[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
MANBABIES BTFO
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Thread replies: 255
Thread images: 74
File: 2.png (432 KB, 964x868) Image search: [Google]
2.png
432 KB, 964x868
MANBABIES BTFO
>>
Does it really matter what a website says when there is literally nobody interested in seeing that movie besides feminists?
>>
>>80523600
im sure theres no dishonesty or software aided, ip spoofing voting going on there at all, to say nothing of demographics of voters being young liberal imbeciles
>>
>>80523600
>>80523600
LOL TAKE THAT FUCKING WHITE MALES
>>
I wonder how much they paid for those reviews. This is probably the apex of damage control.
>>
>fake reviews

really makes you think
>>
>Sony can't release this in China because ghosts

This movie is so fucked
>>
>>80524121
almost forgot:
paid false flag advertising

yep, no chance whatsoever
>>
>>80524121
>he thinks rottentomatoes works by user votes
Neck yourslf.
>>
Rottentomatoes is literally wrong about EVERYTHING, fuck em
>>
File: 1468178478884.jpg (208 KB, 1141x812) Image search: [Google]
1468178478884.jpg
208 KB, 1141x812
>>80523600
>>
>>80524121
>im sure theres no dishonesty or software aided, ip spoofing voting going on there at all, to say nothing of demographics of voters being young liberal imbeciles
Uh...critic score?

Spoofing the critical reviews would
1. Require hacking the site or accounts on the site
and
2. Be detected easily
>>
>>80524240
they don't allow ghosts in China?

not communist enough or something?
>>
File: Junk_In_The_Trunk.jpg (71 KB, 587x651) Image search: [Google]
Junk_In_The_Trunk.jpg
71 KB, 587x651
>>80523600
>Ghostbusters 2
>>
>>80523600
As if the PR companies arent in overdrive trying to put a shine on this turd
Yourself included, faggot
>>
>>80524284
>like/dislike buttons
>ratings counter
>clickable stars
>average rating
Yeah, score totally not related to (possibly bot/spoofed) user votes.
>>
File: ghostbull.jpg (152 KB, 750x675) Image search: [Google]
ghostbull.jpg
152 KB, 750x675
Nice try. I fixed it for you.
>>
Critical reviews by Buzzfeed, Vox, daily beast and (((Canadians)))

Mostly women and nu males giving it positive reviews

This is literally the same cancer as vidya game reviews
>>
>>80523600
When liberal males are even calling it out and breaking the conditioning of their feminist overlords you know something is drastically wrong with the movie.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u-Pvk70Gx6c

Nearly everyone who has said the private screening has said this or something along those lines.
>>
Youre forgetting that millenials are fucking retarded. Look at all the shitty movies that are popular these days. Who cares if it got a good rating, we know its shit. Fuck me transformers was popular when it came out ffs and its the biggest pile of shit ive ever seen.
>>
>>80523600
If you go to top critics, it's got less than 50%.
Also, buzzfeed is considered to be a top critic, which just goes to show how shit that website is.
>>
> rottentomato
>>
>>80524284
>he doesn't know that the only rating that counts is the big number next to the tomato, which only counts the opinion of the professional critics
>>
>>80524815
The one desert scene against the scorpion was cool because of all the military stuff.
>>
>>80523600
It's marketed as a female targeted movie similar to bridesmaids. Its budget is close to what bridesmaids was and their expected profit is roughly similar.
I don't see what the big fuss is. It's basically a chick flick but they're expanding out the genre. It's probably a good movie for what its intended purpose was.
>>
>>80524240
You sure? I know they don't allow skeletons but thought ghosts were fine. Not that it matters mind you, chinese won't pay for a movie starring an actress as black as the one they've got.
>>
>>80523600
Litterly noone is gonna watch the movie.

Poor advertising tactics.
>>
File: image.jpg (151 KB, 640x1136) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
151 KB, 640x1136
>>80524760
They're paying people to shill for this movie on social media. If it's so shitty that they have to pay people to act excited you know something's wrong. Pic related.
>>
File: 1462421779214.jpg (253 KB, 881x848) Image search: [Google]
1462421779214.jpg
253 KB, 881x848
>>80523600
>the kikes needed to start shit with AVGN to create controversy, draw in the cuck audience and make people remember that the Ghostbusters reboot is a thing
Holy shit this is pathetic. You got in a fight with an internet personality who's mostly irrelevant now because he's the only one who bothered to talk about your shitty movie. Part of a grand scheme to FORCE feminists and beta males to see your movie because they gotta support da wimminz!
All this effort and it still isn't going to make bank like capeshit. Reboot jews BTFO.
>>
>>80524420
China has a film bureau that screens all movies and they think ghosts promote superstition or something.
>>
>>80524848
Buzzfeed is like a normie friendly hive pot of leftist propaganda at the end of the day. If a title presents gawker as a good review never watch it.
>>
>>80524815
>tfw 75% of under 24s in the UK voted remain.

