Lolbertarians hate thread
5-2
>>79933694
converting this shit tier thread to a gadsden flag thread
incoming
>>79933940
>>79933940
I have quite a few of these
lay off bro
liberty is cool
>>79933940
moar moar moar
>>79933694
This image is pretty weak, especially considering most lolbertarians won't touch the JQ.
>>79933940
3/666
>>79933940
I seriously may be able to hit the image limit with these things
>>79933940
potato salad
>>79934157
I just love these memes. They're just fucking great.
>>79934195
kek'd
>>79933940
chocolate malk
>>79933940
ham sammish
>>79934252
>implying
>>79933694
>>79933891
*tips fedora*
>>79933940
,
>>79933940
FREEDOMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
>>79933940
eleven
>>79934346
Is that who I think it is?
â–²
>>79933940
pi symbol
>>79933694
/pol/ only hates Libertarianism now because it became mainstream. The fact is there are no more autists in the Libertarian movement than there are in any other movement. For every level 83 edgelord Libertarian you can find, I can find a successful and well-adjusted Libertarian (pic related).
>>79934551
truth
/pol/'s foundation is the Ron Paul movement
>>79934346
We hate Marxist.
/pol/ is National Socialist.
↔
>>79934551
>/pol/ only hates Libertarianism now because it became mainstream
No it didn't. Libertarians have been and will always be irrelevant.
â•‘
1
To everyone in this thread.
Not an argument.
>>79934750
>newfag detected
this board was literally created because of everyone jumping on the ron paul bandwagon and starting ron paul threads on /b/ every single day
we're not a nazi containment board, we're a ron paul containment board. it's sad to see how things changed
suddenly it's acceptable to be religious here. it's weird
propane
>People have been posting the road meme since day 1 on /pol/
>Lolbertarians have not, in any way, shape or form, to this day, approached, in whole or in part, an answer.
It's like poetry.
I'm between libertarian and conservative. Libertarianism is too small government and conservatism is way too big. I think government should build roads. Sue me!
>>79934698
> /pol/ is what I believe.
Alrighty.
>>79934941
Are you omnipresent?
>>79933694
Dumb thread
>>79934941
yes we have
we want limited government not abolished government
municipalities build roads fine
>>79934941
OH GOD WHAT IF ROADS WERENT FEDERAL THE WORLD WOULD END
ITS ALMOST LIKE STATES OR LOCAL MUNICIPALITIES WOULD HAVE TO DEAL WITH THAT SHIT
WTF I HATE RON PAUL NOW
Roads are only a small part. Who will build and maintain things like the golden gate bridge? What bout traffic lights?
>>79934551
I've been noticing it's been making a comeback as "cultural libertarianism" has had to become a thing thanks to how fucking mental the left is getting, guess they are making fascism too mainstream for /pol/ lel
ITT: people who got their feelings hurt online by libertarians
Hang in there guys, it'll be okay.
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>79934859
Neo-Nazi websites like Stormfront invaded this board to try and make it a Christian, white supremacist board. It worked.
Most national socialists just have a Hitler fetish and pretend the socialsm part doesn't exist lol
kek wills it
>>79935117
bureaucracies
tons of em
all governing each other
>>79935311
Checked
>>79935311
dubs prove that kek approves of my flagposting
Ã
>>79934101
Anyone got the NAP version of whatever the fuck this is
'straya
>>79935089
>>79935106
So you just oppose federalism? If not, what functions should the federal government have?
>>79934941
>roads get taken care of as it is
spicy meme you've got here, but it's false
>>79934719
I liked the version where wife's son is part mongoose better. Anyone got that one?
>>79934941
this is what oldfag bait looks like. doesnt mean i wont fall for it
pic related you fucking burgertard
>>79935697
That's the fallback when a libertarian is cornered. They just hate federal government for some reason even though sometimes it's more efficient for certain things
>>79935830
>more efficient for certain things
like state terror, redistribution of wealth, aggressive foreign policy, imposing retarded curricula, enforcing anti-state laws
did I miss anything?
>stormfags alienating the only people that could form an alliance with them
fucking priceless, and you retards whine about how everyone tells you to fuck off.
