How do we de-normalise casual sex?
Previous thread >>80235891
>>80259847
>So whats the alternative? Repress people's murderous urges and have a bunch of frustrated, pent up uber Christians running around committing even more murderous acts behind closed doors? Call it degenerate all you like, you know as well as I do that the urge to murder is as human as the urge to provide for ones children and ensure the security of your home. Also, have you noticed that without fail, every group that tries to control how other people treat their lives usually has some insipid agenda?
Just wanted to reply and fix the post of the guy who posted this in the last thread
>answer is anime
>/pol/ so dumb they need 2 threads to find out
racists are really dumb, huh?
>>80261124
Isn't anime just self-infantilisation?
Go to Church and eat your vitamins. Be an example to others. It's all you can do.
Kind of sad when being a counter-cultural rebel these days means waiting until marriage before you have sex.
>>80260363
MORE AIDS
Public shaming.
Public shaming fixes pretty much everything as long as the person being shamed has the mental capacity to feel shame.
That's why liberals get so much done, you don't even need to pass laws as long as you can prevent people from shaming bad acts, and if you can get people to encourage bad acts then the war is already lost.
>>80261508
>and if you can get people to encourage bad acts then the war is already lost.
Remember that the war you yourself are fighting is a war for goodness and sanity, not a war for people who willingly fight against it
Shut down or stop using the Internet.
If not possible, form a neo-luddite group dedicated to raising children the pre-industrial way
without public schools, screens and technology the Jew has no influence.
the Amish are doing the right thing.
4chan is a major part of the problem
don't pretend you're exempt.
People here who want a serious discussion should consider making a new community with higher standards for discussion
. 4chan is a den of filth and just being here encourages immorality and lack of shame.
>>80261272
Don't fall for the "counter cultural' meme even if in this case you're doing the right thing.
But seeing it as any form of rebellion means you will sway easily if the pendulum ever goes back the other way. Being anti-"normal" is a trap.
>>80260363
Post-happening western countries are going to experience a surge of traditionalism after the people begin to blame degeneracy for what happened. We can't "do it," it will happen naturally after the troubles are over.
>>80261508
This.
>>80261508
Do people not realize that the Internet killed the effectiveness of public shaming?
The fact that people can hide behind a screen, say one thing and do another without ever being seen is inherently destructive to society.
As much as this truth hurts, anonymity online, and really the personal computer paradigm in general has to go. People need to stop feeling safe from shame in their rooms.
>>80260363
you can't
it's far too easy in this day and age. Even with the shame aspect, people just don't give a fuck. Now is the era of hedonism. Delete the internet and remove rapid transit.
>>80262647
The Internet , and technology in general is the biggest barrier to shaming currently in existence. It's why the poorest communities have less of an issue with it until their kids go to school.
Essentially the screen is like a condom for your mind. It lets people engage in all sorts of mental filth while "protecting" themselves from the consequences or shame it used to have.
>>80262516
I didn't agree with you in the last thread, but I agree with this
>>80262516
It's not that I want to be anti-normal but if you engage in casual sex, you become part of the problem. The only solution is not be part of the problem, which is pretty counter-cultural because it's going against the normal society.
a virgin who wants to denormalize casual sex?
>>80260363
Something something bible Something something kill the jews something stop porno ect..
>>80262861
You hit the nail on the head.
Even mass easy transportation could be seen as part of the same trend of globalization, destruction of tradition and basically building the new Tower of Babel.
the Industrial Revolution was where it all started. the City was always the devil's domain (Cain built the first city) and modern technology and modernist ideology actually go hand in hand.
Few people are willing to address this basic truth. They like to pretend that technology and morality are never related but they VERY OBVIOUSLY are and they're in major denial
>>80262940
I don't. and I'm fairly certain I will be celibate for life because I don't see myself as fit for marriage either.