They are like eternal babies that need to be told what to do and what to like. It's crazy.
>>
File: 1402767030781.png (22 KB, 207x239) Image search: [Google]
1402767030781.png
22 KB, 207x239
Something's very fishy about this, and it isn't the cast's unwashed vaginas...
>>
Look at this white cis-male fragility. Your tears are delicious.
>>
>>80525055
Fine but just dont call it Ghostbusters

Fuck em, they knew exactly what they were doing , the controversy was planned from day one.
>>
File: image.png (230 KB, 640x1136) Image search: [Google]
image.png
230 KB, 640x1136
>>80524231
They're paying people to act excited on fb
>>
...assuming that the hyper-PC-Liberal fuckwits are reviewing the movie legitimately and not licking Hollywoods progressive asshole.

The move is pure, unadulterated garbage that should never have been made.
>>
>>80524611
see >>80525012

Not saying it was a good movie or that i'll ever watch it but i just wanted you to know this is one of the most based movie review sites precisely because it's immune to the usual internet bullshit
>>
>>80523600
The movie isn't even out yet... Just critic screenings and shit. Jesus people.
>>
>>80523600
>>80523600
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u-Pvk70Gx6c

Here's a great, honest review on the movie. I am 100% sure that the movie is GARBAGE !
>>
>>80525217
There is no question that they are paying people for positive reviews. This is some kind of weird psyop
>>
File: paul feig the ultimate nu male.png (95 KB, 664x954) Image search: [Google]
paul feig the ultimate nu male.png
95 KB, 664x954
>>80525149
Mate all you need to do is read the column written by the movies director to realize how much of a fucking nu male he is, I mean honestly have you checked out about how he hates male bonding?
>>
>>80524359
>>80524284

imbeciles.
>>
>>80525195
pretty based desu


wish we had a communist people's party that controlled everything :(
>>
>>80524753
whats cancerous about this review?

>Paul Feig's remake is hilarious, forward-looking, and delightfully in touch with its origins.
>>
The original has 97%
>>
>>80523600
>go to theater
>ghost busters trailer comes on
>only one scene got any sort of laugh and it was only 2-3 women in the audience

"H-hey guys! L-l-look at all these positive reviews. Y-you better go see it or else your a m-misogynist."
>>
This will be the biggest movie of the year worldwide, and more than triple the sales of the first two films combined. You. Will. Be. Totally. Blown. The. Fuck. Out. Guaranteed.
>>
File: (564.png (33 KB, 303x837) Image search: [Google]
(564.png
33 KB, 303x837
>>80523600

OHHHH VEYYYY

they made us an offer we couldn't refuse!
>>
>>80523600
>cites the snopes of movie rating websites
slide thread
sage
>>
File: autodidact.jpg (30 KB, 500x587) Image search: [Google]
autodidact.jpg
30 KB, 500x587
>>80525633
>These sheep don't even realize that the critics are controlled by the illuminati.
>>
File: AWWWWWWWWOOOO.png (481 KB, 761x777) Image search: [Google]
AWWWWWWWWOOOO.png
481 KB, 761x777
>>80525775
there's a damn good reason you missed those trips
>>
Many of the reviewers have invested so much emotionally in defense of the film that they are going to say it was great even if it sucked.

Here is Devin Faraci saying he absolutely can't wait for the sequel and then struggling to name one concrete good thing about the film: http://birthmoviesdeath.com/2016/07/10/ghostbusters-review-bad-news-for-the-ghostbros
>>
File: are you fucking kidding me.jpg (39 KB, 316x316) Image search: [Google]
are you fucking kidding me.jpg
39 KB, 316x316
>>80525445
CAN YOU EVEN
ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME
GAMERGATE
I CAN'T EVEN BELIEVE THIS IS THE
CURRENT
YEAR
>>
I fully expect this movie do to well in the box office, but have absolutely shit DVD/Blu-ray sales.
>>
File: 1458350730345.gif (4 MB, 294x233) Image search: [Google]
1458350730345.gif
4 MB, 294x233
>>80523600
Show me the top critics tab