>>79935830
The majority of them just wand reduced government, and the only reason this is a strange position to take is people still believe in a red blue paradigm that thrives on bloated corruption from both sides... t. Noam Chomsky
>>79935980
>implying libertarians want an alliance with stormfags
>>79935697
the powers that are actually explicitly listed in the constitution rather than the ones they pulled out their asses
the commerce clause was never intended to be used to wage a global drug war.. especially one that started just to silence Nixon's political enemies
>>79936019
Both nazis and libertarians are anti-communist and anti-SJW.
Also, on /pol/ people actually believe that libertarians are open borders because Gary Johnson and the libertarian party is open borders. Most libertarians don't even like Gary Johnson.
What we need is a capitalist economic model with as little government intervention as possible and secure borders.
>>79934941
The Florida Turnpike has been an unparalleled success.
Try driving I-95 through Florida then try driving the turnpike. It already costs so much to travel, people will pay for better roads.
>>79936222
Voluntary militia instead of tax-funded conscription.
>>79934941
Pretty much all highways in france are privatized and they work amazingly.
Eat shit.
>>79936222
>as little government intervention as possible
Why not none?
>>79936474
Then I'm sure some other organization would gladly fill the power vaccum
>>79934551
>no more autists in the Libertarian movement than there are in any other movement
>>79936580
Would they call themselves government?
Almost every one of these threads consists of intellectually lazy shills who think AnCap = Libertarianism
They have many of the same principles but are certainly not the same thing.
Really the only semi-valid criticism of libertarianism you will find from /pol/ is "muh minorities" and "muh white race" but this is becoming irrelevant with the rise of closed borders libertarians like Rand.
>b-but degeneracy
browsing 4chan is degenerate.
Nationalism libertariansm is the only acceptable theory.
Closed borders, white only and small government.
The state has a legitimate existence in terms of enforcing borders, police, courts, military and emergency services.
This should be funded theough a fairtax system instead of income taxes.
Everything else should be privatized.
>>79936689
probably, does it matter?
>lolbertarianism
have fun getting flooded with human trash thanks to open borders. Hey at least you can gun them down in a mad max scenario. I'll take the stability of a strong right wing state any dya
>>79937004
How about open borders and no guns but the government will protect you? That work for you?
>>79936955
"white only" is a 16 year old white kid bullied in high school's wet dream. Unrealistic, especially today.
A well vetted immigration system with high standards is more realistic, and can actually be put into practice without you becoming the laughing stock of the world because you think all minorities are evil.
>>79935106
Here in Washington state, the state just majorly fucked up the 405 and the 520. Its all pain in the ass Pay-by-mail toll and if you don't pay it and they neglect to send you a bill, you are still responsible to pay the toll and all late fees that may compound. Plus the 405 carpool lane now talks like a fag and its shits all retarded.
They want to do the same crap to I-5 but its federal and it doesn't look like the feds are gonna approve any to change I-5.
>>79937004
Libertarians don't all support open borders, especially in the modern era.
>>79936857
Nah. Anarcho-capitalism is just Libertarianism taken to its logical endpoint. If the initiation of force is wrong, then logically all initiation of force must be wrong. Since the government is an initiator of force by its very nature, a consistent Libertarian cannot possibly support a government of any form.
>>79937087
>Unrealistic
not at all, at least for those that aren't mongrel """nations"""
problem aren't the good immigrants, it's their offspring that's a big liablility
I'd solve it by sterilizing them; an ounce of prevention is better than a pound of cure
>>79933940
Ron Paul thread?
>>79937081
>strong right wing state
>open borders
pick one.
We do have guns btw. You don't need to live in a libertarian utopia to be able to buy firearms
>>79937164
That's not what modern libertarianism is. Gary Johnson is the libertarian candidate and he is pro open borders
>>79937004
Either
>There's little/no welfare so there's no reason for human trash to immigrate
or
>Government closes boarders because libertarianism isn't Anarchy.
>>79937164
It's mixed, paleo-conservatives (very close to and often thought as Libertarians) are for immigration control.
It depends on the puritan nature of the Libertarian, because immigration laws ARE regulation of the labor market
>>79937257
The problem is that another force would take the position of government if there was nothing there, which is why a small Constitutional state is neccessary to maintain basic police/military etc. to prevent a regional warlord type scenario.
