This pictures show whom own the medias in France.
Only 3 people are Jews. Others (30) are goyim.
When will you stop focusing on Jews and not the betrayal of our own goyim elites?
It sounds like "dindu nuffin, we good goyim".
Either jewish or zionist, same shit. They all preach for Israel.
>>79934417
If they were zionists, they would be strongly anti-muslims since the big majority of muslims in France support Palestinians and don't see problems with killing jews in France.
>>79934083
Kill yourself kike
>>79934628
Yes.
And also reminder, immigration is a tiny problem compared to the tax evasion and all other corrupt politics.
I'm not a leftist but what should I be? Corrupt right? Stupid extreme right? Unrepresented center? Ineffective left?
>>79934083
American media fully controlled by Jews, your government fully controlled by American interests
>>79936362
It's not a tiny problem.
French people are ethnically replaced by millions of Africans and Arabs.
This is the biggest problem we ever had since nobody react really.
>>79934083
>Only 3 people are Jews.
Man, there are two main "contrarian" lines of thinking here at /pol/'s (among the many others).
#1
According to the most butthurt and non-ironic posters, it is literally the Jews who are behind everything. And by "Jews" they mean the descendants of those Semitic peoples who spread throughout Europe and practiced fringe activities such as banking, money lending, etc. but also managed to create strong lobbies etc. etc. until Zionism and then bla bla bla Holocaust bla bla bla Israel.
#2
However, many of us say "Jews" but we actually mean "bankers / elites / ruling lobbies / top 0.01%". This lingo (way of speaking) pre-dates the Occupy movement and draws on the following ideas:
>Banker Jews vs. poor people
>Bankers in general vs. poor people
>Bankers and proto-nomadic globalized culture vs. traditionalist land-related way of life
>People who upset the cultural fabric of a country for economic or ideological purposes vs. those who want to keep it together for economic or ideological (cultural) reasons
So, basically, according to #2, "Jews" is mostly a "metonymy":
>Metonymy (/mᵻˈtɒnᵻmi/ mi-TONN-ə-mee)[1] is a figure of speech in which a thing or concept is called not by its own name but rather by the name of something associated in meaning with that thing or concept.
>For instance, Wall Street is often used metonymically to describe the U.S. financial and corporate banking sector, while Hollywood is used as a metonym for the U.S. film industry because of the fame and cultural identity of Hollywood, a district of the city of Los Angeles, California, as the historical center of American film studios and U.S. film stars.
SAUCE: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metonymy
>>79934083
Jews are the head of the Semitic hydra and they all need to be culled with merciless ruthlessness
>>79934083
Drahi?
Your post isn't relevant and outdated.
>>79937048
It is relevant and not outdated at all, this picture is from July 2016.
At least Australia brings some argumentation unlike you.
>>79934083
https://rsf.org/en/ranking
Get on our level France.
>>79936909
TL;DR:
>Joos is a metonoymy
>You say "Jews" but actually you mean to describe all those people who embody the kind of evil and power that in past times was mostly understood as a meme about Jews... but actually does not apply to all Jewish people