>>80262881
>>80262727
>>80262252
But here is where I still disagree
Don't you see that the way we've constructed the internet to work for us is a manifestation of our cultural liberalism and not a principal source of it?
>>80262940
Really, I see even marrying in this day and age to be part of the problem, because the way we were raised makes it near impossible to truly be a good father, and if I did have kids I would have to completely shun technology and society.
I see celibacy as the best option available now
>>80263258
I am very much the same, but personally I don't think there is "fit for marriage" material, anyone can get married.
>>80263348
Well yes of course.
But a non-Liberal internet would be so radically different (as in, no anonymity at all, and treated just like the public street, with your real face on everything)
that pretty much nobody today would EVER think of it as a good idea.
4chan doesn't like to hear that internet anonymity is inherently leftist and destructive but it really is.
>>80263538
I'm diagnosed autistic. I know what happens to autistic fathers and that they fail to raise children properly and have a higher divorce rate than mixed-race couples even. I don't want to burden my children with this.
AIDS
>>80260363
Bring back the concept of Western Shame culture.
Publically denounce whores, loudly.
>>80263348
maybe it wasn't an initial source, but you can't deny its place in the feedback loop at this point. Women's lib and early gay rights happened pre-internet, but I guarantee you that we wouldn't be having conversations about the transsexual meme if not for the internet.
>>80263569
I don't think it's anonymity that's the problem exactly, it's compartmentalization and self-obsession.
>>80263569
What I disagree with you on is the idea that the structure of the internet is a cause, rather than a manifestation, of the cancer that is within the Western collective psyche
>>80263723
how is this possible as long as the Internet allows this "privacy" that lets everyone evade shame?
Nothing short of a complete restructuring of the Net would make this possible.
As in, make it such that it's required by law to disclose internet history to employers and future marital partners.
>>80263784
>compartmentalization and self-obsession.
that's the natural result of anonymity and "privacy" behind screens.
If everyone's internet communications had the same ramifications as talking to someone in the street this wouldn't happen.
>>80263690
That's sensible of you then.
I'm not just meaning the pair of us though, I'm talking about anybody and everybody has the potential to be a good father, just like we all have the potential to be a bad one, but generally, the only point I really wanted to make was about the casual sex, and waiting until marriage. We need to live in a society which respects those traditional Christian values again, this society doesn't. It's hedonistic and truly awful.
>>80260363
buy everyone anime body pillows
>>80263956
I'm starting to believe that simply going on 4chan is anti-traditional and mentally poisoning.
I'm considering not owning a computer sometime soon and actually seeing how much I really can abandon technology. Thing is I'm a software engineer so I'm kind of bound into the evil system.
>>80263784
Sure, I can accept that. But we'd have to both agree that, in order to socially fix the West, we would have to cut out the tumour that is at the root of all of this "progressive" dogma
Namely, the almost complete loss of faith in, and desire for sanity
>>80264178
it's pretty obvious that 4chan's base culture is rooted in loss of sanity and nihilism and always was really.
>>80263690
To some degree I know this feel. I honestly mostly want to date to raise a family, but I don't feel like I would be a good father and head of the household.
Probably the only two things keeping me going is first I'd probably off myself if I thought there was no hope of me raising a family, its been my dream since childhood, so I may as well try.
Second, I could have literally knock a girl up and leave her and I still wouldn't be as destructive as my own father. I would literally have to actively harm my own family to be as bad as him. I have a pretty fucking low bar to leap over.
>>80260363
just remove the genitals of all the male minorities
and everything will return to normal.
>>80263834
Policing the net isn't possible, or even a good idea.
More over, the internet isn't the problem. Yes, porn has consequences. Yes, whores sending pictures over the internet is a red flag.
Despite those things, you can't have casual sex over the internet, it's simply not possible. That should be the biggest point of concern.
Plus, bringing back shame culture, while it wouldn't entirely eradicate internet whoredom, does bring back the concept of people policing themselves, even online, to a certain degree.
