is /pol/ anti-woman?
only the sodomites and latent sodomites who are into trannies.
i love women, their scent, their aesthetics, they're an integral part of society.
i want them to retain their femininity, 'feminism' just seeks to make women more like men.
the one person that is /pol/ is anti-feminism, but not anti-woman.
>>79509241
Women are scum. In a perfect world they wouldn't exist.
I want to dress like a feminine woman
>>79509241
/pol/ loves women
>>79510038
>>79509241
/pol/ is anti feminism. Women are one of the two pillars on which civilization rests.
Without women we are dead
>>79509241
/pol/ is a friend of woman.
>>79509241
no
im not a faggot
>>79509241
We're about as gay as /fit/
>>79509615
How would you "make women retain their femininity", by forcing them to have children they don't want? By forcing them to depend on someone else's money? By reducing them to household slaves? Be specific.
>>79509241
Mommy mommy the boys won't let me join in and hate girls. Make them let me join their gang even if I am a girl mommy tell them off and get them into trouble.
> tfw nothing ever changes. Stay out feminists. Chav's are just about ok. They can join in but tits out and timestamp please.
What kind of woman is the better question?
>>79509241
We're not against women-that's speciest!
>>79510578
>wants to ban contraception
>wants to ban abortion
>wants to destroy financial freedom
/pol/ is as friend of woman as much as islam is the religion of peace
>>79509241
Not me. I have a gf
>>79509241
Anti parasites and lechers.
/pol/ is anti-bullshit. Women are responsible for the vast majority of the bullshit we face in our daily lives.
>>79510545
Woman-hating assholes like you deserve to be dead honestly.
>>79510910
islam IS a religion of peace you bigot
>>79511046
Yeah because Karl Marx was a woman
>>79509241
I am.
>>79511046
You don't face any bullshit in your life, but you sure do create a lot of bullshit that make you spiteful to others.
>>79511046
so they're the reason behind WW2?
>>79509241
Not trying to be edgy, but there aren't a whole lot of women that I find particularly engaging. Women have yet to into comedy; maybe one day. From what I've heard about Ayn Rand she sounds interesting, but I haven't touched any of her works. Every women I have ever met personally has been a normie; someone without a dream or a drive. My ex-girlfriend begged me to teach her some music theory; she lost interest while I was explaining rhythmic cadence.
Every women I have met has been boring. I've worked with female musicians, it's all the same. I'm sure they're good people and live good lives. I have just lost all interest in women.
>>79511154
Peace of the graveyard.
>>79509241
Lots of /pol/ hates women from what I have seen. I think it makes their lives worse because they get trapped in a cycle of loathing.
t. girl
>>79509241
Only deranged faggots from /lgbt/ permavirgin weirdos from /r9k/ and pedophile weeaboo losers from /a/ hate women. Real /pol/acks love women and fight to destroy the judeofeminist cancer poisoning our society
>>79510789
Are you trying to be stupid? And what kind of flag even is that?
>>79511473
>love women
>want to make them suffer
Pick one. You don't love women.
>>79511461
what is it like to have boobies and vagina?
>>79510789
>by forcing them to have children they don't want?
Women have an instinctual desire to be mothers. It's as strong or even stronger than that of men who have a natural desire to eat food or have sex with women.
>By forcing them to depend on someone else's money?
Women depend on someone else's money nobody what. In Denmark, women pretty much live off of wellfare funded by taxes paid by men. Healthcare, college, pocket money, etc.
>By reducing them to household slaves?
Being a 'household slave' is a million times better than being a wageslave. Women fucking love arranging their apartments, buying new furniture and baking cookies and shit. They don't even see it as work.
When was the last time you heard a pair of women being truly passionate about the technical aspects of engineering?
When women do have jobs, they usually chose female careers anyway, like teacher, hairdresser, housecleaning, etc. Except here they don't even get to do it for themselves, they are forced to do it for others.
>>79511713
>invisible i.d
>>79511657
Stop roleplaying as a woman you gross /r9k/ neckbeard
>>79511124
kek
>>79510789
The whole point of feminism is kids, you retard. They literally spend their entire life prepping for it, via periods and body changes.
