HAPPENING: Newt Gingrich and Donald Trump seen leaving Trump Tower together
>>79972566
Can't Jewt the Newt
Newt has been one of the very few establishment Republicans who "get" Trump. I have huge respect for the guy - unlike Cucks like Paul Ryan, Ben ((Shapiro)) , Mark ((Levin)) etc
People who want Newt want Trump to get JFK'd
>>79973877
But then we'd get our own Moon colony
Gingrich is brilliant. H'es a visionary. But dont make him a VP.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I2wkBucLej8
>>79973877
Yes, if he picks Newt he is doing what the globalists want.
Now if Trump picks Newt he is in danger.
I think Trump is pretty smart, hope he knows how to handle this.
>>79972566
That's an interesting choice. I don't care for how he shit talked the God-Emperor a few weeks back. Pretty cucked up desu.
>>79974202
Next FBI thread someone needs to bring it up.
More Gingrich. Let's meme this fucker to a cabinet position.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DSmeAbS8cC8
>/pol/ finally recognizing that establishment always wins
He was a History professor for some years in Georgia. My dad studied under him, said he was one of the shrewdest guys he's met and a great speaker.
>>79974779
There's literally nothing wrong with being the establishment. You've gotta play to win. Trump knows this better than anyone
RIP Trump's campaign
>>79975040
There's
>literally
everything wrong with choosing an establishment VP. They'll kill him you fucking retard.
>>79975040
Get a load of this Trump shill
Kill yourself
>>79974202
What's the deal with saying trump will be killed with newt as his vp.
>>79975222
Because Newt is a member of the Illuminati.
>>79975437
lmao no he isn't.
That's it, I now #RootForNewt
Tell me /pol/, is this a good choice?
>>79975437
I keep hearing this lately. My opinion of him is neutral at best, but is there any proof of him being the anti-christ as all of you paint him?
I've been suspicious recently since I saw his commercial he did with Nancy Pelosi a few years back, and learning he started out working for the Rockefellers, but need something more substantial than all that.
>>79972566
newfags wont remember the 4chan-newtgingrich wordfilter
>>79976180
Yes. Obviously the 16 year old redditors that have flooded /pol/ will disagree, talking about how Trump needs to pick Webb, Paul or Sessions, but they should be ignored.
A legitimate claim can be made that Gingrich is the best American statesman born after WW2. He also parallels Trump in many ways, except that his vocabularly and oratory skills are better than a 4th grader's.
He's a solid choice, and is exactly the kind of guy Trump needs right now.
>>79976492
don't be a roodypoo ;-)
i forget the others
>>79976640
puddi
>>79972566
MOONMAN
MOONMAN
CANT YOU SEE?
YOUR GOING TO BE AMERICAS VP
>>79972566
I dunno, i get the feeling he might pick newt as sec of state.
"The first step is to control the border"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DSmeAbS8cC8&feature=youtu.be&t=767
>>79976526
Exactly the kind of guy he needs if he wants a bullet through his brain.
>>79972566
Trump is done. Rip in piss.
>>79973404
>Newt power
Newt for presidents!
>>79973877
So much this. Wasn't he ousted on corruption charges?
>>79972566
Welp. Donald is a piece of shit too. Awesome
Wasn't Trump offered money for this?
>>79976180
it fits really well, Newt is agreeable with Trump on many things BUT is also an experienced politician which would quell the claims that the Trump ticket is unqualified.
The worst thing Trump could do is pick someone too extreme or too stupid. So he should avoid Carson/Women and go with someone more like Newt.
>>79975501
He knows of them at least, he said the media and Washington DC elites hate Trump because he isn't one of them club members.