Porn and slutty girls will always exist. That's not the issue. We just have to push this stuff underground, and not let it have a widespread effect on polite society.
>>80260363
>How do we de-normalise casual sex?
delete all social media
>>80263956
The other thing I wanted to ask is what is anon's opinions on arranged marriages?
I've had one relationship in the past (never had sex in it) and it was with someone from a traditional Indian family.
What I learned from seeing her relatives' families was that really, having the parents be involved in formal courtship is something very valuable, and something the West has only suffered from abandoning.
>>80264262
Not so much /pol/ really. Huge blocs of it is pro- social and individual objective sanity
>>80264386
That's not true though. Casual sex isn't a new thing.
This shit has been going on since the cultural Marxist revolution of the 1960s.
Technology isn't the problem. The moral standards of society are.
...why is casual sex wrong again?
>>80264500
are they really?
I think most of /pol/ is hypocrites who pretend to be moral but don't practice what they preach
Sharia law bruv
>>80263949
anonymity would be fine if people were capable of self restraint and intellectual honesty
if people were capable of self restraint and intellectual honesty, we wouldn't need the anonymity
I don't know how to solve it.
>>80264346
>you can't have casual sex on the internet
No, but you can carry out all of the social heavy lifting of finding a partner on the internet. A married person can be seen out in public looking for someone to cheat with. With the internet, you can pull all that shit off privately.
>>80264652
Most people aren't capable of these things anymore.
Anonymity must be completely eliminated for a generation or two. This won't happen which is why I think a large group of people raising children away from the Internet completely is what is needed.
>>80260363
>no fun allowed
eat a dick you fucking kike
>>80264596
See:
>>80263723
More over, the science used to justify casual sex has always been faulty. It ignores the effects of diminishing returns on Oxytocin. Additionally, Dr. Kinsey (Who was at the forefront of the modern sexual revolution), compared the human orgasm to a sneeze, and tried to pass of surveys of prostitutes, and convicted sex offenders as the private behaviors of middle America.
Oh, and his work was also funded by the (((Rockefeller Foundation))).
>>80264617
No one can perfectly practice what they preach. But even knowing what is right, and even believing that something can be objectively right, is a huge step in fixing the tumour at the heart of the West
>>80264652
Also anonymity actually actively encourages people to be dishonest. The temptation to hide things they don't want others to hear is too hard to avoid. Human nature is wicked , and the more abstractions to consequences the more this will come out
>>80264652
The internet's not the problem even then, the fact that adultery hasn't been criminalized is.
>>80264596
-hypergamy
-delays the formation of family unit and destabilises it
-herpes
>>80264857
Is fun more valuable than sanity?
>>80264958
Criminalizing adultery in this day and age would require a strong control of the Internet.
Maybe even sex-segregating the net itself.
>>80260363
I vote for robot girlfriends. Then I don't have to worry about being cucked or having my bank acct rekt.
>>80265063
No, it wouldn't.
Enforcing moral values is not synonymous with being a luddite.
>>80265198
Transhumanism is the ultimate agenda of the globalist/kike elite. They want a virtual world where all consequences of sin are remove and man can act like God. Don't fall for it.
This is really what's gotten me so scared about technology and guilty about my own job as a programmer.
>>80265063
Don't want to seem rude, but I know that autism can make you obsess over a concept or idea
Perhaps you're refusing to accept the proposed alternatives partly because of an obsession over yours
>>80260363
demonize what you cannot have.There is nothing wrong with casual sex.It will get " worse " in the future, it is just a beginning.
>>80260363
I am a libertarian so i don't understand why I can't do things with my own body.
I like chicks and fembois so fuck off. If I wanted to fuck five fembois that is my thing. They can't get pregnate and as long as I pop truvada I don't get hiv. If the femboi is on female hormones too they look ever more fem and smell like a girl while having nice soft girly skin.
