Why don't people just smoke in public enclosed spaces? No seriously, why? What are they going to do?
>fines
They should have no right to fine you.
>kick you out
They shouldn't have a right to do that either. Smoking doesn't harm other people, the fact that it's banned is ridiculous. It's like banning body odor.
>>80341836
>Smoking doesn't harm other people
It harms my nasal cavities you fucking chimney. Go puff puff out in the cold like the rest of the filthy animals.
>>80341953
No it doesn't you fucking priss. Discomfort isn't the same thing as scientific proof of harm.
Recently I went to Las Vegas and people gave me shit for smoking there. One of the casino employees started complaining that the smell of my smoke stunk.
I said "It's Vegas, baby" and laughed.
The people I went with gave me shit for smoking too. "You're smoking? I can't believe that you're smoking!" They acted like I snorted cocaine or something. Bunch of fuckin' lames.
>>80346321
Wait, people aren't allowed to smoke in Casinos in Vegas?
Your head should be chopped off for smoking. When you smoke, you harm those around you 80% of the harm you do to yourself.
>>80346466
Smoking is allowed. By "gave me shit" I mean they complained about it. The female employee of the casino made a "disgusting smell" motion with her hand about my smoking and said she didn't like smoking around her.
It actually kind of bothers me that the people I went with gave me shit for smoking. I didn't fuck any call girls. I didn't use any illegal drugs. I fucking smoked tobacco!
>>80346564
Man what the hell is wrong with Romanians.
>When you smoke you harm those around you.
No, this isn't true.
http://www.smokescreens.org/secondhand-smoke-firsthand-lies/
>>80346682
You harm them almost as much as you harm yourself. Educate yourself on secondhand smoking.
http://ash.org.uk/files/documents/ASH_597.pdf
Smoking disgusts me, but it should be up to a business owner whether or not it's permitted inside. I can always eat somewhere else. So can a smoker.
>It's like banning body odor
You should absolutely be free to kick someone out for being hygienically offensive.
>>80341836
>Smoking doesn't harm other people
Yes it does, you fucking idiot.
Stop ignoring science, Burger.
>>80341836
I can understand why people don't like it. It's just legal enforcement of polite behaviour for a large part
What I can't understand is why we can't have smoking rooms and why smoke-free outdoor spaces exist.
>>80346673
I know that feel. I never used to smoke until recently, only had a single cigarillo on special occasions, but I always got shat on for it.
>>80346682
Romania is one of the few countries I've been to where smoking laws were vastly unfollowed. Nice place, Gypsies aren't all that bad.
>>80345359
>Hmm it feels bad, must not be bad though, I should stop listening to my body
>>80346682
Do you have anything that isn't an anti-science conspiracy theory blog that borders on religiosity? Oh wait, this is /pol/.
>>80341836
>>80345359
I smoke a pack a day and have smoked since I was 14.
With that said, you're a fucking retard. Of course second hand smoke is harmful, just as smoking is harmful. Business have every right to prevent people from lighting up.
And out door smoke-less area's arond businesses ALWAYS say 15-20 feet away from the store, because it's still their property.
>>80346682
>american education
>>80341836
non smokers have a right to not breathe in smoke.
but there also should be pubs and bars that are ok to smoke in. Most people who drink heavily smoke as well. Why cant they continue to allow that? it kinda feels lacking if you go to a old crummy cosy pub but you cant smoke inside.
>>80346825
>ash.
I'm sure with a name like that they're awfully trustworthy.
>>80346919
No it doesn't, fool.
http://www.naturalnews.com/030820_Surgeon_General_cigarette_smoke.html
https://www.sott.net/article/272154-50-years-after-the-flawed-US-Surgeon-Generals-report-ALL-health-problems-are-still-being-blamed-on-smoking
http://www.smokershistory.com/SGHDlies.html
>>80347353
>Implying breathing in smoke is natural and will have no negative effects.
Do you have autism or something? I'm 100% serious.
>>80347011
it's funny how burgers on this board always drone on how the zionist economical conspiracy controls all media and whatnot.
and then they post that quote by 1 scientist in a billion that actually doubts human induced global warming. or post that one study in a billion that says smoking doesnt harm you.
geeee, I wonder if the idea that smoking is bad for you / global warming is human induced might be threatening to certain economical powers, like, I dunno, right the top of my hat, how about the FUCKING MASSIVE fossil fuel industry and the tobacco industry.
how much of a fucking tool can you even be, fucking american fucktards are worse than muslims
>>80347561
Actually read the fucking links, I know you didn't.
Secondhand smoking isn't actually a thing. When it's in the air it's oxidized and the particles people breathe in when they smoke are broken down, eliminating the health """""risk""""" associated with passive smoking.
http://www.smokescreens.org/chemistry.htm
They're just now finding out smoking and secondhand smoke being harmful to the point of causing anything more than discomfort is a lie.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/danielfisher/2013/12/12/study-finds-no-link-between-secondhand-smoke-and-cancer/#630f6f8e623f
>>80347621
Are you really suggesting that just because something is a corporate interest means it can be corrupt? Are you pulling the shill gambit right now?
>>80341836
How about, it is against the Law.