>>79976180
Newt is a good politician. People here are acting like the sky is falling because they think this gives the establishment a good motive to assassinate Trump and put Newt at the helm like they did to JFK
>>79976526
sessions is assaination insurance
newt guarantees that trump either goes full globalist or gets killed
>>79979961
>gingrich
>globalist
This is why foreigners shouldn't be allowed to interject into our affairs. Gingrich's main criticism from the right during the 90s was that he wasn't a Neocon when that was in vogue. The dude opposed the Iraq War far stronger than Trump did.
>>79974779
>>79975040
My order has always been Jim Webb>Newt Gingrich>Jeff Sessions>Anyone but Chris Christie>Chris Christie for this reason.
Add in Joni Ernst in there before Sessions because she's too cute.
>>79972566
NOOOOO, don't do it Señor Trump. Pls, they kill you!
>>79980747
Ernst is done, she's said as much. Trump wins the Gringichb Owl and it's the best chance for Trump to win the election.
>>79979961
>>79980445
Also, I'll add that Gingrich is quite possibly the biggest critic of the UN of any elected official in decades. So tell me again, Mr. Leaf, how Gingrich is a globalist?
>>79972566
>>79973404
Newt attacked Trump when he talked about the Judges Mexican heritage, if Newt becomes VP then Trump is the next JFK
>>79981127
>ugh we need a sycophant as vp! bend the knee, even when Trump makes asinine comments!
Milo for VP!
JIM WEBB OR CIVIL WAR
THERE IS NO COMPROMISE
>>79981059
Source? The only news I see is that she has a big speaking slot for the convention.
>>79972566
He is the logical choice
He comes with a 100 million dollar super pac, he is great in TV interviews. He is a good pick
>>79972566
MOON BASE CONFIRMED
TRUMP WILL ANNOUNCE MOON BASE AND EVERYBODY WILL VOTE FOR HIM
KEIKAKU KEIKAU!
Hopefully this was Trump letting him down easy
Wheres Rudy????? WHY NOT RUDY????
I actually really like newt but how is the leftist media going to spin this ?
>>79981463
Rudy doesn't do well in Interviews.
Remember that Trump strategy is to swamp the talk shows for free media
>>79973404
>>79972566
>jewet
someone let trump know Newt is part of the moloch club.
Newt is a shit VP pick. The general would be most sane pick.
>>79981339
>The GOP senator met with Trump on Monday and received effusive praise afterward, with Trump predicting he will “see her again.” But it likely won’t be as his running mate.
“I made that very clear to him that I’m focused on Iowa. I feel that I have a lot more to do in the United States Senate. And Iowa is where my heart is,” Ernst said Wednesday. “I’m just getting started here. I have a great partner with Chuck Grassley, we’ve been able to accomplish a lot. And I think that President Trump will need some great assistance in the United States Senate and I can provide that.”
It's a Politico interview, so you can give them hits if you want.
Corker also seems to have dropped out.
If its Newt, I will disavow all my support of Trump and vote for the NSA did 9/11 guy again.
Newt is a failure, and has the stink of failed campaigns all over him. Furthermore, I would not be surprised if he is a saboteur from the moneyed Republican establishment.
>>79981463
Because Rudy is an asshole, Guliani was terrible for NYC in the long run.
>>79975501
>>79975437
>>79975222
nice trips see >>79981680
>>79981717
The criteria is an establishment senator, congressman or governor
>>79974063
This dude is AWESOME.
>>79981797
The VP is a powerless position. The only relevance the VP has is trying to win electoral votes and if the President dies
>>79981680
For fuck's sake.
>>79981797
>Guliani was terrible for NYC in the long run.
Objectively wrong. Handing Bratton the reins of the NYPD was the single largest contributing factor in NYC's crime dive. He ran his city as a law and order guy and was very successful in that regard.
>>79981638
Remember that Trump strategy is to swamp the talk shows for free media
And this is exactly why you want Gingrich on your team. His oratory skills and ability to spin ANYTHING would make Cicero himself contemplate his life.
Nikki Haley is a better choice than Newt. They are both establishment. However, she would be better for him on election day.
