched his videos.
Am I a samurai?
>>80569883
>over 2000fps
>pretty slow
can you take one to the chest or face to prove it doesn't expand?
>>80556044
>Not using .50 beowulf
What a pleb.
