>>80145807
deflection? weak bro..... 0/10
>>80145807
>but the USA lynches negroes !
>>80145807
No media outlet complained.
Why?
Because they were legally required to have it because it was for political purposes. It's illegal to use government email for political purposes.
Enjoy your shillpills.
>>80145807
Those were personal emails. They deleted them. Not work related.
>>80145807
>occupy faggots
I'm pretty sure what ever it is its fake
I used to think that once I left facebook I would never see these stupid fucking photos again. /pol/ proved me wrong
>>80146199
>It's illegal to use government email for political purposes.
nigger what?
>>80145807
alright lets put them both in jail... deal ?
>>80146801
You can't use your state department email for your election campaign. Hence Clinton had a private one.
>>80146801
Xer terminology is wrong, but Xe's right in that it can't be used for political electoral purposes. There has to be a sharp distinction, something that wasn't the case here. Nor was there classified information on the Bush servers, which is the biggest difference.
Better argument even than that, hypocrisy is not a defense. Just because someone else might have done something wrong isn't an excuse for doing it as well.
>>80147014
so what is the problem then?
Clinton was using the private server for government business?
don't you think these other politicians did the same?
>>80147249
Business and pleasure.
Can't use government shit for personal shit
can't use personal shit for government shit.
>>80147206
i definitely agree with that.
>Just because someone else might have done something wrong isn't an excuse for doing it as well.
>>80145807
>1 post by this ID
Hide and report
>People bash Trump for wanting a temporary halt on immigration
>No one batted an eye when Obama actually did it in 2011
>>80146199
fuck you nigger
>>80147249
You're a cuck. Fucking Chaffetz has his gmail on his goddamn card he hands out and encourages people to contact him from it. Hillary didn't get indicted because it would open up room for everyone, both R and D to get indicted.
One of the major reasons—if not the major reason—why the FBI did not recommend prosecution is because the precedent available suggested it was not a winnable case.
This was said explicitly over and over, but /pol/ seems to have no idea what that even means.
>>80148116
then why would Chaffetz push so hard here?
>using the work 'cuck' unironically
gas yourself fag
>>80145807
Is Bush running for president?
Wow really makes you think.....
I am now a #hillShill
>>80145807
Were they classified emails?
>>80148361
You can't prosecute someone under an ex post facto law in the US. Was that your point?
>>80158797
>Was that your point?
OP is complaining about Bush
My point was, as you stated:
>You can't prosecute someone under an ex post facto law in the US.
>>80145807
>Wow, the RNC did it too, so that means we can just ignore Clinton!
Blatant corruption on both sides is staring these idiots in the face, and all they can say is "HEY YOUR GUYS DID IT TOO"
>>80158797
>>80148361
>>80159477
> John kerry was Secretary of State since 2013
bruv..