Go on. Do it
>>
File: londonhasfallen.png (286 KB, 903x760) Image search: [Google]
londonhasfallen.png
286 KB, 903x760
>>
File: 1464243074560.png (255 KB, 1066x475) Image search: [Google]
1464243074560.png
255 KB, 1066x475
>>80523600
>rottentomatoes
>>
>>80525734
See...
>>80524674
>>80524674
>>80524674
>>
File: 1398469523698.jpg (27 KB, 350x335) Image search: [Google]
1398469523698.jpg
27 KB, 350x335
>>80525837
>McWeeny
That's a nu-male name if I ever heard one.
>>
>>80525397
>>80525217
When the narrative is faltering so hard you have to pay people to see a movie.
Let chaos reign.
>>
Nobody remembers the fourth, "token" ghostbuster. I wonder why that is... Now they are ALL token ghostbusters.
>>
>>80523600

>GHOSTBUSTERS 2

2
TWO
DOS
DEUX
DEUCE
DUO
BI

this image is fake
>>
>>80523600
The critics are getting paid
Considering the massive backlash it got on Youtube, it shouldn't even be positive
>>
File: 1453082696557.gif (993 KB, 290x198) Image search: [Google]
1453082696557.gif
993 KB, 290x198
>>80523600
PROTIP:
Change 'All Critics' to 'Top Critics'
>>
File: GARBAGE.png (200 KB, 835x415) Image search: [Google]
GARBAGE.png
200 KB, 835x415
>>80526071
As I thought
>>
File: Screenshot_20.png (609 KB, 765x700) Image search: [Google]
Screenshot_20.png
609 KB, 765x700
>>80523600
>>
Critics can say whatever the fuck they want. If the movie makes no money, it's a flop.
>>
>>80523600
>comparing cuntbusters to the shity second movie
>>
>>80526326
BTFO
>>
>>80524420
>>80524420
>>80524420

The only buildings the communist revolution didn't knock down were the religious ones. They are superstitious as fuck.
>>
>>80523600
fuck off man baby.

>>80524121
sure

>>80523895
you are feminist and interested in it.
>>
>top critics
>all the top critics are white cis-males
Nice try, pissbabies
>>
>>80525837
oh boohoohoo "the new generation"

they can all die for all i care
>>
>>80526326
>Below 50%
Only surprise is those Tomatoniggers permitted that to show up on their site
Even shitty critics cannot hide the smell of this cinema turd
>>
File: 1426189249416.jpg (63 KB, 500x500) Image search: [Google]
1426189249416.jpg
63 KB, 500x500
>>80525882
your right, I can't see any bias in these rigorous analytical reviews

>>80526078
>>80526107
>>
File: 4816294.gif (455 KB, 594x589) Image search: [Google]
4816294.gif
455 KB, 594x589
>>80526010
Yes. They should rather start advertising lube because they're gonna need it where they are heading.
>>
>>80525720
>hilarious

Simply not true.
>>
File: explain.png (486 KB, 526x700) Image search: [Google]
explain.png
486 KB, 526x700
>>80526433
>second movie
>shitty
I haven't watched it since before the death of VHS. It's probably because I was a dumb child in primary school but remember liking it.
>>
>>80523600
Ghostbusters 2 was Ass Though
>>
>>80527021
All movies before like 1999 were good. I dont know what happened.
>>
>>80525055
A fucking leaf

Not even once
>>
File: 1395704543424.jpg (13 KB, 320x240) Image search: [Google]
1395704543424.jpg
13 KB, 320x240
>>80523600
>critic reviews
>>
>>80523600
Ghostbusters 2 was terrible
>>
>>80525672
Move to California

Almost the same thing
>>
>>80525265

I would not go so far as to say those particular tweets are paid, but they are clearly not genuine. They are trying to win some contest, one that likely requires them to say something positive about the movie on Twitter with that hashtag.
>>
>>80525837
>>80526161
McWeeny

Entire family line destined to be cucks, it's like pottery
>>
>>80527336
(((critics)))
>>
>>80527007
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6NhfRFSaFo

This and the dancing toaster. Nostalgia goggles are dangerous. And I love the original Ghostbusters.
>>
>>80523600
When will any of you autists realize how brilliant this marketing strategy is?

