Why don't more of you unlettered idiots support Bernie Sanders? If you knew anything about 20th century history, you'd notice that America was at its peak after FDR's New Deal policies were enacted. Even Eisenhower recognized how beneficial these programs were. And Bernie, also recognizing this fact, is a New Deal politician himself, not some old SJW, as you'd probably call him. The Republicans simply support the nanny state for the wealthy, whereby policies are designed to funnel most of the wealth to the top with the hope (we're told) that more wealth at the top means the filthy peasants at the bottom (i.e., most of us) will receive more of the wealthy's crumbs. Listen folks, most of you clearly don't realize this, and most of you never will, but you've been bamboozled, hoodwinked, scammed. Your ideas were generated by men who want to use you for their gain. Nationalism won't make America great again. Lower taxes for everyone won't make it great again. Is taxation theft? No, it's the cost of freedom. Don't like it? Move to a primitive shithole where taxes don't exist.
Barney Sandals is a hippie faggot.
>expecting /pol/ to ever respond with a coherent argument to a true, albeit probably copied from facebook, post that contradicts their circlejerk
>i typed >>79498156 before even seeing >>79498092
>>79498156
Nah, I just wrote it, but I'm glad someone's smart enough to recognize its truth. You're right, though. They probably won't respond with coherent arguments. They'll just call Bernie a hippie faggot.
>>79498022
This is the 21st century. Everybody knows that socialism doesn't work.
>>79498198
thus speaketh the newfag
>>79498344
Maybe you failed to read the original post, or are unfamiliar with FDR's policies, but it's his economic policies that made America so great in the middle of the 20th century. If you look at America's decline, you'll notice that it runs parallel to the move away from FDR's policies -- sensible policies that are now casually dismissed as socialistic and therefore stupid by people who are under the influence of corporate propaganda.
>>79498249
>They'll just call Bernie a hippie faggot.
Do you have a better name for a hippie faggot?
He might as well use a pair of smelly flip-flops as his logo; at least then he would get the filthy, stinky hippie vote.
>>79498022
Well, Bernie IS a hippy faggot, there's no denying that.
But more imporantly, taxation does not resolve the problem. The problem is not that some people have more money than you. The problem is not that massive corporations have more money than you. The problem is not that investors have more money than you. None of that matters.
What matters is that the people who can PRINT money are in collusion with bankers, investment bankers and investment insurance companies to transfer the actual wealth (material) into the ownership of their small international clique. You cannot tax the Rothschilds--every dollar ever printed is an IOU to their vile brood.
Bernie Sanders' plan does not resolve anything except taking more of my money. He would not have broken up the banks, because you cannot revolt against the elite without Nationalists behind you. It has never worked a single time, ever. He would not have broken the Fed because he serves them. As Lenin said, all that is actually required for Socialism to work is one, big bank. Well they're the biggest.
Most importantly, Bernie would not have resolved anything because he was and is controlled opposition for the DNC to pull the wind out of young Socialists and gradually corral them back into the fold under Hillary. His defeat was never in question--as I predicted months beforehand, however admirable his ideas were, only Whites care about such lofty things. I predicted he would be crushed by the minority vote because dumb niggers only care about gibs that go to THEM, and his gibs were focused around the idea of education and healthcare, both abstract concepts to the nigger.
So when you ask why I didn't vote for Bernie Sanders, the answer is that I knew he would lose because his party is corrupt beyond redemption and not even remotely Democratic. You can try to shift the blame onto us, or you can recognize that YOU were fucking bamboozled by even entertaining the notion that that ancient kike ever had a chance.
Bernie is alright.
>>79498636
Give it up, comrade. Capitalism works and socialism doesn't.
Also socialism is evil, it involves stealing from good people to feed leeches.
>>79498022
Why don't we support the man that said: "If you are white, you don't know what it feels like to be poor" ? Oh geez I don't know.
>>79498636
You know what else it coincides with? The existence of an ever-expanding and bloated standing army, ever-escalating federal deficit and the concentration of more and more economic power in the hands of a small international clique of bankers.
Just raising taxes and spending it on welfare and bridges to nowhere isn't going to save the economy. At this point we need Hitler, not Trotsky.
And yes, Hitler did many things similar to FDR--but he also did what FDR dared not to do, he named the Jew and took back the Bank.
>>79498885
America under New Deal policies had the wealthiest middle class in the world. A man could support his entire family and live a comfortable middle class life working a factory job. It was still a capitalist country. It's just that there were policies put in place to help to benefit the middle class. The larger and wealthier the middle class, the more consumption there is. The more consumption, the larger and healthier the economy. Simple stuff. Not socialism.