Girls are cool too, but they are not into as much casual sex. I like the feel of a vagina more, but honestly quantity vs quality I would pick the femboi. They put out much much much more than a girl does.
>>80265654
>demonize what you cannot have
Bulverism
>There is nothing wrong with casual sex
Why do you think this?
>>80260363
THEN HOW WILL WE HAVE QUALITY PORN
>>80265418
You're probably right. I'm obsessed with this because the Internet and technology is so deeply tied to my own life and career.
>>80265336
But why? I'm not saying I don't want to procreate. I would just buy a kid using artificial insemination in a rented girl.
DESU this is my irl plan, I'm not getting married, it's too dangerous to my potential offspring. I will only be having girlfriends and kids which I purchased from a clinic.
Robot wifus would just be a sweet bonus.
>>80264868
Casual sex =\= promiscuity
If people want to fuck each other let them. Promiscuity has and will always be undesirable in a person. Fuck sluts, marry women, it's not hard.
>>80265823
destabilize the world so your dopamine rushes can be satiated. degenerate fuck, truvada wont save you.
>>80265654
This. Only virgins give a fuck about this, the same way only poor people give a fuck about how much money the 1% have.
>>80260363
OP, what is wrong with casual sex? Please explain.
>>80265336
>guilty about my own job as a programmer.
I had a short stint in IT working with databases and I completely agree. "Big Data" allows a level of moral distancing that really creeps me out.
>>80265912
I have no problem with a heavily regulated vice industry. I just don't want disney channel peddling sex simulacra to tween girls. South Koreans are rediculous smokers, but you can't show people smoking cigarettes on korean tv. I'm totally fine with that. You can DO it, but make it clear that it's a vice and not just "the way it is."
>>80265823
>I am a libertarian so i believe there should be no limit to the things I can do with my own body.
Does that mean you're right to believe this
To the anon who is hell bent on destroying the internet: the focal point of this thread is about casual sex. The internet just provides more ways to achieve casual sex, but people cannot have sex with the internet.
Shutting down the internet does nothing, as it can be used as a shaming tool against people who engage in casual hookups.
The problem is outside of the internet, in the real world, where people are fucking each other for the sake of fucking, and dragging society down with them.
>>80266177
It's for casuals.
>>80266177
It's purely a raw hedonistic pleasure, that leads to this >>80264983 and this >>80263723
>>80260363
You don't. You don't have the right to tell other people what they can/can't do with their own bodies.
We already have a sexually ignorant nation. Things are bad enough as it is without your stupidity. You're either a bitter christian virgin, or a pedo muslim. Either way, fuck off.
>>80266264
you're right and I'm sorry for derailing the thread.
I'm just going on and on about the Internet because I have no real world experience with even pursuing casual sex. I only see the effects of it on social media.
>>80266121
>implying you wouldn't hit this.
>what's wrong with casual sex
It's cynical/dog morality. Just go shit in the street with pajeet. Why not? Why maintain personal hygiene? Why exercise?
>>80266530
this is why I seriously consider leaving 4chan for good.
The majority of people even on /pol/ are like you . 4chan has this poisonous culture of "you're here forever" like crabs in a bucket, like there really aren't better , saner places online to discuss topics like this.
>>80266274
Filthy casuls, bet they can't speedrun sex like me
>>80266598
the irony is that the one thing India has right is marriage.
They have the parents arrange it. They don't fall for the Western "dating" trap (well it's definitely spreading but historically it's newer there).
I think there's very real benefits to arranged marriages. The idea of "soul mates" is bullshit, marriage is about sacrifice and not about compatibility. Orthodox Jews in the US do it too
>>80266442
>You don't have the right to tell other people what they can/can't do with their own bodies.
And why shouldn't I have this right?
>Things are bad enough as it is without your stupidity.
Describe what you see as these "bad enough" things
>You're either a bitter christian virgin, or a pedo muslim.
It doesn't matter. All that matters is if I'm right or wrong
>Either way, fuck off.