>>79511277
Women don't have dreams or drives, faggot. They support men's dreams and drives. They will often adapt and assume whatever belief the men in their lives believe. You shouldn't be expecting nor desiring a common thread in them, save for the desire of marriage and family.
>>79511713
What is it like to have a penis?
>>79510789
>>79510910
>>79511124
>>79511237
>>79511335
>>79511657
Bulgarian women are in full force today
>>79509615
Basically this. Personally I want a return to tradition. Men and women are not the same, therefore not equal, and this push by feminists to make women more manly and men more cucked is destroying the differences between men and women that, when together, compliment each other and dragging each gender down to the lesser genders standard to accommodate for incompetence.
>>79511992
>Bulgarian women are in full force today
*one woman* Probably a cat lady who will be alone forever.
>>79511124
>how dare you hate me
>die
Typical libtard.
>>79509241
Bitter tumblr trannies and dykes don't count as women senpai
>>79512051
True, but someone's vagina is seething lava today
>>79509241
No, we're anti-feminism.
>>79511977
Very uncomfortable tbqh, always gets in the way and is very sticky
>TFW no vagina
>>79512262
Haah. That picture. I love /pol/ .
>>79512359
Save it. It's all yours.
>>79511124
Jej. Libtards ar incapable of love.
>>79511737
>Women have an instinctual desire to be mothers
False, and even for those who do want to be mothers, there's a limit to how many kids they want and can afford. My mother didn't want more children after her only child so she took the pill for twenty years to make sure she wouldn't get pregnant. If she had been forced to have other kids she would have destroyed her marriage and made us all suffer. Life with one child was hard enough for her and she made sure both my father and I knew and understood that, you should listen to women more.
>Women depend on someone else's money nobody what
That makes no sense. Learn to write, retard.
>In Denmark, women pretty much live off of wellfare funded by taxes paid by men
Bullshit. Men and women both pay taxes. Working women pay for the welfare of non-working men and women alike, including the neetbux you receive.
>Being a 'household slave' is a million times better than being a wageslave
Speak for yourself. I hate doing chores and I fucking love going to work because it earns me money.
>Women fucking love arranging their apartments, buying new furniture and baking cookies and shit. They don't even see it as work
Except they do see it as work because when they're doing those things for apartments that are not their own they want to get paid for it.
>When was the last time you heard a pair of women being truly passionate about the technical aspects of engineering?
At work and in university.
>When women do have jobs, they usually chose female careers anyway, like teacher, hairdresser, housecleaning, etc. Except here they don't even get to do it for themselves
I certainly do it for myself. And my job isn't any that you described.
>>79512084
>how dare you rebel against someone who is threatening you, you should just suffer and die
>>79511934
>Women don't have dreams or drives
False and you know it
>>79513741
>threats on the internet
oh boy here we go again
Nice obfuscation or extrapolation, whichever you prefer. Faggot.
>>79513820
Okay, what is your drive or dream?
>>79511992
>"Women"
>in /pol/ of all places
burguer, please...
>>79513626
Shocker the Bulgarian chick is triggered. Please leave, 3rd wave feminism ruins women.
>Here are some cats for you.
>>79513820
She is right you know, women want to be with chad and that is what drives them.
>>79511737
>baking cookies and shit
TFW no t h i c k gf to bake you cookies
>>79510910
>ban contraception
>ban abortion
>a bad thing
Women being reduced to thier holes is a byproduct of the concept of sex without reproduction.
You can't have it both ways.
>>79511934
This senpai. Why have dreams that distract you from gaining family and influence. In many ways this is the better course of action, safe but consistently fulfilling.
Sure if we all acted like women we would be in the stone age, but if we all acted like men we would be extinct.
Get married and you will understand just how much of a reckless risk taker you are, which is good for progress awful for not dropping my 3yr old on his head (I'm so sorry Gene)
t.MarriedMan
>>79513741
>Rebel
>Threaten violence
Learn your place
>>79509241
>is /pol/ anti-woman?
only the MGTOW faggots from >>>/r9k/ lurking here are
>>79516582
Women were reduced to holes that shat out kids before, you mean. Only men that want women to be babymachines and not live their life as they want it reduce women to "holes".
>>79514281
It's none of your business.
>>79517328
Shoo shitposter.
>>79518380
Nice pic. Do you have a women version?