>>79498092
He actually got kickef out of a hippie commine for being lazy, distracting others, and preaching nonstop.
He was too lazy for a hippie commune! Google it.
>>79498912
I never said he was perfect. But at least he doesn't encourage anti-intellectualism like Trump and the rest of the Republicans. Was there a single Republican candidate this year that didn't think climate change was a liberal hoax? Most of them also thought our already bloated military needs more funding. Idiots, all of them.
>>79499233
>The more consumption, the larger and healthier the economy.
That's not how it works. Read pic related if you want to understand basic economics.
>>79499319
>He was too lazy for a hippie commune!
That describes every Socialist anyone has ever met.
Socalists are great at spending other people's money.
When saving the world depends on their own money, they falter.
>>79498022
FDR prolonged the depression with his socialism. He would have ruined the country if we weren't lucky and dragged into ww2 which boosted production like crazy.
>>79499463
>Was there a single Republican candidate this year that didn't think climate change was a liberal hoax?
It's not a hoax, it's liberal horseshit.
Former U.S. Senator Timothy Wirth (D-CO), addressing the same Rio Climate Summit audience, agreed: “We have got to ride the global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic policy and environmental policy.” (Wirth now heads the U.N. Foundation which lobbies for hundreds of billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars to help underdeveloped countries fight climate change.)
Also speaking at the Rio conference, Deputy Assistant of State Richard Benedick said: “A global warming treaty [Kyoto] must be implemented even if there is no scientific evidence to back the [enhanced] greenhouse effect.”
In 1988, a former Canadian Minister of the Environment told editors and reporters of the Calgary Herald: “No matter if the science of global warming is all phony…climate change [provides] the greatest opportunity to bring about justice and equality in the world.”
In 1996, former Soviet Union President Mikhail Gorbachev emphasized the importance of using climate alarmism to advance socialist Marxist objectives: “The threat of environmental crisis will be the international disaster key to unlock the New World Order.”
Speaking at the 2000 U.N. Conference on Climate Change in the Hague, former President Jacques Chirac of France said: “For the first time, humanity is instituting a genuine instrument of global governance, one that should find a place within the World Environmental Organization which France and the European Union would like to see established.”
http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybell/2013/02/05/in-their-own-words-climate-alarmists-debunk-their-science/#1a566c5076fb
FDR was really nationalist, dumbfuck
>>79499463
>I never said he was perfect. But
Completely disregards all of the cucks many flaws including the fact that there is more opportunity in the USA than any other Western country - ever.
"It is better to be a negro slave in America, than a white free man of a Nordic state."
Climate Change™ is an important religious issue to many as well.
Most religious communities have released statements on Climate Change and the need to care for Creation. The following list (organized alphabetically first by religion, then by denomination) demonstrates the unity within the religious community on these important issues.
Please let us know if there are any additional statements you would like to see included.
Baha’i
Seizing the Opportunity: Redefining the Challenge of Climate Change
Buddhist
The Time to Act is Now – A Buddhist Declaration on Climate Change
A Western Soto Zen Buddhist Statement on the Climate Crisis
Christian
17 Anglican Bishops across six continents issue urgent call for climate justice
Anglican Church of Canada, The Episcopal Church, Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, Evangelical Lutheran Church in Canada – A Pastoral Message on Climate Change
Baptist – A Southern Baptist Declaration on the Environment and Climate Change
Catholic – U.S. Catholic Bishops’ Statement on Climate Change
Catholic – Vatican on Climate Change
Catholic – Pope Mass: Protecting Creation a Christian responsibility
Catholic – Frequently Asked Questions on the Papal Encyclical
Church of the Brethren – Statement on Global Climate Change
Episcopal Church – Sustaining Hope in the Face of Climate Change
Evangelical Climate Initiative – Call to Action
Evangelical Lutheran Church of America – Caring for Creation: Vision, Hope, and Justice
Evangelical Lutheran Church of America – Issue Paper: Global Warming and Climate Change
Mennonite – Creation Care Network
Presbyterian Church USA – U.S. Energy Policy and Global Warming
Quaker – Earthcare Mission Program
United Church of Christ – A Resolution on Climate Change
United Methodist Church – Church Statement on Climate Change
http://www.interfaithpowerandlight.org/religious-statements-on-climate-change/
>>79498022
Sanders' policies are nothing like the New Deal. The end
>>79498885
The same 'good people' who are filling the entire West full of barbaric immigrants, using corrupt options like golden parachutes just so their weakness proliferates and stimulating the worst kinds of politics and culture that thrust society into the gutter. Worshipping the wealthy won't make you wealthy you striver faggot
>>79498022
The New Deal was shit which nearly destroyed the US economy. The reason why America came up on top was this little event caled WW2.