>>79981972
Not true at all. Their Executive duties aren't used all too much (their Senate vote is invoked more than you might think though). But they are incredibly important during election season, and can make or break your ticket. It would be an oversimplification to slap Palin with McCain's loss, but she was a horrible runningmate. Lieberman didn't do Gore any favors either.
Beyond that, you ship your VP off to foreign head of state's funerals and shit like that. At the very least, Gingrich has tact and would be suitable that.
>>79976526
>A legitimate claim can be made that Gingrich is the best American statesman born after WW2.
ahahahahaahahaahahkrrrffffhgjkdlshlfjsdhfkasfka
>voted pro-Amnesty
>supported Bill Clinton with pushing NAFTA through
>believes government should take action on climate change
>wrote the foreword for the kike Alvin Toffler's "futurist" multiculti globalization book "Creating a New Civilization"
>supported gun control in the 1990s as house speaker
>>79972566
looks like this card is finally coming into play
MEME MAGIC
E
M
E
M
A
G
I
C
NEWT IS THE TRAP
DON'T FALL FOR IT TRUMP
>>79981874
Fuck that shit. Almost all of the other candidates are pure shit.
>>79981972
This is not true. Also, picking Newt would signify to me that he is selling out or joining forces with the Republican establishment. Its a symbolic gesture that speaks volumes.
>>79982171
I said in the long run. Crime went down, but hes also responsible for vacant real estate worth millions sitting empty because its owned by Chinese and Russian investors. Its the reason Times Square is now a pedestrian plaza filled with perverts in Elmo suits. His vision of the city is a fucking nightmare, and we're seeing the true implications of it now.
>>79982821
Cool. Another foreigner who read a Wikipedia article and thinks he's an expert on American politics. Let me guess, context isn't even in your vocabulary?
>Voted pro-Amnesty
Again, that context bit. You know, the part where he forced through the part of the bill where border security would be properly enforced (not delivered by Clinton)? Or where he was the immigration candidate during his 2012 bid?
>NAFTA
You going to ignore that NAFTA had bipartisan support and that Gingrich has recanted in that department and admitted it was a mistake that must be immediately rectified?
>CLimate Change
Nope. He wanted to reform the EPA and saw it as a massively corrput, bureaucratic organization that was utterly incompetent.
>muh globalization
I've addressed this a couple of times in this thread. By no reasonable metric can you consider Gingrich a globalist when he spearheaded UN criticism in America. And, again, he cautioned against American interventionism and nation building.
>muh gun control
Yep. He supported background checks and was opposed to convicted felons owning firearms.
Try again Hans.
>>79982581
Yes a good VP pick can make a campaign
Lieberman was a horrible pick for Gore but would have given McCain a shot. Paul Ryans debate performance was the end of Romney.
Edwards was the opposite of what Kerry needed..Kerry needed a shark and got a cuck
We are going to the moon guys !!!
>Newt Gingrich wants permanent Moon base, manned mission to Mars
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I2wkBucLej8
>>79983347
I mean he has said from the beginning he was going with an establishment VP to rally the establishment. He is only polling 75% with Republicans at the moment.
This is sells mother fucker and Newt is the best man for the demographics he needs to sell.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PoWMmZEoT84
>>79972566
Guys quit flipping out, hes probably just offering him a cabinet position
even though i kinda like Newt (he's not great but not bad either), i feel like he'd be a terrible VP pick. really nervous Trump is gonna blow it with whoever he picks, but then again i've thought "it's over" before but he's made it this far so who knows
>>79972566
I like Newt a hell of a lot more than most of the establishment and now the retards of the GoP will fall in line like they were suppose to months ago.
Trumps gunna ducking die if he picks him.
>>79983969
Based Webb is what he needs. Newt is a shifty little fuck, and no undecided voter will ever be swayed by his grubby face next to Trump. The establishment can enjoy 4 years of Hillary if they are unwilling to fall in line.
