What is /pol/'s view on Civil Disobedience?
If say Article 50 is not triggered, how do we go about solving the ignoring from our politicians? How can we bring pressure to them and other groups who wish to us dead?
Use examples of why Civil Disobedience would be needed for your own Nation of course, but my point is that subtle forms of disobedience on a mass scale can help break the back of the 'system' and that miht be needed here in England and Wales should we be denied our rightful request to leave the (((E.U))).
>>79827180
Bump.
>>79827180
Disobedience is our national sport!
And ... nothing changes.
>>79827180
Civil disobedience is a good thing if the System demands that we obey any unjust law. We NEED to make Brexit happen. We won't defeat the System (which is inherently corrupt and deliberately so) by stockpiling weapons, because they have MORE weapons and STRONGER weapons. The ONLY way we can defeat the System is by civil disobedience, but ONLY if it occurs IN MASSIVE NUMBERS. If enough people practiced civil disobedience, we could bring down the System LITERALLY OVERNIGHT. The power is with US - it's ALWAYS been with US. Most people do NOT know their TRUE power, both individually AND collectively, but fortunately that's changing.
"No-one rules if no-one obeys." - Lao Tzu
>>79828714
>IN MASSIVE NUMBERS
Or you could have a small, mobile, well trained, dedicated, covert force which could use subversion or whatever means necessary for the task at hand. Then it disappears back into the crowd as if nothing happened.
>>79827180
Some smug poofs demanded that we pay tax for their faggot ass tea, we rekt em real good
Now living in the freest country on earth
>>79830042
STFU were in the same boat and you know it
>>79830512
I know, but a man can role play cant he?
>>79830588
True.
>>79827180
Organize a mass refusal to pay taxes. The tax collection office would eventually be overwhelmed; and the government would realize that it needs white male shitlords' money in order to function.
>>79827180
it is the obligation of a man to follow his principles, if the law doesn't agree with him, then it is his obligation to change the law