http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2016-07/09/c_135499439.htm

>>80356780
>Germany will lead

so after 1941, they have the nerve to put soldiers at russias border again?

history repeats itself

>>80356780
Well the weather's mostly shit, so we got that covered

This is hella bad, war seems more likely than ever when you take into account what FBI-anon said.

>>80356780
>Battalion
Pls i expect no less than a Brigade or division considering natos size.. cmon.

>>80356780
NATO Would Lose A War To Russia Within 36 to 60 Hours
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/06/23/nato-cant-protect-baltics-from-russia-says-us-general/

>>80357685
who?
ans what did he say?

>>80356780
why do we have to constantly fuck with Russia? Can't we get along?

>>80356780
They let migrants depart from Lybia towards their death in the sea instead of occupying it and actually solve the refugee crysis. Yet they deploy in Estonia? Hell they're fucking stupid if world safety is the real goal. But wait, it isn't

>80358034
Those are just trigger forces, to draw said countries into war with Russia if they attempt something.

>>80358034
In the Baltics... In a conventional war, we would absolutely push their shit in and to doubt that is delusional.

That said, I don't want to kill Russians.

>>80357783
If they did that it would probably trigger a panic response from Russia

>>80356780
We should deny

>>80358935
>we

who are you again? youre not doing anything here.

Remember guys, Russia want war

>>80356780
That'll work against 25 Russian divisions.