>people don't remember gingrich meme
>don't even know about the levels of meme majick going on
typical neo-pol
>>79981680
>>79981841
Trump's daughter is a convert to Judaism, you edgelords.
>>79984263
>world filters
>meme
Nope, poni is still the best choice.
If they give Newt VP they might as well just call Hillary up now and tell her they concede.
>>79975222
Reagan was an outsider that picked an establishment VP (H.W. Bush) and they tried to assassinate him.
>>79981347
Trump refused 200 million in order to reject him. Picking him now minus the 200 million seems dumb. I don't see how Newt has a chance. Especially since he didn't stand by Trump over the Judge.
>>79984390
This. Almost no one takes Newt seriously anymore, especially after his moon comments, and the amount of shilling in this thread makes me think there is a serious concerted effort by god knows whom to make /pol/ think Gingrich will be a good pick, when he'll just be absolutely terrible.
>>79984401
Yeah but the Secret service is much better at their jobs than they were back then
>>79973404
He's an opportunist.
>>79984552
He will get the 200 million. He vetted everyone, honestly the RNC is not a deep pool of talent. Its cuckservatives and jews.
>>79984613
>people who disagree with me must be a shill
Explain why Gingrich will be terrible. If we want to get stupid, I should ask you why a retarded Dutch faggot like yourself is trying to interfere in our presidential election?
>>79972566
>mfw I've been shilling Newt for months
newt is a great choice, he knows how to work congress
Imagine Ben Carson trying to break some cunt neo con senators balls to get a trade bill passed
I know he isn't a white nationalist but you retards need to be pragmatic, he is a successful Washington operator and a genuine policy wonk
>but muh NAFTA
1. Trump believed in gun control and leaned democrap at the time, things change
2.
>implying any of these assholes have genuine principals and beliefs anyway
Sessions would be better ideologically but I want him as secretary of state or DHS
>>79984021
>i feel like he'd be a terrible VP pick
He's got a lot of what Trump lacks, namely experience in dealing with Congress. Believe it or not, that's the VP's job and he'd be aces at it. What's more, my mom doesn't like Trump much but she thought the world of Newt back in the 90's, I think picking him would do a lot for some people who are still on the fence and worried Trump wouldn't work with the establishment.
>>79984613
We hate Newt.
>>79972566
He's gonna be in the cabinet, but no VP for him.
Screencap this
>>79972566
Does Newt still have connections in Congress? Trump will need someone who has passed build before so his agenda doesn't get stonewalled.
If it's him, it's over. The dream is dead.
If Newt is VP, HRC is president. No contest.
Savage is right.
>>79985283
>does one of the most celebrated congressional republicans, who delivered the house to the gop for the first time in 50 years still have clout in congress?
Eh. Probably not, I guess.
>>79985141
yeah but i worry that it's going to alienate a lot of the independents/moderates who don't want to vote for hillary, while also alienating some of the anti-establishment crowd. idk, obviously Trump and his team know better than I do but it just makes me uneasy
>>79985123
>I know he isn't a white nationalist but you retards need to be pragmatic, he is a successful Washington operator and a genuine policy wonk
ahahahhaharhggfdjgfdk
yea we nede a genuine policy wonk who goes to the CFR like Hillary Clinton
>>79976492
Pepperidge farms remembers, you fucking candy ass roody poo.
>>79985489
Gingrich is probably Trump's best chance for crossover appeal. His only route to the WH is through a larger majority of the Independent vote than ever before: there are still too many gop holdouts.
I don't think you realize how favorable Congress and the presidency was during 92-98. We're at all time highs in unfavorability, and have been since around 2005.
Gingrich was well liked up until his marital indiscretions, and Clinton would be stupid to bring that up.
>>79985283
His talent is explaining the concepts of bills to wrangle votes. You can see how good he is just by watching his Interviews. He is a good pick.
