[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Asian/White Unity: College Admissions Addition Why don’t Asian
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Thread replies: 16
Thread images: 6
File: colleges copy.jpg (130 KB, 639x597) Image search: [Google]
colleges copy.jpg
130 KB, 639x597
Asian/White Unity: College Admissions Addition

Why don’t Asian Americans vote for Republicans? Asian SJWs are almost as bad as white SJWs in that they consistently argue against the interests of their own demographic group. The Supreme Court just upheld the University of Texas’ biased admissions that mainly favor black and hispanic students over better qualified non-hispanic white and asian students. Is California next? With its huge hispanic population, Proposition 209 could be overturned, and the UC’s could start discriminating against asians and non-hispanic whites.

Do asians really think that UC admissions would continue being merit based? They would immediately shift to look more like Harvard’s admissions than Caltech’s. As you can see by the chart, asians only make up 16% of Harvard’s classes, when they probably should make up 35-40%. Also, this chart debunks a myth about admissions: asians aren’t discriminated against because of whites in general, they are discriminated in favor of specifically Jewish whites. Non-jewish whites are actually the most discriminated against in Ivy league admissions. There is no reason for asians to feel like whites in-general get it easier than they do: only jewish whites get it easier.

This is not meant to be anti-semitic. These are important numbers: if you are jewish, you are given an admissions break in Ivy league admissions similar to being black or hispanic. Caltech is the only school that only uses objective metrics (grades, test scores, etc.) in admissions. Jewish students make up 6% of the student body. Schools that use holistic criteria like UC Berkeley and Stanford admit 10% Jewish students. The Ivy league more than doubles these numbers.

Non-jewish, non-hispanic whites and asians should be natural allies on affirmative action. Both groups are hurt for the benefit of other groups, including very privileged groups (jews).
>>
Cont...

Finally, I would like to note that being overtly anti-semitic only hurts spreading these hit-you-in-the-head numbers. Jewish students benefit as much or more than disadvantaged minorities in affirmative action. When you subtract Jewish students from the white total, the remaining whites are the most underrepresented group in the Ivy league.

This data was taken from Ron Unz’s excellent article on the subject, which is available here: http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/the-myth-of-american-meritocracy/ . I actually did not use many of his arguments as to illustrate the undeniable fact that asians and non-jewish, non-hispanic whites are being extremely discriminated against one only needs to compare the admissions data from schools like Caltech and Stanford to schools like Yale and Harvard.
>>
If you are asian, the recent Supreme Court decision in favor of discrimination against asians at a public school should concern you. This last case avoided setting a precedent. If Hillary takes the White House, you can be assured that the next case will fully enshrine asians getting fucked over in favor of hispanics, blacks, and jews. Vote for Donald Trump this fall.
>>
>>79583395
>vote trump
>even though trump is kike puppet
>>
>>79584250
See, this is uncalled for. As uncalled for as the ADL bashing Trump. None of these facts are anti-semetic. It is very bizarre that a very privileged group like the jews is treated as favorably as blacks and hispanics in Ivy League admissions. It is very noteworthy that when you take jewish whites out of the white totals at these schools, the remaining whites are the most discriminated against group in college admissions.

Asians know they are getting fucked. They wrongly think that they getting fucked by everyone. Non-jewish, non-hispanic whites are not taking any deservedly asian spots int he Ivy League. Asian SJWs are once again fucking over their own people to promote divisive politics. Asians and whites should be friends!
>>
Facts aren't anti-semitic. Asians and non-hispanic, non-jewish whites should be natural allies. Let's drop the hate.
I propose that the following happen:
1. Asians stop saying you are the most discriminated against. It isn't due to non-hispanic, non-jewish whites, and they probably have it worse.
2. Whites stop making fun of asians for dumb, racist reasons. Asian men don't have super small dicks just like blacks don't have super big dicks.
3. We all get to fuck each other's women, but we all admit that same race marriage is probably best usually, but not always.
>>
File: Yvettefelarcamustbefired1.webm (1 MB, 300x300) Image search: [Google]
Yvettefelarcamustbefired1.webm
1 MB, 300x300
>>79584658
>It is very bizarre that a very privileged group like the jews is treated as favorably as blacks and hispanics in Ivy League admissions.

It's very bizzarre that we have affirmative action in the first place, and need violent thugs to uphold it: https://www.change.org/p/berkeley-unified-school-district-fire-yvette-felarca

http://jewishworldreview.com/cols/fund112006.php3

Michigan voters struck a blow for equality this month, when 58% of them approved an amendment to the state constitution banning racial discrimination in public universities and contracting. Almost identical measures have previously passed by similar majorities in California and Washington state. That means the original meaning of the 1964 Civil Rights Act — that racial discrimination of any kind is illegal — has won reaffirmation in three liberal states, none of which have voted for a Republican for president since 1988. Supporters now plan to carry the fight to other states.
>>
File: BAMN cult.jpg (928 KB, 1023x3254) Image search: [Google]
BAMN cult.jpg
928 KB, 1023x3254
>>79585468
cont'd...

From the outraged cries of affirmative action diehards, you would think the dark night of fascism was descending with the passage of the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative. Mary Sue Coleman is president of the University of Michigan, which has already spent millions of taxpayers' dollars defending its racial preferences in courts. She addressed what Tom Bray of the Detroit News called "a howling mob of hundreds of student and faculty protestors" last week. "Diversity matters at Michigan," she declared. "It matters today, and it will matter tomorrow." Echoes of George Wallace, who in 1963 declared from the steps of Alabama's Capitol: "I say segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever."