>>79516582
My mother and the married women I know are accomplished professionals yet they all use contraception and support abortion. Why? Because they want to control how many children they have (if any) and when to have them so they're not an unbearable, unwelcome burden on their lives. The only one who reduces them to holes to be used is you.
>>79516582
>burden women with kids they have no time no will and no money for
>hurr but letting them control when/how many kids to have is bad because I'm upset they aren't prisoners in their homes slaving away after children they can't and don't want to support, how dare they enjoy their life making their situation better instead, who cares if my ideas lead to broken homes and divorce because won't want to have sex with their husbands anymore due to fear of unwanted pregnancies and the husbands will go crazy for this
>>79509241
We like women. The problem is that modern society has eroded them away and left us with overdeveloped girls. When we decry the plight of males and masculinity - betas, cucks, manchildten, nu-males, etc - know that the other side of the aisle has an equivalent problem and they share the same roots.
>>79509241
If it's not pussy or sandwich then yes, well at least I am, not speaking for the whole of /pol/ but pussy/kitchen or gtfo.
>>79509241
No. Just anti-women's suffrage, sexual liberation, and feminism. While not completely blameless women themselves are victims of their own sex's horrible machinations. I don't hold it totally against them because they don't have the same capacity to logic and reason in the abstract that men do. Men of generations long gone are to mostly to blame for ever letting this get as far as it did.
>>79510910
Im all for contraception. The poor need to start using it.
yes, /pol/ sees women as lesser humans.
>>79509241
Only if they leave the kitchen
Only /pol9k/-ers like myself are anti-women. Better than being a fedora white knight.
I don't know if /pol/ is anti-women. But women are seriously anti-/pol/.
>>79524896
>>79509241
Yes*.
*Actually I think a loyal partner who is mother to your children and puts her family ahead of herself is really really cool and I support them a lot. Also if a girl is good enough to compete with the men on her own merits then that's nice too.
Women who offer nothing to society besides their holes and their feelz can go fuck themselves tho.
>>79510789
>How would you "make women retain their femininity", by forcing them to have children they don't want? By forcing them to depend on someone else's money? By reducing them to household slaves? Be specific.
All good suggestions. Thank you Hungary.
2d
>>79509241
Women are anti-men
>>79527262
rare flag?
>>79527262
Nice proxy
>>79511461
>girl
>in romania
can I purchase you?
>>79527332
What autism is this man
Like the way he needs it to be cunts even in the citation
>>79527509
>Antarctica
>proxy
>Not knowing who PK is
>>79511977
It flippy flops around a bit, makes closing my legs a bit of a gamble and always makes operating pants zippers a risk, especially if I'm not paying attention or am sleepy.
Also capable of hardening at random times, especially in the morning, which is a little embarassing as people might think I am lustful when I am not.
Still, very handy as a pee aimer.
Given that I masturbate by pillowhumping there's not that much geometry difference there with the women, though I imagine the cleaning of the pillow is different to some degree.
>>79527650
You sound like a salty cunt.
>>79527332
>This is what bitter losers actually believe
>>79527804
It's true. Women tend to vote more leftist as a whole. Are you retarded?
>>79509241
No. Women are women. Throughout history, they have always relied on their man. The same thing is true today. The true art of a man is to penetrate whatever feminist resistance and independence adherence any woman may have, with manliness, confidence and leadership. It's in their dna to want a strong man. If you can give them a feeling of protection while also being romantic and dominant, you can get any woman you'd like. Throw a little humor in there and she will do anything that you wish to ask for in bed. Naturally, neets and weebos would only know of the woman they see in threads on pol. There are plenty of interesting, caring and beautiful woman with a strong mother instinct and a need for a strong man all around us. That is what women essentially are.
>>79527760
I think women are all on easy mode but I don't see the need to get all OCD about your infographics
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_differences_in_suicide
>>79527892
Youthfulness and ethnicity are far stronger indicators of voting patterns than gender is.
>>79527929
I didn't make the infographic, you newcuck. It has been circulating around /pol/ for like a year now.
