Paul was the sole “No” vote in a 93-1 decision confirming the FBI director.
So tell me, /pol/...
Miss Rand yet?
Rand would make a much better president than Trump.
But since Rand can't advertise himself, we have to settle for Trump.
I'm hoping that he will make him VP at least, or make him secretary of state
yeah, but he hates faggots. alt-right loves faggots
Rand is the kind of person who gets elected when only land-owning male are allowed to vote.
>>79971078
Rand Lost the nomination before he started running way back in 2012 when he sold out to the establishment
No. Libertarians are fucking retarded.
No, Rand supports legalisation of drugs
In an alternate Universe, the US public made the right choice, and he's the GOP candidate.
Intersesting
>>79972530
>cannabis
>a drug
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ABhyKEK-CDg
>>79972530
God forbid people make decisions and be held accountable for those choices.
People who want to do drugs have access to them still, it's just a lot more sketchy and dangerous and our jails are filled with dipshit teen potheads.
>>79972790
is not clapping at at least 100CPM (Claps Per Minute) a big social taboo in America?
>>79972929
Nobody needs 100CPMs, ban assault claps.
>>79972929
Yeah, it's about as uncommon as brushing your teeth is in Britain.
>>79971078
Rand's entire platform was pandering to black people. It was a pathetic misread of the political landscape.
>>79970761
Yeah, and Paul opposed Comey solely on the grounds that he thinks niggers are "over-policed" and the police are "over-militarized".
I'll break it down simply:
>dems: the state should impose its multicultural ideology on civil society
>GOP: well, only if the rich don't have to pay for it plus ISRAEL AT ALL COSTS
>libertardians: actually it should be a corporation doing it
As much as I would have loved for Rand to have been the nominee, I think he'll be better in the Senate. A libertarian president is useless without a liberty minded majority in Congress.
>>79973251
If Trump loses because he cant shake off the racist label stuck to him then maybe Rand wasn't so off base with his strategy.
>>79972365
Sadly Rand lost any potential of early traction because campaign aides for his father were indicted for election fraud.
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/11/rand-paul-advisers-re-indicted-216108
>>79972871
Shit bait
>>79971078
Rand paul would be best after a trump presidency
>>79971078
Libertarians are done, their plataform shifted to Progressivism with lower taxes.