>want to make money
>use well known brand because less risk
>attach it to resurgent tumbler feminism
>start controversy over it
>all tumbler landwhales go see it to prove a point
>rake in the money

I can't tell you how many times I've seen feminism/BLM used as a marketing strategy. It's brilliant too because the morons can't even see through it. They seriously think that business is on their side.
>>
>>80524674

B T F O
T
F
O
>>
>>80527748
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YjskzUlJOfc

other one cuts off too early
>>
>>80525195
But they have a calendar of fortune talking animals, fortune cookies, and gender calendar based on the stars
>>
It hasn't even come out yet, what is RT smoking.
>>
>>80525241
I think it's more that they just don't give a fuck. The controversy around it doesn't alienate their target demographic anyway. The people it upset wouldn't go see it anyway most likely.
>>
nooo i'm btfooooo nooooooooo
>>
>>80524420
Time travel movies are banned in China too.

No skeletons, no ghosts, no time travel.
>>
>try to add negative review
>it says 'Posted' but audience reviews section is completely empty

why?

also, every critic's website that gave this a positive review either have disabled comments or the comments are full of people saying "how much has Sony paid you?" and "how does Sony's dick taste?"
>>
File: sunset the game.jpg (55 KB, 460x215) Image search: [Google]
sunset the game.jpg
55 KB, 460x215
>>80527805
>we want the SJW audience
This will literally bankrupt your company.
SJWs don't seem to pay for anything. They need a fair amount of normal people to be interested in another unnecessary crappy reboot.
>>
>>80526326
they have removed some of the rotten reviews
>>
File: Slide.jpg (64 KB, 773x307) Image search: [Google]
Slide.jpg
64 KB, 773x307
>>80526326
They are sliding it.
>>
>>80528926
>adding negative reviews to a movie you haven't seen

Literally pathetic.
>>
>Average rating 6.6
>Score of 76%

What
>>
File: 1435997078050.jpg (61 KB, 666x632) Image search: [Google]
1435997078050.jpg
61 KB, 666x632
>>80529169
SHUT IT DOWN
>>
>>80529169
Oy vey!
>>
>>80527805
Why do you think everything on TV is geared towards women and minorities?

Is it because these groups are harder or easier to take money from than white males?

Marketing strategy always involves pandering to the least critical consumers.
>>
>>80529223
>assuming i haven't seen it

pathetic
>>
>>80529259
Rotten tomatoes only counts if someone liked the film (fresh) or not (rotten) and gives you the average. It's not like metacritic.
>>
>>80526107
Holy fucking shit.

Bias at its prime.
>>
>>80525672
You do
>>
File: current year.jpg (29 KB, 431x286) Image search: [Google]
current year.jpg
29 KB, 431x286
>>80529169

WE'VE BEEN FOUND OUT!
>>
>>80523600
WOWO
I thought the movie was going to suck, turns out liberal critics think its a 6/10 movie!

Let me go clear my busy schedule to make way for this 6/10 summer blockbuster!
>>
>>80529496
So a movie with a hundred 51% reviews would look like a 100%? Seems like a flawed system
>>
>>80529259
76% of people gave it a passing score. The average of the scores being 6.6
>>
>>80529905
I think the fresh cutoff is higher than 50% but that's basically the idea. I generally like it more than metacritic.
>>
>>80523600
it was
so bad
they shot
the series
in the actual
dick.
>>
still not watching your shitting remake

stay mad
>>
>>80527805
There aren't as many of them as there would be other things.
>>
File: 1442804995086.jpg (78 KB, 495x738) Image search: [Google]
1442804995086.jpg
78 KB, 495x738
>>80526107
>Johansson is a patronymic family name of Swedish origin meaning "son of Johan"
>>
File: RTBug.png (360 KB, 1430x601) Image search: [Google]
RTBug.png
360 KB, 1430x601
>>80529169
It's a bug, and affects all movies. Don't know what causes it.
>>
idk why is pol so mad about movie with women? might it be ´because you are all bitter virgins? sad rly.
>>
>>80531267
(you)
>>
>>80523600
Maybe we should wait until more review come? I mean, they did do a review embargo.
>>
>>80526078
Sounds like a standard spy flick, how is that xenophobic?
>>
File: topcritic.png (13 KB, 353x246) Image search: [Google]
topcritic.png
13 KB, 353x246
>>80526071
>>80526326
>top critic
>buzzfeed
>>
>>80524229

$0.

The (((critics))) would be too afraid to say it was shit because they fear being called a sexist.
>>
>>80523600

>people keep complaining that it's not about the gender of the cast and the movie is just bad
>keeps appearing on /pol/ citing sexist and racist reasoning for it's positive reception.