>>79499233
New Deal policies did no such thing, especially considering most of them were repealed or declared unconstitutional before 1950. If anything, they prolonged the depression.
What got us out of the Depression was this gigantic war in Europe where we sold tons of material to the warring states. Not FDR's retarded policies, of which, only three exist and they're shit and one is about to run out of money because the government used it as a slush fund and because seniors are living longer.
Whats worse are the autists like you who whine like the faggots you are because someone has more money than you. KYS, Sanders will never be president and you will never get free shit here
>>79499104
replying because I like your post, and to add on.
Assuming FDR policy move forward to now and Bernie applies them, frankly if anyone applies them.
>military spending
Please no. The loss of the nuclear family has turned the average servicemember into a fatherless child, race non material. This has repeated enough that most NCOs had no positive role model and are now pretending to be father to other fatherless children. The officer corps is half politician, half useless dipshit. Values are almost gone. That's just the men, the toys they have will be manufactured by whoever can lobby the best, ie, who already has the most money.
>Federal deficit
The ticking time bomb, but I cant say how/what/when will happen. Then again, deficit spending is all today knows. The answer I'd like to have is the most likely end to it (someone calls our debt, global crash, etc.) The better solution would be an actual budget, duh, but I feel before that, it should be two hard years of GAO audits and reviews of budget requests. There is a ton of fat in the budget, someone just has to trim it. Oh wait, all the people with that power are bought....
>infrastructure
A good thought, honestly, but. As in, yes, modernization of utilities would be great and it would provide opportunity for people to learn a trade, but see earlier comment related to govermental contracting. I don't think the end stream of the money would be to people who "need" it.
t. capitalist asshat
>>79498885
> Give it up, comrade. Capitalism works and socialism doesn't.
This is a bad propaganda. Under socialism, there were lines in shops and some material goods were in deficiency, but:
- healthcare was free
- education was free and was of much better quality, the talent was not wasted because of social status of parents...
- people were more near one to another, more near to nature.
- family values were respected
- industry worked much better
The problem with old east-europe socialism was in that it was too much atheistic, it was done by jews to make a civilization vaccination against the only good regime...
There was a problem with freedom of word, but that is starting in western europe be almost same, as was in eastern-europe in deepest socialism - only you must not criticise other things and society "layers"...
Look, how is the culture, spirituality and all things that really matter distorted at Western capitalistic countries...
Some say, that private owner is better manager than a state. Almost never true. Private investor is a worst manager. He pours his money somewhere to exploit gains, then he pours his money somewhere else and a brown-field empty eggshell remains from the industry...
There were few brown-fields in socialistic countries, because state owned both the enterprise and if the enterprise failed, which was seldom, the state also made the cleanup...
And the free market is only a free law of jungle, which just lets the stronger exploit the weaker. The weaker are not as free even as they were in east-europe socialistic countries...
People of USA had ONE good choice, and it was Bernie Sanders. They rejected.
Then they can choose between Oligarch exploiter and cheater, whose only positive things is, that he tells the truth about others,
and between Criminal Corrupted Warmonger, the smiling-witch beast, electing "fighting for us" - fighting WWIII - which you will be fighting for her... Gangster land ruled by a chief-gangster witch...
(If self-paying the campaign is a virtue, then only Oligarchs will be ruling... If you will obey Media choice, Mediarch jews will be ruling...)
>>79504109
>Under socialism... some material goods were in deficiency
That's quite the understatement there.
>>79498378
"thuss speaketh the newfag," proclaimed the newfag
>>79498022
FDR has just as much in common with Trump as Bernie Sanders. He would be extremely socially conservative compared to modern standards.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internment_of_Japanese_Americans
There is a reason why the South backed FDR and voted Democrat. FDR didn't waste anytime fucking around with SocJus. And even so, he spent the vast majority of his efforts rebuilding the American economy, rather than giving out gibesmedat. (You are thinking of LBJ)
The 30's were a fucking wild time. Men like Sanders or even Trump would get eaten alive.
>>79498022
>America was at its peak after FDR's New Deal policies were enacted.
and then what?
>>79498022
>Your ideas were generated by men who want to use you for their gain.
the irony
>>79498022
I've been shilling this book here for anyone interested in how the Democrats abandoned the New Deal to become technocratic libertarians: Listen, Liberal by Thomas Frank.
