If evolution is a lie then the bible is true. prove me wrong
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqCx2j9Ig1I&index=14&list=PLDF03FD71FE7D634E
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4mal27etUPM&list=PLDF03FD71FE7D634E&index=10
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RaI72902vrQ
>protip
you can't
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xGisYvbLiI&list=PLDF03FD71FE7D634E&index=9
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZEQoGUj5L5A&index=18&list=PLDF03FD71FE7D634E
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjy413Fm5pI&list=PLDF03FD71FE7D634E&index=11
What evidence for evolution isn't there?
>>80388013
their is none.
Here's the deal. No one hates you. No one even dislikes you. You know that rambling homeless schizophrenic that you walk by on the way to work? You are the intellectual equivalent of that. If you say you are being persecuted in any meaningful way, you will be met with a chorus of laughter.
Christianity reflects a time where we, as humans, categorically knew less about the world. Do you acknowledge this?
>>80388105
Name the evidence you would need.
The Bible says and you might check it out on page one: Earth was created in 7 days. Yet day and night were only created on the 4th day. So how was it the 4th day when it really was the first day?
Autism.
Check and mate.
>>80388199
Anything, they have yet to give any evidence at all for their theory.
>>80387490
B-but the animals fossils that I arbitrarily put in sequence are the proof of evolutionism...
>>80388406
>makes bold statements on a topic when he's never learned anything about it
No wonder you're a christcuck.
>>80388406
Ok, wow, you're just dumb then.
>>80388721
>biology
>arbitrary
>>80387490
https://youtu.be/KnJX68ELbAY
Posting the foundational falsehoods of creationism
>>80387490
https://youtu.be/ZFrkjEgUDZA
>>80388721
You really no nothing of evolution? We have evidence for evolution, amino acid sequencing, the fact that we know mutations happen, animals adapting, natural selection. Evolution is a scientific fact. The world cannot exist 6,000 years ago, we have dated fossils and trees older than that. We have found evidence of everything evolution has to offer. The human ancestry line is actually complete, vestigial organs, these all suggest animals change over time.
https://youtu.be/fnj7PlqmJ5o
https://youtu.be/80nhqGfN6t8
but what are the proofs of creationism?
https://youtu.be/HzmbnxtnMB4
>>80387490
>If evolution is a lie then the bible is true. prove me wrong
Well, you're wrong in the first step. If evolution is a lie then the Koran is true, since Jesus was a false prophet.
Prove ME wrong.
>>80389822
Creationism is outright contradicted https://youtu.be/g8Q2Db17v5U
https://youtu.be/t3k0dDFxkhM
https://youtu.be/TU-7d06HJSs
https://youtu.be/5MXTBGcyNuc
>>80387490
>>80388105
There is literally so much evidence I don't even know what to share with you:
-Vestigial organs,
-microevolution,
-controlled cases of macroevolution under observable conditions,
-genetic evidence,
-fossil evidence,
-embryonic evidence,
-selective breeding (dogs alone prove gradual change through selecting pressure),
-homology, and morphology.
I mean, what more do you want? Literally every facet of what I mentioned has a vast amount of critical research attached to it. Observable evidence. It's real.
All of you shut the fuck up or take it to /his/ or /b/.
>>80389641
Micro evolution is a fact, but macro evolution (one species turning in to another) is not, and never was scientifically tested.
>>80388406
their evidence is actually that different animals have extremely similar bone structures and body parts.
But they imply that a creator would never make things with similar designs, and that is just grasping at straws
>>80390503
Not true faggot. There have been a few cases of macro-evolution observed in controlled environments which introduced diversity into an otherwise homogenous starting species.
Honestly just don't talk if you have no clue what you are talking about.
>>80390503
You're not going to be able to observe these changes happening you autist. But there is more than enough evidence that suggest we have. Vestigial structures, homologous structures. Why do whales have a tail bones? Whales are mammals. Species don't just randomly change into a new species, its a very gradual change dependent on allele frequencies. Speciation, if you were to split two groups of the same species, over time they would begin to look more different. Why is it that life 500mya is very simple when compared to life now? What is amino acid sequencing?