Which is it /pol/? does the female cast matter or not?
>>
>>80532435
The female cast matters to feminist reviewers who have spent the last couple of months mocking anyone who criticizes the movie as sexist.
>>
>>80523600
Hmm, really makes you think...
>>
File: 1468167436774.png (2 MB, 1018x4344) Image search: [Google]
1468167436774.png
2 MB, 1018x4344
>>
>>80523600
Nobody likes Ghostbusters 2, though
>>
>>80532062
KEK
>>
>>80533390

The way you phrase that makes me think it's important to you as well.
>>
File: 1445131341311.jpg (88 KB, 458x604) Image search: [Google]
1445131341311.jpg
88 KB, 458x604
>there are people in this world who are legitimately mad that a film with female leads is good
>>
File: 1409507600497.png (8 KB, 363x364) Image search: [Google]
1409507600497.png
8 KB, 363x364
>No user reviews yet
>Going by movie critics
>>
>>80523600
I'm going to start buying these all-female movies on iTunes just to encourage them making more and piss off redditors and /pol/tards.
>>
Is it out already?
>>
>>80523600
its not out until the 15th and every feminist wandered over to rotten tomatoes to make it look good

going to just guess and say it wont break the 500 mil mark which by modern standards is so so. might not even break 300 mil thats global mind you
>>
>>80523600
>let's compare the sequel vs the remake, because the sequel is ALWAYS better than the first
>>
File: 1451922064948.jpg (22 KB, 200x227) Image search: [Google]
1451922064948.jpg
22 KB, 200x227
>it's a movie that everyone universally knows is shit but people still praise it because it supports their agenda

In 80 years we'll view shit like this the same way we view WW2 propaganda films and war bonds commercials.
>>
>>80531786
>Sounds like a standard spy flick, how is that xenophobic?
The baddies were muslims instead of eastern europeans or east asians.
>>
>>80525228
So you like the taste of our jizz?
>>
>>80537436
A lot of white muslims too apparently. That first scene where all the white British security officers turn on everyone is bizarre.

The movie ends Morgan Freeman basically telling us we can't be isolationist and we have to fight endless wars against Israel's enemies. It's a shit movie and jew propaganda to boot.
>>
>>80523600

1 Post by This ID
>>
File: 1467886673830.jpg (115 KB, 1221x1386) Image search: [Google]
1467886673830.jpg
115 KB, 1221x1386
>>80523600
Give it a week or two
>>
>>80523600
Slow down, it's not even out yet.

also this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u-Pvk70Gx6c
>>
File: the pits 3.jpg (32 KB, 357x303) Image search: [Google]
the pits 3.jpg
32 KB, 357x303
>>80523600
>critics
>not the most jewed to the max demographic
>1 post by this ID
>>
>>80538085
>1 Post by This ID
>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yOieWN28BlE

I'm 99% sure most of the good reviews are just butthurt feminist leaning people
>>
I look forward to when it financially tanks.
>>
>>80538814

S
L
A
M

S
H
O
T
!
!
!
>>
>>80537906
>jew propaganda
It wouldn't be hollywood if it wasn't.
>>
>>80523600
all rated from a couple of preview showings which were filled almost entirely with feminists. wait until real people watch it, that'll plummet
>>
My GF wants me to watch this with her or she'll withhold sex from me.

What the fuck do I do? I don't want to fucking give these guys my money and I have been hiding my power level this entire time.
>>
File: 1457554346346.jpg (222 KB, 1600x1038) Image search: [Google]
1457554346346.jpg
222 KB, 1600x1038
To what an extent the Jew takes over foreign culture, imitating or rather ruining it, can be seen from the fact that he is mostly found in the art which seems to require least original invention, the art of acting. But even here, in reality, he is only a ' juggler,' or rather an ape; for even here he lacks the last touch that is required for real greatness; even here he is not the creative genius, but a superficial imitator, and all the twists and tricks that he uses are powerless to conceal the inner lifelessness of his creative gift. Here the Jewish press most lovingly helps him along by raising such a roar of hosannahs about even the most mediocre bungler, just so long as he is a Jew, that the rest of the world actually ends up by thinking that they have an artist before them, while in truth it is only a pitiful comedian.
>>
>>80538814
Aren't the proton guns supposed to hold the ghost till they put it over that trap thing?
Why are they killing ghosts?
>>
>>80539196
Because they just don't fucking care. It's a shitshow.
>>
>>80539050
tell her you'll go see it, but you get to pick the next movie and she has to go. pick the new Jason "Walking Patriarchy" Bourne movie. laugh at her rage
>>
>>80539050
throw her out of the window

