Check mate gun-nuts. It's over.
>>80345768
>Jewish shaming and ridicule tactics
Not working here rabbi.
Daily reminder a handful of Aussie posters are literally JIDF shills. Watch all kinds of shilling happen now.
>>80345768
I'm literally the only important person. I don't know what you're talking about.
>Poison the population
>Have no population
>Government becomes pointless
Good plan.
>>80345768
>b-baka. it's not that I want to disarm you or anything...
That's the most pathetic edgelord shit I've read all day.
If nobody is necessary, who cares if a gun owner kills another person?
>>80345768
> guns magically make the chewing tobacco and mountain dew poison poisonous.
> libertarian logic right here, gentlemen
i have guns to protect myself from crazy fucking people like the one in OP's post. if the govt turns into those fucking crazy people, so be it.
>HEY NIGGER NOT MY FUCKING MOUNTAIN DEW N CHEWIN TEEBACCEE WHAT THE FUCK ER YOU?
le eternal hillbilly strikes again
>>80346247
>population
>chewing tobacco and mountain dew
The evil government is only going to poison the hostile rednecks in this person's fantasy. The rest of everyone will then be free to live in a progressive utopia filled with whole foods and and skinny soy lattes.
>>80345768
>that flag
is australia finally back to out-shitpost the fucking leaf?
>>80345768
>you cant stop the government
>single guy with ar15 shuts down a major city and kills several cops
If 100 guys with rifles attacked Dallas that night the fighting would still be going on.
We surround them
>>80345768
>grow up
anyone tired of the preachy nagging tone of all of these things. does being patronizing make your arguments more correct or something?
>>80345768
>>80345768
since when is a platitude ever an argument?
>>80346898
It does in the minds of libcucks.
Everyone who doesn't agree with you is inferior, uneducated, childish. You are always right, you can do no wrong. You have the moral high ground. Emotions and assumptions are more valuable than facts and rationality.
>>80345768
wtf? I hate guns now!
>>80345768
Socalists are just going to have to give up on gun control.
There is no justifiable reason for socialism to be in our country at all. Hobby, fetish and tradition are not worth the risk to our society.
And don't even start the pedantic definition debate. I don't give a goddamn what you call it. Don't even start, that has precluded reform far too long.
Any ideology capable killing a million of people before any can get out, of kidnapping and murdering thousands of LGBT folks, capable of overpowering a rational police force and picking off political opponents does not belong in the mind of any citizen. No matter how well adjusted, clean or quiet.
We are a grown up society, a country capable of changing. Change isn't always comfortable. But, just as the people got on board or got left behind throughout the civil rights movement, women's movement and the marriage equally movement, among so many others, the people are ready to reject socalism. We've had enough.
Conservative social reform is a civil rights movement. It is a social movement. Those movements always move forward, even with set backs. Get on board.
>>80345768
That's really dystopian, I think after the first few deaths from Mountain Dew some questions would be raised.
Don't trust Australian's.
>>80346918
>extends militia status to LGB.....(etc)
You do know how cucked you would be if you actually tried to have fags fight don't you? Just because someone says it can be done doesn't mean it's a good idea
>>80346865
Fucking kek! If 100 guys attacked Dallas the military would've stomped the flat. Or they could rain hellfire down on them. Or roll over them in tanks. There is precisely shit all in your piddling civilian arsenal that you can use to take on a first world military you delusional cuck.
I'm not suggesting this is true, but it's an interesting read regardless.
>>80347386
Depends
In the case of uprising against a totalitarian leftist regime the military may actually be in support of the uprising (military types hate leftist/libcuck types)
If 100 niggers went on a spree they would be there until a side ran out of food. They wouldn't drop an air strike because muh civilians and for boots on US soil requires a presidential authorization. Like hell Obama would let the army go after niggers
The problem with you Brits is you trust the authorities. If you knew how long the police take to respond even in a big city here you'd want some kind of firearm too
oops
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MW_noXjj6w8
>>80345768
>grow up
lol every time
>>80345768
Wow it's true I'm btfo I'm gonna go kill some Austrians to get on tv now
>>80347386
Poe's Law sure is a humdinger.
>>80345768
If people believe there is a grand scheme, they wouldn't be using chew or drinking the liquid Jew
LOOK AT THE FLAG. >>80345768
>>80345768
>>80347551
Honestly if a civil war does break out for better or for worse we better hope Russia goes in. Why? Nukes. That's always the biggest fear. If the US government were to basically cease to exist who would have control of the nuclear weapons?
What if that is the plan all along? To leave the nukes unguarded and in anyone's hands? A US civil war could quickly become a global nuclear war if the wrong people were to gain control of even a few nukes and set them off in the right places
For better or worse We better hope Russia secures the nukes. At least they arent Islamic or a death cult and they likely would not glass the world with them
>>80345768
They don't want to disarm, yet.
They're going for bans and other restrictions, then try to confiscate.
>>80345768
>If government wanted you dead you'd be dead
>If muslims wanted you dead you'd be dead
>So just roll over and don't resist
I thought it was easy to get rid of me, why do you need me to not resist?
>>80345768
>the government can magically poison your stuff
kys
The revolutionary war was won, wasn't it?
>>80348138
Vlad, what are you doing in Canada, lmao?
>>80345768
Why did you switch from "/pol/ BTFO"
Getting bored? Need a change? What about the "How can white boies even compete" threads? Do those still make you happy?
>copy fight club speech
>retailor it for statist bootlicking purposes
Wow I am now a shill4hill
ive posted this so many times I should just start copy and pasting it in every gun thread
how are you going to disarm a population of 318 million+ population continent with over 300 million guns scattered all around.
How the fuck are you going to disarm the US
You can't. Even if you dedicated a whole task force to search every home and looking for guns you'd only make a dent in the true # that are out there.
It's impossible to remove guns from the US, that is why we have them, to protect ourselves. Why is this so hard for some people to understand?
so what's the deal, do we really have summerfriends who feel compelled to respond to these threads or are the responses also shills trying to rope people in?
>>80348298
You don't get it
Anyone with a brain knows how dangerous a civil war in a nuclear weapons state would be. I'm pretty sure America also has plans for securing Russian nukes in the event of a civil war there
>>80348565
they don't want to use logic and have discourse, they just want to strawman and make up statistics or narratives and name call and try to shame and try to tell you you're stupid, classic liberal tactics.
they are scum, more people here need to call out shills, they have been lately everywhere and they have been getting lazy and being real obvious. I've had enough of it.
>>80348465
Hell there are even far more guns in Canada than the government knows about. Banning some classes of gun just drove them underground
Around 300mil is the official number. Imagine how many unofficial guns are in the US?
Out of the official number tell me how many guns would you say are useful in combat?
>>80348631
I honestly fear what might happen to russias nukes in case of a civil war, if suddenly some retard manages to trigger the Perimeter system.
>>80348859
exactly, the 300m is probably registered, that doesn't count military reserves, unregistered guns, guns that were passed down in families, etc
it's just so naive I don't get it
be proactive about guns, not fucking unrealistic
>>80348565
Its good practice, honestly. You have to debate these sorts of shillings in real life, and if you end up just stuttering and going "S-shal not i-infringe", you have already lost.
Every shill is a training opportunity for the masses.
>>80348674
Who is this semen demon?
Why do liberals live in this fictional fantasy land where only retarded southerners support gun rights? Don't they know their exemplar Karl Marx was a gunfag?