No
>>80266121
This is even better.
See how nicely this femboi looks? so hot....
>>80266701
fuck off and go fuck a femboi
>>80266598
>t. virgin
>>80260363
You don't. Liberalism and all this SJW cultural marxist shit is a pandoras box. You can't close pandoras box.
You have to buckle down and wait for the storm to pass. Only then can you observe the wreckage and begin to rebuild.
Nobody is going to listen to your noise complaints when the party is still going strong.
>>80266598
I agree, manners are one humans way of showing respect for another.
>>80266935
Boner pls
>>80267028
It's an interesting way to rationalise not doing anything, but I agree with you
I myself and ordinary people can't do much until it completely brakes down
>>80267131
what's your take on 4chan and anonymity?
this place is the antithesis to manners and proper discussion.
>>80260363
Casual Sex is fine.
Sexual Promiscuity (for both males and females) is not and leads to the breakdown of the family unit and plummeting birthrates.
>>80267131
What do manners and politeness have to do with it?
>meet girl
>go for dinner
>attracted to each other
>fuck
>go separate ways after a good experience
What's wrong with that? It's not like rutting in the streets or some shit.
>>80267376
>Casual Sex is fine.
Not in the case of women. See >>80263723
This thread is a perfect example of how /r9k/ ruined /pol/ by turning it into "Nu-males on the alt-right: The Board"
>>80267626
how is it OK for men? It takes two to tango. I agree the consequences are worse for women but if men stopped doing it then women wouldn't either. It takes two to tango
>>80265823
>I am a libertarian so i don't understand why I can't do things with my own body.
What you mean to say with that is you're autistic and don't know why societal rules and pressures are beneficial for society/
>>80266097
The data shows that woman is synonymous with virgin bride.
More over, the acceptance of casual sex is the acceptance of promiscuity. The acceptance of those things cuts into the population of proper women.
Plus the sluts are still going to find some poor sap to knock her up, she'll then be more likely to get divorced, and now society picks up the tab. Welfare and another person that's very likely to be a criminal.
>>80266135
>>80266177
see: >>80263723
>>80266701
you are here forever faggot
>>80267505
On a personal note, doesn't it feel empty? To regularly have casual sex
It does objectively damage the girl and her future marriage stability, but I want to know how you feel about it as well
>>80267762
I don't get it
some people claim /pol/ was ruined by the alt-right being too liberal and not moral enough on social issues like sex
other people claim the exact opposite, that the alt-right is too restrictive and /pol/ used to be more libertarian and all about freedom
WHICH ONE IS IT? make up your minds, or realize that /pol/ isn't one person and doesn't have only one view on serious issues.
If you think /pol/ should be forbidden to virgins and those who don't approve of casual sex, you're just as much of a problem as the opposite.
>>80267762
Can you actually dispute the data provided, or are you just going to shitpost?
Jesus Christ. Arguing for morality against nerds who LARP as alphas on the internet, is like arguing race with liberals. Just acknowledge the facts.
>>80267762
shut up and get some femboi
>>80267814
yeah pretty much as long as I get mine.
>>80267292
I'm not saying do nothing, just saying you have to go about it differently.
If that means getting your religion on and going more devout to be part of a tight knit community etc, then maybe that's what you'd have to do.
But the, for a lack of a better word, normies, they aren't going to listen. Of course they aren't. Why would they? They have a whole palace of pleasure there to be visited, and they can't see the forest for the trees.
What do they care if the palace gets trashed, as long as they have their fun?
People who realize early will go off and start forming new communities and eventually normies will join when they realized society was fucked. But you have to ignore them for now and go it alone or with like minded people, because they won't listen until its collapsed.
>>80264447
I guess arranged marriage is fine as long as both parties are ok with it. I mean hell, I would love to have a wife found for me, I literally wouldn't have to do any of the work. So they're a good thing.