A soon as the woman starts using sex as a weapon you know she's no good. Just break up with her and be done with it.
>>
>>80524336
I thought Harambe was dead?
>>
>>80539196

Because the people who made this movie anon don't care about anything ghostbusters related. This is a cash grab written by progressive liberal idiots
>>
>>80524511
That image made me laugh harder than t should have.
>>
>>80539370
You'd think that, but they make a point in the movie of how the proton guns don't kill ghosts just hold them in place till they can be sucked by the fat nigger ape.

so it makes no sense even in the context of this movie's universe
>>
>>80523600
Average rating 6.6/10
Average tomato meter 76%


???)??????!
>>
>>80539050

Dump that bitch.
>>
>>80539050

Tell her you don't respond to black mail
>>
>>80539050
Tell her you'll watch it once it comes out on Blu-ray, and that in the mean time you can watch the original to appreciate how good ghostbusters is. Then pirate the fuck out of it. Alternatively, stop being a fucking wuss and tell her if she's going to withhold sex for such an asinine, trivial matter, she's a shallow cunt that deserves to be alone, and dump her.
>>
File: 1465700352022.jpg (1008 KB, 1536x2048) Image search: [Google]
1465700352022.jpg
1008 KB, 1536x2048
CONSERVASHIT TRUMPKEKS BLOWN THE FUCK OUT BTFO

PPIC RELATED ITS U
>>
>>80532062
So basically the movie sucks but gurl powah?
>>
>>80538886

It's slap shot, you stupid burger.
>>
Some people wont even see a movie if someone spoils it for them.

Spoiler raids anyone?
>>
File: 1467915986131.gif (281 KB, 640x240) Image search: [Google]
1467915986131.gif
281 KB, 640x240
>>80523600
>6.6/10
>>
>>80540186
The fuck are you even going to spoil? All the plot points are in the trailers.

The only thing worth spoiling is how they shoot the logo in the dick and most people who you'd want to spoil would probably be reaffirmed by that.
>>
>>80528055
Their leftism is showing again
>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YigM-F4oSIE
>>
File: 1462583696819.gif (768 KB, 500x375) Image search: [Google]
1462583696819.gif
768 KB, 500x375
>6\10
>>
>>80523600
I've noticed how most of the movie reviewers are liberals and they give a low rating if they don't like the message of the movie. It's not even that much about the quality.
>>
>>80539305
This isn't the first time. I've made a similar offer and she refused to take it, after watching that stupid Minions movie.
>>80539346
>>80539872
>>80539905
>>80539926
You guys really think that's worth it? I've been with her for 3 years.
>>
>>80540553
>That ID
>hRmJkBwy
>hm k bye

The answer was in your ID the whole time.
>>
>>80540553
Fuck any bitch who will withhold sex from you as leverage. I can deal with most other women's shit but once that starts it's headed downhill. If she'll do this while she's your GF she'll be a huge cunt if you marry her,
>>
Sony's and the SJWs' smear campaign has worked. It has made everyone terrified of being labeled a misogynist for disliking the movie.

It has become universally politically incorrect to dislike this movie.
>>
>>80523600
>2016
>Taking part in the anti-White Judeo media.
Pick one.

Also...
>Reviews mean a movie is great!
>>
File: image.png (186 KB, 326x289) Image search: [Google]
image.png
186 KB, 326x289
>>80528760
>>
File: 1468193577840.png (383 KB, 531x235) Image search: [Google]
1468193577840.png
383 KB, 531x235
THE FINAL

BATTLE
>>
>>80527007
second movie was 2 spooky 4 me when I was a kid. I was terrified of faucets for a month afterwards.
>>
File: 1465964273739.png (327 KB, 629x425) Image search: [Google]
1465964273739.png
327 KB, 629x425
>>80523600
>trusting other people's opinions

Time to grow up
>>
File: Screenshot_2016-07-10-18-48-25.jpg (79 KB, 715x260) Image search: [Google]
Screenshot_2016-07-10-18-48-25.jpg
79 KB, 715x260
>>80538660
>>
File: 1436319983885.gif (4 MB, 581x327) Image search: [Google]
1436319983885.gif
4 MB, 581x327
>>80533913

The person that wrote this should be fired. I can't believe I read most of that article. To sum up, it says the movie is dog shit BUT the actresses are funny, engaging, and wonderful.