It isn't that simple.
>>79937004
But Libertarians no longer support the open borders meme.
>>79933694
You can tell that pic was made by an SJW because it has Stormfag shit, "Meninist, AND Atlas Shrugged as if they're the same thing.
Why would people immigrate if there is no welfare?
>>79937323
Many libertarians hate Gary Johnson. Most libertarians I know think he's a joke.
Bad example.
99.99999% if people realize that paying taxes is part of being in a modern society with roads, bridges, fire fighters, police officers, public schools for the poor, ect.
>>79937336
>There's little/no welfare so there's no reason for human trash to immigrate
Wrong. Human trash will still come because they will always try to commit crime. Yes you can defend yourself, but crime would still be increased. Many cities would turn into warzones
>Government closes boarders because libertarianism isn't Anarchy.
See my post above. Modern mainstream libertarianism is exclusively open borders
>>79937257
No. Look at minarchism.
Such a system accepts that the use of force against somebody who hasn't aggressed against you is wrong, but acknowledges that some force is needed to maintain a functional society. Hence why it's minimized to its greatest possible extent.
Humans naturally organize and elect governments that do stuff. Not having any government and going full anarcho capitalism is very much against human nature IMO.
>>79937462
He's still the public face and the candidate of the libertarian party, isn't he?
This means that the majority of libertarians agree with him, otherwise someone else would be leading the movement
>>79937398
Or you could just not have a monopoly of force. Why is having multiple defense agencies such a bad idea? If we are to accept the idea that the free market produces the best goods, then logically it would also produce the best defense.
>>79937606
No because traditional libertarians like ron paul and rand paul which oppose open borders are republicans.
>>79937454
Jobs. If US became anarcho capitalist me and my family would move there and work and eventually vote to increase the size of the state. I can promise you this.
>>79937606
Most libertarians don't give a fuck about the LP. It's a meme party. The US is a two party system.
>>79937511
>>79937323
>Because Gary Johnson supports open borders all Libertarians do
Doesn't the pope like gays now?
>>79937522
>some force is needed to maintain a functional society
Then its not consistent Libertarianism.
You can call it whatever you want, I don't care. Just don't tell me you are enforcing the NAP when you have a fucking monopoly of violence running society. I don't care how small it is, if it can violate my property without my consent then its an aggressor, end of story.
>>79937615
How would an AnCap society prevent me from paying a huge war band to burn houses down of people I don't like, who have much less money than me?
>>79937790
>Libertarianism = Anarcho-Capitalism
Stop this
>>79937667
>No because traditional libertarians like ron paul and rand paul which oppose open borders are republicans.
That's what I said. Republicans are closer to libertarianism than the libertarian party itself
>>79937704
I see. From a European perspective libertarianism is the libertarian party. That's what the media says and the vast majority of people are influenced by the media
>libertarians support open borders all of them
Where did this shitty meme come from? Why do people conflate anarcho capitalism to libertarianism and not just a strain of it? Most libertarians are minarchists. Thomas Jefferson was a minarchist.
>>79937767
He does. This goes to show that the majority of Catholics agree with him, otherwise there would be protests.
Taxation is not force only autists see it that way. I went to a public school and turned out great. You have to understand you are part of a society and society decided they are willing to pitch in for certain public goods and services.
>>79938014
Because /pol/ is only capable of black and white thought. This can be good or bad depending on the topic.
>>79936262
The only reason the turnpike is so popular is because it's literally the only major road from Orlando and Northwest Florida that leads to Miami/south Florida without having to stop, go on highways and surface roads, and then drive an hour east or west to connect to a different interstate. I fucking hate it every time I have to drive on the turnpike because it's expensive as hell and still clogged with traffic.
>>79938074
But you could've went to a private school and had a better experience, and saved the money that was taken from you at gunpoint by the federal government.
I don't know about Canada, but the US is full fucking retard with how they spend our tax dollars.
>>79937767
>guy voted for by the masses to lead them
compared to
>guy picked by a small group of men to lead them and the masses
Come on, Nigel.
>>79937825
Nuclear weapons.