I think even in the West, it's traditional for a guy to ask the woman's father for permission before proposing to his daughter.
>>80267793
I could say the same thing. If women stopped doing it, men would stop it as well
It's a different psychological experience of getting fucked (and abandoned soon after) to fucking (and moving on to your next holes)
>>80267977
>>80268004
Settle down there, Nu-males.
>>80267294
I disagree, in a place like this only real humans will show kindness and respect for one another.
It's like how Europeans made rules for war.
"Look Eurohomies, I know we bombed each other with mustard gas but... No more! From now on we will only use bullets like civilized people."
I think this is one of the few places where etiquette shows the quality of the person you are dealing with.
The idiots who can only scream at you in allcaps about kikes and niggers are scum.
The people who speak to you rationally about their opinion deserve your respect even when they talk about disgusting things. They are fighting a civilized battle with you. If you are sure of your position you cannot lose.
At least that is my take on it.
Castrate sluts.
>>80268274
Which is the Nu-male to you?
The one who opposes casual sex, or the one who goes out of his way to obsess over it because pussy makes you "alpha"
>>80268078
Aren't you gonna join in as well?
There's still some traditionalist Christian groups left here and there in this country
Is it ok to have sex with one person all the time though?
>>80268274
>>80267940
It's fun, that's all. Casual dating leaves you with a few good transient experiences and memories. I've only ever slept with girls I've genuinely felt a bit of a connection with, I'd never fuck someone for the sake of it. That's the difference between casual sex and unhealthy behaviour.
Also it doesn't damage the girl at all. Girls with more partners are more likely to have failed relationships because they can't commit, not because of their partner count.
>>80267505
Manners and standards often go hand in hand.
The issue arises when a girl who has been casually fucking the entire block tries to pass herself off as wife material to some poor chump who believes in real love.
The act of casual sex is not wrong, anymore so than shitting in the streets.
It's about elevating society to a higher standard. Man created rules so that we would not be lawless savages.
>>80260363
Stop having sex casually.
I'm doing my part. Actually I'm doing my part so well that I don't have any sex at all.
>>80267626
This doesn't prove that Casual Sex causes Promiscuity, it only proves that Sluts like to have more casual sex.
My point stands.
>>80268671
they can't commit because they never HAD to commit because being a slut is allowed. They habituated themselves to "do what feels right in the moment."
>>80267793
>but if men stopped doing it then women wouldn't either.
What drugs are you on? I want some.
>>80260363
The problem fixes itself over time. My cousin used tinder and fucked 15 dirty whores. Now he has herpes for life.
>>80268548
Biblically no, unless you eventually marry her
But you'd still be hundreds of miles ahead of those who have casual sex
>>80268520
Well I'm not engaged in casual sex, and I'm not religious.
>>80268797
>Casual Sex causes Promiscuity
How are these things even different? What is your definition of casual sex?
>>80268671
Yes, it does. The data is explicitly clear on this.
see:
>>80263723
Go read about Oxytocin and diminishing returns. There's a wealth of peer-reviewed information on Google Scholar.
It was weird growing up in a community where chastity and temperance were valued and then moving to the city where those values are considered outright evil
>>80268783
You can have both standards and be sexually active. You can enjoy casual sex without being promiscuous.
There are shades between black and white.
>>80268671
>Also it doesn't damage the girl at all. Girls with more partners are more likely to have failed relationships because they can't commit, not because of their partner count.
The higher their partner count, the lower their commitment >>80263723
>>80268797
Sluts = women who have more casual sex
What you said there is a tautology, not a refutation
>>80268955
Well, I am planning to anyway. I don't even religion (was raised a christian, just quit going to church as a teenager) anymore.
Maybe we should slut-shame harder(and Chad-shame I guess) or start an AIDS hoax
>>80269403
We can't slut shame without being politically corrected, but if you're religious people usually give up in trying to correct you
>>80269078
So if Becky has had 10 partners in her life, by sleeping with 5 more guys she is now 50% more likely to end up in a failed marriage?