So the movie sucked ass, but the actors more than did their part? What the FUCK?? That makes no sense. If the actors were great, then the movie, should be good, but it's not and not funny, even thought he actors themselves are funny and the script is lame but engaging???

That's a whole lot of sucking up.
>>
>>80524420
Ghosts take up space and don't pay up to the state.
>>
>>80535322
This
>>
hey, i was rooting for this debismal, chuthlu appocalypse of a movie for days.
>>
>>80534540
It isn't good. Go watch the fucking movie.
>>
>>80541386
>Not seeing a release in China
Imagine if I wagered the fate of my entire ideology on the sales of a lead balloon.
>>
>>80525734
>that id
>>
I work at a movie theater and definitely feel like it will sell. Hopefully it gets btfo but I doubt it. People will see it for nostalgia.
>>
>>80525195
A friend once told me, its because seeing ghosts would lead to believe the existence of an afterlife, or something like that.
>>
File: 212321312.jpg (21 KB, 439x290) Image search: [Google]
212321312.jpg
21 KB, 439x290
>>80523600
>1 post by this ID
>>
File: image.jpg (134 KB, 800x531) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
134 KB, 800x531
>>80523600
Sounds like the nastiest turd ever.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=u-Pvk70Gx6c
>>
File: Real Ghostbusters.jpg (141 KB, 1024x682) Image search: [Google]
Real Ghostbusters.jpg
141 KB, 1024x682
My fav reboot right here.
>>
>>80544395
>The only one with an attractive face is the black one
Fucking spooky
>>
Metacritic has it rated as a 63% from critics
>>
File: ss+(2016-07-10+at+07.24.40).jpg (43 KB, 1269x667) Image search: [Google]
ss+(2016-07-10+at+07.24.40).jpg
43 KB, 1269x667
>>80544395
I like how the porn parody has more respect for the franchise than the actual reboot does.

>Four Heroes
THAT'S ALL YOU HAD TO DO, SONY.
>>
>>80539050
You're a genuine cuck.
>>
File: 1446587034263.jpg (33 KB, 500x500) Image search: [Google]
1446587034263.jpg
33 KB, 500x500
>>80544395
it comes out tomorrow

>mfw i'm more excited for this than the actually movie it's parodying
>>
>>80544395
yeah but why is there a nigger? instant limp dick
>>
>>80547743
because there's a nigger in the original
>>
File: 1455262531766.jpg (34 KB, 500x436) Image search: [Google]
1455262531766.jpg
34 KB, 500x436
>>80524511
>filename
My sides
>>
>>80525055
This is fucking ghost busters the series isn't ment to be a fucking chick flick
>>
>>80539362
That's Kimbo you fucking bigot
>>
>>80523600
It's out already?
>>
>>80523895
Lol it's predicted to top $1.1 billion in ticket sales you moron. Every female in the civilized world is going to see this movie and they're dragging their nu male slaves with them.
>>
>>80537412
What would we call this era? We had Extreme 90's, the Hippies in the 70's, the Leave it to beaver like 50's, etc?
>>
Needs 5 ratings to show up on imdb, spam some 1 votes http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1289401/?ref_=nv_sr_1
>>
>>80541386
>Cohen
>>
>>80523600
Guys, what if the movie is actually good?
>>
>>80541386
I don't know why they had to bet everything they had on this movie. If they would follow a pattern, they would know that the majority of 80's remakes are soulless cashins with a rare few actually being decent.
>>
>>80547743
Its ana foxxx. She only does porn with white people. Plus shes a qt
>>
>>80551350

Because now when the movie fails they can blame misogyny and absolve themselves of every getting blamed for pumping out dull vapid pandering shit for the next decade.
>>
>>80523600
so the new ghost busters is actually good? Huh, because i just go by the fact that 99% of remakes such balls so i avoid them
>>
>>80552141
After travesties such as the nightmare on elmstreet remake,the thing remake,the robocop remake and the total recall remake i just stay away from remakes.
>>
>>80552317
The new The Thing movie was a prequel to the original and pretty good imo
>>
>>80523600
The only thing that I ever came into contact with about this movie was the opening screen of the trailer. It started with
"30 Years ago, Four Scientists saved New York..." and I closed the tab.
>Four scientists.
>>
>he thinks movie critics critique anything other than actual right wing propaganda at this point
>>
>>80552474
And I'm probably going to have to buy two tickets to watch one of my favorite movies get ruined, tarnished, and mocked right before my eyes.
>>
>>80523895


Im not a mysoginist, but I would not see it becaue i dont find mccarthy funny at all
>>
File: 1468070647565.gif (778 KB, 153x165) Image search: [Google]
1468070647565.gif
778 KB, 153x165
>>80551197
That would be fucking spooky.
>>
>>80523600
When was the last time Ghost Busters was relevant though? I mean shit isn't most of the original cast dead, retired, or old as fuck?