AS LONG AS HE NEVER APOLOGIZES FOR TRUMP
>>79985722
Who is the alternative
And don't say sessions...Sessions is a vocal race realist.
>>79972566
Newt would be a terrible pick. Honestly not a lot of politicians are going to want to hitch their future to a candidate who will probably lose, so I can see why Trump has to reach out to Newt who does not give a shit, but I hope he goes with Rick Santorum, who also would not give a shit.
>>79973404
too bad he had to tow the "that was racist" line when trump was rightfully attacking the burrito judge
>>79985489
I'm anti-establishment, but I'm also not a fucking baby and realize that you can't just say fuck everyone who doesn't 100% agree with me, we had enough of that with Obama. Gingrich is a small, small price to pay, and those independents still won't be voting for Hillary.
>>79972566
Newt's face really bothers me
>>79981252
Trump's judge comments weren't asinine, though.
As a nation, we've already accepted that a Judge's ethnicity can influence their decisions; remember the cheering for Sotomayor's "Wise latina with rich experiences... that a white man simply wouldn't have."?
If we've accepted that (and we have), and add in that the judge was a member of La Raza, it's not too hard to see why Trump's criticisms are valid, and have genuine precedent in American public opinion.
>>79986451
>but I'm also not a fucking baby
a lot of voters, especially younger first or second time voters, are though. not that trump was ever gonna win the young vote anyway. Newt could still end up attracting a net positive of voters if he wins over enough independents and former #nevertrump old GOP faggots
>>79986806
Come on. They were absolutely stupid. And where are you getting this idea that Sotomayor's comments were acceptable? Those remarks will, appropriately, be a black stain on her judicial record.
Trump was airing his dirty laundry. I can see why he's upset, and I can even see why he would want a recusement. If he thinks he's being treated unfairly, you have a court and a team of elite lawyers to exercise your defense. Use it.
I'm glad Gingrich and other Trump supporters called him out on it. It shows that he doesn't just have a team of inept Yes-Men behind him.
You don't want lackeys on your team.
>>79974063
too bad we never went to the moon. anyone with a brain who looks at the moon landing footage in 2016 can see it's the result of shitty movie effects. you have to be an absolute moron to think otherwise, stop blindly following what nasa says and use youre own brain
fuck him
pick a hispanic woman or a nigger you dumb fucking cuck
newt is way too easy to lambaste
WE MOONBASE SOON YET?
>>79983347
>hes also responsible for vacant real estate worth millions sitting empty because its owned by Chinese and Russian investors.
No he isn't, how do you figure that? How can you control who buys and sells real estate if its done within the law?
The strength of the US capital markets is the reason for this. every city in America, fuck, the world is experiencing the same thing with regard to Chinese and Russian investors. Thats why buildings are colloquially termed 'billionaire bitcoins'.
I've never heard such an asinine inference in my life. Rudy Giuliani is actually the invisible hand of the free market? Fuck outta here.
GOP shills pls go.
Newt is a death sentence to trump...
>>79988094
Yes, but the "law" also does not grant residency to people who purchase real estate, and certain buildings/neighborhoods used to stipulate that owners must occupy their property in some way. It might be good for markets, but its shitty for the quality of life in a city, and its the reason that Manhattan is a giant shopping mall with empty (yet expensive) property all over it, and people are being displaced.
Rudy Guliani wanted to clean up the city to make it safe for investors, not make it better for residents.
>>79974037
Noice.
>>79987533
I agree about not wanting lackeys, but Newt was pulling a Paul Ryan on that issue.
Regarding Sotomayor's comments, don't you remember the (small) Conservative backlash? We were all told by the left to shut the Hell up.
Those remarks were celebrated by Dems. and left-leaning independents, had Trump argued along those lines (And this was something that Buchanan went out of his way to write about twice, so it's not some obscure thought), he'd have fared better.
>>79988094
Yeah, I had no idea what he was trying to get at. From personal experience, all I remember about Giuliani was him telling me to buckle up in taxis in New York.