>>79511154
>Islam IS
IS
Being anti woman must be the ultimate cry for help. Women, family and bourbon is really all the motivation there is in life desu
>>79513626
>My mother didn't want more children after her only child so she took the pill for twenty years to make sure she wouldn't get pregnant. If she had been forced to have other kids she would have destroyed her marriage and made us all suffer. Life with one child was hard enough for her and she made sure both my father and I knew and understood that,
She's bullshitting your father because she's lazy. More children does not destroy a marriage.
>you should listen to women more.
Actions speak louder than words.
>>79509241
only r9k infiltrators, I for one love my women
>>79519640
By "live life as they want it" you mean "gain success through own work" or otherwise going through life without coasting on handouts, affirmative action, and welfare, right?
Because your right to live your life as you want it ends when other people's lives must be burdened to support you.
If you can achieve happiness or success without being a burden to others, I think that is great.
However, for women who can't do this (and this is the majority of women), the best they can do is to balance their burden to others with some benefit to others. Namely, outputting babby. Men can do everything else pretty well without a woman. Can't output the babby.
>>79528024
>More children does not destroy a marriage
Unplanned, unwanted children do. They destroy the family too because the mother will abandon them to die.
>Actions speak louder than words
Actions such as taking contraceptives and aborting unwanted children and divorcing/avoiding men who like poltards who want to abuse women?
>>79520669
> Why? Because they want to control how many children they have (if any) and when to have them so they're not an unbearable, unwelcome burden on their lives.
Perhaps, but the purpose of your life is to set things up for the future generation(s). Spawning the future generation(s) is a very good way to do that.
Your life is being wasted if it's not burdened by the future generation, because you cannot take your free time with you when you die.
> prisoners in their homes
Prisoners in their husband's homes.
> who cares if my ideas lead to broken homes and divorce
Then we remove the option of woman-initiated divorce. Problem fixed.
Out of all boards, /tv/ seems to hate women the most, even more than /r9k/
>>79528889
Once they pass 12 years old yeah
>>79528474
>By "live life as they want it" you mean "gain success through own work"
Of course.
>handouts, affirmative action, and welfare
That stuff only exists in your neet-ridden countries because in your countries young males don't want to work.
>your right to live your life as you want it ends when other people's lives must be burdened to support you.
That is why I approve of mothers throwing on the street their NEET sons.
>for women who can't do this (and this is the majority of women
Strange that the majority of women I know works and does financially well for themselves.
>>79524482
Seeing someone as a lesser does not mean that you are against them. Israel you should fucking know this.
>>79524292
>women themselves are victims of their own sex's horrible machinations.
If you ask me, the fault is that the State has become a surrogate parent for single mothers without fulfilling the duties of a husband or a father in ensuring the woman upholds her side of the parenthood/marriage.
>>79528805
>Perhaps, but the purpose of your life is
I decide what is the purpose of my life. Any who tries to define the purpose of my life for me is evil and an oppressor and must be brought down, as they do not respect my will and want to force me to a shit life I do not care for.
>Your life is being wasted if
My life is being wasted if I am forced to live for shit I do not like and do not care for. I do not care for after death, the life I am living now is what matters and I do not intend to waste it for people who do nothing but make it horrible for me.
>Prisoners in their husband's homes
So you want to steal property from women too? Congrats for proving men are thieves too.
>Then we remove the option of woman-initiated divorce
And pave the way for woman-initiated justified murder. Brilliant idea.
>>79529293
>Seeing someone as a lesser does not mean that you are against them. I
But by forcing someone to suffer and live horribly denying them their freedom and choices you are de facto against them.
>>79528696
>women
>avoiding men who want to abuse them
>>79529555
Most of /pol/ and 4chan is KHV.
>>79528696
>Unplanned, unwanted children do. They destroy the family too because the mother will abandon them to die.
If you do not want children in your marriage then your marriage is shit. It is a weak marriage.
>divorcing/avoiding men who like poltards who want to abuse women?
If you consider negligence to be abuse, then letting a child or a retard unsupervised near heavy machinery or poisons is abuse, because the child or retard will hurt themselves.
In this sense, allowing a woman to waste her ovaries and her life on divorce and independence is abuse.
I know a lot of /pol/ disagrees with me on this, but I honestly think that if a person is going to make bad decisions and wreck themselves (or wreck their legacy), and you can prevent that by removing their agency and making the decisions for them, then you SHOULD remove the agency and make decisions for them.