Guess it is kinda true what they say. Women make gains only when males fail.

Joss in some fake reviews and rely on the people who hate it to be so digusted with the fetid pile of shit they won't want to go near it to leave a review, and the ignorant fucks who are delighted won't be able to stop gushing about it leaving positive reviews, and you have skewed and fake statistics like so.
>>
>>80526071
>>80526071


Why is guldan so sad?
>>
>>80552744
Only Ramis is dead. Moranis isn't touching it with a sixteen foot pole and the rest of the original cast apparently have background cameos.
>>
>>80526188
Everyone remembers "that's a big twinkie"
>>
>>80526107
>Meninist
I can't wait for this to piss off the Meninite community when they find out that these scags are basically running their name through the mud.

Too bad they aren't the type to use the internet or scream "religious persecution, oy vey"
>>
>>80526188
He's only in half the first movie and people try to forget the second one exists.
>>
>>80523600
DELETE THIS
>>
>>80533913
The article starts off seemingly well, but devolves into "it isn't the fault of the women it sucks, come on gynephobes!"
>>
>Rotten Tomatoes

Isn't this the same website that bashed American Psycho but some reviewers changed their mind and raised their rating after Christian Bale became more popular and recognized?

Their reviews have been leaning left for a while too. Picture related.
>>
>>80524420
Can't have people believing in ghosts. Next they might start believing that people have souls.
>>
>>80552744
Extreme Ghostbusters was a popular cartoon in the late 90's for kids that liked spooky.

Seriously check out their website, it is 100% 90's. My God it is like stepping back in time.
>>
>>80540553
>Minions
Drop her
>>
>>80523600

36 reviews of 2.

So basically no one has seen it, yet we judge it from that?

Fuck off cunt.
>>
>>80554211
The Heaven's Gate website is better, desu familia.
>>
File: 1.png (2 MB, 1862x521) Image search: [Google]
1.png
2 MB, 1862x521
>>80532435
It matters in that they were obviously pandering.

I don't care about all-female casts or Ghostbusters. I see this as a political move that should be mocked in any way possible.
>>
>>80547743
Because the original and the anime had a nigger character you stupid double nigger
>>
>>80554671
So was the original version of that image used at all in the movie?
>>
>>
>>80526576
Not true at all. Many temples were destroyed/damaged. Most notably confucion temples.
>>
File: gb.jpg (113 KB, 960x642) Image search: [Google]
gb.jpg
113 KB, 960x642
>>80554809
No. It was a promotional thing. They went to some children's hospital in costume and unintentionally made asses of themselves in front of terminally ill kids.
>>
>>80555307
Damn, I was hoping that it would be part of some montage or something in the movie showing them at work.
>>
>>80528760

That's, like, all the best stuff...
>>
>>80523600
same professional reviewers that gave it positive reviews were the ones that wrote the articles about the "sexist" negative feedback from trailers

Its trash
>>
>>80523600


I can't wait to see it. Looks like typical dumb summer popcorn flick


People that idolize 80's movies are delusional. They were just movies. Your nostalgia gives you bias
>>
File: Sensible Chuckle.gif (993 KB, 250x250) Image search: [Google]
Sensible Chuckle.gif
993 KB, 250x250
>>80555377
Underrated
>>
File: GB2.jpg (67 KB, 1280x720) Image search: [Google]
GB2.jpg
67 KB, 1280x720
>>80555377
If only.
>>
>>80555307

"your time has come little one"
>>
>>80552474
>>80544971

the porn at least had PEOPLE WHO LIKED GHOSTBUSTERS involved
>>
File: tyktyktykk.png (456 KB, 750x675) Image search: [Google]
tyktyktykk.png
456 KB, 750x675
>>80524674
now it's accurate
>>
File: cmplnc-ukaakdmj.jpg (81 KB, 529x705) Image search: [Google]
cmplnc-ukaakdmj.jpg
81 KB, 529x705
>>80523600
It takes more money to buy the entire market than to buy off one review site for opening weekend.
Thread replies: 255
Thread images: 74

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.