>>79937790
>then it's not consistent libertariansm
You are a fucking idiot. Nothing in that statement contradicts libertarianism. You are conflating anarcho capitalism to all libertarianism which is false. Most socialists are not communists or anarchists either.
Anarcho capitalism is just one strain of libertariansm. Most livertarians are minarchists and accept the state has a legitimate role in enforcing borders, laws and courts, policing and military.
If you want to look at a country with a relatively small government, low regulations and a highly free market Hong Kong is an example.
>>79938188
Dude I get that but on the other hand there are poor peole in Canada and those kids need to go to school too. Not everyone is born with money and charities do not cut it. Some government is okay no need to be black and white in thinking. Black and white thinking is often never true.
>>79938257
You're going to have to elaborate on that for it to make sense.
>>79938338
Except in mathematics.
Should kids without money be able to just stay at home and skip school since they abolished all public schools?
Fresh OC
>>79938074
>steals $10 from you
>pockets half of it for myself
>uses the other half to buy a meal for a homeless man
>its not theft, bro
![Ludwig%20von%20Mises%20576x720[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/m69Xinx.jpg "Ludwig%20von%20Mises%20576x720[1].jpg")
>>79937965
>From a European perspective libertarianism is the libertarian party
not really, I don't see it mentioned anywhere in the (((media)))
most local libertarians I know were heavily influenced by reading Ludwig von Mises and having experienced the change in their purchasing power over time through wageslavery aka redistribution of their wealth denominated in a fiat currency
>>79938339
Mutual assured destruction. Nuclear weapons are the best method of preventing invasion because they act as a deterrent against aggression.
>>79938338
Don't you guys have charity over there? Caring for the poor is wonderful and I have nothing against it, but my problem lies in forcefully taking money from people to make up for idiots having babies and putting a drain on society. It's not right.
Here's what you do in a libertarian society
>get all your liberal/socialist friends who love the poor
>all of you pool x% of your income to charity
>boom, problem solved
If they don't want to voluntarily do it, then they are frauds.
>>79937680
>shitting where you eat
Why would you do that, leafy?
>>79938620
I'm just presenting to you the reality
>>79938526
I partially see what you're saying but it doesn't quite answer my original scenario.
>wealthy businessman in ancap society hates people who wear purple hats
>the purple hat guild, full of lower middle class people, live two miles down the road
>wealthy businessman hires mercenary army to slaughter them all
>purple hat guild can't afford better protection, especially nukes
Even if they could nuke, their homes would be destroyed.
I know this is a lengthy scenario, but this is why I consider myself a minarchist libertarian.
You're gonna have to redpill me on how nukes come into play here.
>>79938763
How would you vote a state into existence?
>>79938074
>Taxation is not force only autists see it that way.
Not even a Libertarian and this argument is ridiculous
>be born into the world
>legally forced into education system
>told to get a job and pay taxes
>don't pay taxes go to jail
>want to live life on your own terms?
>can't
>need money to buy things to live
>taxed when you earn money
>somehow already have enough to buy your own property?
>state tax, council tax etc.
Argue for tax if you want to argue for tax, but don't pretend like it isn't forced on people, because objectively, it is.
>>79935106
>states or local municipalities
coming from a place where the local municipalities have to deal with the roads i can say first hand the corrupt city government hasnt fixed many of the roads since the 80s. people have literally had to put their own sheets of plywood over holes in their streets to stop peoples shocks getting fucked up
doesnt work
>>79938876
In portuguese, the words tax and imposed are "imposto" so it's very easy to explain how tax is theft in those terms. The word "taxa" also exists but it implies more of an "authorized deduction" than "imposto."
>>79934550
There's another Gadsden Flag parody involving the snake game, you got it?
>>79938817
With force you faggot
>>79938156
I'm sure you glanced at a map for all of 5 seconds in order to post that, but you clearly have never been to Florida more than for vacation.
There are routes where the Turnpike has no real viable alternatives, but for the largest portion of it (the congested South-East Florida area) and for that part that is most used and most praised, it's competing directly with the free, government-run I-95. I have the choice on a daily basis. The idea that it could possibly be more congested that I-95 and is any less of a highway than I-95 is entirely laughable.
>>79939140
Try it, faggot.