But I will reiterate that hiring Bratton was the best move the city's ever seen. Honestly, I'm somewhat surprised that his name isn't floating around considering Trump has definitely played the law and order card several times. You also get the nonpartisan angle that so many here want with Webb.
>>79973404
Newt is a globalist
Newt also botched the Clinton sex scandel SO BADLY
LETS PAY ATTENTION TO WHO TOUCHED HIS WIENER INSTEAD OF HOW HE SOLD OUR MILITARY SECRETS TO THE CHINESE
p.s. to all the weaboo fagoots
more proof asians aren't creative
the yellow question
>>79987566
>IT'S 2016
>>79988650
If you will recall, Bratton also happens to be commissioner right now under Blaz, and crime is going UP.
>>79988619
I think I must be misreading your posts, because I don't understand what you're getting at.
Sotomayor has superseded Ginsberg as target #1 for the right. There absolutely was backlash from Conservatives. Had Obama tried forcing her through during an election year, I guarantee Congress wouldn't play ball.
I also don't give a fuck what Democrats and the left celebrate. They picked a Justice who will always vote to the left, and who will race bait at every opportunity. What can we do about it beyond dissect and refute each and every one of her opinions that plays into leftist hands?
Just what Trump needs to fire up that youth demographic.
A white male even older than him.
>>79989486
If Newt is older, then he's pretty much disqualified. Trump wanted Sessions as his VP but his age made him not viable.
>>79989118
Because De Blasio is hamstringing his own fucking department at every chance he gets. Give Bratton the streets again; it worked in LA, Boston and NYC. Even the UK wanted him.
vote http://www.strawpoll.me/10683691
>>79989486
>>79987692
Back to Rebbit.
I didn't read this thread so maybe someone thought of this before me.
But it's 4d chess. Do you really think Trump would be so obvious to be seen with someone who might be his VP, and spoil the element of surprise before the convention?
I think this is just a smoke screen. Wanting the media to speculate on it.
He might hire Newt as a consultant, but I think he has another VP choice in mind.
Or maybe this is just wishful thinking.
I like Newt because he triggers Arabs.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/dec/10/palestinians-invented-people-newt-gingrich
>>79989877
>But it's 4d chess. Do you really think Trump would be so obvious to be seen with someone who might be his VP, and spoil the element of surprise before the convention?
Pretty much, Newt is bait for the kike media, his real VP pick will be something more unexpected.
Michael Flynn would be the best pick for Trump
HANDS DOWN
A
N
D
S
D
O
W
N
>>79972566
They've been campaigning together
>>79989877
I guess it's possible, and I think that Gingrich would be a very good SoS: he and Trump line up almost 1:1 on foreign policy, except Newt can actually vocalize the policy.
Still, Gingrich will, and should, be VP. Trump has said for weeks that it will be a "big name." Of all the names left, Gingrich is the only one who meets that requirement.
>>79972566
I still want Rand.
>>79990043
>t. beaner convinced you can't be president if too old and illuminati is controlling trump
>>79990228
>8 years of Trump making short jokes and calling him "little buddy"
I'm OK with this.
If Trump picks gingrich, then he is either a massively incompetent retard or he has been a hillary plant all along and is going to purposely lose so she wins.
My bet is that Trump is a plant. I've been saying it along and won't be surprised when I'm right.
LOL @ pol thinking they could meme a bombastic racist like Trump into the white house.
>>79990175
Why would Gingrich be a good choice? I don't know enough about the guy.
But my grandpa says he would be terrible and I trust his opinion since hes redpilled as fuck and been voting since like 1948.
>>79987566
Alright Canadacuck, we understand you're butthurt enough from taking Ahmed's dick three times today but this is crossing the line...
>>79972566
>Trump/Gingrich
Just when I thought it wasn't possible to make Trump seem less appealing to vote for, he puts an even more contemptible human being than he on the ticket.