>>79529022
>That is why I approve of mothers throwing on the street their NEET sons.
>would make her own flesh and blood homeless
Average woman 2016
>>79529784
>I honestly think that if a person is going to make bad decisions and wreck themselves (or wreck their legacy), and you can prevent that by removing their agency and making the decisions for them, then you SHOULD remove the agency and make decisions for them
Remember when /pol/ used to believe in freedom?
>>79529463
>I decide what is the purpose of my life.
>Any who tries to define the purpose of my life for me is evil and an oppressor and must be brought down, as they do not respect my will and want to force me to a shit life I do not care for.
Or they might just know better what to do with your life than you do.
> the life I am living now is what matters and I do not intend to waste it for people who do nothing but make it horrible for me.
The #1 cause of your emotions is yourself.
Other people do not "make it horrible for you", you make it horrible for yourself by having poor emotional hygiene and poor control of your feelz.
>So you want to steal property from women too?
Most of the houses are gonna be husband-bought.
You're right though in that I hadn't considered what'd happen if a woman owned property of her own merits (presumably by inheritance).
>And pave the way for woman-initiated justified murder. Brilliant idea.
>justified
Only if you assume your emotions are justified.
They aren't.
>>79529548
>But by forcing someone to suffer and live horribly denying them their freedom and choices you are de facto against them.
I do not view freedom and choices as inherently good things.
They are tools.
Like all tools, they can be wasted if they are wielded by someone incompetent in their use.
Moreover, serving the future generations by creating them is not living horribly. It may well be suffering but suffering tends to be a part of life anyway.
>>79529784
>If you do not want children in your marriage then your marriage is shit
Then why do childfree couples last longer and have less problems than children where one partner is forced to have children against their will?
> letting a child or a retard unsupervised near heavy machinery or poisons is abuse, because the child or retard will hurt themselves.
In this sense, allowing a woman to waste her ovaries and her life on divorce and independence is abuse
This comparison makes no sense. Heavy/sharp machinery and poisons can hurt a child. Independence and divorce from horrible husbands do not hurt a woman, in fact they make her stronger, happier, satisfied, fulfilled if that is what she was wanted. Abuse would be making the woman unhappy by restricting her and denying her the independence and freedom she wants.
>if a person is going to make bad decisions and wreck themselves (or wreck their legacy)
What fucking legacy? Wrecking how? By not shitting out children you don't want so their life and yours won't be ruined? Sound like preventing harm rather than wrecking to me.
>and you can prevent that by removing their agency and making the decisions for them, then you SHOULD remove the agency and make decisions for them
Except you don't know how that decision will turn out while they know that being made slaves to someone else's bullshit will turn out extremely bad for them, their life will be wrecked and that's unacceptable.
>>79509241
>is /pol/ anti-woman?
No, we are anti-slut.
Sluts should be shamed and discriminated against on every given opportunity.
>>79530591
Then you turn around and say all women are sluts. Nice job.
>>79509241
No, women make up 50% of the population and are extremely important in raising future generations.
A lot of women are way too Leftist nowadays, but some women are still Right-wing.
>>79530044
>Remember when /pol/ used to believe in freedom?
I remember when I wasn't all of /pol/. I do not believe in free speech, though I do believe in offensive speech. A human mind (with human feelz / consciousness / agency / personality) does not have inherent value. The human mind is a tool for a task, and derives its value from being able to perform that task.
>>79530452
>Then why do childfree couples last longer and have less problems than children where one partner is forced to have children against their will?
Because the parents dislike the marriage and want to dissolve it. D'uh. Disliking a marriage is not an accurate metric of if the marriage is good or not. (The actual metric is # of successful children produced)
>Independence and divorce from horrible husbands do not hurt a woman, in fact they make her stronger, happier, satisfied, fulfilled if that is what she was wanted.
I disagree strongly with you.
> Abuse would be making the woman unhappy by restricting her and denying her the independence and freedom she wants.
Who cares that she wants freedom.
TRAIN HER TO BE HAPPY WITHOUT IT.
People's emotions adapt and change.
YOUR emotions adapt and change.
>By not shitting out children you don't want so their life and yours won't be ruined? Sound like preventing harm rather than wrecking to me.
Assuming the child will be a net burden on society, good point. But most children grow up fine anyway.