>>79939329
Wow that cat's got a serious arsenal, mice better watch out
>>79939475
>mice
I guess you could call Canadians that, at this point.
>>79939329
why would you hate libertarians? all they want is for you to have more freedom, like seriously? how can you be against that?
>>79939329
Why the fuck do you own three pistols from the 19th century? One of them looks like the model that used to shoot Lincoln.
>>79940691
It's not my picture, I got it from a random guns appreciation thread.
>>79940155
They are fucking cringey
>lol, you statist sheep
>Borders are just imaginary lines
>Soldiers are welfare queens
>Taxation is theft
>I home school my kids
>god damn vaccines!! gave my kid gay autism!!
Some, I assume, are good people
>>79940155
anti-libertarian is not anti-small government
>>79940920
i think you are confusing anarcho-capitalists and libertarians
>>79940788
Oh sorry then.
>>79940796
How is taxation not theft?
more OC
>>79941858
>How is taxation not theft?
It is, but it's so god damn annoying to hear that any time I talk to a libertarian
Like that's the only thing they have to say, that and complaining about people who bring up what would we do about roads with no gov.
>>79940796
>Borders are just imaginary lines
Never understood this one. If the whole point is people living for themselves, protecting their own property, how is a border not just government property? Or are Libertarians actually stupid enough to think that anyone can come and live on their property because the border of their land is imaginary too?
>>79933694
God forbid we legalize marijuana, keep our guns, lower taxes, and give niggers less welfare. That sounds awful.
>>79943284
>doesn't understand something
>assume the worst
kek
>>79942925
Only reason we keep saying its theft is because no one will admit it. They are literally convinced society is incapable of making rectangles of asphalt without the help of a giant super mafia.
>/pol/ is anti-Ron now
Wtf happened?
>>79943284
>government property
No such thing.
>>79943492
I didn't assume the worst, it was a pretty logical step. The country and state borders define government land. If you lived in a society where communities had their own land and law, then they would have borders. If you believe borders are imaginary lines, and therefore not relevant, then anyone could come into your country, and if people can cross a country border because it's just imaginary, why can't they then cross the imaginary border of your personal property or the land governed by your community?
>>79943599
How so? People can own land, groups of people can only land, governments are groups of people who govern land.
>>79943599
And corporate property is?
>>79943727
Private property is defended by you, not imaginary lines.
>>79944005
Private property.
>>79943661
You realise we are now stormfront 2.0
>>79943772
Government land is paid by stolen money.
Guys, I'm a libertarian. What should I do?
>>79943727
>The country and state borders define government land.
t. the government
>>79944107
Nothing
>>79943772
No one recognizes stolen property as property of the thief. Same goes for government officials.
The government didn't acquire its land legitimately. You can't just claim millions square miles and say its yours ex nihilo. No citizen is able to do such an absurd thing.
>>79944107
Nothing. When you grow up you'll grow out of it.
>>79944005
If its private property, yes.
>>79944107
You'll grow out of it and grow into National Socialism if everything goes well.
>>79933910
What is wrong with this logic? Unless right is a monopoly, which libertarians still oppose the legality of, the individual can work somewhere else if he has this overwhelming desire to throw cans on the ground
why is that every libertarian hate thread has absolutely no argument against it. you're jsut spouting stupid generalizations and memes.
>>79944356
>a society where people can just throw cans on the ground without repercussions
Madness.
>>79944030
Right, and if you own land, and then decide to share it with your community, or rent or sell parts of it to others who agree to live by the same rules as you, and follow your law...?
>mfw there are people on /pol/ who don't support privatised Sharia courts
Truly free individuals may deal with their conflicts via whatever peaceful means of arbitration they choose and are willing to fund. Even in a light-libertarian society with a lawkeeping state, citizens have every right to take their greivances to a sharia court, provided those courts respect criminal law.
>>79940155
Like anarchism and communism, is a form of government that it's fucking impossible to establish
Yet they think it is
>>79944198
But you as a citizen in a libertarian society could claim a few square miles is yours so long as you can defend it? But a government, claiming millions of square miles, with an entire army to defend it is some how not legitimate?
>>79944511
We already have one f a m
>>79944698
Yeah, well we also have one where gays can get married and Hillary Clinton has a chance of becoming president.
