>the founding fathers knew weapons would advance so new guns are covered.
Ok prove it, do some research because there is none. The ment for muskets ONLY! And now you see why with all these shootings. All automatically loading guns must be banned for us to truly be considered a civilized society. it's long overdue American, let's have an honest discussion about gun control. We saw why in Dallas with the man using an SKS to kill 5 policemen.
>>80410141
>The ment for muskets ONLY!
Then why did they say "arms" instead of "muskets"?
also saged :^)
>>80410141
The founding fathers didn't know that advanced faggots would be posting on a message board online either, so do we remove your free speech and right to privacy because this didn't exist then?
Also, repeating (((HIGH CAPACITY))) rifles existed.
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Girandoni_air_rifle
Please end your life immediately, save air for the rest of us.
>>80410141
>It's a shitpost thread
>>80410141
>Ok prove it
Nah, come take them and die by the millions.
>>80410141
Actually the founding fathers and many others knew weapons technology would become much better.
#1 Example Belton Flintlock
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belton_flintlock
Year 1777 fired multiple shots
#2 Puckle Gun
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puckle_gun
#3 https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Tench_Coxe
Basically says citizens should have anything regular soldiers have.
There's more out there, mainly in letters written to each other but I can't do all your homework.
>>80410141
Guns for everyone, let Darwin take out overpopulation.
>>80410141
Rifles are only a fraction of total gun deaths. At the end of 2014, out of 11k murders, rifles accounted for 248 deaths. Blunt objects had more murders at 280.
Makes sense. Ban the rifles.
>>80410141
You're making the statement. You prove your conclusion. You have the burden of proof, not us.
>>80410141
You're welcome https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CquUBWHU2_s
>>80412758
Besides, the Chamberloader was accepted into Norwegian service in 1814, and at that point you could fire as fast as you could shove rounds into the gun.
(It was like the later German Dreyse needlegun, except that it was more accurate out to longer distances.)
So if you're talking about small arms in general, then you should have had this discussion right after the napoleonic wars. Which you didn't. So clearly there is some precedent.
OP is too busy sucking cocks to post a non bubba'd sks
>>80413146
Good God that is pure sex. I know this is /k/ of me but my last initial is S so my first child(boy or girl idgaf) is going to have the initials SKS for the shigles.
Alright, fine. Let us suppose for a moment that the second amendment only applies to the weaponry that was available at the time.
Well, abortions weren't available at the time, so those are no longer constitutionaly protected. In fact, radio, television, tv, Internet, email, phones, and cell phones all didn't exist then, so you are NOT free to say what you wish through them. And in fact, they're free to be searched at will, since the unreasonable search amendment only applies to things that existed at the time of course!
>>80413571
Stephen Karl S
>>80413955
Something like this but yes. For the Murdercube, it must be done.
>>80410141
The 1st amendment was meant for ink only, they didn't know such advanced speech would arise.
The only thing uncivilized about America is the niggers. Stop trying to legislate guns, start legislating niggers.
>>80410141
Ok cock fag, example one.
The Girardoni air rifle was in service with the Austrian army from 1780 to around 1815.
Magazine size, 20 rounds. Soldiers were also equipped with 2 additional reservoirs for a total of 3 (the one on the weapon)as a combat load.
Lewis and Clark took one west with them.
The bill of rights was ratified in 1789, the founders knew about this weapon yet did not stipulate it as restricted for ownership.
Can you guess why? They just survived a war with arguably the greatest military power on earth (with much help form the french), they understood the need for the citizenry to be well armed as to enable them to defend their freedom.
>1 POST BY THIS ID
>>80410141
>>80410141
>>80410141
Dumbfuck, the second amendment covered cannons, that's right full blown artillery, for civilians.
>>80410266
Praise kek
I give it a year before /pol/ goes full bootlicker and is demanding the confiscation of arms to protect our brave police. This board is easier to shift than reddit.
>>80410141
>>80415383
what about the repeating gun that Jefferson personally owned that had a 20 round magazine
The most amusing thing about this rhetoric (I know the thread is bait, but people do authentically advocate this shit) is that you can never nail down exactly what it is that's the problem.
> assault rifle!
An assault rifle specifically refers to having a select fire mechanism so you can switch between full and semi auto. Already banned.
> authors of constitution didn't have the benefit of knowing about semi-automatic, high-capacity rifles!
Jefferson had a Giradoni, as mentioned elsewhere in this thread. 20-round capacity, semi-auto rifle. of course, the point is moot because if you read the Federalist Papers and other correspondence, the whole point was that the government should fear the people.
> ban semi-automatic weapons! "automatic loading"!
semi-automatic means the next round is ready to go in the chamber without any input. revolvers are semi-automatic.
>>80415997
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Girandoni_air_rifle
>>80410141
Shut the fuck up. All I hear is yelling blah blah blah! Come and take them you fucking pussy! See where that gets you.
Obama Agenda Media "reports" the gun the Dallas Shooter was an SKS.
Is this a shot at banning all semi-auto rifles? No way this dude had an SKS and killed 5 cops......
Someone post the image where it says something like "When the founding fathers wrote the 2nd amendment, guns looked like this" and it shows a musket and then there's a reply "And tyranny looked like this" and it has a picture of some red coats.
>>80410141
OP, You sound intoxicated. Maye try to post something that makes sense after you sleep it off.
>>80416356
He wounder 12 more too
Yeah no way it was an SKS
>>80415997
Thank you, i will be making an update infograph :)
Inb4 dumb asshole op tells us that only the military should have guns....
>>80410141
The right to bear arms does not specify which type of arms are acceptable. Thus we should be allowed to use anything until liberals can find a way to override the Constitution.
