>She didn't MEAN to be grossly negligent
He basically openly admitted in his statement that what she did was criminal and that anyone else would be put on trial for it. He doesn't actually believe she's innocent or any shit like that and is just doing his job, which is doing what the Deep State tells him to do if he wants to see his children again.
>>79924952
>implying America is run by a dictatorship
>in 2016
Wew lad
>She was "extremely careless", but not "grossly negligent" guys.
>So chill, alright?
>>79925016
No, it's run by a far more complex and sinister system that is practically self-sustaining. A dictatorship would be preferable.
In a way Goyim
Your lawyer is your best friend
>Doesn't care if you did it or not
>Only job is to get you the best deal possible
>/pol/tards in charge of knowing what negligence in the law and intent in negligence are
Wew lad
>>79925341
Well, federal criminal law gives us a good idea.
>>79925341
Really makes you think, huh?
>>79925386
>I underlined "Gross Negligence"
>That means I know the legal definition of Gross Negligence
Go to law school. Torts is usually first semester, Crim Law second (unless you're going to a Crim focused school). Both have things to say about negligence.
Inb4 you actually post the Black's Law Dictionary definition of Gross Negligence. That would be pretty funny.
>I wasn't pretending to be retarded, I actually AM retarded
And people want to vote this woman in.
>>79925582
>"pshh I know more than you kid."
>"No I'm not going to explain what made me say that, I'm just going to sit here and make you do my work for me"
>>79925341
>he is pro-Hillary
Wew lad how about you get back to your pegging session and finally pay the black bull for all the services he has been providing over the years?
Americoons truly are the cancer of this board.
>>79925582
Comey himself graded her performance as "extremely careless", and he was the deputy attorney general.
There isn't a legal definition that would not qualify "extreme carelessness" as "grossly negligent".
>>79925582
>>79925341
By the way, paragraph e) talks about the "willful communication" of secrets.
See >>79925386
Seems pretty obvious that, if the espionage act wanted to imply "intent" or "willfulness", they would simply keep wording it that way.
>>79927017
I tried going through some but it was all boring and coded, so I gave up, and I never even see people cite them when they are talking shit other than the shit about the elders, so what are some of the juicy interesting emails, does someone have a pastebin or copypasta of the damning stuff?
>Sorry officer I didn't MEAN to kill that family while drunk driving
>>79927596
The Hillary defense.
Lawyers will soon be out of a job, this shit's too easy.
If the DOJ upholds this "negligence requires intent" bullshit, brace for a legal shitstorm.