>>79944820
We can fix it
>>79944581
Libertarians aren't anti-law, faggot.
The central issue here is consent. Non-consensual actions are wrong within the Libertarian framework. Everything else is fair game. If you can get someone else to agree to something, then fine. If you have to force someone or threaten someone to do something, that's wrong. Notice that the vast majority of Westerners already accept this principle, yet somehow applying this principle to government "officials" is deemed too radical.
Property is just a tool to determine the boundaries of consent. Nothing more.
Came to say this. >>79936400
France tollways are A++ and the systems works amazingly.
>>79934941
>>79944679
>a citizen in a libertarian society could claim a few square miles is yours so long as you can defend it
Nope, that's not legitimate. You have to actually make use of the land before you can claim it as your own. That's how it works in the Libertarian framework.
>>79938471
Are we talking individuals now?
Because if you take 10$ only from him then yeah he didn't agree on it, its theft.
But if we are talking about whole country and most of the people in this country agree that everyone in this country should pay those 10$ or face consequences then no its not theft, by being in this country you agree to its rules, rules are being made by representatives that are chosen by the people so its those people who make the rules, not "BAD GOVERNMENT"
And don't give me any "I didn't sing any contract" bullshit, when you are in a restaurant and the bill comes up, you are obliged to pay it even tho you did not sign anything.
You were using the services so you have to pay up.
>tfw no qt sensible libertarian gf
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dCLJJUIpFKQ
>>79944955
Right okay, and what about a situation where all the land has been claimed, people have formed into large groups in the hundreds of thousands on the agreement that their ideals for a community and law are similar enough that it makes sense to combine their efforts, form armies and take large areas of land for themselves. You find yourself incompatible with the communities you could feasibly travel to, or at the very least there are particular laws you dont want consent to, but they have all the good land for resources, farming etc, what then?
>>79945054
Says who? Who's going to make them make use of it? If they can adequately defend their land should someone try to take it, what's stopping them keeping it without using it?
>>79945118
Oh, so if an individual steals, it's theft. But if a society does the same thing, it's not. So, at what point does it stop becoming theft? When 2 people are involved? 100? 5,000? One million? Please tell me and then proceed to explain to me how that number is not completely arbitrary.
If I tried to implement the social contract exactly as you described it, I would be arrested and labeled a madman. Just let that sink in for a while.
>>79933694
fuck you inbred faggot
>>79933694
Ironically, if I remember my course in Devil's Advocate: Brony Edition, MLP actually had an episode that shat on echo chambers and thought conforming.
>>79933694
Why do lolbertarians seem to think that their liberty will be guaranteed by sitting on the couch and smoking weed, only ever fighting an enemy who threatens their liberty after they step across the threshold of their front door?
Do they not realize the reason our founding fathers built a navy immediately after winning independence was to keep battles with foreigners away from the homeland?
Do these assholes think open borders allowing Muslims and beaners to flood our nation isn't going to affect them and that at the point that it does, they'll just go all Rambo to keep them off their little piece of property?
>>79945204
>sensible libertarian
There is no such thing. Stop posting, faggot kike.
>>79945907
forget about what the majority of libertarians want
my specific sect of libertarianism doesn't support open borders
libertarianism totally isn't just a bunch of faggots and druggies who want maximum degeneracy in society
>>79945641
The individual just takes the money from him because he said so.
When you get taxed those are the RULES made by the people.
You may not like it but this is how democracy works.
>at what point does it stop becoming theft? When 2 people are involved? 100? 5,000? One million?
When more than half population of this country/state is involved.
If i had a small country of 100 people and 51 of those people agreed that if you want to live in this country you have to pay 100$ each year.
Will you come to this country, start living there and then refuse to pay 100$ screaming "THEFT, THEFT!"?
Like I said rules are made by people, they chose their representative by voting, its not like "government" is a single entity made for the sole purpose of taking your money.
>>79934859
you are a obvious newfag.
/pol/ has always been natsoc but it was libertarian too. No there was not ron paul threads on /b/.
The meme happening emerged a litttle before than libertarians appropriate this.
And stop be a faggot pretentious, /pol/ was much more christian before.