Also, I disagree with your definition of "ruined". A woman's life isn't ruined by having children, that's the point of her life.
>Except you don't know how that decision will turn out while they know that being made slaves to someone else's bullshit will turn out extremely bad for them, their life will be wrecked and that's unacceptable.
And you don't know that "being made slaves to someone else's bullshit" is a bad thing, plus your metric of a "wrecked" life is ... odd.
>>79530268
>Or they might just know better what to do with your life than you do
No, they do not.
>The #1 cause of your emotions is yourself
Bullshit. The #1 cause of anyone's emotions is other people. Emotions are a reaction to something. If someone treats you like shit, you will feel like shit. You can choose to ignore it but I won't.
>Other people do not "make it horrible for you"
Yes they do, by actively trying to rob me of what makes life worth living.
>You make it horrible for yourself by having poor emotional hygiene and poor control of your feelz
You be a doormat if you like, I will rebel against injustices against me.
>Most of the houses are gonna be husband-bought
Most mortages are equally split between couples. My parents' house was paid entirely with my mother's wages.
>presumably by inheritance
Shows your ignorance.
>Only if you assume your emotions are justified
And they are, as by your actions you've declared yourself an evil oppressor that wants to make women miserable.
>>79530367
>I do not view freedom and choices as inherently good things
You want to oppress people, of course you don't. You don't respect others' will.
>they can be wasted if
Whether one's life is wasted or not is only up to the one who's living that life to decide. No one else. I like my life as it is and it would be wasted only if I were forced to the shit you want to force on people.
>Moreover, serving the future generations by creating them is not living horribly
Yes it is, when you're not allowed to live your own life too.
>It may well be suffering but suffering tends to be a part of life anyway
Speak for yourself.
>>79530452
>>79531080
But you do have a good point, Mrs. Hungarian.
Some women are just evolutionary dead-ends not suited to producing heirs to carry on their legacy.
Perhaps you are one of such dead-ends, and society wouldn't benefit from having more copies of you.
In this case, I don't really give a shit what the woman does. If she does not serve a purpose in reproduction then her womanhood does not matter.
>>79531235
>the startling realization that women are people too, who have their own thoughts, desires, and ambitions
>>79530654
>Then you turn around and say all women are sluts. Nice job.
I never said that, don't put words in my mouth, you fatfuck!
Not all women are sluts, only the ones who dress like sluts, act like sluts and ARE sluts.
>>79531450
>woman
>ambition
>>79531107
>The #1 cause of anyone's emotions is other people.
Are you baiting me, or do you honestly believe this.
Because you're completely fucking wrong.
> Emotions are a reaction to something.
And the way in which you react is within your own sphere of influence.
>. If someone treats you like shit, you will feel like shit.
Being "treated like shit" is subjective. Your feelings are not an objective measurement of realtiy, and if you feel like you are "treated like shit", it might just be because your feelz are out-of-sync with reality.
Feelings can be incorrect, just as beliefs can be.
>by actively trying to rob me of what makes life worth living.
Then perhaps your life was not worth living?
>I will rebel against injustices against me.
>injustices
Wrong.
>as by your actions you've declared yourself an evil oppressor that wants to make women miserable.
Oppressor yes. Evil and wanting misery no. The healthy woman enjoys her role, and it serves the future generations. And if the woman does not enjoy her role, she can be trained to do so.
>You don't respect others' will.
I acknowledge that a person's will is an incredibly useful tool that some people are just not skilled at handling.
>I like my life as it is and it would be wasted only if I were forced to the shit you want to force on people.
I consider this an error, or a pathology.
>>79531450
Having thoughts, desires, and ambitions doesn't automatically mean that those thoughts, desires, and ambitions have any value.
>>79531080
>Disliking a marriage is not an accurate metric of if the marriage is good or not. (The actual metric is # of successful children produced)
>people should be machines that shit out children after children regardless of the conditions such children are brought up, who cares if this turns countries and societies into shitholes people should act like mindless animals
>I disagree strongly with you
Of course you do, you want to oppress people.
>TRAIN HER TO BE HAPPY WITHOUT IT
>People's emotions adapt and change
You know nothing about people, emotions or even psychology in general. People do not adapt to something that is bad, worse and negative for them.