Ms. Coleman isn't the only Michigan official to employ Wallace-style rhetoric against MCRI. Detroit's Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick told a fundraiser last April that the measure would usher in an era of racial prejudice. "Bring it on!" he bellowed. "We will affirm to the world that affirmative action will be here today, it will be here tomorrow, and there will be affirmative action in the state forever."


Another leader in Michigan's massive resistance is Karen Moss, the executive director of the state ACLU. "I do think it's necessary for the courts to slow this thing down and . . . interpret some of the language," she told the Washington Post. That "thing" is an amendment that simply states: "The state shall not discriminate against, or grant preferential treatment to, any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in the operation of public employment, public education, or public contracting." As the blog Discriminations.us notes, "What part of that language does the ACLU find vague or unclear and in need of "interpretation'?"
>>
File: BAMN=CULT.jpg (45 KB, 381x542) Image search: [Google]
BAMN=CULT.jpg
45 KB, 381x542
>>79585536
Let's be clear what is really at stake here. Racial preferences were intended to help disadvantaged minorities, but they have turned into a spoils system for the privileged. "Most go to children of powerful politicians, civil-rights activists, and other relatively well-off blacks and Hispanics," notes Stuart Taylor of National Journal. "This does nothing for the people most in need of help, who lack the minimal qualifications to get into the game."


School choice and other dramatic efforts to improve the quality of K-12 education would do far more to improve the chances of minorities entering and finishing college than any racial set-asides. Indeed, school choice would represent genuine "affirmative action" in favor of millions of disadvantaged kids trapped in failing schools.


Despite all the demagoguery and misrepresentations hurled at the MCRI, a CNN exit poll of 1,955 Michigan voters showed that the measure had widespread appeal across many demographic groups. A majority of both sexes voted for MCRI, as did 40% of self-described liberals and Democrats. Among nonwhite voters, 30% of men and 18% of women voted "yes."
>>
File: YVETTE FELARCA.png (322 KB, 800x428) Image search: [Google]
YVETTE FELARCA.png
322 KB, 800x428
>>79585629
The public sentiment against racial preferences is in accord with the overwhelming belief of the lawmakers who passed the 1964 Civil Rights Act. They thought they were ending segregation, not sanctioning new race-conscious violations of the Constitution. But it didn't take long for activist courts and bureaucrats to claim the act actually authorized the creation of preference programs.


In recent years, the courts have been slowly inching back towards a belief that the legitimate quest for diversity does not justify any and all race-conscious means to achieve it. In 2003 Jennifer Gratz, a young white woman denied admission as an undergraduate to the University of Michigan, won her case before the Supreme Court. By a vote of 6-3, the high court held that the school's undergraduate college had unconstitutionally awarded applicants a set number of points solely for not being white.
>>
File: felarca1.jpg (99 KB, 575x416) Image search: [Google]
felarca1.jpg
99 KB, 575x416
>>79585712
On the same day, however, the court ruled 5-4 against Barbara Grutter's suit against the University of Michigan's law school. The court decided that the law school used race as only one factor among many and upheld the view of the late Justice Lewis Powell, who held in the 1978 Bakke case that race could be used to achieve "diversity" in higher education.


Justice Sandra O'Connor, who sided with Ms. Gratz but wrote the opinion in Grutter, issued some cautionary language that supporters of affirmative action should heed: "The court expects that 25 years from now the use of racial preferences will no longer be necessary to further the interest approved today." After noting that institutions of higher education in California and Washington were pursuing alternatives to racial preferences, she urged that "universities in other states should draw on the most promising aspects of these race-neutral alternatives as they develop." Just last week, the now-retired Justice O'Connor was asked her opinion of MCRI's approval. She replied that it was "entirely within the right and privilege of voters" to enact a ban on racial preferences.
>>
>>79585468
>>79585536
>>79585629
>>79585712
All excellent points!
>>
>>79585796
This Felarca women is a perfect example of an asian SJW who fucks over her own demographic. She literally advocates violence to keep affirmative action policies which would harm her own children in favor of blacks, hispanics, and jews.
>>
There used to be more Asian Republicans, but over the last decade or so the GOP's shift to white right-wing populism has disenfranchised most Asian-American groups. They're just voting for their self-interest, and the Republican Party only caters to whites now
>>
>>79588228
Asians are the most economically well off demographic (unless you split jewish whites off, then they are). They get fucked by affirmative action more than any group save non-hispanic, non-jewish whites. Their SJWs are as bad as white SJWs. The "oppressive asian man" slander is common in the community. Their low-tier legal immigrants compete with illegal hispanics for jobs. Their kids get fucked over in college admissions in favor blacks, hispanics, and jews. Even after graduating from a great school, many asian men get passed over for diversity hires (asian men are not considered diverse by SJWs). Asian immigrants are disproportionately small business owners who get fucked over by taxes and regulations. Why are asians, particularly asian men, voting against their interests? It seems like the community is literally listening to the asian SJWs who are overtly against their best interests, particularly the interests of asian men. Vote for Trump!
>>
Where are all the asian men at? Let's come together for a common goal. SJWs and feminist attack you, take jobs that are rightfully yours, and lie to you about who is doing it. The data is clear: non-hispanic, non-jewish whites aren't taking any spots at Harvard from your people. We have common enemies. Let's be friends!
Thread replies: 16
Thread images: 6

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.