>>79944356
it's the soldier that is throwing the can tought
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QNd8iNx1gGk
>>79945907
implying there is such a thing as a migrant that emigrates to a country without a welfare program. I dont know about the libertarian parties in america, but in norway, the libertarian party are the only party that pretty much prohibits all immigration.
>>79934008
I'll keep em coming.
>>79948547
>>79948573
>>79948609
>Libertarian hate thread
>Bunch of snake meme posts
I am sad now.
>>79948650
The thread appears to be dead. I will let it rest.
"jews"
"good"
oh I wonder who is behind this post.
>>79948669
Hey I asked legitimate questions, just got no reply
>>79945565
>>79945630
>>79935830
>They just hate federal government for some reason
Yeah, what did the Feds ever do to anyone?
>>79946307
Yes there were ron paul threads on /b/ fucking constantly
>>79935830
>for some reason
Only a Canadian would find it incomprehensible
>>79944668
i dont think you understand what libertarianism is
>>79934036
>>79934379
>>79934862
>a political cartoon by Ben Franklin is a meme on /pol/ like Ben Garrison's cartoons
you all have something against Bens
The founding fathers couldn't have predicted this
>>79945907
>libertarians
>open borders
Who the fuck keeps spreading this shit? Maybe this is true for the bleeding heart libertarians who support Johnson, but most libertarians don't support open borders.
>>79948776
Still no god dammed replies, check mate Libertarians
>>79934719
fucking great
>>79953317
Indeed. It isn't liberty for me if I have to wade through a river of shitskins everyday.
>>79934941
>Lolbertarians have not, in any way, shape or form, to this day, approached, in whole or in part, an answer.
>Lolbertarians have not, in any way, shape or form, to this day, approached, in whole or in part, an answer.
BUT MUH ROADS!
>>79937257
No, because a libertarian still believes that a small amount of governance is better than none. It's trading evils, essentially.
>>79935697
>If not, what functions should the federal government have?
Protecting borders, overseeing international commerce and foreign relations, acting as a impartial mediator for conflicts between states.
>>79937336
why not both?
>>79944356
found the child who has never lived on his own or paid his own bills.
get a job.
>>79934859
this board was just as much NatSoc as it was libertarian.
unfortunately these days it's primarily a GOP circlejerk.
>>79956614
I thought the libertarian answer was to allow private companies to build and maintain roads, and you just pay to use them or it's a "everyone chip in at once" deal. Basically a simplified voluntary tax.
Private companies already build and maintain roads, it's just that the government manages payment like a middle man.
>>79933694
>libertarians
>not good goys
I have literally never met a libertarian who was Jew aware. They all migrated to the alt-right.
>>79943284
Because people think that libertarian party = libertarians as a whole
Really the libertarian party is as in touch with what most libertarians want as the republican and democrat parties are to the demands of their voters which is to say barely at all.
>>79944107
Try to take control of the world and leave people alone to do what they want obviously.
>>79957930
No it's more like what's explained in this video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xVYnQyZWlik
Which is a method already used on many roads in the world.
You wouldn't be paying a toll every time you use it instead the companies and businesses that utilize the road would be paying and they would be reimbursed in turn by peoples business with them.
>>79939329
>drive to work
>sit into car
>get shot by rifle
Not too hard. Your arsenal is going to serve the Right Wing Death Squad well.
>>79944107
lurk moar
>>79958051
The Libertarian Party are literally just the Republican Party 2
>>79934667
Low bait or been here for 4 years total.
Go play somewhere
>>79940691
Why not collect old pistols? I love old Lugers and Walthers, wouldn't mind having a bunch of those.
>>79950806
/b/ died in 2011 nobody visited it anymore after that.
>>79959446
Except when it comes to drugs,gays,foreign policy,immigration policy,and surveillance policies.
Don't get me wrong the libertarian party is terrible but for different reason then why the republican or democrat parties are terrible
>>79959852
That's why I don't like them.
They say they are Libertarians but they're not Libertarians.
They're not even the I Can't Believe It's Not Butter of Libertarian politics
>>79959405
I really like this image. Quite cute.
>>79933694
This is such a strawman it wraps back around and actually becomes a strawman of anti-libertarians by suggesting they would create such a horrible pic
Genius.