>>80390570
We have evidence that not all animals came into existence at one point in time. If that were true we would find human fossils dated back to dinosaur remains, or dogs with trilobites. We don't. We can find ancestors to these species based on their homologous structures. We also caj see how closely related animals are to eachother based on their amino acid sequence. There is no evidence that an external force forces these changes, these changes happen randomly due to genetic mutations. This happens naturally, along with meiosis, which also happens naturally, it is necessary for genetic diversity and nothing suggest their is an external force manipulating it.
>>80388382
a day has 24 hours god the creator of time probably knew that
tip it
>>80390797
You didn't even know what is macro and micro evolution, go back to your 7th grade science class, worthless shit.
>>80391118
>You're not going to be able to observe these changes happening you autist.
So you admit it was not scientifically tested. Good.
>But there is more than enough evidence
evidence =/= proof
>>80392524
Evolution = change in the frequency of alleles within a population over generations, if you seriously don't think this happens on the macro level you're a fucking retard.
>>80392266
The day didn't have 24 hours until recently. It only got 12 hours in Roman time, and the length of those hours varied with the seasons.
But that doesn't matter, you haven't read the short Bible passage. According to Gemesis 1, before the 4th day there was no day. Only from the forth day on could days be counted.
>>80392385
LMAO. Confirmed you are a fucking moron. Do you not realize we have actually observed macro-evolution happening in controlled environments?
Houde, A. E. (1988) "Genetic differences in female choice between two guppy populations." Animal Behavior 36: 510-516.
http://www.mta.ca/~raiken/Courses/3401/Labs/Lab%20Papers/guppy3.pdf
This is just one of many, many well done pieces of research that clearly illustrate macro evolution happening in lab controlled populations in different environments with various selecting pressures.
Seriously shut your fucking mouth you are a stupid jungle nigger who obviously has no clue what they are talking about.
______
ncomplete Speciation observed in natural places based on geography:
There are countless cases of distinct species which can, in unusual or limited circumstances, form hybrids. One example is the West European carrion crow (Corvus corone) and the Asian hooded crow (Corvus cornix), which have distinct ranges meeting in a narrow "hybrid zone". Another are the Platte river species of sucker fish of the Catostomus genus which live together and only rarely interbreed (Futuyma 1998, p. 454).
One of the most striking instances of partial or incomplete speciation are the numerous "ring species" (for review see Irwin et al. 2001). Ring species, such as the salamander Ensatina, form a chain of interbreeding populations which loop around some geographical feature; where the populations meet on the other side, they behave as completely different species. In the case of Ensatina, the subspecies form a ring around the Central Valley of California—the subspecies freely interbreed and hybridize on the east, west, and north sides of the valley, but where they coexist on the south side they are incapable of hybridizing and act as separate species (Moritz et al. 1982; Futuyma 1998, pp. 455-456).
>>80392936
I don't believe in your atheistic religion LEL, sorry.
>>80393521
Nice mental masturbation there, but tell me where are the proofs.
> muh genetics is real
> but evolution isn't
wew
>>80393100
And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day
>And the evening and the morning were the first day.
this is after each day its almost like the bible wants us to know that it is a day with a morning and evening
>>80394469
>Observe something happening
>Evidence in every single field of observational science supports the theory of evolution
>Microevolution is a fact
>Genetic information clearly shows evolution
>Embryonic development clearly shows evidence of evolution
>We have body parts that no longer serve a purpose which used to at one point
>We have selectively bred animals for specific reasons
>We support the world with agriculture based on breeding successful plants
>Fossil evidence
At this point I am convinced you are trolling. Evolution is one of the most sound, credible scientific theories ever conceived.
But yes, clearly all this empirical, physical, and observable evidence means nothing and it's surely the work of a God who created the world 6,000 years ago. kek
>>80394790
Not quite there. Counting only began three days later.
And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years:
15 And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so.
16 And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also.
17 And God set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth,
18 And to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness: and God saw that it was good.
19 And the evening and the morning were the fourth day.
>>80395100
>Evidence in every single field of observational science supports the theory of evolution
lol no
Information, like those in the DNA, cannot be created spontaneously, the only explanation is that there needed to be a creator.
Evolutionists cannot explain the irredutional complexity too.
The micro evolution only happens because and with the actual genes, the mutations never create any new information that enables the appearance of new species.