That's fucking retarded. The number of partners isn't the thing that makes them bad at marriage, it's the fact that they suck at relationships that gives them a high count. It's an important difference.
>>80269174
I agree however, like so many things, you have to draw the line somewhere.
The age of consent for example, in reality you can't just deem humans good to go just because they added another year to their lives. The concept borders on retarded.
But you have to make order from chaos somehow.
>>80269051
>>80269398
Casual Sex means you like to have a lot of sex
Promiscuity means you like to have sex with several partners
You can have a lot of sex with a single partner.
>>80269637
>The number of partners isn't the thing that makes them bad at marriage, it's the fact that they suck at relationships that gives them a high count. It's an important difference.
I do believe that is what we call: "The exception which proves the rule."
>>80268982
It's always to open to you if you ever do
Gas the stacies and chads, and cleanse the media of all things that could possibly allude to sex.
>>80269637
>Implying your shit-tier hypotheticals counter data.
Sorry, anon, you're fucking retarded. Quit defending immorality.
>>80269637
*tips fedora*
>>80269605
I'm a tanned immigrant, people don't dare "correct" me because it would be racist(kek). The idea is that if you slut-shame AND chad-shame, the SJ(e)W can't call you on it because she lacks the intellectual capacity to make an argument other than muh racism and muh sexism
>>80260363
>Falling for mohamad's tricks
>even with the god damn flag
This is how Shria Law starts /pol/
>>80269694
You can't have "a lot of casual sex" with a single partner if you're in a relationship with him
>>80270010
including this site :^)
>>80270010
lol
>>80266274
> sex is for casuals
Not even the most pathetic 4chan lurkers said such thing. 80% of the traffic on this site is some sort of sex.
>>80266345
Not always. Besides, even if you're married, weird shit like secret incest or having a huge amount of children (which is economically unfit. Bottlenecking sex to one person in your life is not an idea that can work for everyone. Hence, many poor families with a large amount of kids.)
Furthermore, shaming culture is prevalent in Islam. I thought you hated Islam. Why do you wanna ape them?
>>80270176
>other than muh racism and muh sexism
You know that's enough to get you in prison right?
>>80270082
Nice refutation, bellend.
You can't apply hard data to complex human behaviours like sex and relationships, too many variables especially when you're reducing it down to partners vs divorce rate.
>>80270237
>ancient greeks, romans, germanics, and literally every western society until the 60's were muslim
>>80260363
We need to bring back Christian Values.
>>80270506
>talks about lack of refutations
>While completely failing to refute what was provided.
Let's start here: Go to the image, thoroughly read the studies, then get back to me.
>>80270237
>Implying that morality is inherently Muslim
kek
>>80270458
>secret incest
>>80266893
> it doesn't matter if I'm a Muslim pedophile or christian loser
FUCKING KEK
>>80270719
It doesn't impact the validity of my arguments
>>80270484
As I said, foreigners in France get special treatment.
>>80270458
>I thought you hated Islam. Why do you wanna [imitate?] them?
I only hate Islam because it's a perversion of the true Abrahamic faith
That doesn't mean I have to be an amoral person
>>80270644
>>80270458
forgot to add this at the end of my second sentence after the parantheses: *can happen.
>>80270718
Half of the families that had "christian values" up to the mid 1900s will fuck their sisters, cousins, and/or daughters
>>80271378
>half
Source?
>>80271378
>a
>fucking
>yankee atheist
>>80271378
Source?
>>80271609
His favorite online sex story.
>>80271958
Omg that picture is disgusting. Drinking tears is such a weird concept
>>80260363
Define casual sex.
Sex involving a good couple that is unmarried I consider healthy for any relationship. I feel it helps to strengthen any couple.
But constant promiscuity with multiple partners, even when not married I consider a flaw with today's society.