I find more and more that the few liberal writers I admire are skeptically supporting Trump, as am I. The man I can do with or without, but Trumpism needs to stay
>>79504109
>there were lines in shops and some material goods were in deficiency
why?
>>79504505
>Oligarch exploiter and cheater
czech man, czech man, you will lose,
from how many buzzwords you must use
>>79509373
The Left is giving up on the Working Class/Proletariat all together for the Underclass/Lumpenproleteriat. A terridumb strategy, which is why I am trying to run as fast as I can from the Globalists.
>>79504109
You can keep saying "Free" all you want, but if you're still going to die in a hospital, or come out of school uneducated, or live in intense poverty it doesn't make up for it
>>79499233
>MUH GDP
>>79499233
New deal policies are feed by stalin (i.e. blood money from killing russians) buying his "industrialisation".
>>79498022
AND none of this shit is remotely feasible if you have open borders, retard.
You're a little late to be shilling for Bernie, lad. It's over, Hillary won, you aren't getting a donation refund.
>>79498022
The New deal was shit. Only half of it worked and it just capitalized on the inevitable bounce back of the economy. Furthermore, FDR actually did understand economics which is he killed the cattle and farming goods. He also stated it was temporarily relief only if you work.
>>79509485
> >Oligarch exploiter and cheater
> from how many buzzwords you must use
I've read enough, how Trump deals with his employees - not paying wages, how he deals with bussiness suppliers - also sometimes not paying contracts and causing them almost bankruptcy, how he cheats with bank loans... (should I post some links?)
His bussiness pracice is not much honest, and his rule will be?
While I'm really very convinced, that Trump is by 100x better choice than Hitlary, I think that Sanders choice would be 5x better than Trump for ordinary people, which are 90% of you...
---
Is gun-ban going to be a vote theme? Why do you insist on guns so much? To fight bad government? That's ridiculous... Your gestapo DHS squad troops in armored vehicles with machine guns and armor vests, who bought a billion bullets against own nation, would you attack with colts?
Last time gun used against government was JFK murder by GWHB (no Oswald...)... Was it good for something?!
Only you shoot each other, more US victims of your own guns than from all wars abroad...
But then your police, if it needs to be afraid of every crook having gun, must be fiercer than gestapo...
In eastern Europe, in my 43 years, I once seen man shooting on man from an air-soft gun, I've once seen a dead man (my grandparent on burial 30y ago), and need not be afraid of walking any city in our country by midnight... And if policeman would touch me on street beside politelly asking my IDs, I would feel insulted, really not expecting any police violence (beside demonstration handling)
In our country, cca 3% people have guns, but they need a psychological tests to get a license...
>>79498636
We never moved away from his policies dumbass. America is declining for that reason. Socialism will ALWAYS denigrate over time. The longer the time the worse Socialism gets.
>>79498022
Is the Trump Wall the equivalent of the German Reichsautobahn?
If you want to vote for a socialist then vote for Trump.
If you want to vote for a Jewish thief you can't because he wasn't nominated.
There is no room in this country for hyphenated Americanism. When I refer to hyphenated Americans, I do not refer to naturalised Americans. Some of the very best Americans I have ever known were naturalised Americans, Americans born abroad. But a hyphenated American is not an American at all … The one absolutely certain way of bringing this nation to ruin, of preventing all possibility of its continuing to be a nation at all, would be to permit it to become a tangle of squabbling nationalities, an intricate knot of German-Americans, Irish-Americans, English-Americans, French-Americans, Scandinavian-Americans or Italian-Americans, each preserving its separate nationality, each at heart feeling more sympathy with Europeans of that nationality, than with the other citizens of the American Republic … There is no such thing as a hyphenated American who is a good American. The only man who is a good American is the man who is an American and nothing else."
That's a FDR quote. And you know damn well that Bernie will encourage his "Hyphenated-Americans" because the idea of an immigrant having to actually LIKE the country they come to more than the one they left is racist.
>>79513923
The American Left before 1992 has nothing in common with the American Left after 1992. Unfortunately, this requires higher-order thinking to distinguish between multiple groups of Left, which only something like 4% of the population is capable of. But good on you bringing this reality up. (It was Teddy Roosevelt, not FDR, which made this quote.)
>>79514151
Oh shit, my bad, I get them two mixed up a lot.
>>79514438
It's all good. Teddy and Franklin were related and fought for the same causes. Don't come to pol for history lessons though. It isn't smart enough to talk about the past very well, even if it's honest about the present.