>YOUR emotions adapt and change
Right the more I frequent /pol/ the more they grow into hatred and disgust for men.
>Assuming the child will be a net burden on society, good point. But most children grow up fine anyway
Except they won't, anfd they will rebel against such an oppressive system. See Romania when they banned divorce, abortion and contraception and the children that resulted from that Decree unleashed a bloody violent revolution against their tyrant and restored abortion, contraception and divorce as they are objectively good things.
>A woman's life isn't ruined by having children, that's the point of her life
A woman's life is ruined if the children are against her will. And no that is not the point of her life, I decide what is the point of my life.
>And you don't know that "being made slaves to someone else's bullshit" is a bad thing
Yes I do. It is a horrible thing.
![1002423d2e4a233a9633f0038e1f6db7[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/GhjYcTW.jpg "1002423d2e4a233a9633f0038e1f6db7[1].jpg")
some say that women have it easy because they only have to give access to her pussy to a successful or up-and-coming male; what they are forgetting is that in this regard women have no control over their fate unlike men worth a damn do
>>79509241
No.
>>79531801
>People do not adapt to something that is bad, worse and negative for them.
Need Swede or German as counter-example :^)
>Right the more I frequent /pol/ the more they grow into hatred and disgust for men.
If I were in your position I'd grow hatred and disgust for myself.
> See Romania when they banned divorce, abortion and contraception and the children that resulted from that Decree unleashed a bloody violent revolution against their tyrant and restored abortion, contraception and divorce as they are objectively good things.
I see.
So, basically, some children are maladapted or useless. Got it.
And that these tend to come from women who don't want children.
So, then, what use are the women? Societal deadweight?
Oh well. I suppose at least it's a less worse option.
>Yes I do. It is a horrible thing.
Storytime!
Does it involve rape? That's my fetish.
>>79532395
If you ask me, we could just cull the women who wouldn't produce viable offspring, save the resources needed to care for them.
>>79531680
>Because you're completely fucking wrong
No, I am right. You are happy/sad/angry/etc because things happen to you. Many of those things are of your own doing but more are of other people's doing. You can choose to be a doormat and ignore your reactions but that's just you. Most people do not accept being doormats when their lives and quality of life are at stake.
>And the way in which you react is within your own sphere of influence
Reacting by rebelling against that which is harming you is the logical and natural reaction.
>Being "treated like shit" is subjective
Having your freedoms removed is accepted as being treated like shit by every sane person. That is why prison is seen so negatively.
>Your feelings are not an objective measurement of realtiy
There's no objective measurement of reality when it concerns one's quality of life, that is up to the individual to decide.
>It might just be because your feelz are out-of-sync with reality
When you've declared you want to do evil to me? Try gaslighting someone else.
>Feelings can be incorrect, just as beliefs can be
Like your belief people should be oppressed and made miserable and unhappy? Yes that is indeed incorrect.
>Then perhaps your life was not worth living?
If you ruined it with your bullshit then yes life would be not worth living. Of course that means I will prevent you from ruining it.
>Wrong
Nope. Right. What you want is injustice.
>Oppressor yes. Evil and wanting misery no.
You are evil and you do want misery though. You do not care that someone is miserable because of you.
>if the woman does not enjoy her role
Women are not dogs. If a woman decides she does not enjoy her role you cannot ""train" her, you are only making her miserable.
>an incredibly useful tool that some people are just not skilled at handling
If they are happy with their life then they already are more skilled than you.
>I consider this an error
I consider everything you've said an error.
>>79532395
>If I were in your position I'd grow hatred and disgust for myself
Please do, hate be disgusted at yourself all you want. I'm happy with myself.
>what use are the women?
I earn my living and pay my taxes, if society thinks it has no use for me give me my tax money back.
FEMINISM IS CANCER
NOW WOMEN ARE JUST INFERIOR MEN
>>79531741
<doesn't automatically mean that those thoughts, desires, and ambitions have any value
They have more value to the the person who has them than the ramblings of an evil oppressor.
>>79533208
You're a good example of why arguing with women is like arguing with children.
>>79533437
Because I'm using logic and facts? Why do you think people should accept something that makes them unhappy and unfulfilled without a fuss?
![[fit].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/nia8ySd.jpg "[fit].jpg")