Before you get mad, this doesn't mean Hillary is any less trash or that Warren is any less of a sell-out if she is chosen for VP.
>>79990634
Trump has said for a while he wants somebody with political experience. And, as I said earlier, Trump has said it will be a "big name." All signs point to Newt, especially with today's elminations.
As to why he would be a good choice? I've kind of answered earlier this thread, but I'll quickly run through.
>Immigration
Gingrich's (fairly short) 2012 campaign hedged on immigration. He wanted a secure border, and it almost seems like Trump borrowed he talking points. He wanted an "open border" to bring in legal immigrants, but it must first be impenetrable for illegal criminals. He brought up the rape trees in one of his debates/interviews.
>foreign policy
Strongly opposed to intervention. Opposed the Iraq War and has been a strong critic of the UN for decades now. Another parallel.
>Trade Policy
He was speaker during NAFTA passage, but has since recanted. For several months now has supported Trump's more protectionist policies.
That's the 3 that come to mind, but beyond that is his oratory ability. This is something that doesn't come up very often. Trump is good on the stump, sure. But you want to send a guy like Gingrich on the Sunday shows to clarify and expand.
Notice how Trump has pulled back on his "establishment" argument, at least for the gop. He's inviting a guy like Gingrich. You want him on your team. And it doesn't hurt that, since 1999, Gingrich's "career" was much less of a Washington insider. Kind of bullshit, since you don't throw a guy like him from politics, but he's been out of the "game" for almost 20 years.
No idea why your granpappy doesn't like him.
>>79972566
Trump already rejected like $100M he was offered if he chose Newt. It's not going to be him, this is just a red Herring.
>>79976363
He was to Bill Clinton what Paul Ryan is to Obama. Most people credit him as the creation of the retarded GOP.
>>79992897
Trump changes his mind. A lot. Newt is the best choice for VP; he knows Washington, and the Clintons, better than anybody and can navigate Trump through the minefields better than anybody.
His only drawback is his name, Newt, oh, and the fact that he served divorce papers on his dying wife in the hospital.
>>79994303
It's going to be Michael Flynn.
Everyone in this thread that didn't say Sessions is a nigger-loving faggot and a shill.
>>79972566
He should make Roger Stone his VP
>>79992660
>He wanted an "open border" to bring in legal immigrants
How is that even remotely similar to Trump's policy of closed borders? That's like people like Gary Johnson and other tepid neocons and even Democrats. He also previously supported amnesty for illegal aliens.
>Strongly opposed to intervention. Opposed the Iraq War and has been a strong critic of the UN for decades now. Another parallel.
Nope.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Newt_Gingrich
>Gingrich had also been generally supportive of the war in Iraq. He had also strongly opposed attempts to set timetables for withdraw and compared such measures to legislating defeat.
>Gingrich has called for a stronger foreign policy, along the lines of the "Reagan model" of toughness",[146] having been critical of the "weakness" of recent administrations' policies.[147]
He was only slightly opposed to intervention in Libya.
>He was speaker during NAFTA passage, but has since recanted.
Probably only to pander. Just as late as 2011, he said it was a good thing.
http://www.rawstory.com/2011/03/whoops-gingrich-praises-nafta-for-shipping-out-american-jobs/
He also supported other trade deals like the WTO, GATT and and MFN. Also his firm Dentons supposedly supports the TPP. I can't open the site for whatever reason but the Google preview I have says:
>The Trans-Pacific Partnership offers Canadian retailers exciting new ... textile industry retailers and producers should consider the TPP's impact ...
>On November 5, 2015, the text of the groundbreaking TPP Agreement was released.
So it seems supportive.
>>79975147
It would be too obvious and it would totally set off the powder keg of crazy right wingers
>>79987566
>use you are own brain
>>79994509
This
Flynn is too based
Man, almost seemed like Trump was hinting that Newt was going to be his VP at the campaign today.
FUCK