It never really helps that the media, feminism, and constant hatred towards anyone that may be a virgin helps to feed the fire.
I don't consider myself religious, but I feel religious values and morality can somewhat fix this issue.
>>80260363
Slut shaming needs to become a thing again.
>>80272542
It's just taunting, anon. No one's actuality gonna drink anyone's tears
>>80272542
It's MADE with tears, yankeefuck.
>>80272704
>Define casual sex.
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/casual-sex
"Sexual relations not involving a love relationship, esp. brief encounters or an encounter on one occasion"
>>80272876
I kno :p
>>80273165
Thanks
>>80260363
You don't.
It de-normalises itself when all the retards end up not having kids or if they do they do badly.
Faggots cant into stable families.
>>80260363
Drive home the idea that the pleasure of long term partnerships outweighs those of casual sex. Remember /pol/ it's easier to convince through positive enforcement than negative fear mongering (even if it's true)
ITT: Jealous, bitter virgins conspire to bring about a fantasy-world where casual sex is outlawed and they have smoking hot le aryan wives.
These threads are always depressing as fuck, all innocence is lost in the real world.
I see why anime and other similar media is popular. It shows a more innocent world than the one that we live in.
>>80272704
>>80273165
https://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/casual-sex
This seems alright as well
"Sexual activity between people who are not established sexual partners or do not know each other well:"
>>80260363
Give 1/3 of the population SUPER AIDS
>>80273684
That's a good definition. I feel some people define it differently, weather it's a one night stand or a couple that hasn't been with one another very long
>>80260363
ban condoms
don't understand why this hasn't been said yet.
>>80273578
>hot le aryan wives.
I wouldn't even mind an average looking White woman, as long as she'd be faithful
If we were looking for "sexy wives" we'd let sexual liberation continue as it is
>>80273578
Fuck that, white girls are bitches. Every one I've ever dated has been a soulsucking disaster.
Asian and Hispanic girls have been good to me.
Personally idc if ppl have casual sex, I just agree with OP's premise that casual sex being "normalized" is bad for society.
Your generalizations are bullshit.
>>80273991
No you're right. Thanks for reminding me to give the definition
>>80274201
The main reason I myself am going for Whites is because of the identity crises, among other disorders, that typically affect mixed race children more than those of one race
Gonna need a time machine to fix this one.
>>80275216
Ceteris paribus
But what if something drastic changed?
Trip fag, why does this "moral" problem of yours matter? Why should we care. Im about to go have me a casual fucking.
>>80276262
It's a way to bring back stability and health to society
To keep families from falling apart and from never forming again. cf. >>80263723
>>80276262
Read this
>>80276262
God have mercy on your soul
>>80260363
You can't.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PlT-dq9cn7o
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8byGFryWQRU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7vqRbScCIPU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4wpca1ZDIRQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sp_rgqRugho
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c_x2vQfDRA8
>>80276262
>I'm too stupid and lazy to read the thread
I'll spoonfeed you anyways: casual sex subverts healthy relationships, thereby undermining the foundations of society.
See: >>80263723
>I can't have sex because I am a disgusting basement dweller so nobody else should
gee sounds like /pol/ is now a bunch of liberals
>>80277938
Pray that either they may know the cleansing wrath of God or that they may turn to God eventually
Jesus personally recommended the latter, but this world is gonna end in fire eventually
>>80278253
sexual revolution destroyed the family
mass broken families / single mother hood destroys society
>>80278253
>social liberals
>not cultural liberals as well
>not being irrevocably against social conservatism while simultaneously being the dominant system of social values, in a stunning act of doublethink
K
>>80260363
CASUAL SEX! WTF
FUCKING CASUALS HAVE TO RUIN SEX TOO REEEEEEEEEEEEE
No idea
>>80279562
See >>80273684 and >>80273165
>>80260363
Honor killings.
>>80280455
It will come to that if we do not embrace traditional Christianity again
A society cannot survive too long without a morality
